ImageImage

Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

BucksBrew
Junior
Posts: 495
And1: 123
Joined: Jul 17, 2009
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#641 » by BucksBrew » Fri May 23, 2014 8:30 pm

Maybe this has been brought up but would anyone do this?

If Wiggins goes 1

we take Embiid at 2

Trade Sanders to the Lakers for the 7 pick and Steve Nash (Contract)
we take Smart at 7

Do you think the Lakers would do this to get rid of Nash's dead weight and get a player they can use.
Blame Rasho wrote:It is the same circle jerk fans like always going on and on and the sad part is that they don't even realize how pathetic they sound to a neutral fan.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,527
And1: 9,854
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#642 » by M-C-G » Fri May 23, 2014 8:34 pm

BucksBrew wrote:Maybe this has been brought up but would anyone do this?

If Wiggins goes 1

we take Embiid at 2

Trade Sanders to the Lakers for the 7 pick and Steve Nash (Contract)
we take Smart at 7

Do you think the Lakers would do this to get rid of Nash's dead weight and get a player they can use.


Smart is the only guy outside of the top 4 I would consider moving Sanders for.
User avatar
Zeezprah
Analyst
Posts: 3,539
And1: 1,569
Joined: Apr 16, 2014
Location: How can the Bucks be real if our eyes aren't real?
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#643 » by Zeezprah » Fri May 23, 2014 8:35 pm

BucksBrew wrote:Maybe this has been brought up but would anyone do this?

If Wiggins goes 1

we take Embiid at 2

Trade Sanders to the Lakers for the 7 pick and Steve Nash (Contract)
we take Smart at 7

Do you think the Lakers would do this to get rid of Nash's dead weight and get a player they can use.


no. i think the lakers would rather just take someone like vonleh/smart and roll with it, especially since they'll be trying to save cap room for kevin love after this season.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#644 » by Newz » Fri May 23, 2014 8:40 pm

El Duderino wrote:Glenn did alter his game to be more of a mid-range/post up jump shooter, but another big reason why is he simply was very poor at handling the ball and with that high dribble, he constantly would turn it over when trying to get into the paint. In college he could get away with that, but not in the pros.

I still remember his rookie year, Dog was a turnover machine, averaging four of them a game. In fact, in his first four seasons, these were his turnover averages.

3.9
3.4
3.4
3.6

That's a ton for a non-PG. It was pretty crazy though compared to today's NBA when Glenn and Sammie were teammates in just how great both were at the mid-range jump shot. Now teams basically beg offenses to take mid-range jumpers, but with good reason because so few players today can consistently make them.


I actually read an article not too long ago about the value of players that have a good mid-range game. It was basically an explanation of why Carmelo Anthony is more valuable and efficient on offense than people give him credit for... because he is a guy that you can't let shoot from midrange or else he will dominate. I actually agree with what the article said too, being able to shoot in that inbetween area is huge and it makes the defense go away from the typical (and smart) strategy of "run them off of the three point line, then protect the paint".

I will say that I think the thing that stopped Big Dog from being a stud in the NBA was that he didn't have a great work ethic. I think he could have been a 25+ PPG scorer that could have had a TS% of at least 55%+ and a great rebounder for a 3. He just didn't seem to care all that much. He had a doughy body and his game never really developed as the years went along. It was kind of a testiment to his talent that he was as good as he was.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,336
And1: 15,145
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#645 » by Ayt » Fri May 23, 2014 8:54 pm

Every time Big Dog put the ball on the floor it was an adventure.
User avatar
breakchains
General Manager
Posts: 8,722
And1: 2,708
Joined: Jun 23, 2013

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#646 » by breakchains » Fri May 23, 2014 8:55 pm

BucksBrew wrote:Maybe this has been brought up but would anyone do this?

If Wiggins goes 1

we take Embiid at 2

Trade Sanders to the Lakers for the 7 pick and Steve Nash (Contract)
we take Smart at 7

Do you think the Lakers would do this to get rid of Nash's dead weight and get a player they can use.

It would be epic but I think the chances of either are slim, let alone both. We're going to have to come to terms with the fact that we are going to miss out on Embiid.
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,185
And1: 8,562
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#647 » by buckboy » Fri May 23, 2014 9:24 pm

The most amazing thing in this thread is that someone likes Bill Walton.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
mattg
General Manager
Posts: 8,022
And1: 3,508
Joined: Feb 12, 2007

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#648 » by mattg » Fri May 23, 2014 9:26 pm

PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:Updates coming on the 2nd and 3rd tier guys. I never thought of Shawn Marion as a comparison for Gordon until Simmons brought it up, but I kind of like it.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/469932333445836800[/tweet]
really? Not trying to be a dick but haven't people compared him to Marion all yr. I actually think he compares more to AK47 in his early Utah days. Marion has always looked awkward so I think people think he sucked on o but imo he was way ahead of gordon offensively even early in his career.

Sent from my SM-N900V using RealGM Forums mobile app


I don't stay up late to watch Pac-12 games (wish I did though, I love Bill Walton) and really didn't pay any attention to Gordon until the NCAA tournament. So maybe that was a really common comparison, but I never heard it until recently. I think Gordon has a better shot than Marion. Marion had one of the ugliest shots in the history of the league, though to his credit, he made it work.

Marion is significantly better at shooting than Gordon. Shawn always has had nice touch on floaters and weird runners and he's sort of become known for that. Gordon is obviously an awful FT shooter, but he's also equally terrible from everywhere else in the midrange. He hit a few 3s towards the end of the year that people seem to be putting too much stock in, considering the really small sample size and his absolute ineptitude from everywhere else.

I don't think the comparison is terrible though, just highly doubt that Gordon ever approaches levels Marion reached. I'm a bit skeptical of Gordon defending on the perimeter, I don't like how upright he sits in his stance and his balance doesn't look good in that regard. I'm also notoriously wary of guys who should be playing inside but think/want to be perimeter players. It just screams lack of self awareness and never seems to work out. Fr example, I really liked Derrick Williams as a PF prospect until predraft came along and he was touting himself as a Carmelo type SF, then I knew it was done.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,934
And1: 13,637
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#649 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Fri May 23, 2014 9:33 pm

It wasn't a high-dribble. It was the big dog yank....
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#650 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri May 23, 2014 9:46 pm

mattg wrote:
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:really? Not trying to be a dick but haven't people compared him to Marion all yr. I actually think he compares more to AK47 in his early Utah days. Marion has always looked awkward so I think people think he sucked on o but imo he was way ahead of gordon offensively even early in his career.

Sent from my SM-N900V using RealGM Forums mobile app


I don't stay up late to watch Pac-12 games (wish I did though, I love Bill Walton) and really didn't pay any attention to Gordon until the NCAA tournament. So maybe that was a really common comparison, but I never heard it until recently. I think Gordon has a better shot than Marion. Marion had one of the ugliest shots in the history of the league, though to his credit, he made it work.

Marion is significantly better at shooting than Gordon. Shawn always has had nice touch on floaters and weird runners and he's sort of become known for that. Gordon is obviously an awful FT shooter, but he's also equally terrible from everywhere else in the midrange. He hit a few 3s towards the end of the year that people seem to be putting too much stock in, considering the really small sample size and his absolute ineptitude from everywhere else.

I don't think the comparison is terrible though, just highly doubt that Gordon ever approaches levels Marion reached. I'm a bit skeptical of Gordon defending on the perimeter, I don't like how upright he sits in his stance and his balance doesn't look good in that regard. I'm also notoriously wary of guys who should be playing inside but think/want to be perimeter players. It just screams lack of self awareness and never seems to work out. Fr example, I really liked Derrick Williams as a PF prospect until predraft came along and he was touting himself as a Carmelo type SF, then I knew it was done.
you're pretty spot on with your gordon analysis. He's not going to be able to defend the perimeter like Marion but realistically not many guys can. Gordon is bigger than Shawn and with his athleticism he could be a ridiculous pick and roll defender from the 4 spot.. like best in the league good. One skill they do seem to share is they have a great feel for rebounding and a crazy quick second jump.

Youre right that gordon might never be as good as Marion but really that's some lofty comparisons considering Marion is a border line hall of famer imo. If gordon is 75% the player Marion was the team who takes him will be super stoked.

Edit- Marion has a career .485 shooting %, will pass 10,000 rebounds next yr. And is one of 5 players in NBA history with 1500 steals and 1000 blocks. One of the most underrated guys of his generation.

Sent from my SM-N900V using RealGM Forums mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
smauss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 432
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#651 » by smauss » Fri May 23, 2014 10:19 pm

BucksBrew wrote:Maybe this has been brought up but would anyone do this?

If Wiggins goes 1

we take Embiid at 2

Trade Sanders to the Lakers for the 7 pick and Steve Nash (Contract)
we take Smart at 7

Do you think the Lakers would do this to get rid of Nash's dead weight and get a player they can use.


Definitely! Don't know if Smart will be there at 7 though....
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan (CBQ is missed)

simul justus et peccator
Buckrageous
Starter
Posts: 2,247
And1: 665
Joined: Jul 08, 2010

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#652 » by Buckrageous » Fri May 23, 2014 10:49 pm

buckboy wrote:The most amazing thing in this thread is that someone likes Bill Walton.

Prepare to be amazed again..........Im a fan as well.
mattg
General Manager
Posts: 8,022
And1: 3,508
Joined: Feb 12, 2007

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#653 » by mattg » Fri May 23, 2014 11:18 pm

If you don't enjoy bill Walton's commentary you're a square and probably the most boring person to hang out with.
EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
Posts: 18,710
And1: 4,490
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Contact:
 

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#654 » by EastSideBucksFan » Fri May 23, 2014 11:21 pm

Bill Walton is awesome. I wish he would still call games.

Surprised they didn't get him out for a Blazers playoff game.
Serge28
RealGM
Posts: 16,332
And1: 1,957
Joined: Apr 30, 2002
Location: San Diego
 

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#655 » by Serge28 » Fri May 23, 2014 11:29 pm

EastSideBucksFan wrote:Bill Walton is awesome. I wish he would still call games.

Surprised they didn't get him out for a Blazers playoff game.


That would have been really cool actually. I would have tuned in just for that.
In Giannis We Trust
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,074
And1: 4,202
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#656 » by DanoMac » Fri May 23, 2014 11:32 pm

I'd rather listen to Walton hallucinate during games than listen to a lot of the guys ESPN has now. Tirico and Hubie are horrible.

Hubie Brown - "That's a great time out, let me give you 14 reasons why"
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,336
And1: 15,145
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#657 » by Ayt » Fri May 23, 2014 11:32 pm

I used to enjoy Walton, but I caught a game of him broadcasting this year and it was absolutely brutal.

http://deadspin.com/what-the-hell-is-bi ... 1498489413

Edit: Actually, it is this game. Skip to like :45 seconds.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#658 » by WeekapaugGroove » Fri May 23, 2014 11:40 pm

I love Walton

"So bill how many grateful dead concerts have you been to?"

"Not enough Marv.. not enough"

That's the perfect answer no matter how many dead shows you've seen :)

Sent from my SM-N900V using RealGM Forums mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
drew881
RealGM
Posts: 12,848
And1: 5,633
Joined: Aug 14, 2007

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#659 » by drew881 » Fri May 23, 2014 11:44 pm

DanoMac wrote:I'd rather listen to Walton hallucinate during games than listen to a lot of the guys ESPN has now. Tirico and Hubie are horrible.

Hubie Brown - "That's a great time out, let me give you 14 reasons why"


Yep. Hubie Brown is awful. He uses the color man spot to get off on his coaching obsession. Put the coaching boner away.
Buckrageous
Starter
Posts: 2,247
And1: 665
Joined: Jul 08, 2010

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#660 » by Buckrageous » Fri May 23, 2014 11:45 pm

Embiid gaining 15lbs in 2 months is a negative in my opinion. It would be impossible to naturally gain that in muscle. So hes probably gained at least 10lbs of fat. The leaves 2 negative options to me; hes been lazy since the season ended or hes had to rest his back. If its the back it kind of shoots down the whole "he could have played in the tourny if..." theories. I love his talent but I cant get over the back thing. Maybe Im just overreacting, I dont know.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks