2013

Moderators: kdawg32086, magik9113

Mr Grant Hill
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,907
And1: 102
Joined: Jun 25, 2011
 

Re: AW: 2013 

Post#2041 » by Mr Grant Hill » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:02 pm

Little Nathan wrote:
Mr Grant Hill wrote:
Little Nathan wrote:More possession, more corners, more shots (if they are not really dangerous) - that doesn't mean anything.

Real had better chances and could have scored more.

bayern had enough chances to score. what exactly are you trying to tell me?
that real "we had 25% possession and 3 chances" madrid were the better team?
you're going to give madrid props for this crap.
lol, can't bevlieve it.
as i said, this is 2012 chelsea all over.
i'm not gonna acknowledge this as some kind of "good football".


You overrate possession.

and you don't understand the conception of possession and what it says about the teams on the pitch.
bayern playing away against a team with 25% possession and getting 3 chances on the counter - is this augsburg?

the only team that was active tonight, that did something for the game, that actually tried to do something WITH the ball - that was bayern munich.

you can acknowledge that madrid were smart tonight. but please don't call it "good" or "deserved" or "lucky for bayern". because that's how you destroy the image of global football.
Wake up, girl. I wanna go surfing.
User avatar
Man of Steel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,610
And1: 548
Joined: Jun 03, 2010
Location: Toronto
       

Re: AW: 2013 

Post#2042 » by Man of Steel » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:04 pm

Mr Grant Hill wrote:you wanna tell me that bayern's chances weren't as good as madrid's 3 chances?
that this was a logical win for madrid?
come on, guys, you're better than that.

a passive, counter-attacking team has 3 chances on the counter and you're telling me that this was a deserved win?
biased, sorry.

this was a poor, lucky win by a counter-attacking team. i've seen enough of that in the bundesliga. i don't expect to see it in a CL-semifinal against madrid. at the bernabeu.


You're coming off a little homerish. I think everyone who saw this game can agree Bayern's best shot on goal was a Gotze shot from slightly to the left of a defender, that Casillas saved. Real Madrid's chances on the other hand were three 1v1s where Bayern Munich's defenders left a man wide open. If you think Bayern's chances were better than a 1v1 with a world class goalie, I invite you to reconsider. And keep in mind, Casillas is also a world class keeper. This is the same way we played with Mourinho and no one was complaining then (except maybe Barcelona). The philosophy of this midfield is simple- one well placed through-ball or long-ball is exponentially better for a quick winger like Bale or Cristiano compared with a hundred passes in front of the box that only get to players who are well covered.
HALA MADRID || GO LEAFS GO || LET'S GO RAPTORS
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,088
And1: 3,620
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: AW: 2013 

Post#2043 » by Foye » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:06 pm

Mr Grant Hill wrote:
MaliBrah wrote:nothing bayern did was threatened madrid except the gotze chance and the muller half chance. If you didn't threaten the opponent no way you dominated the match. The game could have been ugly on the counter if bale was fit to start and ronaldo was anywhere near 100%

and majority of bayern's possession was useless.

you wanna tell me that bayern's chances weren't as good as madrid's 3 chances?


The only chance I remember was the one from Götze. There was really no other chance for Bayern to score in 90 minutes. One shot from Kroos but it was deflected before Casillas even had to jump. Other than that nothing. Just nothing.
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,456
And1: 6,814
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany

Re: AW: 2013 

Post#2044 » by Andi Obst » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:07 pm

Mr Grant Hill wrote:
Little Nathan wrote:
Mr Grant Hill wrote:bayern had enough chances to score. what exactly are you trying to tell me?
that real "we had 25% possession and 3 chances" madrid were the better team?
you're going to give madrid props for this crap.
lol, can't bevlieve it.
as i said, this is 2012 chelsea all over.
i'm not gonna acknowledge this as some kind of "good football".


You overrate possession.

and you don't understand the conception of possession and what it says about the teams on the pitch.
bayern playing away against a team with 25% possession and getting 3 chances on the counter - is this augsburg?

the only team that was active tonight, that did something for the game, that actually tried to do something WITH the ball - that was bayern munich.

you can acknowledge that madrid were smart tonight. but please don't call it "good" or "deserved" or "lucky for bayern". because that's how you destroy the image of global football.


Yeah okay, let's just say we completely disagree here.

Have to go to bed, Rockets vs. Blazers starts in 4 hours :lol:
Mr Grant Hill
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,907
And1: 102
Joined: Jun 25, 2011
 

Re: AW: 2013 

Post#2045 » by Mr Grant Hill » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:10 pm

Man of Steel wrote:You're coming off a little homerish. I think everyone who saw this game can agree Bayern's best shot on goal was a Gotze shot from slightly to the left of a defender, that Casillas saved. Real Madrid's chances on the other hand were three 1v1s where Bayern Munich's defenders left a man wide open. If you think Bayern's chances were better than a 1v1 with a world class goalie, I invite you to reconsider. And keep in mind, Casillas is also a world class keeper.

as i said:
if you think that this was a logical 1-0.
that bayern didn't have enough chances to score, to make it a remis.
if you think that this kind of football deserves to win.
if you think that this is what a CL final football team should stand for.
-- then i don't expect you to be a real football fan.

ballon d'or winner cristiano ronaldo... 16 touches. 16 freaking touches.
ancelotti turned this site into an italian site from the 60s.
no way in hell this crap should be rewarded.

and i'm glad, really glad that bayern won't allow this crap to be rewarded.
3-1.
Wake up, girl. I wanna go surfing.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,992
And1: 4,488
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: 2013 

Post#2046 » by BUCKnation » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:12 pm

That reminded me of a Tottenham game. All the possession in the world for Bayern, but never really looked threatening.
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

Re: 2013 

Post#2047 » by Point forward » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:16 pm

BUCKnation wrote:That reminded me of a Tottenham game. All the possession in the world for Bayern, but never really looked threatening.

Which is puzzling. Until March, a Bayern squad with 66% ball possession would score at least 3 or 4 goals - at half time. I don't remember a Bayern match where their first chance was in the... 84th minute? They are so out of sync that it is not even funny. :crazy:

In basketball terms, Bayern Munich = Indiana Pacers. :nonono:
Jogi Löw to Mario Götze wrote:Show the world that you are better than Messi.
User avatar
MaliBrah
RealGM
Posts: 20,096
And1: 4,608
Joined: Feb 03, 2011
     

Re: AW: 2013 

Post#2048 » by MaliBrah » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:18 pm

Mr Grant Hill wrote:and i'm glad, really glad that bayern won't allow this crap to be rewarded.
3-1.

that arrogance.

don't count your chickens before they hatched. :wink:
User avatar
EArl
RealGM
Posts: 49,977
And1: 13,479
Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Columbus
   

Re: 2013 

Post#2049 » by EArl » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:26 pm

Hala Madrid. Im glad they won the game. Lets see how Bayern responds.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
User avatar
Man of Steel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,610
And1: 548
Joined: Jun 03, 2010
Location: Toronto
       

Re: 2013 

Post#2050 » by Man of Steel » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:46 pm

Mr Grant Hill wrote:as i said:
if you think that this was a logical 1-0.
that bayern didn't have enough chances to score, to make it a remis.
if you think that this kind of football deserves to win.
if you think that this is what a CL final football team should stand for.
-- then i don't expect you to be a real football fan.

ballon d'or winner cristiano ronaldo... 16 touches. 16 freaking touches.
ancelotti turned this site into an italian site from the 60s.
no way in hell this crap should be rewarded.

and i'm glad, really glad that bayern won't allow this crap to be rewarded.
3-1.


I don't think any particular brand of football "deserves to win" over any other brand. I think if you create more chances then you feel a little cheated if you don't win, but I don't think Bayern created more clear-cut chances today. Bayern dealt with a very similar tactic in the CL final two years ago- one would expect them to figure out a way to fix it. If you score more goals, you win a football game. That's how football's been since the beginning. You can have all the possession in the world but if you don't make good chances, you don't win football games.

The number of touches you cited for Cristiano makes me laugh. Ronaldo isn't a player that needs hundreds of touches to influence a game. As far as I'm concerned just one of those 16 touches was the most important in today's match. He carved up the Bayern right side with a key pass that allowed Coentrao to assist Benzema, and that's where he showed his Ballon D'Or quality. If you have a problem with the fact that our strikers are ridiculously fast and we use that to our advantage, tough grapes. We don't shoot ourselves in the foot by not playing to Cristiano's strengths... Maybe Bayern shouldn't have played right into our hands by trying to use tiki-taka.

If you're criticizing Ancelotti for turning back the clock to an old tactic, you should have just as much criticism for Pep reusing tactics he had with Barcelona, which admittedly worked fantastically for years, but eventually got figured out and quite visibly exposed 2-3 years ago. It looked pretty clear that Bayern weren't going to counter at all, so they must have expected more mistakes from our CB pairing. All three of Ramos, Pepe, and Varane- Hell even Xabi who looked like a 3rd CB at times- were fantastic positionally. Sorry to disappoint, I guess.

I won't make any predictions about the next game, but I'm very happy to see Real Madrid secure an important clean sheet and win in the home leg. I expect next week's game will be equally exciting, if not moreso.
HALA MADRID || GO LEAFS GO || LET'S GO RAPTORS
DD12
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,228
And1: 953
Joined: Dec 11, 2013

Re: 2013 

Post#2051 » by DD12 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:01 pm

Good job Real. The counters with di maria, healthy ronaldo and bale will be crazy.

Btw, possession is the most overrated stat in football. You can have all you want but in the end who wins is the most important thing. It was, again, disgusting short passes by Guardiola's team.

Also, i have to mention that last year's Bayern would Destroy today's Bayern with counters.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,092
And1: 14,458
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: 2013 

Post#2052 » by cgf » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:30 am

treiz wrote:
Next Coming wrote:
Can see both arguments really. It's a game at the end of the day. Id rather my team always play fun than ten men behind the ball nonsense.

You spend that type of money there should be a responsibility to play in an attractive type of way.


Not really, spending that type of money should have a bigger responsibility when it comes to success as opposed to entertainment. Mancini's first full season with City emphasises this, his team was highly entertaining, they only beat us for second on goal difference and yet he was criticised for not bringing home the PL with the money they spent.

At the end of the day, the fans of any team will be much more entertained and overall happier if they got the result they wanted, and that's what matters most since they're the ones paying for the tickets.


This may just be cause I'm an union fan, but no. I can live with them losing if they played with their hearts, battling for everything they could get and continuing to try and create. That's why I'm just a little bummed by our late season collapse and the potential playoff spot it's cost us. The team is still battling, trying and doing their best to play attractively while scoring.

treiz wrote:
cgf wrote:While winning ugly is better than losing pretty, see West Germany - The Netherlands, winning pretty is best of all, so those very same Germans in the 70s, when they even out total football'd the Dutch. Dortmund have won pretty, arsenal of yore won pretty, Bayern last year won pretty. Chelsea have the guns to win pretty against all but the truly top of the top, and yet Mou has them bunkering against peers and even lesser sides.

That I do dislike. It's why I don't have the same disdain for Italy 2006 or us in 2002. If you're maximizing your limited talent that's one thing, but that's not what we saw.


It is the best for all, but realistically achieving that is very difficult in any sport, yes teams have achieved it but that's 3 teams in the last decade or so. That's not a great sample size, I don't consider Barcelona to be winning pretty btw.

I think Mourinho learned from his lesson with Madrid when facing Atletico, he might've overestimated them but considering we were without Hazard/Eto'o (it's usually the case we look lost without them) then I can understand why he did what he did. He wanted to take it back to the Bridge and decide it there. We didn't have to push Atletico, they were at home they should've pushed us more, our defence was just better than their attack and hardly caused any problems. The same thing happened at the Arsenal game at the Emirates. In reality, we didn't need to force the issue, they did and there was no point in taking risks when there's another leg in 2 weeks.


Well I didn't include Barca in my list cause I too found them rather tedious to watch. But those aren't the only teams to win pretty, I just stopped the list at three because three is the holy number for listing things. Citeh played attractive football when they won the EPL, Juve in recent years have been playing attractive football as they win the serie a. PSG and Monaco have both strived to play attractive football in a very physical and conservative league while running away with the title chase. Real of the Galactico's who last won were a very attractive side, even if I disliked them. Hell most times when a top team wins they do so playing plenty of attractive football. It's when a top team mourinho their way to a title that things are abnormal.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
User avatar
Baphomet
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,227
And1: 6,242
Joined: Dec 03, 2008
Location: UK
   

Re: AW: 2013 

Post#2053 » by Baphomet » Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:02 am

Tiki-taka possession football is just as tedious to watch as seeing everyone behind the ball. It could be argued that it's equally as detrimental to the image of 'global football' as its opposite foil; parking the bus. I would sooner watch Stoke and West Ham play rugby like a bunch of pissed up gazelles than one of Guardiola's sides pass teams to death whilst we all sit bored to tears just telling ourselves that this is how football is 'supposed' to be played.

Arsene Wenger was right on the money when he called it sterile.
No_20
Veteran
Posts: 2,562
And1: 320
Joined: Feb 06, 2013

Re: 2013 

Post#2054 » by No_20 » Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:28 am

Ribery is NOT a top 10 player.
Dirk Nowitzki, Steve Nash, Kevin Garnett, Toni Kroos, Pep Guardiola, Ernst Happel, Joachim Löw.
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,088
And1: 3,620
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: 2013 

Post#2055 » by Foye » Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:31 am

No_20 wrote:Ribery is NOT a top 10 player.


Hes out of form currently. On form easily.
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

Re: 2013 

Post#2056 » by treiz » Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:21 am

cgf wrote:
This may just be cause I'm an union fan, but no. I can live with them losing if they played with their hearts, battling for everything they could get and continuing to try and create. That's why I'm just a little bummed by our late season collapse and the potential playoff spot it's cost us. The team is still battling, trying and doing their best to play attractively while scoring.


I can agree with you on this, sometimes the effort alone can be pretty satisfying to watch. But more often than not showing that kind of effort and pouring your heart out (sort of like Chelsea's performance against Barcelona and Bayern Munich) isn't necessarily the most attractive from a neutral's stand point, other times like Chelsea against Atleti you can see that they were playing for the counter they just couldn't execute properly and every one of them was poor in that regard, unlike Real yesterday. Same gameplan, different executions. Which was what I was saying, sometimes you just have to please your supporters as they are the one paying for the ticket, and more often is the case they care more about results rather than being entertained.

cgf wrote:
Well I didn't include Barca in my list cause I too found them rather tedious to watch. But those aren't the only teams to win pretty, I just stopped the list at three because three is the holy number for listing things. Citeh played attractive football when they won the EPL, Juve in recent years have been playing attractive football as they win the serie a. PSG and Monaco have both strived to play attractive football in a very physical and conservative league while running away with the title chase. Real of the Galactico's who last won were a very attractive side, even if I disliked them. Hell most times when a top team wins they do so playing plenty of attractive football. It's when a top team mourinho their way to a title that things are abnormal.


Those are also true, but we do entertain when we play against other teams too mainly those teams who are lesser than us, in some cases against bigger teams (ala Arsenal, Citeh, United this season). Same could be said about every other team you listed, against smaller oppositions they will entertain but against bigger ones sometimes they change their philosophy to get a result especially in the CL and that's what Mourinho specialises in. Sometimes though, any team can be hit with a poor performance from 9 out of the 11 players which happens once in a while to any team, like Bayern yesterday. Nobody's gonna deny how 'entertaining' they were to start the campaign, but right now they've regressed a lot since winning the title and were quite frankly boring to watch, passing side to side without any purpose is not entertaining.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,092
And1: 14,458
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: 2013 

Post#2057 » by cgf » Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:56 am

treiz wrote:
cgf wrote:
This may just be cause I'm an union fan, but no. I can live with them losing if they played with their hearts, battling for everything they could get and continuing to try and create. That's why I'm just a little bummed by our late season collapse and the potential playoff spot it's cost us. The team is still battling, trying and doing their best to play attractively while scoring.


I can agree with you on this, sometimes the effort alone can be pretty satisfying to watch. But more often than not showing that kind of effort and pouring your heart out (sort of like Chelsea's performance against Barcelona and Bayern Munich) isn't necessarily the most attractive from a neutral's stand point, other times like Chelsea against Atleti you can see that they were playing for the counter they just couldn't execute properly and every one of them was poor in that regard, unlike Real yesterday. Same gameplan, different executions. Which was what I was saying, sometimes you just have to please your supporters as they are the one paying for the ticket, and more often is the case they care more about results rather than being entertained.


See you're falling into the typical english trap of conflating playing hard and with passion with playing defensively and parking the bus. Our boys are still pushing forward, aggressively building up and challenging teams with dangerous long balls into our streaking wingers or big striker to push them back when we can't build as smoothly as we like, but balls aren't going into the net, the d has been extra sloppy and the team has started playing a lot more of the kids since promotion is functionally impossible. Which would be frustrating if they weren't still pouring the blood, sweet and tears on the pitch to try to play attractive football, even when we play the big teams in the division who out gun us.

That's why the result is secondary to the performance. If the players play with courage, ingenuity, and honor they will get the respect and love of the now 20+ thousand who populate die Alte Forsterei, whether we secure the points or not.

Which isn't to say Chelsea didn't passionately park their bus in the matches you referenced ;), just something I see a lot of english commentators doing that is a clear misrepresentation of what playing with passion really means as they scramble to defend this performance as anything other than pure cynicism and cowardice.

treiz wrote:
cgf wrote:
Well I didn't include Barca in my list cause I too found them rather tedious to watch. But those aren't the only teams to win pretty, I just stopped the list at three because three is the holy number for listing things. Citeh played attractive football when they won the EPL, Juve in recent years have been playing attractive football as they win the serie a. PSG and Monaco have both strived to play attractive football in a very physical and conservative league while running away with the title chase. Real of the Galactico's who last won were a very attractive side, even if I disliked them. Hell most times when a top team wins they do so playing plenty of attractive football. It's when a top team mourinho their way to a title that things are abnormal.


Those are also true, but we do entertain when we play against other teams too mainly those teams who are lesser than us, in some cases against bigger teams (ala Arsenal, Citeh, United this season). Same could be said about every other team you listed, against smaller oppositions they will entertain but against bigger ones sometimes they change their philosophy to get a result especially in the CL and that's what Mourinho specialises in. Sometimes though, any team can be hit with a poor performance from 9 out of the 11 players which happens once in a while to any team, like Bayern yesterday. Nobody's gonna deny how 'entertaining' they were to start the campaign, but right now they've regressed a lot since winning the title and were quite frankly boring to watch, passing side to side without any purpose is not entertaining.


See if Chelsea only did this sort of thing when they were out matched like against Bayern or Real that'd be one thing. But that's not the only time Mou turns to his old underdog tricks. He uses it against peers a lot and against teams that Chelsea actually have more firepower than. That's the gripe, not that Chelsea have these games because, you're right only Klopp and Streich can get away with always pressing all over the pitch against any opponent. Other teams that are ruled by the laws of physics do have to go about things very carefully when out manned, but Chelsea doesn't only turn to the tactic when out manned.

I also think those games where Mourinho forgets to cast his voodoo spell make it all the more frustrating as a neutral because you can clearly do some really awesome things but Mourinho, who's a coach I respect a lot, who's responsible for one of the most exciting CL seasons I've watched behind Dortmund's two great runs, and who's:
Image
are some of my favorite things about the sport's off the pitch activities, holds you back from really establishing that kind of identity that would let you advantage of the fact that you could start Hazard, Schurrle, Willian, Oscar, Luiz and Matic in front of the back line. That could be one of the most fluid and dynamic front 6s in the sport with a team dedicated to the Kloppo/Striech/Tuchel way. But Mou, as much as I love so much about him, just isn't that guy tactically. He's a destroyer and not a creator although he's a great destroyer, who does an excelent job of not handcuffing his stars too much despite the anti-football tactics..


Bayern haven't been very entertaining since they functionally secured the BuLi, and have half-assed a good chunk of the CL as well. And honestly I had my gripes about Pep's over-emphasis on possession even when they were scoring 3-4 goals a game doing it. Cause again it's not just the result, it's the performance and watching Bayern slowly pass their way from side to side with super-careful passes is boring whether someone puts the final ball into the net or not.

I did always get a lot of amusement out of how Mourinho and Pep always disliked each other considering that they are two sides of the same anti-football coin and strategically very similar, simply using completely opposite tactics to achieve those strategic goals.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
User avatar
Maex
Senior
Posts: 682
And1: 180
Joined: Jun 22, 2012
 

Re: 2013 

Post#2058 » by Maex » Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 am

Bayern totally lost some kind of Plan B in the second half of the season. At the beginning of the season you could see occasional lob passes and half-long over the two defensive lines. This is totally gone.

I do think that Real is able to score one goal in Munich, which makes it close to impossible to advance for my Bayern.
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

Re: 2013 

Post#2059 » by treiz » Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:01 am

cgf wrote:See you're falling into the typical english trap of conflating playing hard and with passion with playing defensively and parking the bus. Our boys are still pushing forward, aggressively building up and challenging teams with dangerous long balls into our streaking wingers or big striker to push them back when we can't build as smoothly as we like, but balls aren't going into the net, the d has been extra sloppy and the team has started playing a lot more of the kids since promotion is functionally impossible. Which would be frustrating if they weren't still pouring the blood, sweet and tears on the pitch to try to play attractive football, even when we play the big teams in the division who out gun us.

That's why the result is secondary to the performance. If the players play with courage, ingenuity, and honor they will get the respect and love of the now 20+ thousand who populate die Alte Forsterei, whether we secure the points or not.

Which isn't to say Chelsea didn't passionately park their bus in the matches you referenced ;), just something I see a lot of english commentators doing that is a clear misrepresentation of what playing with passion really means as they scramble to defend this performance as anything other than pure cynicism and cowardice.


But playing with passion doesn't just come in the attacking sense, against Atleti Chelsea were barely troubled and I wouldn't count that as playing hard. Mourinho had a gameplan but the players just couldn't execute it. I am English so I guess I was born into that trap :lol:

Whereas the game against Bayern and Barcelona was backs to the walls stuff, players flinging their bodies to get something on the ball, they were organised, orders were shouted at every second of the game, everybody in that Chelsea was not only anxious but amped for it, blood, sweat and tears were poured during that CL run.

Just because they parked the bus and played defensively those games doesn't mean they didn't show any passion, it was clear from not only the scenes when Torres scored or when Drogba scored that the work they've put in to be able to keep themselves with a chance of winning, and achieve a high none of them have ever experienced. Everybody knew Bayern/Barca are the better team, and they knew they had to use that plan in order to stand a chance of winning that's why those players play for Barca/Bayern, they couldn't let Barca/Bayern play to their strengths otherwise it would've been a massacre.

Yes it's true respect does come with playing an attractive brand, and I do admire it like Arsenal against Bayern last year, but tell that to Wenger and the thousands of fans who asks for him to be sacked, or Scolari on his first few months here, Ancelotti, or even AVB. At the end of the day, at a club like Chelsea with an owner like Roman, results always come first and I think that's why we're going to differ in opinion. [/quote]

cgf wrote:
See if Chelsea only did this sort of thing when they were out matched like against Bayern or Real that'd be one thing. But that's not the only time Mou turns to his old underdog tricks. He uses it against peers a lot and against teams that Chelsea actually have more firepower than. That's the gripe, not that Chelsea have these games because, you're right only Klopp and Streich can get away with always pressing all over the pitch against any opponent. Other teams that are ruled by the laws of physics do have to go about things very carefully when out manned, but Chelsea doesn't only turn to the tactic when out manned.

I also think those games where Mourinho forgets to cast his voodoo spell make it all the more frustrating as a neutral because you can clearly do some really awesome things but Mourinho, who's a coach I respect a lot, who's responsible for one of the most exciting CL seasons I've watched behind Dortmund's two great runs, and who's:
Image
are some of my favorite things about the sport's off the pitch activities, holds you back from really establishing that kind of identity that would let you advantage of the fact that you could start Hazard, Schurrle, Willian, Oscar, Luiz and Matic in front of the back line. That could be one of the most fluid and dynamic front 6s in the sport with a team dedicated to the Kloppo/Striech/Tuchel way. But Mou, as much as I love so much about him, just isn't that guy tactically. He's a destroyer and not a creator although he's a great destroyer, who does an excelent job of not handcuffing his stars too much despite the anti-football tactics..


Bayern haven't been very entertaining since they functionally secured the BuLi, and have half-assed a good chunk of the CL as well. And honestly I had my gripes about Pep's over-emphasis on possession even when they were scoring 3-4 goals a game doing it. Cause again it's not just the result, it's the performance and watching Bayern slowly pass their way from side to side with super-careful passes is boring whether someone puts the final ball into the net or not.

I did always get a lot of amusement out of how Mourinho and Pep always disliked each other considering that they are two sides of the same anti-football coin and strategically very similar, simply using completely opposite tactics to achieve those strategic goals.


It's clearly fair to say that Atletico are a better version of us, mainly because they have Diego Costa. Atletico's strengths is on the counter attack so why let them play to their strengths? As we saw during their match-up against Barcelona. Let them have the ball, don't let them break away with speed, let us counter against them since it's one of our strengths too. If Bayern had played this Atletico team, I think they could've pulled it off.

That's Mourinho's blueprint for this team, is a fast counter attacking team, in more cases than not the game plan is there but the execution isn't which is what has been our major downfall this year along with not being able to play possession football properly, which is why I think Mourinho tends to opt for this tactic, just watch the West Ham/Palace/West Brom/Sunderland/Basle games as an example of how this team isn't built on possession.

I agree that front 6 could cause damage, maybe that's what's Mourinho is working towards this is in his own words a transitional season, especially considering Schurrle hasn't been that great this year, Oscar has fallen off a bit due to fatigue, Willian can't handle being the main playmaker as awesome as he is. Hopefully next year the system clicks. He is a great destroyer, I'll give you that, he did build a decent counter attacking/fluid Madrid side, maybe he can replicate the same success with these players too.

I agree, if Mourinho is anti-football then so is Pep, literally two sides of the same coin. I think they mainly disagreed because of their huge egos :lol:
No_20
Veteran
Posts: 2,562
And1: 320
Joined: Feb 06, 2013

Re: AW: 2013 

Post#2060 » by No_20 » Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:27 pm

Baphomet wrote:Tiki-taka possession football is just as tedious to watch as seeing everyone behind the ball. It could be argued that it's equally as detrimental to the image of 'global football' as its opposite foil; parking the bus. I would sooner watch Stoke and West Ham play rugby like a bunch of pissed up gazelles than one of Guardiola's sides pass teams to death whilst we all sit bored to tears just telling ourselves that this is how football is 'supposed' to be played.

Arsene Wenger was right on the money when he called it sterile.


Oh the irony :lol:

If there is any team who pass to death, it's Arsenal
Dirk Nowitzki, Steve Nash, Kevin Garnett, Toni Kroos, Pep Guardiola, Ernst Happel, Joachim Löw.

Return to The General Soccer Board