Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
RaptorNews wrote:darkdrone wrote:ReaLiez wrote:Wifey her - shes hot
Probably never slept with a hot girl in his life.
Be more arrogant
RoyceDa59 wrote:I think the bigger dumbass move here is having unprotected sex with a stripper. Does he want his dick to fall off? WTF was he thinking?
tidho wrote:Shuttlesworth34 wrote:tidho wrote:This is true. In these cases they should limit the amount of money passing through the mother's hands to twice the equivelent of minimum wage or something, then put the excess in a trust for the child. Its child support, the mother's shouldn't live like queens with their kids' money.
Your theory is flawed because you are only thinking about the mother.
Why shouldn't the child of a wealthy person share in the good fortune of his parent? Just because the rich daddy was dumb enough to stick it in a stripper doesn't mean the kid should have to live at the stripper's level of income. The system is set up so that the kid benefits from being a product of his father or mother's wealth. Yes, the mother gets brought up as well for being nothing more than a one night stand or even preying on a rich target. You can't punish an innocent child for his/her mother being a scumbag. Unfortunately there is no way for the court to force the mother to spend every penny on the child and there is rampant abuse by mothers who receive child support, but there is no way to fix the problem without harming the child.
While you are right in that pretty much all of family law is biased towards the female, there really isn't much that can be done without the kid ending up getting hurt
TL/DR the court thinks it is not fair for a baby daddy to live large while his kid lives in poverty so they do what they can to raise the kid out of poverty. It is what it is, people need to be smarter where they put their dick.
The kid wouldn't be living in poverty.
What I specifically said was cap child support to twice minimum wage. Annually that is roughly $30k....which, btw, is more than enough to raise a child. Again, this money isn't intended to make the mother rich, its intended to provide for the child. Let's say that was a little too stingy and double it. Now that child has $60k for living expenses. No one can make a logical argument suggesting that isn't enough to raise a child.
Keep in mind, I'm not letting the dad off the hook. If today they'd be paying $2M per year, they still pay $2M per year. It just goes into a trust that the mother can't touch. The kid will have plenty of support growing up, as well as a share of their father's wealth when they grow up.
The biggest problem for the kids is that child support stops at 18. Half the time dad is retired and broke himself, if stripper-mom burned through that cash upgrading her own lifestyle the kid steps out into the world with nothing.
MaliBrah wrote:I wonder what the kid is going to think when he/she finds out its biological father offered the mother 1M to abort.
Gwynplaine wrote::lol:
Well.. Just shows he's human.. I know I'm not one to judge. I would've done the same under temptation and in the moment. Condoms just suck.
Hopefully he'll own up to it, take care of the child and be a man.
Could've been much worse if he went the Derrick Rose way though....especially without a condom.
That guy straight up refused to pay a Hooker/stripper after a romp..
N more recently over the summer of #theReturn he was caught banging some ho on the couch by his fiance/baby mama after which they broke up.. n all you could her in the summer was about his kid and family..
Just saw some of her pics. Girl's got some meat on her.
JrueHK wrote:Child Support Laws are a joke. I hate it so much. You have hard working Americans making something like 30k-50k a year but you have this strippers that have sex with one professional sports player and they are set for life. Seriously law is a joke and biased against men. And women scream equality. Go figure.
I've come to the conclusion that most folks don't really care that you broke one of the rules... they just enjoy telling you that you broke it.
darkdrone wrote:RaptorNews wrote:darkdrone wrote:
Probably never slept with a hot girl in his life.
Be more arrogant
If you want to wifey a girl purely for her looks, I think its an insult to her and to how low your standards are. Good looks fade, but a good heart keeps you beautiful forever.
ChuckTaylors310 wrote:darkdrone wrote:RaptorNews wrote:
Be more arrogant
If you want to wifey a girl purely for her looks, I think its an insult to her and to how low your standards are. Good looks fade, but a good heart keeps you beautiful forever.
darkdrone wrote:Why not put your semen in a bank for future use and then get a vasectomy?
Then you can and1 on any girl thinking she snared you
Wonderllama wrote:Paul George is one of the top players in the NBA... why settle for a common stripper? He could probably get a real model instead! Could have had a girl like Bryiana Noelle
Shv3d wrote:Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s
The official motto of RealGM.
pacers33granger wrote:Where are the sources? The fact that this anonymous stripper is pregnant? I haven't even seen anywhere where she says he's the father. It's ridiculous that crap like this can qualify for news nowadays. It's bad enough that guys like Broussard make up trades and say there's talks going on, but that doesn't really affect people's lives.
