ImageImage

Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1461 » by mrknowitall215 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:05 am

BrotherDave wrote:I don't think we've reached the ceiling of Alfense yet, upgrading Hendo with a 3pt shooter would improve spacing and keep defenses from crowding Al so much. Our overall team success is pretty close to being maxed out though since there is only so much you can do to improve Al's P&R defense.


This almost read like you're a proponent of Al Jefferson. I'm surprised. However, I think 'Alfense' should be a second line of offense after pushing the tempo. This roster is built around players that can run & thrive in transition, and it's obvious that both Kemba & MKG took a hit production-wise from not being able to play to their strengths
Image
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,207
And1: 45,803
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1462 » by JDR720 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:05 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:I can't begin to comprehend the dislike for Al Jefferson that some of us have. I understand that Jefferson's defense can be frustrating, but during the second half of the season when he was healthy he did far more damage to the opposing team's defense than what was done to the Bobcat's defense by relentlessly attacking him via pick-and-roll. I think this may be the first time Jefferson has played with selfless teammates with good character around the board, and that may be the difference in his give-and-take production correlating to wins

Al Jefferson > Paul Millsap


I dont think anyone dislikes Al, they just dislike that we got him here at the wrong time to them and could've done better
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1463 » by BeesWax » Thu May 1, 2014 12:08 am

JDR720 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:I can't begin to comprehend the dislike for Al Jefferson that some of us have. I understand that Jefferson's defense can be frustrating, but during the second half of the season when he was healthy he did far more damage to the opposing team's defense than what was done to the Bobcat's defense by relentlessly attacking him via pick-and-roll. I think this may be the first time Jefferson has played with selfless teammates with good character around the board, and that may be the difference in his give-and-take production correlating to wins

Al Jefferson > Paul Millsap


I dont think anyone dislikes Al, they just dislike that we got him here at the wrong time to them and could've done better

Exactly. He did not fit the rebuild or the pieces we had. He could have been a great fit somewhere is a great offensive player just not right for this team with these players. At 28 to rebuild an entire team to fit this guy because by the time you get it set he won't be able to play at this level anymore.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1464 » by mrknowitall215 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:09 am

jdm3 wrote:Al is far better on offense but a liability on defense and Milsap can play both ways, hit the three and rebound.


Millsap is a average defender at best, and as you've stated not near the offensive talent as Jefferson. I think signing Millsap would've been a decent signing, but signing Jefferson was the better signing (outside of the fact that Biyombo got lost in the rotation)
Image
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1465 » by BeesWax » Thu May 1, 2014 12:12 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:
jdm3 wrote:Al is far better on offense but a liability on defense and Milsap can play both ways, hit the three and rebound.


Millsap is a average defender at best, and as you've stated not near the offensive talent as Jefferson. I think signing Millsap would've been a decent signing, but signing Jefferson was the better signing (outside of the fact that Biyombo got lost in the rotation)

Jefferson got 4 million more a year and Milsap can run (something Al can't so at all) and hit threes. He would have helped spread the floor and do what we needed. They are different and Milsap is better at the offense we needed to add. Being able to use the extra money to fill holes would have made us a better team too.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1466 » by mrknowitall215 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:12 am

JDR720 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:I can't begin to comprehend the dislike for Al Jefferson that some of us have. I understand that Jefferson's defense can be frustrating, but during the second half of the season when he was healthy he did far more damage to the opposing team's defense than what was done to the Bobcat's defense by relentlessly attacking him via pick-and-roll. I think this may be the first time Jefferson has played with selfless teammates with good character around the board, and that may be the difference in his give-and-take production correlating to wins

Al Jefferson > Paul Millsap


I dont think anyone dislikes Al, they just dislike that we got him here at the wrong time to them and could've done better


Dislike, discontent, disdain, or whatever you want to call it, it's obvious that some of us preferred another option, and I don't think there was a better signing on the free agency market than Jefferson. Signing Millsap would've left this team outside of the playoffs, a late lottery pick, and not much to look forward to in the future but hope like the previous years
Image
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1467 » by mrknowitall215 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:13 am

jdm3 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
jdm3 wrote:Al is far better on offense but a liability on defense and Milsap can play both ways, hit the three and rebound.


Millsap is a average defender at best, and as you've stated not near the offensive talent as Jefferson. I think signing Millsap would've been a decent signing, but signing Jefferson was the better signing (outside of the fact that Biyombo got lost in the rotation)

Jefferson got 4 million more a year and Milsap can run (something Al can't so at all) and hit threes. He would have helped spread the floor and do what we needed. They are different and Milsap is better at the offense we needed to add. Being able to use the extra money to fill holes would have made us a better team too.


What player would you have recommended with the extra $4 million?
Image
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1468 » by BeesWax » Thu May 1, 2014 12:14 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:
JDR720 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:I can't begin to comprehend the dislike for Al Jefferson that some of us have. I understand that Jefferson's defense can be frustrating, but during the second half of the season when he was healthy he did far more damage to the opposing team's defense than what was done to the Bobcat's defense by relentlessly attacking him via pick-and-roll. I think this may be the first time Jefferson has played with selfless teammates with good character around the board, and that may be the difference in his give-and-take production correlating to wins

Al Jefferson > Paul Millsap


I dont think anyone dislikes Al, they just dislike that we got him here at the wrong time to them and could've done better


Dislike, discontent, disdain, or whatever you want to call it, it's obvious that some of us preferred another option, and I don't think there was a better signing on the free agency market than Jefferson. Signing Millsap would've left this team outside of the playoffs, a late lottery pick, and not much to look forward to in the future but hope like the previous years

Milsap puts us in the playoffs because we get to add other pieces too and we have a brighter future because our offense is not completely dependent on one player because he can't play like the rest of the team.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,207
And1: 45,803
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1469 » by JDR720 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:17 am

jdm3 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
JDR720 wrote:
I dont think anyone dislikes Al, they just dislike that we got him here at the wrong time to them and could've done better


Dislike, discontent, disdain, or whatever you want to call it, it's obvious that some of us preferred another option, and I don't think there was a better signing on the free agency market than Jefferson. Signing Millsap would've left this team outside of the playoffs, a late lottery pick, and not much to look forward to in the future but hope like the previous years

Milsap puts us in the playoffs because we get to add other pieces too and we have a brighter future because our offense is not completely dependent on one player because he can't play like the rest of the team.

maybe true, Paul makes 4mill less than Al that can be a Gerald replacement and he can play quicker than Al
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1470 » by BeesWax » Thu May 1, 2014 12:17 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
Millsap is a average defender at best, and as you've stated not near the offensive talent as Jefferson. I think signing Millsap would've been a decent signing, but signing Jefferson was the better signing (outside of the fact that Biyombo got lost in the rotation)

Jefferson got 4 million more a year and Milsap can run (something Al can't so at all) and hit threes. He would have helped spread the floor and do what we needed. They are different and Milsap is better at the offense we needed to add. Being able to use the extra money to fill holes would have made us a better team too.


What player would you have recommended with the extra $4 million?

With what we had I would have gotten Hickson to supplement the middle and pair with Biz at C. Add to that Milsap and we have a better team than we ended up with. I would have rather had a trio of Milsap, Dunleavy and Hickson over Al and Hendo.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1471 » by mrknowitall215 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:19 am

jdm3 wrote:With what we had I would have gotten Hickson to supplement the middle and pair with Biz at C. Add to that Milsap and we have a better team than we ended up with. I would have rather had a trio of Milsap, Dunleavy and Hickson over Al and Hendo.


That team would've been sub .500 like the 2013-14 Cleveland Cavaliers
Image
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,207
And1: 45,803
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1472 » by JDR720 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:20 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:
jdm3 wrote:With what we had I would have gotten Hickson to supplement the middle and pair with Biz at C. Add to that Milsap and we have a better team than we ended up with. I would have rather had a trio of Milsap, Dunleavy and Hickson over Al and Hendo.


That team would've been sub .500 like the 2013-14 Cleveland Cavaliers

not in the East....and that might have been a playoff team anyway like ATL
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1473 » by BeesWax » Thu May 1, 2014 12:22 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:
jdm3 wrote:With what we had I would have gotten Hickson to supplement the middle and pair with Biz at C. Add to that Milsap and we have a better team than we ended up with. I would have rather had a trio of Milsap, Dunleavy and Hickson over Al and Hendo.


That team would've been sub .500 like the 2013-14 Cleveland Cavaliers

Whatever. It would be better and more promising then this stagnant team. Unless we play Al less and expand the offense we are in for first round exits or no play offs for the rest of his time here.

I would take my team over yours any day.

Kemba Kemba
Dunleavy Hendo
MKG MKG
Milsap McRoberts
Hickson Al

I still have McBob on the bench to facilitate with the second unit and spent less on my three than you did on your two.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1474 » by mrknowitall215 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:24 am

If Charlotte doesn't go on that post All-Star break tear with Jefferson and the 'spacing' group, this current team probably doesn't even finish above .500
Image
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,771
And1: 16,751
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1475 » by Liver_Pooty » Thu May 1, 2014 12:49 am

Biyombo gets praised on here like hes the next Ben Wallace while people keep trying to think of reasons to put down Jefferson.
Image
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,545
And1: 14,265
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1476 » by HornetJail » Thu May 1, 2014 1:51 am

jdm3 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
jdm3 wrote:Jefferson got 4 million more a year and Milsap can run (something Al can't so at all) and hit threes. He would have helped spread the floor and do what we needed. They are different and Milsap is better at the offense we needed to add. Being able to use the extra money to fill holes would have made us a better team too.


What player would you have recommended with the extra $4 million?

With what we had I would have gotten Hickson to supplement the middle and pair with Biz at C. Add to that Milsap and we have a better team than we ended up with. I would have rather had a trio of Milsap, Dunleavy and Hickson over Al and Hendo.

Hickson/Millsap/MKG/Dunleavy/Kemba may not even beat the dysfunctional Pistons this season. That lineup makes no sense given how terrible Hickson is. We'd probably have the 8th pick this year, with Detroit giving us the 9th pick. We probably win 30 games at best. Undersized, no go-to guy except Kemba, worse defense (Hickson is a REALLY bad defensive player and dumb as a rock)... that would've been a horrible, horrible team. Al added a good 10-15 wins to this team this year if you ask me.
investigate Adam Silver
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1477 » by BeesWax » Thu May 1, 2014 1:57 am

Biz Gilwalker wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
What player would you have recommended with the extra $4 million?

With what we had I would have gotten Hickson to supplement the middle and pair with Biz at C. Add to that Milsap and we have a better team than we ended up with. I would have rather had a trio of Milsap, Dunleavy and Hickson over Al and Hendo.

Hickson/Millsap/MKG/Dunleavy/Kemba may not even beat the dysfunctional Pistons this season. That lineup makes no sense given how terrible Hickson is. We'd probably have the 8th pick this year, with Detroit giving us the 9th pick. We probably win 30 games at best. Undersized, no go-to guy except Kemba, worse defense (Hickson is a REALLY bad defensive player and dumb as a rock)... that would've been a horrible, horrible team. Al added a good 10-15 wins to this team this year if you ask me.

Funny how it is better then our current team and yet somehow only wins 30 games.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,545
And1: 14,265
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1478 » by HornetJail » Thu May 1, 2014 2:00 am

jdm3 wrote:
Biz Gilwalker wrote:
jdm3 wrote:With what we had I would have gotten Hickson to supplement the middle and pair with Biz at C. Add to that Milsap and we have a better team than we ended up with. I would have rather had a trio of Milsap, Dunleavy and Hickson over Al and Hendo.

Hickson/Millsap/MKG/Dunleavy/Kemba may not even beat the dysfunctional Pistons this season. That lineup makes no sense given how terrible Hickson is. We'd probably have the 8th pick this year, with Detroit giving us the 9th pick. We probably win 30 games at best. Undersized, no go-to guy except Kemba, worse defense (Hickson is a REALLY bad defensive player and dumb as a rock)... that would've been a horrible, horrible team. Al added a good 10-15 wins to this team this year if you ask me.

Funny how it is better then our current team and yet somehow only wins 30 games.

How the **** is Hickson/Millsap/MKG/Dunleavy/Kemba better than Al/McRoberts/MKG/Hendo/Kemba? I have just explained why Hickson is absolutely horrendous. Do I really need to tell you that Al+Hendo is better than Millsap+Dunleavy?
investigate Adam Silver
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1479 » by BeesWax » Thu May 1, 2014 2:02 am

Biz Gilwalker wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
Biz Gilwalker wrote:Hickson/Millsap/MKG/Dunleavy/Kemba may not even beat the dysfunctional Pistons this season. That lineup makes no sense given how terrible Hickson is. We'd probably have the 8th pick this year, with Detroit giving us the 9th pick. We probably win 30 games at best. Undersized, no go-to guy except Kemba, worse defense (Hickson is a REALLY bad defensive player and dumb as a rock)... that would've been a horrible, horrible team. Al added a good 10-15 wins to this team this year if you ask me.

Funny how it is better then our current team and yet somehow only wins 30 games.

How the **** is Hickson/Millsap/MKG/Dunleavy/Kemba better than Al/McRoberts/MKG/Hendo/Kemba? I have just explained why Hickson is absolutely horrendous. Do I really need to tell you that Al+Hendo is better than Millsap+Dunleavy?

If you want to lie to yourself you can. Milsap, Hickson and Dunleavy are better fits for the rest of your roster. You can pretend Al was right but he really wasn't.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,305
And1: 15,517
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Big Al's Paint: The Al Jefferson Thread 

Post#1480 » by yosemiteben » Thu May 1, 2014 2:04 am

Just out of curiosity, does anyone disagree that if Al were fully healthy and integrated into this team from the beginning of last season that we would have been the three seed?

Return to Charlotte Hornets