Paul George Allegedly Offered Stripper $1 Mil To Abort Baby

Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77

donk
Ballboy
Posts: 13
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2013

Re: Paul George Allegedly Offered Stripper $1 Mil To Abort B 

Post#301 » by donk » Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:26 am

Sure I do.

Personally, I'm of the opinion that if a woman chooses to have a child when there is the option to not have the child, and she knows the man doesn't want anything to do with it, then it should be her responsibility. PG knocked her up; she chose to have a baby. The two are not the same.

At the very most, he should have to pay fifty percent of the cost of raising the child; a basic food, clothes, roof package. That's not going to be the case here, the courts will rip this guy a new **** in order for this whore to get her nails done and buy $5,000 dresses to lure other poor bastards into the honey trap.

I don't care if thieves on this scale get forcibly shuffled off this mortal coil; doesn't matter if they are big bankers, con men swindling an old lady out of her retirement fund, or a prostitute like this woman.
User avatar
Nuntius
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,253
And1: 23,754
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
   

Re: Paul George Allegedly Offered Stripper $1 Mil To Abort B 

Post#302 » by Nuntius » Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:54 am

Ok, this thread has reached the point of talking about hitmen. It has far outlived its usefulness (if it ever had any). Therefore, I have to lock it.
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."

She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,681
And1: 32,187
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Paul George Allegedly Offered Stripper $1 Mil To Abort B 

Post#303 » by tsherkin » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:47 am

WenningtonGuy wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:So many people judging in here. Goes to show you the power of the media. Write anything and people will get on it like dogs. I don't know if this is true, but PG, and anyone else, deserves the benefit of the doubt.


It also goes to show you where the world is and how we so quickly believe human beings are capable of these things.


Let's not ignore that for thousands of years, humans have been proving themselves capable of near-unimaginable depravity, cruelty and selfish/destructive ambition with no regard for collateral damage.

To NOT believe such things of people would be foolish in the extreme. How you choose to approach possibility and individual personalities is another story, of course. We know fairly little about Paul George himself, or the woman in question. It is of course possible that the child was an accident and the woman chose to keep it because she wanted a baby... and in that case, that's entirely her decision because it's her body... and since PG is the father, he's got to handle the consequences of his own actions.

It can indeed be that simple.

It may not be, but it is no less fathomable than the alternative being discussed. v

Return to The General Board