hands11 wrote:pineappleheadindc wrote:Brenice wrote:The Bulls didn't get exposed. They are who we thought they were. The Wizards got nation wide exposure. The NBA world is finding out who the Wizards are.
And here is a newsflash for the world, though not champions this year, the Wizards play well and hold their own against Western Conference teams too.
I wonder what all those ESPN analysts are thinking about their predictions.
Good post.
I think many of those "analysts" who picked the Bulls were just engaged in lazy groupthink. To be honest:
1) The Wizards didn't play on TV a lot, so unless you're in the local area, you don't get to see them much.
2) The Bulls are a "brand".
3) The Wiz record sports some really nice wins this season, but is also really distorted by losses against lesser teams or in games which we held double-digit leads then just let the wheels fall off and lost.
I imagine that many of those "analysts" merely looked at the W-L record, thought "oh, the Wizards against the Bulls" as a measurement of brand, and annointed the Bulls as the winners.
Losing Rose and Deng in the same season is a blow that most teams would struggle with. It's just a testament to the Bulls style and culture that they so far have been able to withstand it. But, Bulls fans vehemently disagree with this but it's true -- the Wizards are more talented (in part because of the Bulls losing two key pieces). The "x" factor will be the Wizards' ability to maintain focus and make on-the-fly adjustments throughout the series.
Its easy to get catch up in group think. It happen here as well.
Using *DATA* -- actual statistics, facts, numbers, and analytics is the remedy to groupthink.
This board, for the most part, consists of members who use such data in order to inform their personal opinion.