ImageImageImageImageImage

Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

milellie111
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 245
Joined: Nov 14, 2012

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#121 » by milellie111 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:33 pm

payitforward wrote:
milellie111 wrote:Look sir, i'm just a fellow Wizards fan like yourself. No need to call names like "troll" etc. The only difference is that i believe in Mr. Leonsis and Grunfeld and the plan they have for this team. I am seeing results RIGHT NOW!! I am not focused on living in the past. Every team has gone through dark ages. Why should the Wizards be any different? This team has turned the corner and i have pointed out all of the positives to look to the future with optimism. If you want to drown in sorrows and be negative while the team is currently winning, nothing i say will change your mind. So while you moan and whine, i'll cheer for my team.

Okey dokey, milellie111 -- you're off the hook. Off my hook anyway. You're a fan, you feel you have reason to be happy, you're expressing your happiness, you want to "cheer for my team."

That's all good. I also cheer for the Wizards. I'm also a fan. I'm going to guess I'm much older than you, which would mean that I have a longer time-line into the past with this team -- time spent watching Ernie's Grunfeld's work. Calling for him e.g. to draft Kawhi Leonard and watching him draft Jan Vesely instead. Calling for him to draft Kenneth Faried and watching him draft Chris Singleton instead, calling for him to draft Chandler Parsons and watching him draft (then waive!) Shelvin Mack, calling for him to draft Jae Crowder or Draymond Green and watching him draft Tomas Satoransky, hoping he'd have a chance to nab Kyle O'Quinn and watching him give away the low round 2 pick that would have gotten him for us, and much much more -- that's only the start.

And, thing is, however long I've been a fan (decades) there are people here who've been fans a lot longer than I. But every one of us has watched Ernie's work with attention every year of the decade+ he's been here.

Now that doesn't mean you should hold back on your opinion -- and certainly not on cheering! But it does mean that you might want to hold back on accusing me, as you do above (and many others too) of preferring to "drown in sorrow", "moan and whine", and other such phrases in previous posts. It was that kind of thing, and the repeated iterations of it, that led me and others to think of you as a "troll" -- i.e. just visiting here to rile people up so you could have a laugh at us.

I hope you understand what I'm getting at, and I hope you take it seriously. Please do provide your point of view, I hope you do it frequently. But, even though some of us rough each other up here, keep in mind that we've been at it a little while, we've built up some trust -- when fishercob beats the crap out of me, I just beat the crap out of him in return. Ditto me and hands. Just a couple of examples.

But you showed up out of nowhere calling us moaners, whiners, etc. -- and you were armed w/ a view of the team that didn't evidence much history (at least that's how it seemed to me). Nor did you ever, not even once, engage any point someone made in response to your opinions of the team or posters here. That's why, finally, I boiled over.

As to your opinion that we're "currently winning" -- we're likely to achieve the 7th spot in what has to be the worst Eastern Conference I've seen in all my years of being an NBA fan. We can agree to disagree, but I'm not impressed w/ this "winning."

Sorry to go on so long -- I felt I owed it to you after calling you an idiot. The above is what I really meant to say! That and welcome to the forum. Enjoy your pleasure in this team and its GM, but pay attention to the analysis here all the same if you would.



Please tell me, what GM hasn't missed out on a few picks? What business onwer has never missed out on oppurtunities and profit? Some things are pure chance, and some things are out of your control. My point is that the framework and foundation is laid here for a young competitive group of guys. Their chemistry is continuing to grow. There has been improvement all around from Grunfeld to Whittman which has extended all the way down to the players. You focus on negative moves with Grunfeld, how about the positive ones he's made? You seem to look at the glass half empty. You fail to realize the value Garrett Temple has at his contract price and how much he adds to the 2nd unit defensively. You fail to realize the addition of Al Harrington, who even though he is injured right now showed how valuable he will be coming off the bench. You fail to notice the improvement and development of Seraphin and Booker who get better each year. Booker is a blue collar workhorse and VERY respected around the league.

But more importantly, we are only the second Eastern Conference team to beat the Warriors on their home court this season. We are back at 500 - and in the 5th spot in the East again. Say what you want about this being the worst Eastern Conference division in history, the Wizards can't help that. But do not take away from their success. Give credit where it is due. If Miami or Indiana wins it all this year, do not detract from their success by saying they played in a weak conference.
TGW = Troll Gone Wild
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,585
And1: 3,014
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#122 » by pancakes3 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:42 pm

Yes, give credit where credit is due but discredit is also due when appropriate.
Bullets -> Wizards
User avatar
daSwami
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,284
And1: 563
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Location: Charlottesville
         

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#123 » by daSwami » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:09 pm

*bump*
:banghead:
MikeTheKid
Head Coach
Posts: 6,825
And1: 4,354
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
Location: DC/MD/VA
         

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#124 » by MikeTheKid » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:25 pm

Wheres that goofy now??? Ernie today just proved how horrible a GM he is by cleaning up his messes as usual!
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,801
And1: 7,928
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#125 » by montestewart » Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:18 am

What are you talking about? Andre Milellier just led the league in assists not too long ago. And ask any parent if their kid cleaning up his mess is a bad thing. Tidy Ernie.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,173
And1: 22,590
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#126 » by nate33 » Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:11 pm

Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong:

Challenge accepted!

Since 2009, EG has had the #5, #1, #17, #30, #6, #17, #3 and #3 picks in the draft, plus a plethora of 2nd round picks. Read that again carefully. That's FIVE TOP 6 PICKS plus 3 more first rounders. He also had potentially $20M in cap room in 2012 if he bought out Rashard Lewis' contract. With those assets to work with, here is a list of our rotation-caliber players under the age of 27 who will be under contract next year:

Wall
Beal

That's it. Maybe Porter and Rice step up to be rotation-worthy, but it's far from a sure thing. Oh yeah, and we also have traded away our 2014 pick and will be pushing the luxtax just to cobble together a .500 team in the woeful East.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#127 » by Ruzious » Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:22 pm

nate33 wrote:Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong:

Challenge accepted!

Since 2009, EG has had the #5, #1, #17, #30, #5, #17, #3 and #3 picks in the draft, plus a plethora of 2nd round picks. Read that again carefully. That's FIVE TOP 5 PICKS plus 3 more first rounders. He also had potentially $20M in cap room in 2012 if he bought out Rashard Lewis' contract. With those assets to work with, here is a list of our rotation-caliber players under the age of 27 who will be under contract next year:

Wall
Beal


That's it. Maybe Porter and Rice step up to be rotation-worthy, but it's far from a sure thing. Oh yeah, and we also have traded away our 2014 pick and will be pushing the luxtax just to cobble together a .500 team in the woeful East.

For those scoring at home, that's very not good.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,458
And1: 8,673
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#128 » by AFM » Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:23 pm

montestewart wrote:What are you talking about? Andre Milellier just led the league in assists not too long ago. And ask any parent if their kid cleaning up his mess is a bad thing. Tidy Ernie.

Miller is 9th in assists in NBA history
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,801
And1: 7,928
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#129 » by montestewart » Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:30 pm

Vesely was a #6 pick. Undermines the whole argument.
lastemp3ror
Junior
Posts: 380
And1: 133
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
   

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#130 » by lastemp3ror » Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:59 pm

montestewart wrote:Vesely was a #6 pick. Undermines the whole argument.


Lol. Quest failed.

All kidding aside, Nate probably made the best argument against Grunny on this thread.

I know a lot of people hate this latest move by Ernie and I agree that this move shows that he failed with the signing of Maynor and drafting Ves. However, if we put the past aside and just focus on the trade without looking back, it was a good to a very good move. He got rid of two guys who weren't in the rotation for a guy who should get a lot of minutes. Plus created a roster spot and saved some money in the process. If we can sign another big with the roster spot that can give us some minutes, our bench may actually produce. All for a second round pick. Rarely does this team ever find a second round player who can be a part of a rotation. So in my eyes we basically gave up nothing for Miller, extra roster spot, and some extra cash.

Let me finish by saying that I hate Ernie more than most, so don't take the above statement as if I want to keep that fool around. I am just happy that Ernie didn't make his last move as the GM of the Wizards (hopefully!), a big one which would of further handicapped us in the future. That is something that could of happened so we should all be slightly relieved.
dlts20
RealGM
Posts: 12,454
And1: 6,195
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#131 » by dlts20 » Fri Feb 21, 2014 7:28 pm

Im havent been as hard on the Marshall thing for EG as others have been but for some reason, this quote today drove me crazy. Here is what he said and then Ill respond:

After the Wizards traded for Miller, Marshall, a former Bishop O’Connell standout, responded on his Twitter account, “the irony.” Grunfeld was asked about Marshall on Thursday and said he was never in their plans.

“He’s played well,” Grunfeld said, but “in order to get the deal done for Gortat, we needed to put a couple of players in from a salary cap standpoint, so we never even really saw him at all. He was put in the deal just to get a deal done. But give him a lot of credit, he has played very well for the Lakers.”


This is the GM of a proffessional basketball team. How can you say that you never even really saw him at all and he was just put in the deal? Especially a guy from your own backyard? Where is your scouting team? You just throw guys in trades without even seeing if one of the throw ins is a steal or not? Especailly a guy who had a very respectable college career? Id rather him him say that we didnt think he was that good, or fit with us, or that we already had Maynor but dont just say that he was a throw in that youve never seen and didnt know if he could play or not. That sounds so unaware and incompetent, especially from someone in his role. It really bothers me for some reason
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,801
And1: 7,928
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#132 » by montestewart » Fri Feb 21, 2014 7:41 pm

dlts20 wrote:Im havent been as hard on the Marshall thing for EG as others have been but for some reason, this quote today drove me crazy. Here is what he said and then Ill respond:

After the Wizards traded for Miller, Marshall, a former Bishop O’Connell standout, responded on his Twitter account, “the irony.” Grunfeld was asked about Marshall on Thursday and said he was never in their plans.

“He’s played well,” Grunfeld said, but “in order to get the deal done for Gortat, we needed to put a couple of players in from a salary cap standpoint, so we never even really saw him at all. He was put in the deal just to get a deal done. But give him a lot of credit, he has played very well for the Lakers.”


This is the GM of a proffessional basketball team. How can you say that you never even really saw him at all and he was just put in the deal? Especially a guy from your own backyard? Where is your scouting team? You just throw guys in trades without even seeing if one of the throw ins is a steal or not? Especailly a guy who had a very respectable college career? Id rather him him say that we didnt think he was that good, or fit with us, or that we already had Maynor but dont just say that he was a throw in that youve never seen and didnt know if he could play or not. That sounds so unaware and incompetent, especially from someone in his role. It really bothers me for some reason

You think, therefore you are bothered.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,501
And1: 4,470
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#133 » by closg00 » Fri Feb 21, 2014 7:54 pm

dlts20 wrote:Im havent been as hard on the Marshall thing for EG as others have been but for some reason, this quote today drove me crazy. Here is what he said and then Ill respond:

After the Wizards traded for Miller, Marshall, a former Bishop O’Connell standout, responded on his Twitter account, “the irony.” Grunfeld was asked about Marshall on Thursday and said he was never in their plans.

“He’s played well,” Grunfeld said, but “in order to get the deal done for Gortat, we needed to put a couple of players in from a salary cap standpoint, so we never even really saw him at all. He was put in the deal just to get a deal done. But give him a lot of credit, he has played very well for the Lakers.”


This is the GM of a proffessional basketball team. How can you say that you never even really saw him at all and he was just put in the deal? Especially a guy from your own backyard? Where is your scouting team? You just throw guys in trades without even seeing if one of the throw ins is a steal or not? Especailly a guy who had a very respectable college career? Id rather him him say that we didnt think he was that good, or fit with us, or that we already had Maynor but dont just say that he was a throw in that youve never seen and didnt know if he could play or not. That sounds so unaware and incompetent, especially from someone in his role. It really bothers me for some reason


In other words, I do the bare-minimum in my job as Wizard GM. Yup, Grunfelded :wink:
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,298
And1: 5,047
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#134 » by tontoz » Fri Feb 21, 2014 8:41 pm

Gotta love the due diligence.

*face palm*
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,056
And1: 6,794
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#135 » by doclinkin » Sat Feb 22, 2014 2:04 am

lastemp3ror wrote:
montestewart wrote:Vesely was a #6 pick. Undermines the whole argument.


Lol. Quest failed.

All kidding aside, Nate probably made the best argument against Grunny on this thread.

I know a lot of people hate this latest move by Ernie and I agree that this move shows that he failed with the signing of Maynor and drafting Ves. However, if we put the past aside and just focus on the trade without looking back, it was a good to a very good move. He got rid of two guys who weren't in the rotation for a guy who should get a lot of minutes. Plus created a roster spot and saved some money in the process. If we can sign another big with the roster spot that can give us some minutes, our bench may actually produce. All for a second round pick. Rarely does this team ever find a second round player who can be a part of a rotation. So in my eyes we basically gave up nothing for Miller, extra roster spot, and some extra cash.

Let me finish by saying that I hate Ernie more than most, so don't take the above statement as if I want to keep that fool around. I am just happy that Ernie didn't make his last move as the GM of the Wizards (hopefully!), a big one which would of further handicapped us in the future. That is something that could of happened so we should all be slightly relieved.


2008? An economy of responses. Post more. Post more.
milellie111
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 245
Joined: Nov 14, 2012

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#136 » by milellie111 » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:05 am

Gooden/Miller/Harrington. Three players that have contributed massively to this teams latest success. What defines a good GM? Sticking to the plan even if it defies popular opinion.
TGW = Troll Gone Wild
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,837
And1: 3,626
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#137 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:13 am

Need more emoticons. Where are the friggin' emoticons? How do we know how to feel without the bloody emoticons?
In Rizzo we trust
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,353
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#138 » by verbal8 » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:22 am

milellie111 wrote:Gooden/Miller/Harrington. Three players that have contributed massively to this teams latest success. What defines a good GM? Sticking to the plan even if it defies popular opinion.


Gooden's solid play has been a pleasant surprise, but he has only played 90 minutes. Miller has been very good, but he is only playing 15 mpg. Harrington has played the most but done nothing that contributes to NBA success.

The Wizards "success" is being slightly about .500 in a historically bad Eastern Conference and making a number of short-term moves(Gortat trade, Miller trade) to achieve that.

The massive contributors have been: Wall, Ariza, Gortat and to a lesser extent Nene and Webster. Booker and Beal have been solid for what they are.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,801
And1: 7,928
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#139 » by montestewart » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:15 am

milellie111 wrote:Gooden/Miller/Harrington. Three players that have contributed massively to this teams latest success. What defines a good GM? Sticking to the plan even if it defies popular opinion.

Image
leswizards
Pro Prospect
Posts: 934
And1: 255
Joined: Jun 09, 2010

Re: Grunfeld a Great GM. Proves Doubters Wrong 

Post#140 » by leswizards » Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:07 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Need more emoticons. Where are the friggin' emoticons? How do we know how to feel without the bloody emoticons?


You are getting your trolls confused. That was wizardry who used the emoticons.
Viva le tank! At this pace, it will never end.

Return to Washington Wizards