ImageImageImageImageImage

Warriors @ Kings 2/19

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19 

Post#41 » by City of Trees » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:43 am

McCallum looked solid. Showed good fundamentals. Loved a play where he really battled to boxout Barnes (or Speights) -and won. He has real D potential.
Big_Cat
Banned User
Posts: 547
And1: 123
Joined: Jan 08, 2014

Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19 

Post#42 » by Big_Cat » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:15 pm

Kings2013 wrote:
Big_Cat wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:

He's young, and as I mentioned before, youth will cost you games. This is going to be a frustrating final stretch for coach Malone.


Young or not, I think we can all (well hopefully all of us) agree that we NEED to determine what McLemore is capable of. Forget wins and losses, we simply need to know going forward, can we count of McLemore being part of the future or not.


He's not inspiring confidence right now


Who cares. Then play him the rest of the season, rack up those losses, and trade him for an expiring.


It's hilarious seeing half of these boards so protective about McLemore and how much potential he has and we shouldn't trade him, and the other half complain every single time he gets playing time about how bad he is. He's one or the other.
User avatar
Kings2013
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,829
And1: 932
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
Location: The beautiful capital of California

Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19 

Post#43 » by Kings2013 » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:40 pm

Big_Cat wrote:
Kings2013 wrote:
Big_Cat wrote:
Young or not, I think we can all (well hopefully all of us) agree that we NEED to determine what McLemore is capable of. Forget wins and losses, we simply need to know going forward, can we count of McLemore being part of the future or not.


He's not inspiring confidence right now


Who cares.
Then play him the rest of the season, rack up those losses, and trade him for an expiring.


It's hilarious seeing half of these boards so protective about McLemore and how much potential he has and we shouldn't trade him, and the other half complain every single time he gets playing time about how bad he is. He's one or the other.


Who cares that our first round pick isn't inspiring confidence? I do. I don't know why I'm responding to your troll posts but he's bad and I'd like to believe he has potential, it is both
Big_Cat
Banned User
Posts: 547
And1: 123
Joined: Jan 08, 2014

Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19 

Post#44 » by Big_Cat » Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:59 am

Kings2013 wrote:Who cares that our first round pick isn't inspiring confidence? I do. I don't know why I'm responding to your troll posts but he's bad and I'd like to believe he has potential, it is both


Because last year's draft class is essentially the D-League compared to this year's draft.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19 

Post#45 » by SacKingZZZ » Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:06 am

Big_Cat wrote:
Kings2013 wrote:
Big_Cat wrote:
Young or not, I think we can all (well hopefully all of us) agree that we NEED to determine what McLemore is capable of. Forget wins and losses, we simply need to know going forward, can we count of McLemore being part of the future or not.


He's not inspiring confidence right now


Who cares. Then play him the rest of the season, rack up those losses, and trade him for an expiring.


It's hilarious seeing half of these boards so protective about McLemore and how much potential he has and we shouldn't trade him, and the other half complain every single time he gets playing time about how bad he is. He's one or the other.


The problem isn't him, it's the franchise stance right now of duality. Pick a road. Either have a team where your youth can develop, or build a team around your core pieces. Rarely can you do both simultaneously and especially not with raw rookies.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19 

Post#46 » by SacKingZZZ » Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:08 am

Big_Cat wrote:
Kings2013 wrote:Who cares that our first round pick isn't inspiring confidence? I do. I don't know why I'm responding to your troll posts but he's bad and I'd like to believe he has potential, it is both


Because last year's draft class is essentially the D-League compared to this year's draft.



Really? Might want to look beyond pick 4 in any mock. Some of those guys might be lucky to get picked up in the D-league. Tournament time will be fun to watch, that will probably set the deck for this next draft. Here's hoping to some breakout performances!

Return to Sacramento Kings