HoopsterJones wrote:
1. Minny will have better future asset offers from other teams. If they were thinking win now then Taj and Jimmy are great pieces. I don't see them accepting this offer unless Bulls toss in more draft picks (possibly future 1st rounders and not necessarily this years).
2. This is only possible if Melo makes it known he wants out and wants to come to Chicago. Even still I'm iffy on it. Phil will probably want to win ASAP. Course again it's moot IF Melo makes it known he wants out.
3. No way Lakers do that for the #7 pick. Yes people are high on Nikola Mirotic, but there's a few players that may be available for them to take (Smart, Vonleh, Randle, Gordon). They don't have a lot of history with international players ( Divac, Medvedenko, Vujacic were some).
4. If in the unlikely scenario that the Bulls obtain the #7 pick, I would not be for a two for one swap for a later round player.
1. Minny wants to get into the playoffs and the draft hasn't worked out to well for them. They are not enamored (who really knows or if its smoke and mirrors) with BOS picks. With Bulls they get two starters, a potential really good pick from SAC, and dump a bad contract. They probably make the playoffs next season. Coldfish and I agree.
2. Rumors are PJ doesn't want to pay Melo the max and is asking for him to take less to win. I think PJ will be smart and tear the whole thing down and rebuild it the right way.... the only time that has happened in NYK history.
3. If Vonleh and Randle are off the board (IMO they will be) then I see no reason why the Lakers wouldn't want NIko. They want to ship their pick for proven vet and NIko is the best they can do with big time potential the ability to play heavy mins from day one.
4. I would. At 7 only Randle or Smart will be available and we already have Love at PF so no Randle. Smart doesn't do much for us in terms of spreading the floor. Harris would be the perfect fit with his 3 ball and defense, with Jimmy gone. Moving back gets a backup big for Noah and Love which we will need.
I know this won't happen. My point is we have the assets and the "value" aligns in such a way where if everything aligns it could feasibly happen.