Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
blueberrysticky
Analyst
Posts: 3,499
And1: 525
Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Location: MVP+Attitude= Vengeance 07-08

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#101 » by blueberrysticky » Fri Mar 7, 2014 3:24 am

Mavs were not a treadmill team in the 2000s; anything but. 67 wins, making conference finals a decent amount of time and appearing in the NBA finals twice winning one is anything but treadmill. They would win 55+ games pretty much EVERY year.

The current mavs with aging nowitzki though....
User avatar
FreeChef
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,578
And1: 806
Joined: Feb 10, 2013

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#102 » by FreeChef » Fri Mar 7, 2014 4:07 am

Rerisen wrote:If Rose is healthy the Bulls are contenders, so no.

To me a 'treadmill team' is by definition a team with no hope of better future prospects, but also too good to get a top pick short of tanking or blowing up there team.

It's not simply a team that in any one single season is short of a title contender but not in the lottery. They have to actually be stuck in place, with few options for up or down movement.

That's not the Bulls. They have a lot of avenues to take the next step. Not just Rose coming back though that is the most obvious one. But cap space to go after a guy like Melo. A potential overseas star waiting to come over in Mirotic. Or simply a lot of draft pick assets they could combine with on hand team to make a trade.

A treadmill team is predictable what they will do the next season. The Bulls are about the total opposite of that, one of the biggest unknowns in the league going forward, mostly based on the uncertainty of Rose.


The thinking here is somewhat fuzzy to me. You define a treadmill team as devoid of hope, devoid of options to get better or worse but then you somewhat sidestep and jig around that definition when it comes to Bulls. The Bulls, according to you, don't fit this definition because their future is uncertain--huh, did I read that correctly?

You see uncertainty, and I see instability, tumult, fragility and whatever word you want to use to describe Thibs's relationship with the front office and the structural integrity of Derrick Rose's knees.

There's plenty of risk for this little Bulls thing to fall apart. There are many, many points of potential failure: What if you guys strike out in free agency? What if this international prospect doesn't pan out? What if you guys don't come up with anything good in the draft? What if those draft picks don't develop fast enough? What if Jimmy Butler never emerges? I don't even need to get into doubts about Rose after his flaming burnout of #thereturn.

So the fact that Bulls fans hopes rest on a risky long-term investment in Rose and an unlikely sequence of contingencies is supposed to disqualify them from the "treadmill" label?

Looking at the available evidence, the trends point to you guys not contending in the near future. And your coach is too stubborn to tank. Textbook treadmill. But let me qualify that by saying the Bulls are an honorable treadmill team in the vein of Sloan's later Jazz teams and Karl's Nuggets.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#103 » by hands11 » Fri Mar 7, 2014 4:38 am

IbankingBoiler wrote:Just because the Bulls don't feel like tanking and actually like to play hard doesn't mean they are a treadmill team. They are an injured and depleted team. another solid scorer and an 80% rose would push them to the 2nd best team in the east with a "chance" of testing the heat. They lost rose, traded deng and still nearly 3rd seed(granted east is bad) Treadmil is perennial 5-8th seeds with multiple 1st round exits.


I think they stand more to gain by defying the odds then giving up.

They have talent. They have a good real good coach. They have players that don't give up.

There is so much value in that. When you are that kind of team, you can attract talent. You can draft mid round picks and develop them quicker. I would rather be a franchise that has though assets then a tank reboot team. Specially when I have a historical winning name like the Bulls do. There is still a winning MJ legacy there.
Buckeye-NBAFan
General Manager
Posts: 8,144
And1: 4,844
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#104 » by Buckeye-NBAFan » Fri Mar 7, 2014 4:49 am

The Mavericks are the ultimate treadmill team. 10 straight playoff appearances, including 1st round exists 3 of the last 4 years, and they have no hope of winning a title. Not with the Lakers still at the top and the Thunder about to pass up the Mavs with the core of Durant, Harden, Westbrook, Ibaka. And even if they made another Finals run, LeBron teamed up with Wade and Bosh would sweep them.
mw2889
Freshman
Posts: 69
And1: 5
Joined: Sep 10, 2010

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#105 » by mw2889 » Fri Mar 7, 2014 6:14 am

nevermind
DieYoung
Junior
Posts: 480
And1: 563
Joined: Feb 07, 2013

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#106 » by DieYoung » Fri Mar 7, 2014 7:17 am

Yes, if they continue to try to build around a gimpy, overrated Rose. They should be tanking this year like the Lakers.
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 16,553
And1: 7,560
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#107 » by DowJones » Fri Mar 7, 2014 1:37 pm

CousinOfDeath wrote:Is being a top 3 team in the league with Rose healthy the equivalent of being on a treadmill?


1. You aren't a Top-3 team with a healthy Rose. You are a regular season team that will always struggle in the playoffs.

2. Rose will never be what he once was. He may be really good, but he won't be in that MVP form ever again and there is a very real chance that he will never be a true All-Star ever again.

Chicago is the very definition of a treadmill team. That is why they REALLY need Carmleo. I don't think Carmelo makes them title favorites, and I don't think he would make a HUGE difference, but at least the chance is there for it to all come together.
Buckeye-NBAFan
General Manager
Posts: 8,144
And1: 4,844
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#108 » by Buckeye-NBAFan » Fri Mar 7, 2014 1:53 pm

DowJones wrote:Chicago is the very definition of a treadmill team. That is why they REALLY need Carmleo. I don't think Carmelo makes them title favorites, and I don't think he would make a HUGE difference, but at least the chance is there for it to all come together.


Agreed. Any relatively young team (Noah just turned 29, Butler 24, Gibson 28, Rose 25) positioning itself for a run at a max free agent is the very definition of treadmill team. I mean they should have predicted Rose's injury, predicting the future is easier than people realize.
User avatar
Damon_3388
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,953
And1: 1,056
Joined: Jul 09, 2010
Location: Australia

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#109 » by Damon_3388 » Fri Mar 7, 2014 2:01 pm

nomorezorro wrote:1/3rd of your examples of a 'treadmill team' literally won the nba championship


And one of the others made back-to-back finals series as well.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever.
Kingshadaine
Junior
Posts: 259
And1: 224
Joined: Jun 25, 2013

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#110 » by Kingshadaine » Fri Mar 7, 2014 2:37 pm

CousinOfDeath wrote:
BKing10 wrote:
CousinOfDeath wrote:
They're better than everyone except the Heat and OKC.


lol Rose has played what? 14 games in 2 years, but yet you know exactly how good they are with him?


I don't know exactly but it's not like it's hard to be better than every team other than the Heat and OKC with a top 2 defense and a top 5 player.


Rose isn't a top 5 player, not even the best point guard, stop the nonsense
Keller61
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 5,041
Joined: Feb 12, 2013

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#111 » by Keller61 » Fri Mar 7, 2014 3:47 pm

DowJones wrote:
CousinOfDeath wrote:Is being a top 3 team in the league with Rose healthy the equivalent of being on a treadmill?


1. You aren't a Top-3 team with a healthy Rose. You are a regular season team that will always struggle in the playoffs.

2. Rose will never be what he once was. He may be really good, but he won't be in that MVP form ever again and there is a very real chance that he will never be a true All-Star ever again.

Chicago is the very definition of a treadmill team. That is why they REALLY need Carmleo. I don't think Carmelo makes them title favorites, and I don't think he would make a HUGE difference, but at least the chance is there for it to all come together.


1. Based on what? The last time Rose was healthy in the playoffs, they got to the ECF in their first year together under a rookie head coach.

2. You don't know that. There is no definite reason why Rose can't get back to his previous level and beyond.
User avatar
Damon_3388
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,953
And1: 1,056
Joined: Jul 09, 2010
Location: Australia

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#112 » by Damon_3388 » Fri Mar 7, 2014 4:17 pm

Slava wrote:I wish this "all or nothing" philosophy peddled by the quants could be driven out of sports and especially the NBA. Watching the Bulls compete season after season against all odds is one of the best things about today's league and I'd rather be them than 76ers no matter how much success their shameful plunge may or might not yield.


Great post.

Makes even more sense when you consider this from a Philly perspective - They made the second round of the playoffs less than two years ago, and were then too cheap to re-sign the veterans (Andre Iguodala, Lou Williams, Elton Brand) that played a crucial role in you getting there (and being one of the best defenses in the league) and ease the transition towards the younger generation, then acted surprised when it inevitably caused them to fall away last year, then decided to totally blow the team up. There's no reason why with a bit of patience, nurturing and chemistry (keeping the core of the team together), they couldn't have ended up being the 3rd best team in the East this year, with the capability of putting a scare into the "big boys" (Miami and Indiana) in the right circumstances.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever.
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,488
And1: 4,668
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#113 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Fri Mar 7, 2014 4:26 pm

Pure_Basketball wrote:
CousinOfDeath wrote:
Pure_Basketball wrote:Question is invalid because with Rose, Bulls still aren't a top 3 team in the league.


They're better than everyone except the Heat and OKC.

San Antonio and Indiana Pacers I believe are better. Bulls have no body who can create a shot for others besides Derrick.


Last time i checked the Bulls have a center that gets triple-doubles. Looks like creating for others when you can that from your center. I repeat from your center. I repeat again from your center.
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
aol4532
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,291
And1: 158
Joined: Mar 31, 2012

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#114 » by aol4532 » Fri Mar 7, 2014 5:01 pm

Rose will be fine. By all accounts, he didn't lose any athleticism after the ACL injury, then looking at Westbrook's return, there's a chance that he could come back even better.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,147
And1: 13,039
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#115 » by dice » Fri Mar 7, 2014 5:08 pm

Buckeye-NBAFan wrote:
DowJones wrote:Chicago is the very definition of a treadmill team. That is why they REALLY need Carmleo. I don't think Carmelo makes them title favorites, and I don't think he would make a HUGE difference, but at least the chance is there for it to all come together.


Agreed. Any relatively young team (Noah just turned 29, Butler 24, Gibson 28, Rose 25) positioning itself for a run at a max free agent is the very definition of treadmill team. I mean they should have predicted Rose's injury, predicting the future is easier than people realize.

:lol:

the rest of your post was only slightly less ridiculous
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
User avatar
CousinOfDeath
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,066
And1: 1,260
Joined: Jul 02, 2006

Re: Chicago Bulls = The Leagues Newest Treadmill Team? 

Post#116 » by CousinOfDeath » Fri Mar 7, 2014 5:10 pm

DowJones wrote:
CousinOfDeath wrote:Is being a top 3 team in the league with Rose healthy the equivalent of being on a treadmill?


1. You aren't a Top-3 team with a healthy Rose. You are a regular season team that will always struggle in the playoffs.

2. Rose will never be what he once was. He may be really good, but he won't be in that MVP form ever again and there is a very real chance that he will never be a true All-Star ever again.


Are these facts?

Struggling against the Heat =/= struggling in the playoffs.
suckfish wrote:Reminder: NBA players are stupid.

Return to The General Board