ImageImage

Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

Assuming Embiid goes #1, who is your guy at #2?

Wiggins
188
53%
Parker
126
35%
Exum
33
9%
Vonleh
1
0%
Randle
8
2%
 
Total votes: 356

User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,049
And1: 4,149
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2801 » by DanoMac » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:33 am

breakchains wrote:I feel comfortable in my position. Just because I feel confident about it doesn't mean others can't hold a different opinion. I haven't bashed anyone for liking Wiggins more than Parker. I just don't agree. People felt the same way when I was proclaiming Embiid as the clear-cut top prospect before it was popular to do so. In fact, some of the same people complaining in this thread about people dissing other's opinions bashed me at the time for it. But I just have my own opinion and when I feel comfortable with it, I share it. I don't think I'm ever really disrespectful about it. Some people just seem insecure about their opinions and don't like it when someone else holds a differing one. I don't really care whether you have Wiggins as #2. It's your opinion - doesn't bother me.


2 things here man -

Once I started coming around and had Embiid as my 1, you replied to me saying "you've come a long way", to which I replied to you saying "yeah I have, I was an idiot for saying Embiid wasn't 1, and I just wanted Wiggins to be the best since he's who I already had envisioned as the Bucks savior". I thought our beef was squashed. Then you kept referring to me (albeit indirectly) in other posts to others about "people who would bash me for liking Embiid". I admitted I was wrong dude, and you kept crying about it. Get over it.

Secondly, you don't come off as disrespectful? Some posts from other threads

breakchains wrote:I'm not a stats guy, especially when it comes to talent evaluation and projection at the next level, but I have watched these guys - both live and after the fact - more than most people here, I would guess.


What makes you assume you've watched more of these guys than the thousands that post here? You've been here a year man.

breakchains wrote:It's because you're a fan who has annual draft amnesia.


breakchains wrote:I'm saying pre-draft, people like you assume that guys grouped in the same tier - tiers that they didn't even make but rather just adopted because they have been told that they are in the same tier


Stop talking down to people and telling them they're a certain type of fan. You're a long ways from respecting people's opinions, and even longer way from respecting others.
User avatar
breakchains
General Manager
Posts: 8,722
And1: 2,708
Joined: Jun 23, 2013

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2802 » by breakchains » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:35 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
breakchains wrote:I feel comfortable in my position. Just because I feel confident about it doesn't mean others can't hold a different opinion. I haven't bashed anyone for liking Wiggins more than Parker. I just don't agree. People felt the same way when I was proclaiming Embiid as the clear-cut top prospect before it was popular to do so. In fact, some of the same people complaining in this thread about people dissing other's opinions bashed me at the time for it. But I just have my own opinion and when I feel comfortable with it, I share it. I don't think I'm ever really disrespectful about it. Some people just seem insecure about their opinions and don't like it when someone else holds a differing one. I don't really care whether you have Wiggins as #2. It's your opinion - doesn't bother me.

I don't have a problem with you having an opinion and sticking to it, I just think the little jabs like "Let's hope Philly fall in love with Wiggins" or "Send Dan Gilbert some Wiggins high school highlights" are obvious slights you know will get a rise from people, just as people are throwing out jabs about Embiid's back, Parker's defense or Exum's competition.

:lol: god damn you guys are sensitive around here. I'll do you guys a favor and stop posting. Go Bucks.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,278
And1: 25,432
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2803 » by Baddy Chuck » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:40 am

breakchains wrote: :lol: god damn you guys are sensitive around here. I'll do you guys a favor and stop posting. Go Bucks.

I'll bow out after this, but come on you were suspect number 1 in sensitivity when it came to anything Embiid 2 weeks ago. People would say the littlest thing and we'd get a 3 paragraph post on Embiid and his potential from you. I'm just saying those little slights on Wiggins like anyone would be a fool for wanting him are the exact things you used to get thrown into a tizzy about with Embiid but now we're the sensitive ones. Isn't like I think you are a bad poster and should stop posting, I just think there's some pretty large pot calling the kettle black going on in your actions.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
Wonka
General Manager
Posts: 9,228
And1: 6,080
Joined: Aug 19, 2012
 

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2804 » by Wonka » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:42 am

I'll take the fall here guys. I saw we take Stauskas at no. 2. Now you can all bond by keyboard shouting at me and insulting my intelligence :P
User avatar
Aaron It Out
General Manager
Posts: 8,804
And1: 3,101
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Location: Black Mercedes
     

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2805 » by Aaron It Out » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:43 am

Wonka wrote:I'll take the fall here guys. I saw we take Stauskas at no. 2. Now you can all bond by keyboard shouting at me and insulting my intelligence :P


Honestly man how you could think of taking Stauskus at #2 is way beyond me. There's a special place in hell for people like you.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
User avatar
Wonka
General Manager
Posts: 9,228
And1: 6,080
Joined: Aug 19, 2012
 

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2806 » by Wonka » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:48 am

Aaron It Out wrote:
Wonka wrote:I'll take the fall here guys. I saw we take Stauskas at no. 2. Now you can all bond by keyboard shouting at me and insulting my intelligence :P


Honestly man how you could think of taking Stauskus at #2 is way beyond me. There's a special place in hell for people like you.


You OBVIOUSLY didn't watch any Michigan games. Stauskas is far and away the best prospect in this years draft because...

(5 angry, poorly written paragraphs later)

...the future of our franchise depends on drafting NIk. F*cking morons.

:wink:
Down To Buck
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 306
Joined: Dec 02, 2011
 

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2807 » by Down To Buck » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:13 am

DanoMac wrote:What really disgusts me, is when people are being told that they're evaluating players the wrong way, or when people say things like "this is fact, this is who's the best, you're an idiot/blind/don't know how to evaluate if you don't share my thought". Like scouting is becoming some sort of competition on the board.


I totally agree with this. The draft opinions expressed by a fan are formed from a hodge-podge of YouTube clips, "expert" analysis, janky draft websites, game-watching with preconceived notions, and groupthink. Which makes the sureness with which some hold their opinions a little strange. (edit: I reread this and it applies to NBA front offices as well)

And everyone knows the draft is a near crapshoot when it comes to a specific player panning out. Even talented scouts screw up all the time. So just sit back, enjoy the draft, and don't get too worked up about it. If the Bucks miss on this pick it will be no fault of their own, but of the perils inherent in prospect scouting.

That said, Embiid is a Thabeet-level bust in the making. If you disagree you are incorrect and not a fan of the same caliber as I. :lol:
Check out my NBA Highlights: http://www.youtube.com/user/DownToBuck
User avatar
VooDoo7
RealGM
Posts: 25,953
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Location: WI

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2808 » by VooDoo7 » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:16 am

breakchains wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
breakchains wrote:I feel comfortable in my position. Just because I feel confident about it doesn't mean others can't hold a different opinion. I haven't bashed anyone for liking Wiggins more than Parker. I just don't agree. People felt the same way when I was proclaiming Embiid as the clear-cut top prospect before it was popular to do so. In fact, some of the same people complaining in this thread about people dissing other's opinions bashed me at the time for it. But I just have my own opinion and when I feel comfortable with it, I share it. I don't think I'm ever really disrespectful about it. Some people just seem insecure about their opinions and don't like it when someone else holds a differing one. I don't really care whether you have Wiggins as #2. It's your opinion - doesn't bother me.

I don't have a problem with you having an opinion and sticking to it, I just think the little jabs like "Let's hope Philly fall in love with Wiggins" or "Send Dan Gilbert some Wiggins high school highlights" are obvious slights you know will get a rise from people, just as people are throwing out jabs about Embiid's back, Parker's defense or Exum's competition.

:lol: god damn you guys are sensitive around here. I'll do you guys a favor and stop posting. Go Bucks.
Yet you're the one that can't handle it if someone calls you out on something. Your first response is always "well if you don't like what I write, then put me on ignore".
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2809 » by skones » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:19 am

My Top 30 right now:

1) Jabari Parker
2) Joel Embiid
3) Dante Exum
4) Marcus Smart
5) Andrew Wiggins
6) Noah Vonleh
7) Julius Randle
8) Nik Stauskas
9) Aaron Gordon
10) Adreian Payne
11) Tyler Ennis
12) Elfrid Payton
13) Doug McDermott
14) Dario Saric - more due to his questionable future in the NBA vs. Overseas rather than his ability
15) TJ Warren
16) Kyle Anderson
17) Jusuf Nurkic
18) Jordan Adams
19) Rodney Hood
20) Gary Harris
21) James Young
22) PJ Hairston
23) Shabazz Napeier
24) Jordan Clarkson
25) Patric Young
26) Deonte Burton
27) KJ McDaniels
28) Clint Capela
29) Jarnell Stokes
30) Vasilije Micic
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2810 » by xTitan » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:28 am

Status jus is under rated, he is one guy who is very capable of passing as well as scoring, something I am not completely sold on with Wiggins and Parker. I am not saying draft Nick at #2, but if a trade could be made to get back in the top 10 I would seriously look at him.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2811 » by Nowak008 » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:28 am

JayMKE wrote:Role players on contenders get overrated, Leonard is great and all but he's great because he's a cog in an existing championship machine. Put him on the Bucks or anywhere and ask him to be THE MAN, I don't people would holding him in such high regard. Prime Marion and prime Kirilenko as great as they were, never were the man and never won anything on their own. We need an alpha dog, we need a guy to carry us because we're essentially starting from scratch here. We don't have coach, we have a GM, we don't have a Tim Duncan superstar player.


I hope you're watching right now.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2812 » by xTitan » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:29 am

xTitan wrote:Stauskus is under rated, he is one guy who is very capable of passing as well as scoring, something I am not completely sold on with Wiggins and Parker. I am not saying draft Nick at #2, but if a trade could be made to get back in the top 10 I would seriously look at him.
User avatar
cinematographer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,754
And1: 1,697
Joined: Feb 22, 2013

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2813 » by cinematographer » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:30 am

Nowak008 wrote:
JayMKE wrote:Role players on contenders get overrated, Leonard is great and all but he's great because he's a cog in an existing championship machine. Put him on the Bucks or anywhere and ask him to be THE MAN, I don't people would holding him in such high regard. Prime Marion and prime Kirilenko as great as they were, never were the man and never won anything on their own. We need an alpha dog, we need a guy to carry us because we're essentially starting from scratch here. We don't have coach, we have a GM, we don't have a Tim Duncan superstar player.


I hope you're watching right now.

Just posted this in the other thread:

Ginobli/Parker --> Exum
Kawhi --> Wiggins
??? --> Parker
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,934
And1: 27,512
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2814 » by trwi7 » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:33 am

cinematographer wrote:
Nowak008 wrote:
JayMKE wrote:Role players on contenders get overrated, Leonard is great and all but he's great because he's a cog in an existing championship machine. Put him on the Bucks or anywhere and ask him to be THE MAN, I don't people would holding him in such high regard. Prime Marion and prime Kirilenko as great as they were, never were the man and never won anything on their own. We need an alpha dog, we need a guy to carry us because we're essentially starting from scratch here. We don't have coach, we have a GM, we don't have a Tim Duncan superstar player.


I hope you're watching right now.

Just posted this in the other thread:

Ginobli/Parker --> Exum
Kawhi --> Wiggins
??? --> Parker


Diaw :)
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Chapter29
RealGM
Posts: 14,593
And1: 1,235
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
   

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2815 » by Chapter29 » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:35 am

Right now that may be true but we are hoping this years pick becomes a Kawhi, Ginobli/Parker, or better.
Giannis
is
UponUs
User avatar
cinematographer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,754
And1: 1,697
Joined: Feb 22, 2013

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2816 » by cinematographer » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:36 am

trwi7 wrote:
cinematographer wrote:
Nowak008 wrote:
I hope you're watching right now.

Just posted this in the other thread:

Ginobli/Parker --> Exum
Kawhi --> Wiggins
??? --> Parker


Diaw :)

Hell, I'd love Parker if he could do half the things Diaw does.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,351
And1: 17,200
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2817 » by JayMKE » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:37 am

trwi7 wrote:
cinematographer wrote:
Nowak008 wrote:
I hope you're watching right now.

Just posted this in the other thread:

Ginobli/Parker --> Exum
Kawhi --> Wiggins
??? --> Parker


Diaw :)


Diaw with Parker's personality and work ethic would be a pretty great player
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,747
And1: 18,111
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2818 » by RiotPunch » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:37 am

Bonner --> Parker

#MickeyDavis
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
MrPerfect1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,372
And1: 3,433
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2819 » by MrPerfect1 » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:43 am

Max Green wrote:
Are you really comparing the TS% of a Wing Player who takes a bunch of Jump Shots all over the floor to a who dunker who strictly plays around the basket? Of Course A'mare is gonna have the better TS%, he didn't take many shots outside the paint.


In some ways, that further shows why I do not want a Melo type player. You do not want your primary option to be "someone who takes a bunch of Jump Shots from all over the floor" (unless they do see with Legendary efficiency like Durant or Curry). In the NBA, you are not awarded points for degree of difficulty. The fact that Prime Amare can get and convert more shots near the rim than Melo is basically a sign of superior offensive production.

Max Green wrote:A'mare also benefitted from playing with one of the best Point Guards of the last decade in Steve Nash. He made killing off being on the receiving end of the pick n roll with Nash. Not to mention they played in a crazy uptempo offense where they scored a staggering amount of points.


Amare did have some stat inflation due to the system, but lets not act like those George Karl Nuggets teams were the 90 Knicks or anything. The Dantoni Suns may have led the league in pace, but I bet those Nuggets teams were not too far behind.
User avatar
cinematographer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,754
And1: 1,697
Joined: Feb 22, 2013

Re: Official #2 Pick Thread - Ford #7: Parker 

Post#2820 » by cinematographer » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:48 am

MrPerfect1 wrote:
Max Green wrote:
Are you really comparing the TS% of a Wing Player who takes a bunch of Jump Shots all over the floor to a who dunker who strictly plays around the basket? Of Course A'mare is gonna have the better TS%, he didn't take many shots outside the paint.


In some ways, that further shows why I do not want a Melo type player. You do not want your primary option to be "someone who takes a bunch of Jump Shots from all over the floor" (unless they do see with Legendary efficiency like Durant or Curry). In the NBA, you are not awarded points for degree of difficulty. The fact that Prime Amare can get and convert more shots near the rim than Melo is basically a sign of superior offensive production.

This is why I brought up Parker on the Spurs a few days ago: he'd play no role. They have no use for an iso-heavy player who doesn't pass or create for others.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks