Breaking down the Cavs' perceived failure

Gus McCrae · Post #101 » by **Gus McCrae** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:19 am

defhalotones wrote:Anthony Bennett
15 points 8 rebounds!!!!!!!!!!

Stoked for Bennett

Gus McCrae · Post #102 » by **Gus McCrae** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:38 am

ferk wrote:cle fails at everything. drafts,trades,signing,front office hirings. if it was school they would be held back a year to try again.

I feel like Kyrie and Trystan were good picks. Waiters is okay relative to the draft class (I would've gone Drummond or Barnes) because Kyrie is clearly a scoring guard as is Waiters and considering Waiters wasn't the clear BPA it would've been better to draft for need like Drummond at C or Barnes at SF. I would've taken Noel even if they already had Drummond because he's a homerun pick (like Drummond) and that's what Cleveland needed.

Side note: It's funny how Drummond's stock fell so much from being the obvious #1 pick before college to the 8th pick or whatever due to his subpar NCAA season. I wouldn't be surprised if the exact same thing happened this year with Wiggins and he falls due to his NCAA season and ends up being the best player of the draft.

TLDR: Cleveland should've come out of the last 2 drafts with either Drummond or Noel.

immortalone23 · Post #103 » by **immortalone23** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:12 am

Lol Wiggins falling to Cleveland hahaha

Sent from my XT897 using RealGM Forums mobile app

ferk · Post #104 » by **ferk** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:20 am

Gus McCrae wrote:
ferk wrote:cle fails at everything. drafts,trades,signing,front office hirings. if it was school they would be held back a year to try again.

I feel like Kyrie and Trystan were good picks. Waiters is okay relative to the draft class (I would've gone Drummond or Barnes) because Kyrie is clearly a scoring guard as is Waiters and considering Waiters wasn't the clear BPA it would've been better to draft for need like Drummond at C or Barnes at SF. I would've taken Noel even if they already had Drummond because he's a homerun pick (like Drummond) and that's what Cleveland needed.

Side note: It's funny how Drummond's stock fell so much from being the obvious #1 pick before college to the 8th pick or whatever due to his subpar NCAA season. I wouldn't be surprised if the exact same thing happened this year with Wiggins and he falls due to his NCAA season and ends up being the best player of the draft.

TLDR: Cleveland should've come out of the last 2 drafts with either Drummond or Noel.

maybe my memory is off but cle could have traded down and still drafted most of those players.

i also think most of those guys would be much better on other teams .

frothbrain · Post #105 » by **frothbrain** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:24 am

cleveland could use another 1st pick.

that deng trade was awful.
anyone who thought getting deng would allow them to compete this year is delusional.

Dupp · Post #106 » by **Dupp** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:54 am

frothbrain wrote:cleveland could use another 1st pick.

that deng trade was awful.
anyone who thought getting deng would allow them to compete this year is delusional.

You're just as delusional if you think the deng trade was awful. You just have to go to the bulls board and see how bad they think the return for deng was. You know, the guys that actually know what they are talking about.

majortom71 · Post #107 » by **majortom71** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:00 am

And to think some people expect Lebron to come running back to his former team...LMAO!

defhalotones · Post #108 » by **defhalotones** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:35 am

frothbrain wrote:cleveland could use another 1st pick.

that deng trade was awful.
anyone who thought getting deng would allow them to compete this year is delusional.

Deng has been limited due to a nagging achilles injury. We'll be better. This ADHD Generation wants results asap. Not always how it works....

erekose200 · Post #109 » by **erekose200** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:18 am

Cleveland have had more golden handshakes than any team in recent decades.. and failed. Now they need to take their failure on the chin and absorb the next 5 years of mediocrity they've got coming their way.

Post #110 » by **INKtastic** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:46 am

bennett tonight

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZm78344ovQ[/youtube]

mcfly1204 · Post #111 » by **mcfly1204** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:38 pm

INKtastic wrote:bennett tonight

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZm78344ovQ[/youtube]

Really liking his aggressiveness getting to the hoop. Little by little the game slows down for him.

Q C · Post #112 » by **Q C** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:14 pm

breaking down Anthony Bennetts perceived decent game: fat bust randomly hits shots he almost always misses

mcfly1204 · Post #113 » by **mcfly1204** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:17 pm

Q C wrote:breaking down Anthony Bennetts perceived decent game: fat bust randomly hits shots he almost always misses

Why bother?

mup · Post #114 » by **mup** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:19 pm

ferk wrote:
Gus McCrae wrote:
ferk wrote:cle fails at everything. drafts,trades,signing,front office hirings. if it was school they would be held back a year to try again.

I feel like Kyrie and Trystan were good picks. Waiters is okay relative to the draft class (I would've gone Drummond or Barnes) because Kyrie is clearly a scoring guard as is Waiters and considering Waiters wasn't the clear BPA it would've been better to draft for need like Drummond at C or Barnes at SF. I would've taken Noel even if they already had Drummond because he's a homerun pick (like Drummond) and that's what Cleveland needed.

Side note: It's funny how Drummond's stock fell so much from being the obvious #1 pick before college to the 8th pick or whatever due to his subpar NCAA season. I wouldn't be surprised if the exact same thing happened this year with Wiggins and he falls due to his NCAA season and ends up being the best player of the draft.

TLDR: Cleveland should've come out of the last 2 drafts with either Drummond or Noel.

maybe my memory is off but cle could have traded down and still drafted most of those players.

i also think most of those guys would be much better on other teams .

Can't trade down unless somebody trades up. Who wanted to trade up in 2012 or 2013? Who were they trading up for?

mup · Post #115 » by **mup** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:24 pm

erekose200 wrote:Cleveland have had more golden handshakes than any team in recent decades.. and failed. Now they need to take their failure on the chin and absorb the next 5 years of mediocrity they've got coming their way.

Come on, man. Those drafts were **** with zero margin for error. In most drafts, if you have the #4 pick, you can choose any of 6 or 8 guys that would be solid players. In 2011, 2012, and 2013, the Cavs had to find like one guy. You can sit there and take the easy way out and say they failed or you can analyze it a lot deeper and say they were screwed by getting bad at the wrong time with some horrible drafts.

Guys like Valancunias and Barnes and Oladipo-- the guys people think they should have taken--- aren't even all stars and never will be. The Cavs "best case scenario" team that everybody talks about wouldn't win 30 games.

mup · Post #116 » by **mup** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:27 pm

frothbrain wrote:cleveland could use another 1st pick.

that deng trade was awful.
anyone who thought getting deng would allow them to compete this year is delusional.

The Deng trade was awful?

They gave up nothing for Deng other than a highly protected pick that will end up being a 2nd rounder. Free Deng isn't better than nothing? You don't think a Deng rental is worth a 2017 2nd round pick?

mup · Post #117 » by **mup** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:28 pm

ferk wrote:cle fails at everything. drafts,trades,signing,front office hirings. if it was school they would be held back a year to try again.

So, Mo Williams for Kyrie Irving and Baron Davis was a bad trade? Ok. Got it.

JrueDaDamaja · Post #118 » by **JrueDaDamaja** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:50 pm

mup wrote:Guys like Valancunias and Barnes and Oladipo-- the guys people think they should have taken--- aren't even all stars and never will be. The Cavs "best case scenario" team that everybody talks about wouldn't win 30 games.

Wait, what?! You think Oladipo never makes an All Star game?

ferk · Post #119 » by **ferk** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:10 pm

mup wrote:
ferk wrote:cle fails at everything. drafts,trades,signing,front office hirings. if it was school they would be held back a year to try again.
So, Mo Williams for Kyrie Irving and Baron Davis was a bad trade? Ok. Got it.

pretty sure you can still get held back with one A

Post #120 » by **INKtastic** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:14 pm

ferk wrote:
mup wrote:
ferk wrote:cle fails at everything. drafts,trades,signing,front office hirings. if it was school they would be held back a year to try again.
So, Mo Williams for Kyrie Irving and Baron Davis was a bad trade? Ok. Got it.

pretty sure you can still get held back with one A

I'm not sure how anyone can complain about any of Grant's trades.