Paul George Allegedly Offered Stripper $1 Mil To Abort Baby

[Garbs_7]

It seems strange that just because the Father is making great money, that 25% of that amount is how much the Mother needs to raise the child. The 25% (ish) figure is probably rational when the guy is making 60-100K a year but it is just far too much when the guy is a multi millionaire. It should be 25% of the Father's salary up until he makes 250K a year and then it maxes out at that or something, have the Father pay extra when there are school fees or important hospital bills etc. That is still a lot of money for 18 years...

Ridiculously dumb by George of course but some of these girls actively trying to get pregnant my stars for their lotto ticket in life tells you the system probably needs to be re-jigged a little.

[ComeAtMeBro]

It seems strange that just because the Father is making great money, that 25% of that amount is how much the Mother needs to raise the child. The 25% (ish) figure is probably rational when the guy is making 60-100K a year but it is just far too much when the guy is a multi millionaire. It should be 25% of the Father's salary up until he makes 250K a year and then it maxes out at that or something, have the Father pay extra when there are school fees or important hospital bills etc. That is still a lot of money for 18 years...

Ridiculously dumb by George of course but some of these girls actively trying to get pregnant my stars for their lotto ticket in life tells you the system probably needs to be re-jigged a little.

All hail....common sense.

It should be tiered; much like how taxes are.

[Shuttlesworth34]

It seems strange that just because the Father is making great money, that 25% of that amount is how much the Mother needs to raise the child. The 25% (ish) figure is probably rational when the guy is making 60-100K a year but it is just far too much when the guy is a multi millionaire. It should be 25% of the Father's salary up until he makes 250K a year and then it maxes out at that or something, have the Father pay extra when there are school fees or important hospital bills etc. That is still a lot of money for 18 years...

Ridiculously dumb by George of course but some of these girls actively trying to get pregnant my stars for their lotto ticket in life tells you the system probably needs to be re-jigged a little.

It is tiered. The % of income slowly decreases the more the parents are making. However, like I have previously said, the court's theory is that the child should benefit from the good fortune of the parent, so that decrease is minimal and very gradual.

Obviously most here disagree with the court's opinion, can't say I blame you, but it's not ever getting changed.

[MinneOOPalis]

5k a month should be enough. As an American a lot of the rules dont make sense when it comes to child support.

I bet if they were changed she wouldnt even bother having this kid.

[G35]

Of course he denied offering a million dollars to kill a growing baby. Do you really think he's going to tell the world he offered a million dollars to kill his future daughter?

Also, I don't think he said he was going to be a father. Just said he was going to do the right think aka pay the child support. It is very rare for athletes to have a presence in their illegitimate kids lives. I'll believe pg plans to be a father when he's changing diapers.

You are very negative towards men. If you changed every word to that strippers name where you put PG's name and we would be calling you a misogynist....

That's funny, because in the real world I have a reputation for being anti women. I'm just giving the cold hard truth. I'm not defending or excusing anything the woman has done. It's just not the topic of conversation. We all know what she is and what she did. This kid is nothing but a meal ticket to a better life for her. It's pathetic. But we all know these types of women exist and PG definitely has been told a million times.

Like I said a few times already. I have experience in this area and have seen multiple athletes all do the same thing. I'm not saying they are bad people. Most of them are nice guys who just can't help themselves when on the road. But when it comes to being an actual father, most of them are nothing more than a bank account for the kid.

I have personal experience in it myself. PG actually has the resources to actually defend himself in this situation. I've spent over $90K (because lawyers are $300+ an hour and their associates are $200+ an hour and you can spend $150 on an email shorter than this message) and I'm still fighting my ex. The court system is heavily slanted towards the mother. I'm glad to hear that you do understand the males perspective because even when the father wants to be involved in their kids life it don't mean anything. Women do not give one damn about fair, what is right, what is good for the kid, etc they only give a damn about winning and getting paid.....

[G35]

It seems strange that just because the Father is making great money, that 25% of that amount is how much the Mother needs to raise the child. The 25% (ish) figure is probably rational when the guy is making 60-100K a year but it is just far too much when the guy is a multi millionaire. It should be 25% of the Father's salary up until he makes 250K a year and then it maxes out at that or something, have the Father pay extra when there are school fees or important hospital bills etc. That is still a lot of money for 18 years...

Ridiculously dumb by George of course but some of these girls actively trying to get pregnant my stars for their lotto ticket in life tells you the system probably needs to be re-jigged a little.

It is tiered. The % of income slowly decreases the more the parents are making. However, like I have previously said, the court's theory is that the child should benefit from the good fortune of the parent, so that decrease is minimal and very gradual.

Obviously most here disagree with the court's opinion, can't say I blame you, but it's not ever getting changed.

I agree it's not going to get it changed because all women realize that they have the advantage and there is no reason for women to change something not to their benefit. What we have done in America is that we have swung so far to help women that it cripples men. Lawyers are not going to change it because men fighting for their parental rights only allows them to make more money. It is nearly impossible to represent yourself because the paperwork gets so caught up in minutiae that the man could be 100% in the right but one error and the judge rules in favor of the woman (personal experience).

So the reason it's not getting changed is because it benefits women and lawyers far too much to change the system. Most men are willing to compromise and move on with their lives. Women, not so much.....

[chitownsalesmen]

I get what your saying and if the procedure was a simple needle in the arm I'd agree 100%. With that said, abortion can be pretty brutal on a woman. I really don't think they should be forced in to something like that if their not comfortable with it. I really just think we as men need to be more responsible.

Most of these accidental pregnancies are very easily preventable. Hell I have plenty of friends who have unprotected sex and finish inside all the time, because they haven't had it happen yet. I bet when it does happen they will be expecting the girl to get the abortion like its not their fault.

I've had plenty of sex in my life(not bragging, I'm no player or nothing), but I've never even had a time where I could of possibly got a girl pregnant. Its really not that difficult.

Then you've never had sex, you might have never had a time where it was probable you could have a pregnancy but condoms are not 100% effective at preventing pregnancy and neither is birth control.


In a funny way, Abortion is the only 100% effective form birth-control.

Not having sex is also a 100% effective form of birth control.

As is having either variety of homosexual sex, but I wouldn't call being gay a form of birth control.

[Shuttlesworth34]

It seems strange that just because the Father is making great money, that 25% of that amount is how much the Mother needs to raise the child. The 25% (ish) figure is probably rational when the guy is making 60-100K a year but it is just far too much when the guy is a multi millionaire. It should be 25% of the Father's salary up until he makes 250K a year and then it maxes out at that or something, have the Father pay extra when there are school fees or important hospital bills etc. That is still a lot of money for 18 years...

Ridiculously dumb by George of course but some of these girls actively trying to get pregnant my stars for their lotto ticket in life tells you the system probably needs to be re-jigged a little.

It is tiered. The % of income slowly decreases the more the parents are making. However, like I have previously said, the court's theory is that the child should benefit from the good fortune of the parent, so that decrease is minimal and very gradual.

Obviously most here disagree with the court's opinion, can't say I blame you, but it's not ever getting changed.

I agree it's not going to get it changed because all women realize that they have the advantage and there is no reason for women to change something not to their benefit. What we have done in America is that we have swung so far to help women that it cripples men. Lawyers are not going to change it because men fighting for their parental rights only allows them to make more money. It is nearly impossible to represent yourself because the paperwork gets so caught up in minutiae that the man could be 100% in the right but one error and the judge rules in favor of the woman (personal experience).

So the reason it's not getting changed is because it benefits women and lawyers far too much to change the system. Most men are willing to compromise and move on with their lives. Women, not so much.....

You are coming at this from someone who got divorced and wasn't happy with the system. Can't say I Blake you for being upset. You are right. The deck is stacked in a woman's favor. But you have to remember, this is a paternity case. Not a divorce. The rules are slightly different. Yes, they still favor women, but there really isn't much that can be done to improve the situation without unnecessarily hurting the child.

[isekii]

If true it's horrible on PG's part. But the shorty is a 9-10 no doubt.

[Sprewell4Three]

I know it's easy to mock him after the fact, but ill bet most of the guys here, if this girl was all over them and trying to get them to bed in the heat of the moment, they would do it in a heartbeat. Sadly, this is a guy's weakness.

That being said, using a kid for hostage money sucks. George should set up a nursery, hire professional nannys and private doctors and then try to sue for custody. Leave the girl with nothing, or sue HER for child support if he can get custody. Maybe convince a judge that a millionaire father might be a better parent than a gold-digging stripper?

Do you think he would win a custody battle?

Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2

[Damas]

Then you've never had sex, you might have never had a time where it was probable you could have a pregnancy but condoms are not 100% effective at preventing pregnancy and neither is birth control.


In a funny way, Abortion is the only 100% effective form birth-control.

Not having sex is also a 100% effective form of birth control.

As is having either variety of homosexual sex, but I wouldn't call being gay a form of birth control.

Nice strawman argument.

[brownbobcat]

It seems strange that just because the Father is making great money, that 25% of that amount is how much the Mother needs to raise the child. The 25% (ish) figure is probably rational when the guy is making 60-100K a year but it is just far too much when the guy is a multi millionaire. It should be 25% of the Father's salary up until he makes 250K a year and then it maxes out at that or something, have the Father pay extra when there are school fees or important hospital bills etc. That is still a lot of money for 18 years...

Most pro athletes don't pay more than $5K/month per child for support.

[Archerbro]

It takes two to consenting adults to make a baby. It should take to willing adults to actually decide to have the baby. If it happens to be the case that the female decides to have the baby regardless of the father not wanting to have it, the male should be exempt from financial support. I'd actually go as far as to claim that this would likely decrease the amount of babies being born without a father since females would now have negative consequences for unilaterally deciding to have a child.

And I consider myself a feminist, even as a man, because I want real equality for the sexes. This is just another step to make the decision process more fair.

that's exactly what many people want.

if the female wants an abortion and the male doesn't, it's aborted.

if the male wants an abortion, and the female doesn't. he's stuck with child support for the rest of his life.


It has to go both ways.

[donk]

I dunno. This whore is going to make millions off of maybe ten minutes of work. There are unsolved murders and disappearances all the time that don't get solved. A million or two has to be able to buy you a REALLY good hitman. Hardest part would be getting in touch with them.

Obviously there would still be a risk, see Rae Carruth, but George has the money to hire a better class of hitman then Rae did. If I were him I'd seriously consider it if this bitch came to me trying to extort money.

[cb4_89]

I dunno. This whore is going to make millions off of maybe ten minutes of work. There are unsolved murders and disappearances all the time that don't get solved. A million or two has to be able to buy you a REALLY good hitman. Hardest part would be getting in touch with them.

Obviously there would still be a risk, see Rae Carruth, but George has the money to hire a better class of hitman then Rae did. If I were him I'd seriously consider it if this bitch came to me trying to extort money.

This has to be a joke right?

Even if you could get away with it (and he would obviously be a suspect if a single hair was touched on that beautiful creatures head), why the hell would he do it?

Option 1- Make 100+ million for the rest of your career and pay out 5 million max in child support.
Option 2- Make 100+ million for rest of career and live with being responsible for murdering an innocent woman and your unborn child.

And of course Option 3 (which would be the likely outcome if he were that dumb)- go to jail and make nothing. Potentially face death penalty.

[Cracklenuts]

I dunno. This whore is going to make millions off of maybe ten minutes of work.

I could have saved her at least 9 minutes of her time..

[will]

Mmmhmmmmmm must have been some grade A pussaaaay

[will]

Got PG on my yahoo team. This really explains his slump the past month or so. Damn son. Put on a rubber man.

[donk]

I dunno. This whore is going to make millions off of maybe ten minutes of work. There are unsolved murders and disappearances all the time that don't get solved. A million or two has to be able to buy you a REALLY good hitman. Hardest part would be getting in touch with them.

Obviously there would still be a risk, see Rae Carruth, but George has the money to hire a better class of hitman then Rae did. If I were him I'd seriously consider it if this bitch came to me trying to extort money.

This has to be a joke right?

Even if you could get away with it (and he would obviously be a suspect if a single hair was touched on that beautiful creatures head), why the hell would he do it?

Option 1- Make 100+ million for the rest of your career and pay out 5 million max in child support.
Option 2- Make 100+ million for rest of career and live with being responsible for murdering an innocent woman and your unborn child.

And of course Option 3 (which would be the likely outcome if he were that dumb)- go to jail and make nothing. Potentially face death penalty.

Well first of all, he won't be making a hundred mill. After taxes, he'll be lucky to keep fifty percent of whatever his contracts pay out.

I'm not concerned about the fetus dying. Its not born and its not sentient, so no big deal. She could have chose herself to abort it and it would have been perfectly legal.

As for her, she's a thieving whore who delibrately targeted a rich man in order to get pregnant and sit on her ass for the rest of her life on his dime. She's not innocent, and I sure as hell wouldn't convict if I were on PG's jury.

All in all you're probably right in that the risk, as small as it might be, (being a suspect doesn't mean much without proof) is present, so the wiser course is probably to ignore the principle of the matter, swallow his pride, and pay this bitch her money. It'd still be really tempting to me if I were in his shoes, though.

[Ugalde]

I dunno. This whore is going to make millions off of maybe ten minutes of work. There are unsolved murders and disappearances all the time that don't get solved. A million or two has to be able to buy you a REALLY good hitman. Hardest part would be getting in touch with them.

Obviously there would still be a risk, see Rae Carruth, but George has the money to hire a better class of hitman then Rae did. If I were him I'd seriously consider it if this bitch came to me trying to extort money.

This has to be a joke right?

Even if you could get away with it (and he would obviously be a suspect if a single hair was touched on that beautiful creatures head), why the hell would he do it?

Option 1- Make 100+ million for the rest of your career and pay out 5 million max in child support.
Option 2- Make 100+ million for rest of career and live with being responsible for murdering an innocent woman and your unborn child.

And of course Option 3 (which would be the likely outcome if he were that dumb)- go to jail and make nothing. Potentially face death penalty.

Well first of all, he won't be making a hundred mill. After taxes, he'll be lucky to keep fifty percent of whatever his contracts pay out.

I'm not concerned about the fetus dying. Its not born and its not sentient, so no big deal. She could have chose herself to abort it and it would have been perfectly legal.

As for her, she's a thieving whore who delibrately targeted a rich man in order to get pregnant and sit on her ass for the rest of her life on his dime. She's not innocent, and I sure as hell wouldn't convict if I were on PG's jury.

All in all you're probably right in that the risk, as small as it might be, (being a suspect doesn't mean much without proof) is present, so the wiser course is probably to ignore the principle of the matter, swallow his pride, and pay this bitch her money. It'd still be really tempting to me if I were in his shoes, though.

She didn't steal his sperm and impregnate herself. You do realize PG had sex with this girl right?