carey wrote:Yeah, guess I'm clueless.
Yeah, me too. We're certainly not as learned in this basketball thingy as any Laker fan.
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
carey wrote:Yeah, guess I'm clueless.


sunsbum wrote:I'm gonna stick my neck out here a little bit. I think signing bledsoe to a max would be a giant mistake. Not only that but if the suns are truely interested in Hayward I believe he is a much lower injury risk that would easily be able to replace EBs production next year.
The suns took a little dive when Eric went out but have recovered nicely. That kind of fed my eyeball test theory all along which is EB is more of a luxury than a necessity to phx.
sunsbum wrote:I'm gonna stick my neck out here a little bit. I think signing bledsoe to a max would be a giant mistake. Not only that but if the suns are truely interested in Hayward I believe he is a much lower injury risk that would easily be able to replace EBs production next year.
The suns took a little dive when Eric went out but have recovered nicely. That kind of fed my eyeball test theory all along which is EB is more of a luxury than a necessity to phx.
bwgood77 wrote:sunsbum wrote:I'm gonna stick my neck out here a little bit. I think signing bledsoe to a max would be a giant mistake. Not only that but if the suns are truely interested in Hayward I believe he is a much lower injury risk that would easily be able to replace EBs production next year.
The suns took a little dive when Eric went out but have recovered nicely. That kind of fed my eyeball test theory all along which is EB is more of a luxury than a necessity to phx.
But do you let him walk for nothing? What if Utah matches any Hayward offer? They really have no reason not to because their cap situation has ZERO bad contracts on it. Would you trade Bledsoe for Afflalo?

sunsbum wrote:bwgood77 wrote:sunsbum wrote:I'm gonna stick my neck out here a little bit. I think signing bledsoe to a max would be a giant mistake. Not only that but if the suns are truely interested in Hayward I believe he is a much lower injury risk that would easily be able to replace EBs production next year.
The suns took a little dive when Eric went out but have recovered nicely. That kind of fed my eyeball test theory all along which is EB is more of a luxury than a necessity to phx.
But do you let him walk for nothing? What if Utah matches any Hayward offer? They really have no reason not to because their cap situation has ZERO bad contracts on it. Would you trade Bledsoe for Afflalo?
We are definitely at a strange little crossroad aren't we? I haven't watched Aaron play at all through his career so I can't say much on him. I'm glad McD will be making these next few decisions and not me!
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Frank Lee wrote:When you publicly say, and say it early that you will match all offers and do whatever it takes to retain a player.... well, that is what you do. Bledsoe was going to cost 10-12 mill likely. If you are going to over pay someone, you might as well overpay a difference maker. So he costs an extra 3 mill... just restructure Frye to a 3/4/4/4
INFORMER-93 wrote:I think we need more than a 3&D guy at the 3 spot.
And I wouldn't rule out the Lakers pursuing Bledsoe. In fact, I think them and the Magic will be the main suitors for him. And I think Bledsoe would love to play for the purple and gold (and a big market team in general).
Hayward has not had a good year shooting the ball and scoring, but some columnist claims it's because he gets doubled and tripled all the time. I've always felt he was overrated, but he is very skilled and would be a good fit here.
INFORMER-93 wrote:I think we need more than a 3&D guy at the 3 spot.
And I wouldn't rule out the Lakers pursuing Bledsoe. In fact, I think them and the Magic will be the main suitors for him. And I think Bledsoe would love to play for the purple and gold (and a big market team in general).
Hayward has not had a good year shooting the ball and scoring, but some columnist claims it's because he gets doubled and tripled all the time. I've always felt he was overrated, but he is very skilled and would be a good fit here.
"He’s getting double-teams, triple-teams, but he’s still playing great. Gordon to me is a very, very top-of-the-line player. I think he’s just trying to prove himself to Utah that he’s worthy of having a bigger deal," said Carroll
"Our scouting report, we’re talking about Gordon Hayward, Gordon Hayward, Gordon Hayward," Hawks coach Mike Budenholzer said before the game. "To be able to take that kind of defensive focus and attention and still produce for himself and his teammates is something that’s a big adjustment''.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Ring_Wanted wrote:Stephenson just netted a triple double against us, but he is clearly too volatile. I'd entertain signing him but I believe the concerns about his head are more than legit and as Informer has been pointed, a change of scenario might only lead to buyer's remorse.