ImageImageImageImageImage

Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future?

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

SizzlinSimms
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 55
Joined: Jan 08, 2013
 

Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#1 » by SizzlinSimms » Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:46 am

I'll go far more in depth tomorrow.

Curious to see thoughts though.
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#2 » by mohammed10 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:52 am

SizzlinSimms wrote:I'll go far more in depth tomorrow.

Curious to see thoughts though.


Waiting to see the rest of your post, but unless Turd fires Ernie and Witless, then my kneejerk answer would be - yes
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
SizzlinSimms
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 55
Joined: Jan 08, 2013
 

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#3 » by SizzlinSimms » Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:11 am

Oh I agree about Wittman and Ernie. There is a couple moves that I think can slight save us this season, but right now we are not looking promising. The whole Wizards should be 3rd seed is overrated.
MikeTheKid
Head Coach
Posts: 6,825
And1: 4,354
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
Location: DC/MD/VA
         

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#4 » by MikeTheKid » Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:18 am

If Ted runs the team like he runs the Caps of course!!! No accountability and standing pat on everything, Ernie and Wittdummy will get extended and we'll re-sign Gortat to an albatross contract.
SizzlinSimms
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 55
Joined: Jan 08, 2013
 

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#5 » by SizzlinSimms » Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:21 am

That's a worst case scenario. That is a true nightmare. That might be worse than Freddy coming in my dreams tonight.
MikeTheKid
Head Coach
Posts: 6,825
And1: 4,354
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
Location: DC/MD/VA
         

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#6 » by MikeTheKid » Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:49 am

SizzlinSimms wrote:That's a worst case scenario. That is a true nightmare. That might be worse than Freddy coming in my dreams tonight.


Looks like you and Freddy are gonna have some fun times in your dreams then more than likely that'll happen. Ted hasn't proven otherwise yet as an owner!!!
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#7 » by hands11 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 11:40 am

So what is this thread. a combined...

Official "Raisins" Randy (Wittless) Wittman Thread
Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing (Part 2)
The Amazingly Sucky Theodore Leonsis Thread

Thread.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#8 » by Ruzious » Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:19 pm

Yes, because Ted Leonsis is nothing more than a modernized high-tech version of Abe Pollin. I don't see change happening unless the fans let him know that they aren't going to settle for mediocrity - which likely won't happen because fans are somewhat satisfied with mediocrity - as he has successfully managed fan expectations, so far.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,466
And1: 2,117
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#9 » by Dark Faze » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:37 pm

We can certainly turn things around with good management. We have some great core pieces. Just a matter of our GM doing things that actually make sense.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,421
And1: 8,646
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#10 » by AFM » Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:33 pm

Until a major FA actually wants to come here, yes. We are missing at least one major piece. Watching Howard manhandle Nene and Gortat last night didn't help. I think we need a young, tough big.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,924
And1: 9,309
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#11 » by queridiculo » Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:42 pm

Going from straight up awful to mediocre has its appeal. At least that way the Wizards go from home town patsies to actually being able to put up a fight against everybody's favorite visiting team.

Keeping the Wizards somewhat competitive is going to make for repeat business from those transplanted fans from other NBA cities.
User avatar
MJG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,403
And1: 151
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#12 » by MJG » Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:45 pm

Of course not. Medicority is only the peak in the path that the Washington Wizards walk; there are still many valleys to come.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,141
And1: 7,902
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#13 » by Dat2U » Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:54 pm

MJG wrote:Of course not. Medicority is only the peak in the path that the Washington Wizards walk; there are still many valleys to come.


Yep. We may be mediocre right now. But maintaining mediocrity is going to be very expensive (heck were already limited by the luxury tax right now!). Ted is going to have to fork over that checkbook this summer. It's going to likely take anywhere from $70-100 million (Gortat, Ariza, MLE, etc) just to keep the good times rolling. :lol:
User avatar
20MexicanosIn1Van
Veteran
Posts: 2,985
And1: 321
Joined: May 15, 2004
 

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#14 » by 20MexicanosIn1Van » Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:07 pm

Unfortunately, I think so. I'm worried management is going to be pressured into giving both Gortat and Ariza long term deals. Everyone on the roster is going to decline except Wall, Beal, and Porter. I worry that the only room for growth is the development of those 3.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#15 » by Nivek » Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:50 pm

SizzlinSimms wrote:I'll go far more in depth tomorrow.

Curious to see thoughts though.


Yes.

Here's why -- from November 1.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,798
And1: 7,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#16 » by montestewart » Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:08 pm

Nivek wrote:
SizzlinSimms wrote:I'll go far more in depth tomorrow.

Curious to see thoughts though.


Yes.

Here's why -- from November 1.

That summary is as valid today as ever.

Ariza's having his best year since 2006-2009. Gortat's year is a big improvement over last year, but otherwise seems to reflect a decline compared to his overall career (granted much of that career was as a backup). Even with those contributions, the team is playing .500 ball in a weak conference, and whether they stay or go, it's a good bet that those two won't produce at the same level next year.

Further, 2nd tier free agents often are 2nd tier because they have the name and the volume numbers without the efficiency that contributes to winning. The replacement could be a step down from Ariza and Gortat, and Terd and Ernie are just the duo to take that step.

PS: Mediocrity (or barely above it) has been the Wizards ceiling for 35 years. They've been stuck in mediocrity for a long time.
Illmatic21
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 2,950
And1: 554
Joined: Mar 01, 2009

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#17 » by Illmatic21 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:16 pm

If Wittman and/or Grunfeld are retained after this season, I don't know if I'll be able to continue following the team.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,421
And1: 8,646
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#18 » by AFM » Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:28 pm

I think Hands touched on this before and i agree with him, but I'm not sure a team with a max PG has a good chance of competing. I'd much rather have a good cheap PG and a max SG/SF who can score from anywhere on the court.
So much of the NBA involves luck. A Durant or a TMac are once in a generation type players.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,624
And1: 1,672
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#19 » by mhd » Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:42 pm

We'd be in MUCH better shape had we drafted Noel, or even Len.
User avatar
daSwami
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,284
And1: 563
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Location: Charlottesville
         

Re: Are we stuck at mediocrity in the future? 

Post#20 » by daSwami » Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:47 pm

Ruzious wrote:Yes, because Ted Leonsis is nothing more than a modernized high-tech version of Abe Pollin. I don't see change happening unless the fans let him know that they aren't going to settle for mediocrity - which likely won't happen because fans are somewhat satisfied with mediocrity - as he has successfully managed fan expectations, so far.


Whoever said that the "DC" in Washington DC stands for "Displaced Citizens" was right. This franchise's fan base probably has more churn than almost any other in the league. "Transients" generally fall into the demographic that sports franchises count on to buy tickets (young professionals with expendable income). It's really hard to build a loyal core fan base given that dynamic. (which probably explains the thinking behind Susan O'Mally's "market the other team's star" strategy, which doomed this franchise. With that mentality, all an owner has to do to is put a serviceable team on the court. What incentive do you have to field a winning team, if your business model requires making the other teams' players look good? I'm hoping Ted will wake up and realize that the teams he owns has hovered between awful and mediocre for 35 years and the natives are restless.
:banghead:

Return to Washington Wizards