R-DAWG wrote:moocow007 wrote:GoodAzzGame_NYK wrote:even bulls fan say they would be getting away with murder.
They either take cokehead and give us and extra pick instead of snell and I would consider it.
Chicago needs to understand which I think they do is that Chicago is not Melo's first choice so for them to have the leverege by trading for him now and then being able to offer his the most money would be benificial to them.
I don't want to trade Melo but if he is going and we know he is going then we have to get the best possible package for him.
Why instead of Snell? Include Snell as well...JR Smith instead of Shumpert...AND another 1st round pick. At least then it's basically Jimmy Butler and a couple Bulls 1st round picks (which likely will have marginal value with Anthony's offense tag teamed with Thibodeau's defense, Noah's presence and possibly Derek Rose starting next season for the long haul)...and that's arguably not even as good as what the Knicks gave up to get Anthony in the first place.
remember the Knicks traded for a guy who was 25 turning 26, they are trading a guy who is 29 going on 30.
Doesn't matter. The Bulls are not in a situation where Carmelo Anthony is demanding only to go to them nor are they in a position to be able to just sign him outright as a free agent. And Anthony has actually gotten better IMO as an all around player since he's arrived in NY...and he's not 33 turning 34. The initial package is poo. It is. When Bulls fans think it's lopsided in their own favor it's a clear sign that it's poo (remember how most Knick fans thought we were overpaying and some even getting ripped off?). Jimmy Butler and maybe a 1st round pick as the only real gains (Boozer, Hinrich are fluff that is useless for the Knicks in the big picture...fool's gold for fool's...from trading Carmelo Anthony is poo. Doesn't matter how much one hates Anthony or overrates Butler the role player.





























