TheHottestHand wrote:If lebron trotted out west, the east would be as wide open as my ex-girlfriends snatch
oh wow, sounds like a hard breakup bro *fist bumps*
Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro
TheHottestHand wrote:If lebron trotted out west, the east would be as wide open as my ex-girlfriends snatch
Bubstubbler wrote:It would be much smarter for the Clippers to trade their assets for future picks to clear cap space, then just sign LeBron outright.
If you trade Blake for LeBron, all you get is LeBron.
If you trade Blake to some other team for future picks, then you get LeBron AND those future picks.
This is a game of asset management, and LA would be severely underplaying their hand if they were to go the dim bulb route and needlessly waste those assets in a sign-and-trade.
Eaglenugget wrote:We got Bosh!!!' Not Discounted!! Lmfao
Pedro wrote:Even if this story has any shred of validity, there is no chance Pat Riley would agree to trade Lebron for Griffin or any realistic collection of other players or picks. Griffin is a mediocre defender and after 4 seasons playing "Power Foward" he still has no post game. Pat Riley requires excellent defense from his best player and Griffin lacks it. Griffin also lacks leadership skills. He cannot be any contending teams first option.
deeps6x wrote:alienpick wrote:no one would want Blake in return for LeBron
Yeah, if LBJ tells the clippers he is interested in playing for them, now that he is a free agent, the clippers would have a couple options. Move the necessary players to create enough cap space to the Heat or to the other 28 teams in the league.
If you are Pat Riley, are you going to tell the Clippers to go F themselves and get nothing for LeBron, or are you going to say, Hell Yeah! I'll take Blake and some filler!
From the Clippers perspective, if LBJ wants to play for them, it would be easier to trade with Miami to clear the cap space than it would to trade with the other teams in the league. The other teams don't want another super team created, so they'd all be insisting on first round picks being bundles with the Clipper dregs. Miami would need to show it's fans they got something of value for LBJ. Unless they can sign Melo as his replacement, Blake might be the next best thing.
If you are the clippers, why are you giving up Blake? Mostly because he is essentially LBJ lite. Who are we kidding here. LBJ is more power forward than small forward. He is like a point power forward on the Heat.
As long as LBJ goes to the West, I don't care where. Just not the Spurs. They repeat.
crazymaso wrote:Bubstubbler wrote:It would be much smarter for the Clippers to trade their assets for future picks to clear cap space, then just sign LeBron outright.
If you trade Blake for LeBron, all you get is LeBron.
If you trade Blake to some other team for future picks, then you get LeBron AND those future picks.
This is a game of asset management, and LA would be severely underplaying their hand if they were to go the dim bulb route and needlessly waste those assets in a sign-and-trade.
Clippers would have to free up $30M before they can even begin to think about signing LeBron to a contract.
So in other words, a trade for LBJ is the only way feasible.
Bubstubbler wrote:crazymaso wrote:Bubstubbler wrote:Your conclusion does not follow from your premise.
This has already been discussed in other threads. It is quite feasible for LA to clear the necessary cap room and stockpile future picks in the process.
Eaglenugget wrote:We got Bosh!!!' Not Discounted!! Lmfao
TheHottestHand wrote:If lebron trotted out west, the east would be as wide open as my ex-girlfriends snatch
Marvel wrote:TheHottestHand wrote:If lebron trotted out west, the east would be as wide open as my ex-girlfriends snatch
Or your ass after a Mexican man train has run through your butthole.
Eaglenugget wrote:We got Bosh!!!' Not Discounted!! Lmfao

Championships wrote:This is really funny because I just saw an article from CBS that states they consider Blake Griffin untouchable in terms of trades including this one.


lstern wrote:I just don't see a fit of CP3 with LeBron. That said, I didn't see Wade fitting with LeBron either (and still don't).
I think that Cleveland is a great place for LBJ. If they can trade that #1 pick for Love and resign Hawes and Deng they are elite.
Alternatively Chicago is an ideal destination. Noah is a far better pairing for LBJ than CB1 is. Though Rose fits with the CP3 and Wade group.
Why do people not see the GSW as a fit for LeBron? Curry beside him is a DEADLY duo. Klay helps too and Iggy gives them the flexibility to run James at the PF spot with (the oft injured) Bogut manning the middle. That team can pass, run, shoot from everywhere and get into the passing lanes for some more classic LBJ run out dunks!
crazymaso wrote:lstern wrote:I just don't see a fit of CP3 with LeBron. That said, I didn't see Wade fitting with LeBron either (and still don't).
I think that Cleveland is a great place for LBJ. If they can trade that #1 pick for Love and resign Hawes and Deng they are elite.
Alternatively Chicago is an ideal destination. Noah is a far better pairing for LBJ than CB1 is. Though Rose fits with the CP3 and Wade group.
Why do people not see the GSW as a fit for LeBron? Curry beside him is a DEADLY duo. Klay helps too and Iggy gives them the flexibility to run James at the PF spot with (the oft injured) Bogut manning the middle. That team can pass, run, shoot from everywhere and get into the passing lanes for some more classic LBJ run out dunks!
In order to get James, GSW would have to give up someone on their roster.
David Lee immediately comes to mind. Only problem is - how many teams are willing to take on his contract? I guess they would have to do a D. Lee + Klay + picks deal. Someone else would have to absorb either 15M or 20M in cap space though..next to impossible.
LBJ on GSW would be pretty sweet to see though. Imagine the looks Steph curry would be getting?

lstern wrote:crazymaso wrote:lstern wrote:I just don't see a fit of CP3 with LeBron. That said, I didn't see Wade fitting with LeBron either (and still don't).
I think that Cleveland is a great place for LBJ. If they can trade that #1 pick for Love and resign Hawes and Deng they are elite.
Alternatively Chicago is an ideal destination. Noah is a far better pairing for LBJ than CB1 is. Though Rose fits with the CP3 and Wade group.
Why do people not see the GSW as a fit for LeBron? Curry beside him is a DEADLY duo. Klay helps too and Iggy gives them the flexibility to run James at the PF spot with (the oft injured) Bogut manning the middle. That team can pass, run, shoot from everywhere and get into the passing lanes for some more classic LBJ run out dunks!
In order to get James, GSW would have to give up someone on their roster.
David Lee immediately comes to mind. Only problem is - how many teams are willing to take on his contract? I guess they would have to do a D. Lee + Klay + picks deal. Someone else would have to absorb either 15M or 20M in cap space though..next to impossible.
LBJ on GSW would be pretty sweet to see though. Imagine the looks Steph curry would be getting?
I don't understand why they need to 'clear space', wouldn't Miami prefer to receive that package (DLee, Klay and picks) rather than letting LBJ walk to Houston/ CHI?