closg00 wrote:In the last 15 years, the Wizards have gone through the most number of coaches in this period: 10. With the lowest regular season winning percentage at 38.3 percent, the Wizards have also not won more than 45 games in a season since 1979.
http://wallstcheatsheet.com/sports/the- ... ry.html/3/Just to balance-out the Hands love-in on the other thread.
And on que, the 15 year time frame evaluation.
Balance out ?
Right. We don't have enough posters posting stuff about how the Wizards suck, have sucked and will continue to do so. I do wonder why these people claim to be Wizards fans. Seem like trolls to me. Probably TOR and Cleveland Trolls is my guess.
First off, I would argue the longer time period evaluations are much less relevant then shorter term ones. Starting with Wall and a new owner would be much more relevant. After cleaning up Gils worst in a decade contract even more so. And considering they started a rebuild cycle with Wall, looking at Wall year 3 and forward is even more relevant. If I was to evaluate the Sixers rebuild, I would look at two years from MCW first year in a rebuild ( his 3rd year) much more then the first year. Of course their record will stink this year and it will next year as well. Its the year after that when the window begins. Well for the Wizards that would be Walls 3rd year which was last year and forward.
Clearly the team is not the worst over that time period. Clearly Wall has turned the corner and is now projected to be a top 5 PG over the following years as he comes into his prime. And clearly they would be a lot better with a legit quality HC vs an NBA assistant as HC. A legit HC is something they can add this off season since they don't have a HC signed to a contract after this season. Thats the next big move this team needs to make for the future. Not another mid level draft pick. What they need is the right HC to lead the group of talent they assemble, attract the best of the FA class and get the most from the roster. Getting that right is going to be HUGE. EG or not, the right HC would be a huge move.
As for your link, I do find it funny the cut off date used. They picked the low year of 18 wins in a strike year. Not the 39, 44, 42 win years that proceeded that. Adding those years would have allowed them to list two more coaches, bring the total to 12 coaches. You would think they would favored listing 12 coaches over 10 but I bet they didn't because those wins would have mess up their statement about them having the lowest number of regular reason wins. 10 coaches was enough I guess.
But for the record, the other 4 teams she listed as the worst in recent history ( 15 years window for the Wizards was recent ), she listed.
TOR, MEM, GS, and the LAC
You want to see a horrible franchise. LAC from 1993 to 2008. 15 years of suck and 7 head coaches. Is that more relevant to a Clippers fan then what they have done the last 3 years. I doubt it.