Nuntius wrote:We should really refrain from judging either party before we have verified that this report is actually true.
Source is BallerAlert.com so chances are its BS.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

Nuntius wrote:We should really refrain from judging either party before we have verified that this report is actually true.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."

Nolan wrote:Nuntius wrote:We should really refrain from judging either party before we have verified that this report is actually true.
Source is BallerAlert.com so chances are its BS.
Ugalde wrote:There's no stairs in her city?


Nuntius wrote:Nolan wrote:Nuntius wrote:We should really refrain from judging either party before we have verified that this report is actually true.
Source is BallerAlert.com so chances are its BS.
And according to the site you mentioned, the person who broke this story is living in Pflugerville, TX.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."

Nolan wrote:Nuntius wrote:Nolan wrote:
Source is BallerAlert.com so chances are its BS.
And according to the site you mentioned, the person who broke this story is living in Pflugerville, TX.
And lets not forget what BallerAlert is about either.
Theoretic wrote:Ugalde wrote:There's no stairs in her city?
Shuttlesworth34 wrote:G35 wrote:Shuttlesworth34 wrote:
I have explained this already. The court's theory is that the child gets to benefit from the good fortune of one of his/her parents. That kid won the parent lotto when it comes to financial situation. PG has been told what the deal is a million times. Yet he still knocked up a girl. Now he is going to pay for it. Simple as that.
Not the point. Everyone realizes the penalty of getting a stripper pregnant. We know that if PG really did get her pregnant the rules are in place to protect the child. Before children/women weren't as well protected as they are now; the problem is that rules have swung too far overcompensating the birth mother of these out of wedlock children making wealthy men targets for unplanned children. There is no consequence for women to be on birth control or be honest to any degree in this sort of situation.
The laws need to be updated so there isn't this predatory aspect from some women trying to cash in on the genetic lottery. Because if we are truly concerned about the child we should be doing things to ensure the mother and father are actively involved in the child's and not just posturing about making sure the dad pays "what he owes"......
Please explain this alternative option that has eluded thousands of lawyers and judges.
Every law has ways to exploit it. There is no such thing as a perfect law.

G35 wrote:Shuttlesworth34 wrote:G35 wrote:
Not the point. Everyone realizes the penalty of getting a stripper pregnant. We know that if PG really did get her pregnant the rules are in place to protect the child. Before children/women weren't as well protected as they are now; the problem is that rules have swung too far overcompensating the birth mother of these out of wedlock children making wealthy men targets for unplanned children. There is no consequence for women to be on birth control or be honest to any degree in this sort of situation.
The laws need to be updated so there isn't this predatory aspect from some women trying to cash in on the genetic lottery. Because if we are truly concerned about the child we should be doing things to ensure the mother and father are actively involved in the child's and not just posturing about making sure the dad pays "what he owes"......
Please explain this alternative option that has eluded thousands of lawyers and judges.
Every law has ways to exploit it. There is no such thing as a perfect law.
What do you mean alternative option? Are you saying that the only option is to give the mother of the child $2 million a year for expenses. There are a lot of kids out there that are not being properly taken care of then......
Gwynplaine wrote::lol:
Well.. Just shows he's human.. I know I'm not one to judge. I would've done the same under temptation and in the moment. Condoms just suck.
Hopefully he'll own up to it, take care of the child and be a man.
Could've been much worse if he went the Derrick Rose way though....especially without a condom.
That guy straight up refused to pay a Hooker/stripper after a romp..
N more recently over the summer of #theReturn he was caught banging some ho on the couch by his fiance/baby mama after which they broke up.. n all you could her in the summer was about his kid and family..
Just saw some of her pics. Girl's got some meat on her.
darkdrone wrote:I was getting some chapstick from Walgreens the other day and it happened to be in the same aisle with the condoms.
The condom prices ranged from $4.99 to super pack of $29.99.
When I was in elementary school I was pretty good at math, but you don’t have to be genius to realize having to pay $29.99 is better than…
$1 MILLION OR 25% OF YOUR GROSS INCOME FOR 18 YEARS
Don’t know when these athletes are going to learn, if ever. Jocks and Stiletto Jill reports a story that we hear quite often.
Paul George had unprotected sex with a Stripper named Daniela who use to work out Tootsies in Miami. George allegedly try to pay her off to abort the child, but she declined (not a dumb a stripper). George is dating someone else of course (Doc Rivers’ daughter, photos of her can be seen here), and now the stripper is taking selfies in high heels to show of her pregnancy.
You would think these guys would pay attention to Derek Jeter.
Good luck with all this PG.


BC_IS_A_PLAYA wrote:jonas sucks, his dad should have got a vasectomy
G35 wrote:Shuttlesworth34 wrote:
I have explained this already. The court's theory is that the child gets to benefit from the good fortune of one of his/her parents. That kid won the parent lotto when it comes to financial situation. PG has been told what the deal is a million times. Yet he still knocked up a girl. Now he is going to pay for it. Simple as that.
Not the point. Everyone realizes the penalty of getting a stripper pregnant. We know that if PG really did get her pregnant the rules are in place to protect the child. Before children/women weren't as well protected as they are now; the problem is that rules have swung too far overcompensating the birth mother of these out of wedlock children making wealthy men targets for unplanned children. There is no consequence for women to be on birth control or be honest to any degree in this sort of situation.
The laws need to be updated so there isn't this predatory aspect from some women trying to cash in on the genetic lottery. Because if we are truly concerned about the child we should be doing things to ensure the mother and father are actively involved in the child's and not just posturing about making sure the dad pays "what he owes"......
Case2012 wrote:She would've gotten an abortion if dude wasn't rich. I feel bad for pg but I really feel sorry for the kid.
The Anti-fan wrote:G35 wrote:Shuttlesworth34 wrote:
I have explained this already. The court's theory is that the child gets to benefit from the good fortune of one of his/her parents. That kid won the parent lotto when it comes to financial situation. PG has been told what the deal is a million times. Yet he still knocked up a girl. Now he is going to pay for it. Simple as that.
Not the point. Everyone realizes the penalty of getting a stripper pregnant. We know that if PG really did get her pregnant the rules are in place to protect the child. Before children/women weren't as well protected as they are now; the problem is that rules have swung too far overcompensating the birth mother of these out of wedlock children making wealthy men targets for unplanned children. There is no consequence for women to be on birth control or be honest to any degree in this sort of situation.
The laws need to be updated so there isn't this predatory aspect from some women trying to cash in on the genetic lottery. Because if we are truly concerned about the child we should be doing things to ensure the mother and father are actively involved in the child's and not just posturing about making sure the dad pays "what he owes"......
First off, why does everybody care how much child support rich athletes end up paying? Second, what makes you think a stripper without health insurance would have the $$$ (not to mention the hormonal changes) to pay for regular birth control when a guy can just put on a 25cent condom? We're talking about men, wealthy men, who are more than capable of taking care of themselves against "predatory" babymamas. We don't need to change the law for their benefit. I understand the pleasure of going bareback, but common sense would dictate you still wear a condom when having sex with a stranger even when she says she's on the pill...