ImageImageImage

The Trade Thread

Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33

User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#861 » by MasterIchiro » Thu Feb 6, 2014 7:27 pm

MrBigShot wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
Neptune wrote:You've lost it if you actually believe the Pistons would give Monroe for MKG straight up. That's ridiculous


It's one year of Monroe then a huge cap space commitment. Think Luol Deng type of return.


True, but I'd rather commit to Monroe long-term than trade him for MKG, who will also eventually get an extension. And he's mostly a defensive specialist. Doesn't solve issues for us. We need someone who can shoot and play defense.


I think trading Monroe for MKG does solve at least some issues for you. You have too many players who need the ball in their hands and you thus lack team offense. Monroe needs touches and there is no flow to your offense because so many of your minutes go to players who, like Monroe, need touches. So you have ball movement issues. MKG is unselfish and he turns up shots often. You would still need an outside shooter at SG.

Chicago was realistic when they moved Luol Deng otherwise they would have been stuck with him if they asked for too much. Of course everyone here prefers to move Josh Smith or Jennings but I believe those guys are unmovable. There's a risk an offer for Monroe would make it impossible for you to keep him or highly impractical given Drummond and Smith.

And with MKG playing perimeter defense, Josh Smith will have more energy to focus on offense.
It has been written...
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,851
And1: 22,916
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#862 » by MotownMadness » Thu Feb 6, 2014 7:56 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
It's one year of Monroe then a huge cap space commitment. Think Luol Deng type of return.


True, but I'd rather commit to Monroe long-term than trade him for MKG, who will also eventually get an extension. And he's mostly a defensive specialist. Doesn't solve issues for us. We need someone who can shoot and play defense.


I think trading Monroe for MKG does solve at least some issues for you. You have too many players who need the ball in their hands and you thus lack team offense. Monroe needs touches and there is no flow to your offense because so many of your minutes go to players who, like Monroe, need touches. So you have ball movement issues. MKG is unselfish and he turns up shots often. You would still need an outside shooter at SG.

Chicago was realistic when they moved Luol Deng otherwise they would have been stuck with him if they asked for too much. Of course everyone here prefers to move Josh Smith or Jennings but I believe those guys are unmovable. There's a risk an offer for Monroe would make it impossible for you to keep him or highly impractical given Drummond and Smith.

And with MKG playing perimeter defense, Josh Smith will have more energy to focus on offense.


MKG for Monroe straight up is a bad deal period and we aren't in a position of having to trade Monroe. Worst case we sign him and trade him later. Were going to have 20 mil in cap space again this summer. There's no sense in selling low on our best trade asset outside of Drummond. Teams should know that The Pistons aren't bluffing when they say they won't be low balled for Monroe.
User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,070
And1: 1,352
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#863 » by Piston Pete » Thu Feb 6, 2014 8:13 pm

Only way I even remotely consider MKG for Monroe is if they give us the rights to our pick back....and even then its iffy
User avatar
Damon_3388
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,953
And1: 1,056
Joined: Jul 09, 2010
Location: Australia

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#864 » by Damon_3388 » Thu Feb 6, 2014 9:24 pm

I'd offer the Sixers both Josh Smith and Brandon Jennings for MCW and Jason Richardson.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,858
And1: 20,577
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#865 » by MrBigShot » Thu Feb 6, 2014 9:38 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:I think trading Monroe for MKG does solve at least some issues for you. You have too many players who need the ball in their hands and you thus lack team offense. Monroe needs touches and there is no flow to your offense because so many of your minutes go to players who, like Monroe, need touches. So you have ball movement issues. MKG is unselfish and he turns up shots often. You would still need an outside shooter at SG.

Chicago was realistic when they moved Luol Deng otherwise they would have been stuck with him if they asked for too much. Of course everyone here prefers to move Josh Smith or Jennings but I believe those guys are unmovable. There's a risk an offer for Monroe would make it impossible for you to keep him or highly impractical given Drummond and Smith.

And with MKG playing perimeter defense, Josh Smith will have more energy to focus on offense.


You are right in that we do have too many players who need the ball. And to alleviate that, we should look to get rid of Smith.

You forgot one very very important thing however: Luol Deng is an unrestricted FA. The Bulls dealt him because they likely would have lost him for nothing in the off season. I don't think they would've been willing to pay what he was expecting, especially with Jimmy Butler there. In this situation however, Monroe is an RFA. We are not in danger of him intentionally walking away, and I don't think our FO is stupid enough not to resign him...despite all of the questionable moves the last couple of years.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
sfballa13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,831
And1: 928
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#866 » by sfballa13 » Thu Feb 6, 2014 9:44 pm

Piston Pete wrote:Only way I even remotely consider MKG for Monroe is if they give us the rights to our pick back....and even then its iffy


What about MKG, our pick back, AND dumping Bynum,Jerebko, Datome (9M more to spend this summer)

That 9M can be used to sign a starter.

Id do that deal and so would Charlotte. Cap space for them is esp overrated, no one is signing with the Bobcats.

We get our pick back and two starters (MKG) + money to buy another one
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,858
And1: 20,577
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#867 » by MrBigShot » Thu Feb 6, 2014 9:53 pm

Here's a trade that can help our team:

Detroit in:
Masai Ujiri

Toronto in:
Joe Dumars
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
thruthefire
Head Coach
Posts: 6,734
And1: 600
Joined: Nov 29, 2008

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#868 » by thruthefire » Thu Feb 6, 2014 9:56 pm

It looks like both sides agree. A Monroe/MKG swap doesn't make sense for either team.
Humble yourself.
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,935
And1: 3,501
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#869 » by theBigLip » Thu Feb 6, 2014 10:08 pm

Only two weeks from the trade deadline. I'd expect the rumors to start flying and several teams to start lowering their asking price.

I hope Smith breaks out for 40 sometime this next week :-)
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,292
And1: 5,266
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#870 » by Kilo » Thu Feb 6, 2014 10:19 pm

We need somebody to view Smoove how Sacto viewed Gay - a good player in the wrong situation who would rebound back if used right and a good fit for their current team.

I hope Dumars has reached out to the Knicks to see if they had any interest.

Smoove straight up for Bargnani OR Smoove and Stuckey for Amare and Hardaway Jr both work under the cap and I think good for both sides.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
paQo the BAWSER
Banned User
Posts: 840
And1: 110
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
   

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#871 » by paQo the BAWSER » Thu Feb 6, 2014 11:10 pm

Kilo wrote:We need somebody to view Smoove how Sacto viewed Gay - a good player in the wrong situation who would rebound back if used right and a good fit for their current team.

He's that type of player, I think he can contribute in other teams playing at PF and with some alpha dog over him, which means he don't take too many bad shots (he'll continue taking bad shots, but not a lot of like here).
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,572
And1: 1,242
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#872 » by Warspite » Thu Feb 6, 2014 11:12 pm

Watched some Celtics games and Wallace was playing pretty well. Green and Wallace for Smith and Jerebko would fix us but would it be too late in the season?
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,333
And1: 12,603
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#873 » by BadMofoPimp » Thu Feb 6, 2014 11:15 pm

Kilo wrote:We need somebody to view Smoove how Sacto viewed Gay - a good player in the wrong situation who would rebound back if used right and a good fit for their current team.

I hope Dumars has reached out to the Knicks to see if they had any interest.

Smoove straight up for Bargnani OR Smoove and Stuckey for Amare and Hardaway Jr both work under the cap and I think good for both sides.


Too bad Toronto or the Bucks couldn't use a solid PF. Well, there is always the Knicks. They would probably wanna do Shumpert & Bargs or Amare for JSmooth.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
paQo the BAWSER
Banned User
Posts: 840
And1: 110
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
   

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#874 » by paQo the BAWSER » Thu Feb 6, 2014 11:18 pm

Warspite wrote:Watched some Celtics games and Wallace was playing pretty well. Green and Wallace for Smith and Jerebko would fix us but would it be too late in the season?

I don't think you can get Green as smooth, but we could get better with Smith for Wallace. Anyway, we need to look others and more interesting options like get MKG or Shumpert, or that type of player, but if at the end we can't get nothing of value for Smith, I'm agree with trade him for Wallace.
Q00
Banned User
Posts: 6,374
And1: 2,604
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
   

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#875 » by Q00 » Thu Feb 6, 2014 11:25 pm

Smith for MKG + our pick back. (Smith fits better with Jefferson)

Then we can use our pick in a package with Monroe, Stuckey/CV to get Rondo/Green :)

Rondo/Jennings
KCP/Jennings
MKG/Singler
Green/Mitchell
Drummond/Harrelson
Q00
Banned User
Posts: 6,374
And1: 2,604
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
   

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#876 » by Q00 » Thu Feb 6, 2014 11:30 pm

paQo the BAWSER wrote:
Warspite wrote:Watched some Celtics games and Wallace was playing pretty well. Green and Wallace for Smith and Jerebko would fix us but would it be too late in the season?

I don't think you can get Green as smooth, but we could get better with Smith for Wallace. Anyway, we need to look others and more interesting options like get MKG or Shumpert, or that type of player, but if at the end we can't get nothing of value for Smith, I'm agree with trade him for Wallace.


Trading Smith for Wallace serves no purpose at all. It doesn't make any basketball sense or financial sense. Its basically just trading one big contract of a player whose productive but inconsistent, for another big contract of a player who is consistently unproductive. Wallace is avg 4 pts & 3 rebs and shoots 3s at the same rate as Smith. No thanks on Wallace unless Rondo is coming with him
paQo the BAWSER
Banned User
Posts: 840
And1: 110
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
   

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#877 » by paQo the BAWSER » Thu Feb 6, 2014 11:33 pm

Q00 wrote:
paQo the BAWSER wrote:
Warspite wrote:Watched some Celtics games and Wallace was playing pretty well. Green and Wallace for Smith and Jerebko would fix us but would it be too late in the season?

I don't think you can get Green as smooth, but we could get better with Smith for Wallace. Anyway, we need to look others and more interesting options like get MKG or Shumpert, or that type of player, but if at the end we can't get nothing of value for Smith, I'm agree with trade him for Wallace.


Trading Smith for Wallace serves no purpose at all. It doesn't make any basketball sense or financial sense. Its basically just trading one big contract of a player whose productive but inconsistent, for another big contract of a player who is consistently unproductive. Wallace is avg 4 pts & 3 rebs and shoots 3s at the same rate as Smith. No thanks on Wallace unless Rondo is coming with him

But he's a SF at least :lol: We're really fu**ed up in this issue.
haulerch
Senior
Posts: 695
And1: 269
Joined: Jun 11, 2013

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#878 » by haulerch » Fri Feb 7, 2014 12:35 am

Gerald Wallace for Smith... Horrible trade.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,858
And1: 20,577
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#879 » by MrBigShot » Fri Feb 7, 2014 12:44 am

Q00 wrote:Smith for MKG + our pick back. (Smith fits better with Jefferson)

Then we can use our pick in a package with Monroe, Stuckey/CV to get Rondo/Green :)

Rondo/Jennings
KCP/Jennings
MKG/Singler
Green/Mitchell
Drummond/Harrelson


I'd do that in a heartbeat. Would the bobcats though? It depends on whether or not they view him as a good player in a bad situation or not like someone above aid.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
Q00
Banned User
Posts: 6,374
And1: 2,604
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
   

Re: The Trade Thread 

Post#880 » by Q00 » Fri Feb 7, 2014 12:55 am

MrBigShot wrote:
Q00 wrote:Smith for MKG + our pick back. (Smith fits better with Jefferson)

Then we can use our pick in a package with Monroe, Stuckey/CV to get Rondo/Green :)

Rondo/Jennings
KCP/Jennings
MKG/Singler
Green/Mitchell
Drummond/Harrelson


I'd do that in a heartbeat. Would the bobcats though? It depends on whether or not they view him as a good player in a bad situation or not like someone above aid.


I don't know, but I think he would fit great on their team. A Jefferson/Smith frontcourt is intriguing to me, more so than Jefferson/Monroe who are too similar.

I just want to get another draft pick because I think that's the main thing preventing us from getting Rondo. I think Ainge would do Monroe + lotto pick, but just Monroe alone is probably not enough. If we can find a way to get a pick somehow to use in trades it would really open up our options.

Return to Detroit Pistons