irie wrote:Devilzsidewalk wrote:irie wrote:Yeah, we'll see. I am officially off the bandwagon though.
And the Celtics best player available is a PF. The best players available at #6 will also be PFs. So what's the point of redundancy? We'll see - but I think the Celtics at #6 are now out of the Love sweepstakes.
I can see that stance, but things change quick. Is there really that much separation between Jordan/CP3/Blake and Love/Rondo/Green? I'm not so sure there is. Plus things are getting loose in the NBA - Duncan/Kobe/Pierce/KG are all on the way out. Durant hasn't figured it out with OKC yet. Dwight and CP3 aren't making much traction. It's not unreasonable to picture the Celtics among the elites with a K Love trade, Rondo returning to form, and a couple sly moves for veterans. Maybe not this year, but in a 3 year window.
I mean - what's the point in the Wolves trading for #6 (likely a PF) and Sullinger? They get two PFs who are mediocre NBA prospects. I don't see the value in that for them, when PF is the highest glut position in the NBA. I think PF is even easier to fill than PG right now. Who cares about adding a PF when most teams in the NBA have so many they just start two of them?
The thinking is that we dont have a PF if we trade Love, so Olynyk or Sullinger could make a good backup PF, with one of Gordon, Randle, or Vonleh starting. We would have good big man depth with one of those 3 and Sullinger or Olynyk at 4 and Pek and Dieng at the 5.