Trade away Smith
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,496
- And1: 319
- Joined: Mar 15, 2013
Re: Trade away Smith
people wanna trade smith but ever since we benched Kcp for someone who can score and shoot at the 2 we started winning games. Oh and josh is limiting his shots which means maybe he wants to win who knows but he's a valuable player. This trade talk is the biggest nonsense it's all over this forum and it's gotten really annoying to read.
Hotmayo is an animal
Reggie Jackson Blows
Reggie Jackson Blows
Re: Trade away Smith
- MrBigShot
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,583
- And1: 20,143
- Joined: Dec 18, 2010
-
Re: Trade away Smith
Jeff Green is not garbage. He's a very talented player, albeit an underachieving one. In the right situation he could be a terrific starter. He's having a solid year, but probably hasn't shot it as well as he's capable of.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,474
- And1: 1,213
- Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Re: Trade away Smith
How deperate are Pistons to unload Smith's contract?
Woud they be willing to package him before the draft with a top 8 pick ... just to come from underneath that contract?
Is that, quite possibly, the ONLY WAY to trade him (the next two years) ... with a good pick?
Is that too much to give up?
Woud they be willing to package him before the draft with a top 8 pick ... just to come from underneath that contract?
Is that, quite possibly, the ONLY WAY to trade him (the next two years) ... with a good pick?
Is that too much to give up?
Re: Trade away Smith
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,996
- And1: 12,481
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Trade away Smith
I seriously think Houston would consider Asik and Lin for JSmooth and an expiring aka CV or Stuck.
I would do this because Asik and Lin are very attractive expirings next year while they would both contribute now also.
I would do this because Asik and Lin are very attractive expirings next year while they would both contribute now also.

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Trade away Smith
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,005
- And1: 15,126
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: Trade away Smith
Smith is a better player than Green, but not by a lot. Figure the better position and contract, it's worth considering.
I wouldn't trade Smith for expirings. He's a borderline all-star with a halfway reasonable contract.
I wouldn't trade Smith for expirings. He's a borderline all-star with a halfway reasonable contract.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,960
- And1: 767
- Joined: Jan 26, 2014
- Location: downriver, MI
Re: Trade away Smith
green is a tweener. he's best suited as a 3 with below average defense and decent perimeter scoring abilities. imo we'd be selling ourselves way short. jeff green isn't exactly the lockdown defender and sniper we need at the 3. in fact, he's neither of those things...
we shouldn't make a move just for the sake of doing it. green could be a decent fit, but we could easily get similar talent for much cheaper. at this point, joe should be seriously kicking the tires on a smith-deng swap.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app
we shouldn't make a move just for the sake of doing it. green could be a decent fit, but we could easily get similar talent for much cheaper. at this point, joe should be seriously kicking the tires on a smith-deng swap.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: Trade away Smith
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,996
- And1: 12,481
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Trade away Smith
Laimbeer wrote:Smith is a better player than Green, but not by a lot. Figure the better position and contract, it's worth considering.
I wouldn't trade Smith for expirings. He's a borderline all-star with a halfway reasonable contract.
Smith is a borderline all-star at PF. True.

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,238
- And1: 3,376
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: Trade away Smith
"Green is a stud"
I almost spit out my coffee laughing at that one. He had the "potential" label, but at 27 years old, that should be long gone.
I almost spit out my coffee laughing at that one. He had the "potential" label, but at 27 years old, that should be long gone.
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,610
- And1: 843
- Joined: Jun 14, 2012
-
Re: Trade away Smith
BadMofoPimp wrote:Laimbeer wrote:Smith is a better player than Green, but not by a lot. Figure the better position and contract, it's worth considering.
I wouldn't trade Smith for expirings. He's a borderline all-star with a halfway reasonable contract.
Smith is a borderline all-star at PF. True.
Josh Smith has never been an All Star in his now 10 year career.
He is what he is.
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,238
- And1: 3,376
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: Trade away Smith
"How deperate are Pistons to unload Smith's contract?" Not desperate at all. Our cap situation is fine.
"Woud they be willing to package him before the draft with a top 8 pick ... just to come from underneath that contract?" Absolutely not. Besides, we don't even have our pick to trade.
"Is that, quite possibly, the ONLY WAY to trade him (the next two years) ... with a good pick?" Not at all. The guy is a heck of a pf signed to a pretty reasonable deal. The team will not dump him for nothing, let alone give up assets in the process.
"Is that too much to give up? " Obviously yes
If there was any doubt about this before, the cheeks firing should have settled it. Gore thinks the team is underachieving - ie they have the talent to be better. I can't see any way where he would give away talent at this point without major talent coming back.
"Woud they be willing to package him before the draft with a top 8 pick ... just to come from underneath that contract?" Absolutely not. Besides, we don't even have our pick to trade.
"Is that, quite possibly, the ONLY WAY to trade him (the next two years) ... with a good pick?" Not at all. The guy is a heck of a pf signed to a pretty reasonable deal. The team will not dump him for nothing, let alone give up assets in the process.
"Is that too much to give up? " Obviously yes
If there was any doubt about this before, the cheeks firing should have settled it. Gore thinks the team is underachieving - ie they have the talent to be better. I can't see any way where he would give away talent at this point without major talent coming back.
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,475
- And1: 1,223
- Joined: Jun 07, 2013
Re: Trade away Smith
ALL HAIL wrote:How deperate are Pistons to unload Smith's contract?
Woud they be willing to package him before the draft with a top 8 pick ... just to come from underneath that contract?
Is that, quite possibly, the ONLY WAY to trade him (the next two years) ... with a good pick?
Is that too much to give up?
We're not that desperate and that certainly isn't the only way to trade him considering how the Raptors moved Bargs and Gay. Smith is better than both of them. Besides, we can't trade a draft pick for a couple of years until we've transferred the one we owe to the Bobcats.
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,474
- And1: 1,213
- Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Re: Trade away Smith
Notanoob wrote:ALL HAIL wrote:How deperate are Pistons to unload Smith's contract?
Woud they be willing to package him before the draft with a top 8 pick ... just to come from underneath that contract?
Is that, quite possibly, the ONLY WAY to trade him (the next two years) ... with a good pick?
Is that too much to give up?
We're not that desperate and that certainly isn't the only way to trade him considering how the Raptors moved Bargs and Gay. Smith is better than both of them. Besides, we can't trade a draft pick for a couple of years until we've transferred the one we owe to the Bobcats.
Yeah, but Smith's deal is much worse than Bargnani's or Gay's.
In two years it won't be.
Also, although you're right about trading a pick, the Pistons could concievably draft for someone else, then package Smith with the drafted player. Right?
How much capspace would Pistons have if they gave up Smith for nothing?
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,475
- And1: 1,223
- Joined: Jun 07, 2013
Re: Trade away Smith
He's getting 13.5 a year.
Smith's deal is relatively long (3 more years after this one), but he's also an actually valuable player. I'd say value wise he couldn't be significantly worse than the abysmal Bargs, and he managed to get a first round pick and two seconds IIRC.
My point really was that there is always a team dumb enough for you to move a player.
Smith's deal is relatively long (3 more years after this one), but he's also an actually valuable player. I'd say value wise he couldn't be significantly worse than the abysmal Bargs, and he managed to get a first round pick and two seconds IIRC.
My point really was that there is always a team dumb enough for you to move a player.
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,474
- And1: 1,213
- Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Re: Trade away Smith
I agree that Smith could be valuable, but realistically he won't be able to be traded fot at least a year and a half.
How much space would be created by dumping him though?
How much space would be created by dumping him though?
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 167
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Re: Trade away Smith
New news today, taking my original deal in a different direction
DET out - Smith
DET in- Green
BOS out- Green and Bass
BOS in- Smith and Harrison Barnes
GS out- Barnes
GS in- Bass
DET out - Smith
DET in- Green
BOS out- Green and Bass
BOS in- Smith and Harrison Barnes
GS out- Barnes
GS in- Bass
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,563
- And1: 593
- Joined: Nov 19, 2012
-
Re: Trade away Smith
GooseDiddy wrote:New news today, taking my original deal in a different direction
DET out - Smith
DET in- Green
BOS out- Green and Bass
BOS in- Smith and Harrison Barnes
GS out- Barnes
GS in- Bass
Lmao. Why would GS trade Barnes for Bass???
Re: Trade away Smith
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 167
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Re: Trade away Smith
Phenomenonsense wrote:GooseDiddy wrote:New news today, taking my original deal in a different direction
DET out - Smith
DET in- Green
BOS out- Green and Bass
BOS in- Smith and Harrison Barnes
GS out- Barnes
GS in- Bass
Lmao. Why would GS trade Barnes for Bass???
They're supposedly interested in Bass, and listening to offers for Barnes.
Barnes- 10.3 ppg, 1.4 apg, 4.1 rpg PER = 10.37
Bass- 10.8 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 1 blkpg PER = 15.05
Re: Trade away Smith
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,996
- And1: 12,481
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Trade away Smith
GooseDiddy wrote:New news today, taking my original deal in a different direction
DET out - Smith
DET in- Green
BOS out- Green and Bass
BOS in- Smith and Harrison Barnes
GS out- Barnes
GS in- Bass
Barnes for Bass, no way!

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!