ImHeisenberg wrote:Don't even bite on those Carmelo Anthony rumors. The Knicks aren't trading him.
Yes plus the Knicks are in a bad cap sit. There best play is to pray they can resign him.
Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33
ImHeisenberg wrote:Don't even bite on those Carmelo Anthony rumors. The Knicks aren't trading him.
pollack419 wrote:ImHeisenberg wrote:Don't even bite on those Carmelo Anthony rumors. The Knicks aren't trading him.
Yes plus the Knicks are in a bad cap sit. There best play is to pray they can resign him.
Damon_3388 wrote:pollack419 wrote:ImHeisenberg wrote:Don't even bite on those Carmelo Anthony rumors. The Knicks aren't trading him.
Yes plus the Knicks are in a bad cap sit. There best play is to pray they can resign him.
Hence why the trade sfball13 proposed might make sense for them.
If they chose not to re-sign Monroe (would assume they would, but anyway), they could have up to $21 million come off their cap number next year, as Charlie V, Stuckey and Monroe are all expiring, and only be commited to small numbers for Bynum and Datome. If they chose to go the early termination option on both Amar'e and Andrea Bargnani (which they could well do), that's another $35 million gone, and suddenly they've only got around $36 million commited, and they're way under the cap. Say then that they want to give Monroe some good money and make him the centrepiece, they can still do that, still have fair chunk of cap room to either sign someone now, or be out from under Tyson Chandler's huge contract in a year, and have a heap of free agent cash to throw around at two stars then too.
MotownMadness wrote:I'm reading rumors that we are interested in Deng or Turner. Ideally I would like to trade Smith for Deng but the Cavs probably won't want it. So if we traded Monroe to Cleveland than how about something like Monroe+Stuckey for Deng+Waiters.
Deng would be a rental that likely won't re-sign with us. From what I heard, he's at that point in his career where he wants to chase after a ring. We're nowhere near contending status for the next 2-3 years minimum.MotownMadness wrote:I'm reading rumors that we are interested in Deng or Turner. Ideally I would like to trade Smith for Deng but the Cavs probably won't want it. So if we traded Monroe to Cleveland than how about something like Monroe+Stuckey for Deng+Waiters.

Kilo wrote:Won't trade Monroe within the division. Cleveland wouldn't take Smith.
DBC10 wrote:Deng would be a rental that likely won't re-sign with us. From what I heard, he's at that point in his career where he wants to chase after a ring. We're nowhere near contending status for the next 2-3 years minimum.MotownMadness wrote:I'm reading rumors that we are interested in Deng or Turner. Ideally I would like to trade Smith for Deng but the Cavs probably won't want it. So if we traded Monroe to Cleveland than how about something like Monroe+Stuckey for Deng+Waiters.
"Having spoken with teams trying to pry Monroe out of Detroit the price tag on him is EXCESSIVELY high. You are not getting Greg for anything that doesn’t include a borderline All-Star or a top tier draft pick. It might take both".
MotownMadness wrote:Steve Kyler from basketball insiders-"Having spoken with teams trying to pry Monroe out of Detroit the price tag on him is EXCESSIVELY high. You are not getting Greg for anything that doesn’t include a borderline All-Star or a top tier draft pick. It might take both".
Not sounding like Moose will be getting traded.
engelbert321 wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Steve Kyler from basketball insiders-"Having spoken with teams trying to pry Monroe out of Detroit the price tag on him is EXCESSIVELY high. You are not getting Greg for anything that doesn’t include a borderline All-Star or a top tier draft pick. It might take both".
Not sounding like Moose will be getting traded.
Both? Typical Dumars overvaluing his players.

engelbert321 wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Steve Kyler from basketball insiders-"Having spoken with teams trying to pry Monroe out of Detroit the price tag on him is EXCESSIVELY high. You are not getting Greg for anything that doesn’t include a borderline All-Star or a top tier draft pick. It might take both".
Not sounding like Moose will be getting traded.
Both? Typical Dumars overvaluing his players.
Q00 wrote:engelbert321 wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Steve Kyler from basketball insiders-
Not sounding like Moose will be getting traded.
Both? Typical Dumars overvaluing his players.
Not necessarily true. Its always smart negotiating to set your asking price high. That doesn't mean he overvalues him, or that he won't accept anything less, but maybe there's a team who gives him what he asks for, so its always worth trying. You can always negotiate a lower deal later.
There's a great article by David Aldridge on NBA.com up about where the Pistons are currently at with the Monroe situation. Essentially it says they would like to resign him to a contract like Ibaka got. And would be willing to max him out if that's what it took to keep him, but it would take a blockbuster deal to trade him. Who knows anymore with the coaching change. Its now legitimate to think they could be planning to just keep him if they are going to get Hollins to coach him. Of course this also could all be posturing through the media to make other teams think they need to raise their offers to get him. 10 more days to find out...
I don't see how its unreasonable though for the Pistons to expect to get a borderline all-star or top-tier pick for Monroe. Because that's basically what he is - a borderline all-star who was a top-tier pick. If they won't settle for anything less than both, than that's different, but they should at least get one or the other. I can't blame them for not wanting to give him up just for a role player who fits better.

ComboGuardCity wrote:Chandler and Miller for Stuckey and Bynum.