Warriors @ Kings 2/19
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
McCallum looked solid. Showed good fundamentals. Loved a play where he really battled to boxout Barnes (or Speights) -and won. He has real D potential.
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 547
- And1: 123
- Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
Kings2013 wrote:Big_Cat wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:
He's young, and as I mentioned before, youth will cost you games. This is going to be a frustrating final stretch for coach Malone.
Young or not, I think we can all (well hopefully all of us) agree that we NEED to determine what McLemore is capable of. Forget wins and losses, we simply need to know going forward, can we count of McLemore being part of the future or not.
He's not inspiring confidence right now
Who cares. Then play him the rest of the season, rack up those losses, and trade him for an expiring.
It's hilarious seeing half of these boards so protective about McLemore and how much potential he has and we shouldn't trade him, and the other half complain every single time he gets playing time about how bad he is. He's one or the other.
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
- Kings2013
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,829
- And1: 932
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
- Location: The beautiful capital of California
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
Big_Cat wrote:Kings2013 wrote:Big_Cat wrote:
Young or not, I think we can all (well hopefully all of us) agree that we NEED to determine what McLemore is capable of. Forget wins and losses, we simply need to know going forward, can we count of McLemore being part of the future or not.
He's not inspiring confidence right now
Who cares. Then play him the rest of the season, rack up those losses, and trade him for an expiring.
It's hilarious seeing half of these boards so protective about McLemore and how much potential he has and we shouldn't trade him, and the other half complain every single time he gets playing time about how bad he is. He's one or the other.
Who cares that our first round pick isn't inspiring confidence? I do. I don't know why I'm responding to your troll posts but he's bad and I'd like to believe he has potential, it is both
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 547
- And1: 123
- Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
Kings2013 wrote:Who cares that our first round pick isn't inspiring confidence? I do. I don't know why I'm responding to your troll posts but he's bad and I'd like to believe he has potential, it is both
Because last year's draft class is essentially the D-League compared to this year's draft.
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
Big_Cat wrote:Kings2013 wrote:Big_Cat wrote:
Young or not, I think we can all (well hopefully all of us) agree that we NEED to determine what McLemore is capable of. Forget wins and losses, we simply need to know going forward, can we count of McLemore being part of the future or not.
He's not inspiring confidence right now
Who cares. Then play him the rest of the season, rack up those losses, and trade him for an expiring.
It's hilarious seeing half of these boards so protective about McLemore and how much potential he has and we shouldn't trade him, and the other half complain every single time he gets playing time about how bad he is. He's one or the other.
The problem isn't him, it's the franchise stance right now of duality. Pick a road. Either have a team where your youth can develop, or build a team around your core pieces. Rarely can you do both simultaneously and especially not with raw rookies.
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Warriors @ Kings 2/19
Big_Cat wrote:Kings2013 wrote:Who cares that our first round pick isn't inspiring confidence? I do. I don't know why I'm responding to your troll posts but he's bad and I'd like to believe he has potential, it is both
Because last year's draft class is essentially the D-League compared to this year's draft.
Really? Might want to look beyond pick 4 in any mock. Some of those guys might be lucky to get picked up in the D-league. Tournament time will be fun to watch, that will probably set the deck for this next draft. Here's hoping to some breakout performances!