SideshowBob wrote:http://espn.go.com/nba/standings/_/type/expanded
11-2 against winning teams, 16-7 against losing teams.
Make that 16-8 now. This is a rather glaring discrepancy.
Here's a quick advanced look.
Miami vs. Below Average Teams (< 0 SRS)
23 G, +2.23 SRS, +6.3 Offense, +3.7 Defense (!!) (That's god-awful, good for 23rd in the league)
Miami vs. Above Average Teams (> 0 SRS)
14 G, +8.96 SRS, +7.9 Offense, -2.3 Defense
Again, a glaring difference in performance. A little more than 1.5 points better on offense, but a full 6 points better on defense (a negative defensive score is better). That'a a remarkable difference.
I'm wary on splitting up SRS like this. The whole reason it makes sense on a large scale to look at performance against all teams is that we want to know how team execution can hold up against ALL kinds of offensive and defensive strategy, not only the ones successful teams employ. In this case, I'd just point to the split as an indicator, rather than something to make a conclusion upon. There's a undeniable pattern here.