bondom34 wrote:spearsy23 wrote:Bravenewworld wrote:
No one gave him a shot.
This is the thing we tend to see with these NBA sons.
No matter how talented they are, they all seem to have high IQs and good fundamentals. So much so that at the very worst they can be 2nd, 3rd stringers. That being said, given how well Wiggins fits the OKC mold, i think he is worth the risk.
Its not a name. Its a DNA and advanced training throughout someone's life that you are buying into.
Nobody gave him a shot because he's not an NBA player. Basketball is not genetics, it speaks volumes when you have an NBA player coaching you throughout your entire life and you aren't a successful college player. Wiggins is not good enough to play in the NBA, end of story. Ron Baker is an NBA caliber 2nd/3rd stringer, Wiggins is nowhere near his level. Hell, why don't we just draft Stockton, sign Seth Curry, see if Luke Walton will come play for us and make a play for Daniel Ewing? All of them are better than Nick Wiggins anyway.
If we sign Seth, you think he could convince Steph to sign after his contract is up?
That would be fantastic if we could.