All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs: THUNDERDAN9 WINS

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs: THUNDERDAN9 WINS 

Post#1 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:10 pm

This is the thread for the playoffs for the All-time Fantasy League proposed in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1293300

The draft results and the final team rosters are in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1294562

Quarterfinals Judges:
bastillon
TMACFORMVP
penbeast0
ronnymac2
Doctor MJ
SideshowBob
Texas Chuck
therealbig3

Semifinals Judges:
bastillon
TMACFORMVP
penbeast0
ronnymac2
Doctor MJ
SideshowBob
Texas Chuck
therealbig3
whitehops
Quotatious
john248
MisterHibachi

GMs have the option of becoming judges after elimination.

In each match up, GMs will offer their preliminary strategy for beating the other team and reasons for why their team is stronger. GMs will also have the opportunity to respond to the opponent's strategy. Judges will offer any comments and questions they have of the GMs and finally will cast their vote for whichever team they think is stronger simply by saying 'Team A wins this matchup' or 'Team B wins this matchup'. Whoever gets more votes moves on.

The 16 teams have been sorted into conferences, East and West. The match ups will be decided by the seeds in each conference, which have been randomized. The conferences and seeds are:

Eastern Conference:
1. RSCD3_
2. Narigo
3. Quotatious
4. CaliBullsFan
5. whitehops
6. Notanoob
7. MisterHibachi
8. Bruh Man

Western Conference:
1. DHodgkins
2. batmana
3. ardee
4. john248
5. ThunderDan9
6. Sagittaron
7. O_6
8. HeartBreakKid

There will be separate threads for each matchup and the results and links will be posted in this thread. Good luck, GMs; may the best team win!

Eastern Conference match ups:

Quarterfinals:
Spoiler:
(1) RSCD3_ vs. (8) Bruh Man: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1299929
Winner: (8) Bruh Man

(2) Narigo vs. (7) MisterHibachi: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1299933
Winner: (2) Narigo

(3) Quotatious vs. (6) Notanoob: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1300049
Winner: (6) Notanoob

(4) CaliBullsFan vs. (5) whitehops: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1300050
Winner: (4) CaliBullsFan


Semifinals:
Spoiler:
(8) Bruh Man vs. (4) CaliBullsFan: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1304316
Winner: (8) Bruh Man

(2) Narigo vs. (6) Notanoob: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1304320
Winner: (6) Notanoob


Conference Finals:
Spoiler:
(8) Bruh Man vs. (6) Notanoob: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1306994
Winner: (8) Bruh Man


Western Conference match ups:

Quarterfinals:
Spoiler:
(1) DHodgkins vs. (8) HeartBreakKid: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1299931
Winner: (8) HeartBreakKid

(2) batmana vs. (7) O_6: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1299935
Winner: (7) O_6

(3) ardee vs. (6) Sagittaron: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1300051
Winner: (3) ardee

(4) john248 vs. (5) ThunderDan9: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1300053
Winner: (5) ThunderDan9


Semifinals:
Spoiler:
(8) HeartBreakKid vs. (5) ThunderDan9: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1304318
Winner: (5) ThunderDan9

(7) O_6 vs. (3) ardee: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1304322
Winner: (7) O_6


Conference Finals:
Spoiler:
(5) ThunderDan9 vs. (7) O_6: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1306996
Winner: (5) ThunderDan9


Finals:

(8) Bruh Man vs. (5) ThunderDan9: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1311472
Winner: (5) ThunderDan9
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
MacGill
Veteran
Posts: 2,769
And1: 568
Joined: May 29, 2010
Location: From Parts Unknown...
     

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#2 » by MacGill » Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:12 pm

Awesome :) Looking for some well detailed notes here!!
Image
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#3 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:17 pm

MacGill wrote:Awesome :) Looking for some well detailed notes here!!


Well, not many posts in this particular thread, they would be in each individual matchup thread and in the general discussion thread.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,207
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#4 » by ElGee » Sat Jan 25, 2014 11:56 pm

I'm curious how I should interpret the "3-year peak" when evaluating a team...?
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
User avatar
john248
Starter
Posts: 2,367
And1: 651
Joined: Jul 06, 2010
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#5 » by john248 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:13 am

The general team concept was formed mainly because KAJ was the 1st pick. Have a good big, pair him with a wing, and put a couple shooters out there. This team has a great half-court offense with KAJ in the inside, Brand being able to hit jumpers and low post, TMac with his play making and ability to ISO, Jesus Shuttlesworth with is GOAT shooting, and Porter with his also excellent shooting and off-ball ability.

STARTERS

Spoiler:
CENTER - KAJ (80-82) was my 1st pick and 1 of about 3 centers who can legitimately carry an offense in this draft. I have the last 2 years of his prime and 1 year with slight decline though his offense largely remained the same which includes an MVP and two all-NBA 1st team honors. His scoring ability with his sky hook, shot blocking ability, great passing, and known playoff performer.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... lka01.html

2ND BIG - Larry Nance (87-89) is another underrated player that I have. He offers a mid-range shot, able to post-up, and is a great finisher who plays efficiently on the offensive end. I don't want to overrate his offense as he's not much of a creator but will benefit from the ball handers and offensive initiators on the roster. Nance's was a very good defender who can also guard 3's, a great shot blocker, and a solid rebounder. He was also a good help defender and a great teammate who didn't mind lesser roles, and his numbers were also not impacted much going from a faster Suns team to the slower paced Cavs where his averages of about 19ppg, 9reb, 3ast, 2.5blk, 59%TS remained the same.

WING/POINT - TMac! (01-03) As we all know, he has an incredible peak season that rates just below Kobe's 08 and Wade's 09. We also know that the 2 seasons before that were very good but not as great. Still, as a wing player, he's what you want in a guy who can create shots for himself and a play maker who can open up opportunities for his teammates. He was a solid 37.8% from beyond the arc from 01 to 03 however he shot more behind the arc while getting better and went to the line more in 03 which led to a bump in his TS%; still he was good ball handler, passer, rebounder at his position.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... atr01.html

SHOOTING GUARD - Ray Allen (00-02) is the GOAT 3PT shooter. He's not as 1-dimensional as he can handle the ball and be a play maker when he has to. Still, we're talking about a guy who really made his living running off screens & hitting those corner 3 pointers and an underrated finisher.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... nra02.html

POINT GUARD - Terry Porter (91-93) is an underrated PG who rarely gets talked about. He's comparable to Chauncey Billups. During those 3 years, he averaged about 17.7pts, 3.5treb, 6.3ast, 1.6stl, at roughly 57-63%TS. Doesn't look all that inspiring until you look at how his game rose in the playoffs where all his per game numbers went up which includes breaking 20ppg. What's more astounding is that his efficiency went up during these deep playoff runs at over 60-64%TS. This is one of those guys who can step up in the playoffs where he can play in the half court as well as run when he played on a Portland team that was top 5 in pace during those years. Not just a shooter as he can initiate the offense and was a good passer too.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... ete01.html




BENCH

Spoiler:
CENTER - Tyson Chandler (11-13) is 1 of 2 players I had targeted for my bench. A former DPOY who's a good rebounder and solid shot blocker, he's also good at help defense and defending the PnR. A big reason I chose him is because he knows what his limitations are on offense. He doesn't hold onto the ball too long nor does he ask for plays and is good at setting screens. This is important for ball movement.

POWER FORWARD - Elton Brand (05-07) can also start as PF on this team. Prior to the 06 season, he got in shape and developed a good mid-range jumper out to 17 feet which shows in the stats. Compared to 05, his eFG% went up 24% in 06 and 30% in 07 which is remarkable; his TS% in 05 was 55.4% (+2.4%) to 58% TS in 06 (+4.5%) and 58.1% TS in 07 (+4%). Just to give additional information, his jumpers were 7% better. This allows him to space the floor when needed or hit the low post where he was also effective and a good offensive rebounder. Even though he is 6'8", he had a standing reach of 9'2" which is what most centers are which made him a good shot blocker.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... del01.html

SMALL FORWARD - Nicolas Batum (12-14) may be viewed as a player who might have been a reach. He's a good man defender but not so good as a help defender. Hopefully having Chandler and Nance behind him will mask some of that. I took him mainly due to his 3 point shooting, ball handling, and passing. Once he was out of McMillan's system where he was nothing but a corner or wing 3 point shooter, Stotts made better use of his ability to initiate the offense, make the pass to the roll man, and run around the court for the open 3. He was averaging about 5 assist last season, and this season he's tied with Lillard with the team lead at 5.7. I do like his ability to do a bit of everything while scoring efficiently.

SHOOTING GUARD - Michael Redd (04-06) is the 2nd guy who I wanted on the bench who had some great scoring years. As Allen's back-up, the same plays can be called for him when it comes to running around screens to get an open 3. He's also able to get his own shot off. In 04 when league average TS% was a low 51.6%, he was at 54.4%, and by 06 he was at 57.4% (league 53.5%).

POINT GUARD - Derrick Rose (09-11) is almost a pity pick since I didn't want to see him go undrafted even though this was really a series of years where we saw him progress and peak. I mainly chose him due to his ability to drive the lane, good passing, and good decision making. Even though I wanted Ainge here, I still value Rose's ability to create offensive opportunities when things break down.




ADDITIONAL PLAYER NOTES

Spoiler:
Below quote shows Porter's leadership which might help keep KAJ a bit more motivated on the defensive end though KAJ was plenty motivated in the playoffs.

"He came to work and did his job," McMillan said. "He didn't care when other people got the attention. He played the game hard and he played it the right way. One area where I think we were alike is that he wouldn't be afraid to say what needed to be said -- whether it was to an all-star or a young guy who needed to be led."


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53IGG4ygn1E[/youtube]




STRATEGY

OFFENSE - Spurs Offense with some Triangle

Spoiler:
Lots of screen action. Post ISOs with KAJ. Screen for 3s with Allen & Porter. Slashing with TMac. Change of pace with Rose.


DEFENSE

Spoiler:
Deny the middle & paint. Good rotations. I have guys who can alter & contest shots near the paint with KAJ and Brand (9'2" standing reach) with Chandler and Brand off the bench.

More on this later.




ROTATIONS

Depends on the match-up...

Spoiler:
1st round: ThunderDan Suns

Howard/Divac
Grant/Bird/Josh Smith
Bird/King/Josh Smith
Ginobili/Majerle
Price/D. Harper

I wanted to build a team that feels like a real team. A team that I could envision as a functioning unit, rather than a random assembly of individually good players. I mainly tried to draft players who understand the team concept, are unselfish (!), and do whatever it takes to win. That may be a generalization, but still... :lol: No ego clashes, no headcases (I don't think there would be too much problem with even Bernard, he would like the opportunity to finally play WITH a TALENTED team).

I did not drafted defensive specialists in the mold of Bowen or Ben Wallace... the defense would be still pretty good, with a true defensive anchor in the middle (3*DPOY Dwight) surrounding him with players who again understand the importance of team play on the defensive end as well. Team defense should be great with high basketball iq guys like Bird, Ginobili, Grant, who are also capable defenders individually. Put in tenacious defenders like Majerle and Derek Harper and Josh Smith or even smart Divac... I don't think it would be pleasant to play against my team. This team would also generate some steals, and the rebounding of my starting 5 would be one of the best in the whole field (maybe even #1?). All in all: Bird is paired with an all-time great defensive center, a true difference maker, and gets another great defensive big man in Grant who is quick and athletic enough to switch the forwards of the opposing team occacionally, and good perimeter defenders like Gino, Majerle, Harper... with the fregoli man Josh Smith.

My offense should be a nice balance as well.
My team is led of course by arguably the best offensive player ever, 3*MVP Larry Bird. I don't want to go into details how many ways he can hurt the opponent... There is Dwight Howard in the middle, who doesn't shoot a great many volume of shots, but that's not a bad thing considering that my team features plenty of offensive threats... so his relative flaw (not a dominant scorer with polished offensive moves, like a Hakeem or Kareem) almost turns into a benefit. As we all know, he is still a big threat on the court due to his extreme athleticism, and he would have a) plenty of space because he is surrounded by 3 excellent shooters (Bird, Price, Ginobili) and 1 good midrange shooter (Grant), and b) when the situation occurs, he would be fed by excellent passers (again: Bird, Price, Ginobili) to score easy buckets.

And here we are at a big forte of my team: passing. Bird is the best passer at his position, prime Price is a great playmaker, a sharp passer and Ginobili is also an elite passer at his position. Grant is no slouch in that department, either. The ball movement should be smooth, and would consistently create good scoring opportunities. Great passing also makes it very hard to double-team any of my key players... and Bird, Price and even Ginobili are not easy to guard 1-on-1. As a rule, Price is the player who initiates the attack, breaking down the first line of defense... a pick-and-roll with Bird would be pretty unstoppable, lol. And then comes Bird with his unpredictible game, Manu driving to the basket, dishing out to Price or Bird, or making a cut to the basket scoring of a Bird-pass from the post, the creativity (!), passing and shooting of my players would open so many possibilites. Shooting: with some cheating, I almost have TWO 50-40-90 guys... :o that's insane. Add Manu and a reliable midrange-shot from Grant.

i think my team is capable to pick apart any defense with these kind of well-rounded skill-sets.
For all the good points there might be - in absolute terms - a weakness to my offense: Bird doesn't have McHale in this case. Grant is not that kind of supper-efficient post-player... but then comes Bernard King off the bench with his virtually unstoppable post game from the baseline! He would be another exceptional offensive force... think about it, he was so hard to stop when entire defenses focused on him - now imagine playing him alongside with Bird and co. Majerle and Harper can't be left alone either. They are great shooters! And then there is the finesse game of Vlade, another excellent passer and team player... comparable to 86 Walton.

Let's suppose any given opponent fought bravely to force a thrilling endgame... my team is led by one of the "clutchest" players ever! Is there a better finisher at the end of games than Larry? Only that he is accompanied by a Mark Price and Manu Ginobili... Defenses should be overburdened... and you can't really afford to foul them, because both Price and Bird are 90% FT shooters...

I think my team would excel in the half-court, but could also run the fast-break effectively because of a) dominant defensive rebounding, b) the occasional steals from Manu, Larry etc., c) all of the starting 5 can run the floor, d) passing, passing, passing, passing... did I mention, passing? A Price-Ginobili-Bird fast-break would be pretty scary, with two super-athlete big men in addition... Bernard King was also a freakishly good player in the transition... It is all situational, and my players - especially Larry - would make the best decision in the heat of the game.

I like my team, it would be fun to watch.
And I trust the fierce competitiveness and high basketball iq of BIRD, Ginobili and co.
The Last Word
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#6 » by MisterHibachi » Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:22 am

ElGee wrote:I'm curious how I should interpret the "3-year peak" when evaluating a team...?


The 3 year peaks were used to weed out the one year wonders. You should evaluate them on their average play across those 3 years. So that eliminated one season of very high play and other seasons of low/average play. Usually all 3 seasons would be comparable, but nevertheless, its the average of the 3 years.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
kayess
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,807
And1: 1,000
Joined: Sep 29, 2013

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#7 » by kayess » Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:15 am

Oh my god finally!

Are non-participants allowed to comment in the threads?
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#8 » by MisterHibachi » Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:25 am

kayess wrote:Oh my god finally!

Are non-participants allowed to comment in the threads?


Yup.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,207
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#9 » by ElGee » Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:25 am

MisterHibachi wrote:
ElGee wrote:I'm curious how I should interpret the "3-year peak" when evaluating a team...?


The 3 year peaks were used to weed out the one year wonders. You should evaluate them on their average play across those 3 years. So that eliminated one season of very high play and other seasons of low/average play. Usually all 3 seasons would be comparable, but nevertheless, its the average of the 3 years.


Thanks. I find this to be a bit awkward (to say the least) -- you're asking me to imagine a Tracy McGrady that never existed...do I keep his accurate 3-point jumper from 2003? Or do I just scale back that one skill to attain an average?

In other words, how do you take an average of skills when the skills don't keep the same proportions to each other over the 3 years? There are guys that played at the same overall level over 3 year periods where they are adding in 3 areas to offset the loss in 3 other areas...

-
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#10 » by MisterHibachi » Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:34 am

ElGee wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:
ElGee wrote:I'm curious how I should interpret the "3-year peak" when evaluating a team...?


The 3 year peaks were used to weed out the one year wonders. You should evaluate them on their average play across those 3 years. So that eliminated one season of very high play and other seasons of low/average play. Usually all 3 seasons would be comparable, but nevertheless, its the average of the 3 years.


Thanks. I find this to be a bit awkward (to say the least) -- you're asking me to imagine a Tracy McGrady that never existed...do I keep his accurate 3-point jumper from 2003? Or do I just scale back that one skill to attain an average?

In other words, how do you take an average of skills when the skills don't keep the same proportions to each other over the 3 years? There are guys that played at the same overall level over 3 year periods where they are adding in 3 areas to offset the loss in 3 other areas...

-


Well you aren't just evaluating 03 Tmac. You are evaluating him on a 3 year period. How did he perform over those 3 years. He had a hot 03, similar to how some player may have a hot January. But in the end you evaluate him over 3 years, same way you evaluate a guy over the entire season, not just that one hot month. I realize its kinda awkward, since its one series, and we are taking 3 years of a guy to evaluate him in one series, but its just simply averages. If one player had a hot year and he dropped off in the other years, that's gotta be counted in. Most drafted players had a relatively even level of play over the 3 years, but some varied and you gotta account for that drop off/jump in play.

I would just recommend evaluating this in the same way you evaluate a guy in any given season for one game. Some players have ridiculously hot months or hot weeks or stretches. If you look back on their season and you wanna know, on average, what kind of performance they're gonna give you for any given game, you gotta take their yearly numbers, not just their hot/cold stretch cuz that skews it a lot. If you wanna evaluate 03 Tmac and how he performed that season on average, you're gonna take his yearly numbers, not his numbers from a hot stretch of weeks because its not representative of his whole season. I think its similar to how you would evaluate a 3 year stretch.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#11 » by MisterHibachi » Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:57 am

Any bystanders interested in filling this ballot out?

Steal of the draft:
Reach of the draft:
He should have been drafted:
He should NOT have been drafted:
Best offensive team:
Best defensive team:
Strongest core (top 3 picks):
Match up you wanna see in the playoffs:
Top 3 teams:
Favourite to win the playoffs:
Any other categories you wanna comment on that I missed:
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
john248
Starter
Posts: 2,367
And1: 651
Joined: Jul 06, 2010
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#12 » by john248 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:09 am

mistype
The Last Word
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#13 » by lorak » Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:41 am

Too many threads on PC board. They should be moved to Fantasy Basketball board, where they belong.
Notanoob
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1,223
Joined: Jun 07, 2013

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#14 » by Notanoob » Sun Jan 26, 2014 4:58 am

With my first round pick, I selected Hakeem Olajuwon. I settled on him because during his three year peak, he really did not have a significant weakness in his game. I guess some would say he wasn't an awfully good rebounder for a center, but that shouldn't be a huge problem for this team. He's one of the best defensive centers in the game since Russel, with his ability to not only protect the paint and the rim, but also be quick enough to move out of the paint and bother guards. His post game is one of the best in the history of the sport, but is undoubtedly the most beautiful to watch. He was adept at distributing the ball when posted up, and also had a bit of a mid range jumper. He also was not a liability at the line and thus immune the Hack-a-Shaq. Given his success with Drexler, I also knew that I could pair him up with a star wing player to great effect. Hakeem seemed like an easy-mode pick, simply because he has perfect portability, really. He is a complete player, and I figured that I'd rather go with Hakeem over LeBron because I'm more worried about running into a dominant C than I am any of a number of solid wing players.

With my second round pick I selected Paul Pierce. I was really unsure of what I was going to do with my second pick, and figured I'd just wait and see how things shook out. I was kind of hoping for Grant Hill or Tracy McGrady to be there, because you just have to love/feel bad for guys with their talent who don't do anything wrong but just get screwed by injuries. But when I looked at it, I knew I needed a top end wing talent to be a top offensive option, I couldn't just leave it all to Hakeem. I also knew that spacing would be hugely important, so the guy had to be able to shoot. I finally decided to go for Truth because he just brought so much to the game. Not only could he stroke it from deep, but he's got all sorts of crafty ways to get the ball in the hoop. He was an excellent trash talker (good for getting guys off of their game, like Payton with Jordan), and even managed to give LeBron some trouble while he was still young. He's got a fantastic reputation with people. I don't think you could find many guys who don't like or at least respect Pierce. Plus, for people who believe that being clutch is a thing, the Truth certainly brings loads of that. He seemed to me to be the best wing player (with good range) left.

Originally I was targeting a Sid the Squid for my third round pick, because I liked his excellent defense and solid offensive game, and I already had Truth to cover up his drop off in the postseason. I honestly didn't think that Chauncey would go as high as he did, because I certainly was interested in him too. I ended up settling on Rodman because I believed that he was the best player available at that point. His absurd rebounding would be appreciated by those who thought Hakeem didn't do enough there, and together they would provide incredible defense, shutting down pretty much anybody. He was also a former Piston, and I kind of wanted one after missing out on Grant Hill and Chauncey.

Other guys I considered heavily were Jason Kidd and John Stockton. This was a pair of really excellent point guards, with loads of advantages. Stockton was super-efficient and handed out an absurd number of assists. He could space the floor and was perfectly happy to let other guys shoot, and he player pretty good, dirty defense, raking up steals to boot. Kidd provided me with a great playmaker and defender to put on Jordan, Kobe, or Wade. But I decided to wait on them because PG was probably the least important position, and I just hoped one of them might slip to my next pick. No such luck, but even more to my dismay, Sheed was gone. I really did not think he was so well thought of, but he really was a perfect fit-could space the floor, play good defense, post up, rebound, and play center very well whenever I moved Hakeem to the bench. So I decided to get another PF, since I planned on using Rodman as a SF with regularity and wanted a real offensive PF in case things got bogged down with Worm on the floor. This lead me to select Chris Bosh. He's shown that he's very willing to accept being a 3rd option on offense, hit midrange shots and score inside, plays solid defense and can give me a small-ball center.

My next pick was pretty much set, I wanted Air Canada. I viewed Vince Carter as the best remaining player, and a cut above my remaining options at SG. I wasn't going to wait any longer to fill that spot.

After that I decided on a pair of excellent defenders to round out my backcourt, Mookie Blaylock and Michael Cooper. I was so settled on this that I didn't even think Cooper wouldn't be there, but he was drafted (seriously, you have Jordan and you wanted a defensive role playing SG? gah), and I sort of panicked and selected a good SG I could think of who played good d, and that was Arron Afflalo. I haven't forgiven Joe Dumars for dumping him, and the past two seasons he's shown how effective he can be on offense, but here he'll be confined to being a role player, coming off the bench, hustling hard, spacing the floor and playing tough defense. Blaylock was a guard who I felt fit my needs at PG too, played excellent defense, could shoot the 3 at a decent clip, and was very good at taking care of the basketball. Plus, after he spent many years basically watching Nique do all the scoring, you know he'd have no problem giving up the ball to the rest of my superior offensive options.

I was disappointed to see Sampson go, because I liked the idea of being able to pair him with Hakeem again, but I already had two PFs and despite his height Sampson did really play as a PF. I went with Jason Terry because I wanted a sixth man. Mookie and Afflalo are not explosive offensive guys, and most of my backups were better defenders than scorers. JET had some excellent shooting seasons and provides a real spark off the bench.

I then selected Ron Artest. I knew that I couldn't select him at his best, but I figured such a legendary character and defender would not be available for much longer. Even though I'm getting Rockets/Lakers version, Artest was still an excellent defender at SF, and in the seasons available was at least a competent 3 point shooter, so he wouldn't murder spacing with Rodman at PF. Plus, if someone is really giving me trouble, Ron can just lose his mind on the guy, hurt him so he won't be available, and I'll be okay because Rodman, Pierce and Carter can soak up minutes at SF anyways. Artest won't get too much burn though.

With my last pick, I wanted a real backup center for Hakeem, so I wouldn't be forced to go small ball with regularity if I didn't want to. I thus selected Tree Rollins, who was an good rebounder and paint protector, and excellent shot-blocker. I don't lose much on defense with him in. Plus, he tried to bite off Danny Ainge's finger once, so along with Rodman and Artest, I have a nice collection of all time crazies/fighters in my backup frontcourt. If anyone wants to start anything, they'll be going home with a lot of stitches.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,066
And1: 15,150
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#15 » by Laimbeer » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:17 am

Steal of the draft: Derrick Rose
Reach of the draft: Marques Johnson
He should have been drafted: Brad Daugherty
He should NOT have been drafted: Gheorghe Muresan
Best offensive team:
Best defensive team:
Strongest core (top 3 picks):
Match up you wanna see in the playoffs:
Top 3 teams:
Favourite to win the playoffs: -
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Quotatious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,999
And1: 11,145
Joined: Nov 15, 2013

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#16 » by Quotatious » Sun Jan 26, 2014 11:31 am

When I mentioned that Thunder Dan's team and my team are very similar, he agreed, so I think there's not really that much to be added to his description. :)

My team is also led my a great defensive center (Alonzo) who can score 20 PPG on very good efficiency, but his advantage over Dwight is the fact that he could knock down 15 footers fairly consistently, and he's a significantly better FT shooter. Both guys were really poor as passers, so that's a weakness that can potentially be exploited, but it's not really that big of an issue, because you can just limit their touches, or limit how many times they pass out of the low post, so they wouldn't have the opportunity to make a bad pass. Instead, they can attack the rim and try to draw fouls, or even finish and-1's, because both are so strong that it's hard not to let them overpower you under the basket.

Our leaders are also similar in terms of the caliber of player they were - Bird and Kobe are both among the most skilled offensive players ever, and both were crazy competitors who would do anything in order to win. I'd really like it if Kobe could cut down on his FGAs, 16-18 FGA per game would be the number of shots from the field that I'd like him to take. That's already less than Kobe has ever taken in his prime. There's no reason for him to shoot more, because I also have two others 25 PPG scorers - Alex English and Chris Mullin. I went with 2007-09 Kobe, and by 2007, he was already so frustrated by playing with scrubs (except Odom), that after the 2007 playoffs ended for the Lakers, he said that he would rather play on Pluto than with them. :lol: I'm sure he'd appreciate having such talented teammates like English, Mullin or Zo. Both guys (Mully and English) were really unselfish and proved that they could coexist with other high-octane scorers (English played with Kiki Vandeweghe in the three seasons that I selected - 1982-84, and Mullin obviously played for the Warriors during the Run TMC era, with Mitch Richmond and Tim Hardaway), so I'm sure they'd be fine with less FGA. I'd like both to take 14-16 shots per game. The reason I selected 1982-84 English, even though it might not have been his peak just yet, is because who was a lower USG% player than he'd eventually become later on in his career. He was still good enough to be chosen to the All-NBA Second Team twice during this stretch, and when you consider what kind of opposition he had to play against at the SF spot, that's very impressive.
English also averaged well over one steal and one block per game during that timespan, and he was a very good athlete capable of making chasedown blocks and disrupting opponents' offensive schemes because he could jump into the passing lanes and use his very long arms pretty well in this situation.

Chauncey Billups is just a perfect complement for these guys, because he could be very effective without dominating the ball. He had excellent post game and moved without the ball very well. He was also an All-Defensive caliber player, and was actually chosen to the All-D 2nd Team twice, one of them was in 2006, so that's a year which is a part of the stretch that I chose.

Buck Williams should be a great complement for Zo because he was a very athletic, relentless, tenacious rebounder and an excellent defender.

Lamar Odom was an amazingly versatile player, capable of everything from running a team as a point forward, rebounding and playing good man defense, to knocking down jumpshots. He's a PERFECT player for a fantasy draft team.

Brad Miller was an excellent passing bigman, solid defensive rebounder, and a very good shooter with excellent range (he could even knock down an occasional 3 pointer)
Darrell Armstrong and Doug Christie were two bulldogs on defense, and also really capable of being useful and productive on offense. Christie was an elite man defender, one of the toughest opponents Kobe ever faced (well, now he won't have to worry about guarding Bryant :D ). He was an excellent passer and a really solid shooter (37% from the 3 point land on almost 3 attempts per game, and 85% from the FT line!!!). I think he was a better player than Shane Battier and Bruce Bowen, so I'm really happy about nabbing him.

My second unit (Miller, Odom, Mullin, Christie, Armstrong) is tailor made for playing the Princeton offense, so I'm sure I'll try to take advantage of that quite a bit. Mullin could also easily beat his man off the dribble, or create a high percentage midrange shot by throwing him off balance. Mullin/Odom pick and rolls and pick & pops are something that I'm really looking forward to run.

I want to always have two of my top 3 wing players (Kobe, English, Mullin) on the floor, so one of them will be resting on the bench, while the other two will take care of my offense. This way I won't lose anything in terms of my offensive efficiency and productivity (Kobe and English are 57+ TS% scorers, and Mullin was over 60%TS, so good luck leaving any of them uncovered on the perimeter :P ).


*copied from the old discussion thread, just like you ordered Hibachi. It's absolutely not a complete strategy breakdown, as you can see, but you can get a clue how my team looks.
User avatar
Quotatious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,999
And1: 11,145
Joined: Nov 15, 2013

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#17 » by Quotatious » Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:33 pm

DavidStern wrote:Too many threads on PC board. They should be moved to Fantasy Basketball board, where they belong.

We wanted to do this draft here on the PC board because there's a totally different environment (ie. posters) on the Fantasy Basketball board, and we felt like the kind of people that there are on the PC board would be more fitting to an exercise that requires a lot of knowledge about historical players, as there are many people with good understanding of the 80s or 90s here, and the average age of the posters seems to be significantly higher than on other forums. At least that's how I feel about it.

MisterHibachi wrote:Any bystanders interested in filling this ballot out?

Steal of the draft:
Reach of the draft:
He should have been drafted:
He should NOT have been drafted:
Best offensive team:
Best defensive team:
Strongest core (top 3 picks):
Match up you wanna see in the playoffs:
Top 3 teams:
Favourite to win the playoffs:
Any other categories you wanna comment on that I missed:

I'm not exactly a bystander here, but I'll try to answer in an unbiased manner:

Steal of the draft: John Stockton, absolutely. He was drafted at #50, in the beginning of the 4th round, and there were a few clearly worse players drafted before him. Derrick Rose and Alex English kind of go in a different category because seemingly no one was willing to draft them, and they were eventually drafted 'just to be drafted' or because someone wanted to pay a tribute to them, if you will. HeartBreakKid also had a HUGE steal with Kevin Johnson at #82. Now he has Stockton and KJ as his point guards. :o

Reach of the draft: Dominique Wilkins at #74, considering the fact that he was drafted much higher than superior players like Bernard King (91), Alex English (152) and Adrian Dantley (undrafted).

He should have been drafted: Adrian Dantley, absolutely. Brad Daugherty as well. These are clearly the two guys that sticks out to me.

He should NOT have been drafted: Hard to say, because there are players like Allen Iverson, who are supremely talented, but don't really fit well in any role here, and poor overall players with one or two elite skills (like Bruce Bowen, or Kyle Korver). Role players are necessary for a team to succeed (at least in my humble opinion), so all of these picks seem to be justifiable. Gheorghe Muresan provides A LOT of size and he could be really useful in some matchups, even if he's less than a superstar talent.

Best offensive team: ardee (Dirk, Nash and Rice in the starting five, and Parker off the bench) and whitehops (Barkley, CP3, Pau Gasol and Harden).

Best defensive team: CaliBullsFan (Duncan, Payton, Moncrief and Marc Gasol in the starting lineup :o ) and Bruh Man (Garnett, Pippen, Kidd and Hibbert). Honorable mention - O_6 with Ewing and Sheed inside, Dennis Johnson, Shane Battier and Terrell Brandon off the bench.

Strongest core (top 3 picks): RSCD3_ (LeBron, McHale, Yao), HeartBreakKid (Dr. J, Karl Malone, Artis Gilmore) and O_6 (Durant, Ewing, Penny).

Match up you wanna see in the playoffs: Quotatious vs CaliBullsFan - we disagree on almost every topic on the forums, so whoever wins should feel really good about kicking the other's ass here. :lol: Quotatious vs ThunderDan9 as well, because our teams are built in a very similar way.

Top 3 teams: ThunderDan9, ardee and HeartBreakKid. I really like Narigo's and Sagittaron's teams as well. Not overly stacked, but a great fit.

Favourite to win the playoffs: ThunderDan9, slightly over HeartBreakKid and ardee. Take any of the three teams, all are great.

Most stacked team (not necessarily in a good way tho) - this is my own category, and I nominate DHodgkins - he has five 25 PPG or so scorers in his starting lineup, and three of them are clearly below 55% TS (Isiah, Dominique and C-Webb). They would've been fun to watch on the court together, no doubt, but first - we're not seeing them actually play, it's just a fantasy, 'numbers basketball', and second, I don't really see them succeeding as a unit. It really would've been an anarchy. He also has inefficient scorers like Antoine Walker (seriously, this guy?), Latrell Sprewell and Alvin Robertson, all of whom need a lot of touches and field goal attempts...

Don't get me wrong man - I think your team is tremendously talented, but literally no one on your team is a really dependable first option (D-Rob and Clyde are the most dependable and efficient, but even they declined against tougher defense in the postseason, more often than not), and I really don't like the fit. It looks more like an All-Star team, to be honest. :wink: And I'm not hating on you, not in the slighest.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,415
And1: 9,942
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#18 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 4:18 pm

Suggestion. Clear the threads and restart just having 2 matchups (1 east and 1 west) at a time. Takes a lot longer but builds suspense and the other players look in and comment instead of being monofocused on their own matchups. That and easier on the judges :-)
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#19 » by MisterHibachi » Sun Jan 26, 2014 4:46 pm

penbeast0 wrote:Suggestion. Clear the threads and restart just having 2 matchups (1 east and 1 west) at a time. Takes a lot longer but builds suspense and the other players look in and comment instead of being monofocused on their own matchups. That and easier on the judges :-)


Alright that's good with me. Problem is I'm not on a computer right now lol and have no way of saving my write up and don't lose it (along with all the comments). Do you, as a mod, mind locking all threads except the 1-8 match ups in each conference? That way we can keep the write ups already posted along with the comments. We can then open the threads when the time comes for them.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: All-Time Fantasy League (2014) - Playoffs 

Post#20 » by HeartBreakKid » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:03 pm

What's the deal with all of these matches? I thought we were pushing it when we posted 4 at a time.

Keep in mind that we have to evaluate 20 players all in hypothetical situations, figuring out their rotations, as well as rebuttals and strategies from the GMs. There is no way the judges will be able to do everyone's match.

I think we should just do 2-4 matches at a time, leave the thread open for say 3 days (starting after when both GMs have posted their initial strategies).

That's my piece.

Return to Player Comparisons