ImageImageImage

Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,991
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1621 » by theGreatRC » Wed May 21, 2014 2:26 am

Worm Guts wrote:If you want to bottom out you probably haven't been a Wolves fan for very long. I don't think I can take any more bottoming out.


Preach brother. If we take another rebuild i'm jumping on whatever team Love ends up on(As long as it's not the Cavs)
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
LordBaldric
General Manager
Posts: 7,611
And1: 1,970
Joined: Jul 14, 2006

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1622 » by LordBaldric » Wed May 21, 2014 2:26 am

If we trade with Chicago we need Mirotic coming back with the picks/fillers. He's the only one in a Bulls package that has serious star potential. We can't just dump Love for a couple just solid players and 2 non-lotto picks. If Niko won't sign with us we hang up the phone and dial up Danny Ainge.

Mirotic and Pek together could form for us a Montenegrin Voltron of destruction.
User avatar
MinneOOPalis
Analyst
Posts: 3,457
And1: 1,415
Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Location: Minneapolis
   

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1623 » by MinneOOPalis » Wed May 21, 2014 2:33 am

We didnt bring ricky from europe to play with more unathletic euro's.....
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1624 » by Grits n Gravy » Wed May 21, 2014 2:40 am

theGreatRC wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:If you want to bottom out you probably haven't been a Wolves fan for very long. I don't think I can take any more bottoming out.


Preach brother. If we take another rebuild i'm jumping on whatever team Love ends up on(As long as it's not the Cavs)

I've been a hard core wolves fan since 2010, I've watched basically every game since the beginning of the Darko/Wes/Beasley era. I'd love to make the playoffs but that's not enough for me. I want to have a sustained contending team and we all know how tough that is, especially in the west. The problem is we handed the keys to the wrong guy in Kahn when we could have had that contending team now. I think bottoming out and developing and trusting Flip is the only way to achieve this now. He has my faith with last years draft results and I really believe if we could land the #6, #17 as well as Sullinger and a future Brooklyn pick that would put us on that path.
User avatar
Yes We Kahn
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,421
And1: 18
Joined: Jul 15, 2010

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1625 » by Yes We Kahn » Wed May 21, 2014 2:46 am

One thing I'm not sure has been brought up, but I think may be a point to consider. Any chance it was Love who pushed for the contract he got instead of Kahn with the motive being that he could get out sooner if we don't improve enough?
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1626 » by Krapinsky » Wed May 21, 2014 3:01 am

AQuintus wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:I'm willing to bet they make an offer that doesn't have #1 pick in it. They'll offer Waiters, Bennett, and Thompson and we'll have to decide between that and the #6 pick and Sullinger/Olynyk.


Not even a question, imo. Bennett is negative value, and 6>Waiters.


You're pretty quick to call Bennett negative value. He had a terrible rookie season, but he's still one year removed from 30 GMs thinking he was a top 7 pick. I personally think Waiters and 6 are pretty close. I like 5 players in this draft. At 6, I start to get a little less confident.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1627 » by Krapinsky » Wed May 21, 2014 3:02 am

Yes We Kahn wrote:One thing I'm not sure has been brought up, but I think may be a point to consider. Any chance it was Love who pushed for the contract he got instead of Kahn with the motive being that he could get out sooner if we don't improve enough?


This is well chronicled. Love wanted 5, Kahn/Taylor wanted 4. As a compromise, they gave him 4 with a 3 year opt out.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1628 » by Narf » Wed May 21, 2014 3:03 am

I'm still thinking Ibaka, Lamb, and pick (Dallas or OKC) for Love. Maybe something else on either side to help even rosters if needed.

Not sure we need a rebuild instead of a retool.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1629 » by AQuintus » Wed May 21, 2014 3:04 am

Krapinsky wrote:
You're pretty quick to call Bennett negative value. He had a terrible rookie season, but he's still one year removed from 30 GMs thinking he was a top 7 pick.


And Wes Johnson is only 4 years removed from 30 GMs thinking he was a top 5 pick. When a young guy has a terrible season it's usually because he's not good.
Image
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1630 » by Krapinsky » Wed May 21, 2014 3:12 am

AQuintus wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
You're pretty quick to call Bennett negative value. He had a terrible rookie season, but he's still one year removed from 30 GMs thinking he was a top 7 pick.


And Wes Johnson is only 4 years removed from 30 GMs thinking he was a top 5 pick. When a young guy has a terrible season it's usually because he's not good.


You almost had me go for the eye-roll there. I'm not a fan either, but I'd probably take him over a late first in this draft. I think he has value. If he still sucks after a few games into next season, then i'd agree he's probably reached negative value.

EDIT: This is coming from the guy that wouldn't trade the then #2 pick (Williams) for #15 (which became Leonard) and Hibbert.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1631 » by AQuintus » Wed May 21, 2014 3:13 am

Krapinsky wrote:You almost had me go for the eye-roll there. I'm not a fan either, but I'd probably take him over a late first in this draft. I think he has value. If he still sucks after a few games into next season, then i'd agree he's probably reached negative value.


At 1st overall pick money? I'd much rather have the late 1st guy. We'd probably get similar production at a fraction of the guaranteed cost.

[edit]

You almost had me go for the eye-roll there


Would it make you feel better if I had said 2 years ago 30 GMs thought Derrick Williams was a top 2 pick? :D
Image
User avatar
Xplatformer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,890
And1: 271
Joined: Nov 03, 2013
     

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1632 » by Xplatformer » Wed May 21, 2014 4:23 am

BleedGreen1989 wrote:Putting myself in a Wolves fan shoes, I'd rather root and watch a 19 year old develop into a hopeful star or good player than eat Lee's contract and worry about what Klay will get paid.

Whether that's a deal with Boston or LA doesn't matter.


Gotcha. You're ok being Cleveland or Philly.

Look...I'm hopeful the rumors are true that the Warriors management don't want to include Klay. Seriously, as great as Love is, he's not that much better than David Lee for the Warriors to give up their best two way player who isn't even 25 yet.

If you guys think David Lee + Klay Thompson isn't good enough for a Love deal I say fine.

I think a Lee + Thompson combo is too much for love.
I also think a Lee + Barnes combo isn't enough for Love.

So, unless the inclusion of next years draft pick sweetens the Barnes deal...it's best for both teams to simply agree to part ways.

There is no need to shaft either team.
In 1971, the team moved across the Bay Area to Oakland, and changed its geographic name to Golden State to symbolize the team as representative of the entire state of California
slicedbread2
Analyst
Posts: 3,657
And1: 3,045
Joined: Jan 23, 2014

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1633 » by slicedbread2 » Wed May 21, 2014 4:24 am

Krapinsky wrote:
AQuintus wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
You're pretty quick to call Bennett negative value. He had a terrible rookie season, but he's still one year removed from 30 GMs thinking he was a top 7 pick.


And Wes Johnson is only 4 years removed from 30 GMs thinking he was a top 5 pick. When a young guy has a terrible season it's usually because he's not good.


You almost had me go for the eye-roll there. I'm not a fan either, but I'd probably take him over a late first in this draft. I think he has value. If he still sucks after a few games into next season, then i'd agree he's probably reached negative value.

EDIT: This is coming from the guy that wouldn't trade the then #2 pick (Williams) for #15 (which became Leonard) and Hibbert.


Well in all honesty, I actually liked the picks Saunders made last year. In regards to Love, I don't think he's going to re-sign in Cleveland. He gets Irving, but the rumblings of Kyrie wanting out of Cleveland are pretty strong and I won't blame him due to the incompetence of management. The only thing to me that would truly work is Love going east since the west teams interested in the Lakers, Rockets, Warriors and the Suns don't really have many compelling options at all. If Love were to agree to waive his P/O the way Paul did, T-Wolves can get a better package. As far as what I'd go for, I'd go for 2 deals in a certain scenario:

1) Chicago

Chicago: Kevin Love, Corey Brewer, trade exception of 6-7 million
Sacramento: Taj Gibson, Gary Neal, Jared Dudley, Ronny Turiaf, Willie Green, Sacramento pick returned
LA Clippers: Jason Thompson
Charlotte: Kevin Martin
Minnesota: Carlos Boozer, Brendan Haywood, Reggie Evans, Jason Terry, Travis Outlaw, #8, #16, #19, #24, #28 via Clippers/2017 first rounder, 2 seconds(#45 and a future second from Charlotte), future first from Chicago(2016 lottery protected)

Bulls get their guy in Love who'd make them a lethal threat on offense and would give Thibodeau a lot of offense to work with and vaults the Bulls into title contenders. They plan on luring Anthony to Chicago too and they still have some assets to do so. Brewer is a great energy guy who could easily mesh with Noah since both are friends and former team mates at Florida. They give up picks, but they go for it.

Kings trade a lotto pick that could be good, but they want to go for it to win now since they are going for their push. This deal would be perfect for them as they get the perfect guy to round out their starting 5 in Gibson who'd do really well next to Cousins. They also can waive Green who's non-guaranteed while using their bench players in Dudley and Neal to alleviate some scoring on the second unit.

Clips get that third big they wanted while jettisoning salary.

Charlotte loses some picks but they have #9 so they can afford to lose some picks while upgrading their wing spot with Martin to alleviate some scoring and adds spacing. Liability on defense, but Cliff's system covered Al, so it can definitely cover K-Mart.

For Minnesota, it's somewhat cringe worthy, but they move some long term salary in K-Mart and Brewer and send away a guy who was leaving anyway in FA. They get a whole stash of picks they could use to dump some expiring deals if they don't want too many players or buy out everybody coming to Minnesota. They obtain a whole stash of picks they could use to get some potential young talent. You'd probably have to do one more trade to lose some expirings. Enter Philadelphia:

Philadelphia: J.J. Barea, Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, Jason Terry, Travis Outlaw, Alexey Shved #24, #40, #53
Minnesota: J-Rich, trade exception, #52, #54

76ers move up into the first round while taking in a bunch of dead weight salary while Minnesota sheds some salary to open up roster spots. Waive J-Rich and let him go elsewhere as he has no spot on this team. Get David Blatt to come coach and your line up:

Rubio/?
Muhammad/Budinger
?
Boozer/Evans
Dieng/Pekovic/Haywood

+#8, #13, #16, #19, #28, #42, #52, #54

With those picks, I'd go for a combination of Dario Saric, Zach Lavine/Nick Staukas, Kyle Anderson, and the best players available at each spot. You can use some of the remaining picks on stashing international prospects and keep them for future trades. I'd try and dump Boozer to a team looking for cap relief and take a contract with an extra year on it while getting a pick in the process. If you can't find a deal for him by the deadline, may as well buy him out.

2). Boston

Their deal would be most likely centred around this:

Boston: Kevin Love, Kevin Martin, Omer Asik(Paul Pierce TPE)
Minnesota: Keith Bogans, Brandon Bass, Francisco Garcia, Joel Anthony, Jared Sullinger, #6, #25, Brooklyn 2016 first rounder, Philadelphia second rounders
Houston: 16-19 million trade exception, top 55 protected pick from the Warriors in 2018, Miami 2016 second
Golden State: Jeremy Lin(Richard Jefferson TPE)

Rockets get a crap load of cap space and can outright sign Anthony upon completion of jettisoning Asik and Lin along with Garcia and sending away picks to do so. They use their TPE's to fill out their roster.

Warriors use their TPE to bolster their bench and bring home Lin who's jerseys would sell out light a forest fire and his skill set would be perfect as the 6th man off the bench for a team that badly needed help on the offensive end.

Celtics get their guy and flank him with Rondo, K-Mart and Omega man anchoring the low post while sending away a lottery pick and a potentially strong 2016 pick from the Nets along with another pick from the Rockets and the 76ers picks. They use a bevy of their assets while still having some remaining ones available.

Minnesota loses a good star and a good shooter, but the return isn't too shabby and they manage to put a good return of some picks and get some expiring deals and end up not tying up long term cap space.

I think the C's deal would be better for most T-Wolves fans, but either one can't hurt if Saunders can hit on his picks and he did well surprisingly in the last draft and hires a coach who will work with developing young talent and hopefully build a sustainable core of developing youth.

Thoughts?
zauchary
Junior
Posts: 324
And1: 28
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
         

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1634 » by zauchary » Wed May 21, 2014 4:44 am

I bet Kyrie would be down to stay in Cleveland if he had a guy like Love. In fact I could all but guarantee it. I also think would jump at the chance if he had those two.

Bring us the number one draft pick and put the name Joel Embiid on it. He is the transcendent talent in this draft.
User avatar
Jukeness
Analyst
Posts: 3,335
And1: 326
Joined: Jul 13, 2012
Location: West Saint Paul, MN

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1635 » by Jukeness » Wed May 21, 2014 4:59 am

We should not trade with the Warriors. I dont want David Lee on this team, he's not worth what he's getting paid and sucks worse than Love on defense.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1636 » by GopherIt! » Wed May 21, 2014 6:13 am

No deals with Boston. Can't go there.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1637 » by GopherIt! » Wed May 21, 2014 6:45 am

Cavs #1 2014, plus Waiters.


If they are willing to include TT or Bennett great.


Jabari Parker is my favorite out of the top group. Possibly Embiid.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1638 » by moss_is_1 » Wed May 21, 2014 7:16 am

GopherIt! wrote:No deals with Boston. Can't go there.

That's really the best deal. Unless the Cavs are willing to move the #1 with Waiters/TT, which I highly doubt.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1639 » by GopherIt! » Wed May 21, 2014 8:38 am

moss_is_1 wrote:
GopherIt! wrote:No deals with Boston. Can't go there.

That's really the best deal. Unless the Cavs are willing to move the #1 with Waiters/TT, which I highly doubt.


That might be true. Blame the ghost of the KG trade.

I'd rather send him to OKC for Ibaka/Lamb/pick.


Lets hope Dan Gilbert comes through.
User avatar
Viljanen
Junior
Posts: 307
And1: 81
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
Location: Madrid

Re: Kevin Love Free Agency/Trade Thread 

Post#1640 » by Viljanen » Wed May 21, 2014 9:29 am

Come on. Lee + Klay is not a decent package.
Of course Taj + Butler is way better!!! (still not close to Love´s value, but much better).

Lee similar to Love? Sure, they´re both white, and rebound well. lee is a horrible defender, and that has been also said about Love, so I guess we have to take that as a possitive as well... Being able to take long 2s is nice, but nothing compared to take 3s at such a good and consistent rate. (Almost) everybody knows that by know!. And then, there are more things please, do not simplify Love as a good rebounder with the ability to shoot 3s. This is not that simple. Love can score at will, from inside, outside, excelent post moves, he is also a great passer... extremely versatile, and all that makes him special.

Lee... come on!
Los de Valladolid somos de los Timberwolves Jazz de toda la vida.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves