Induveca wrote:AWIZZINGBULLET wrote:Would like to hear from Induveca after tonight's showing...
Speaks like such an authority on Porter.
Changes nothing. Chris Singleton has made a few threes in multiple games.
Porter is on pace to play the least minutes of a number 3 pick in the history of the NBA......until that changes he's beyond a disappointment.
Keep it up over the next 2 months, I'll happily admit I was wrong. Until then, two shots are two shots.
Want to make it clear,.obviously I hope he pulls a Beal from last year and suddenly the switch flips. Would make us a much better team. I'm just not hopeful.
I think you're focusing way too much on minutes and where Otto Porter ranks with other players selected where he was, simply because you believe the selection was a bad one. It's almost as if you're intentionally pretending to lack knowledge of his injury situation, the depth chart, and how Randy Wittman operates just to give life to your bleak outlook on Porter.
Barring injury or a complete falling off of a player, Wittman isn't going to incorporate anyone into the rotation who doesn't offer something substantially greater than those already in rotation. Porter had two important, quality players, ahead of him.
Porter being thrust into the lineup on the merit of being picked third overall in the draft on a team filled with so many respectable veteran names battling for continuity, respectability, and a playoff spot wasn't going to just happen. That's what we wanted to happen... but that's not how Wittman moves. You know that.
Porter's lack of minutes aren't due to lack of skill, it perhaps is due to not being fully up to speed with the other guys and having two guys ahead of him on the depth chart (something Beal and Wall didn't have to worry about as top five selections).
I understand you don't like Porter's selection, but I think you're intentionally disregarding the circumstances that have limited Porter's services.
*Porter has a much more fluid and natural shot than Singleton. Day and night difference.