ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,719
And1: 23,216
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1701 » by nate33 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:00 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:Nate let me ask you something? how can the lakers not buy Miller out for the 2 that guaranteed if we trade him before the 30th ?
Plus maybe they would be fine buying him out over paying Nash to leave. and maybe they would be fine with having webster. Maybe they would do that? then if we get nash to leave we get a bit more room.

From Larry Coon:
When the trade deadline has passed. Teams are free to make trades again once their season has ended, but cannot trade players whose contracts are ending or could end due to an option or ETO.

I'm pretty sure the team option on Miller's final year must be exercised before he can be traded.


From my understanding it's not a team option or an ETO is it? It's just that only 2 mil of that 4.5 hes owed is guaranteed, so if he stays on the team he get's the full amount, if a team cuts him he does not get the full 4.5, the team only has to pay him 2. That's how I understand it as I am reading the details of the contract, or am I misunderstanding it?

I don't know for sure if a partially guaranteed deal is treated like an option year or not.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1702 » by verbal8 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:27 pm

For trade purposes salary is the same whether or not it is guarranteed. It is one reason why an unguarranteed contract is more valuable from a trade perspective than one with a team option.

With Miller's contract he has to be cut this NBA year or the full contract becomes guarranteed.

nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:From Larry Coon:

I'm pretty sure the team option on Miller's final year must be exercised before he can be traded.


From my understanding it's not a team option or an ETO is it? It's just that only 2 mil of that 4.5 hes owed is guaranteed, so if he stays on the team he get's the full amount, if a team cuts him he does not get the full 4.5, the team only has to pay him 2. That's how I understand it as I am reading the details of the contract, or am I misunderstanding it?

I don't know for sure if a partially guaranteed deal is treated like an option year or not.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,344
And1: 20,738
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1703 » by dckingsfan » Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:33 pm

stevemcqueen1 wrote:Beal + Nene for DeMarcus Cousins + Ben McLemore. Thoughts?


I would be shocked if they traded Cousins.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,569
And1: 1,993
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1704 » by gambitx777 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:46 pm

Beal and NENE for Cousins and McLemore would be horrible !
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,567
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1705 » by LyricalRico » Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:24 pm

verbal8 wrote:For trade purposes salary is the same whether or not it is guarranteed. It is one reason why an unguarranteed contract is more valuable from a trade perspective than one with a team option.

With Miller's contract he has to be cut this NBA year or the full contract becomes guarranteed.


That's my understanding as well - it doesn't matter who has him or when they got him as long as they waive him before the deadline specified in the contract.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,500
And1: 2,148
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1706 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:22 pm

Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine 2m
Sources tell ESPN that Mavericks are in advanced talks on deal to complete trade that will bring Chandler and Raymond Felton to Dallas


watch us be literally the only team looking to get Gortat now and still end up "rewarding him" with a dumb contract
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,412
And1: 6,819
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1707 » by TGW » Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:27 pm

Dark Faze wrote:
Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine 2m
Sources tell ESPN that Mavericks are in advanced talks on deal to complete trade that will bring Chandler and Raymond Felton to Dallas


watch us be literally the only team looking to get Gortat now and still end up "rewarding him" with a dumb contract


You already know it's going to happen, regardless of the demand for Gortat.

The Wizards already blew a first rounder to get him...if they lose Gortat in free agency it would be an admission that the trade was a complete failure (which it was).

I would actually have some respect for Grunfail if he moved on from Gortat (and Ariza) and tried to build through free agency.

Trying to keep together a middling team with no hopes of a championship is more than likely what they do.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,500
And1: 2,148
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1708 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:34 pm

all im asking for is to let the market set the price--if we're the only ones looking to bring him in as a starter then why don't we start at 7 million a year in negotiations? why not actually negotiate?
thinker07
Junior
Posts: 360
And1: 75
Joined: Jul 08, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1709 » by thinker07 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:38 pm

TGW wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine 2m
Sources tell ESPN that Mavericks are in advanced talks on deal to complete trade that will bring Chandler and Raymond Felton to Dallas


watch us be literally the only team looking to get Gortat now and still end up "rewarding him" with a dumb contract


You already know it's going to happen, regardless of the demand for Gortat.

The Wizards already blew a first rounder to get him...if they lose Gortat in free agency it would be an admission that the trade was a complete failure (which it was).

I would actually have some respect for Grunfail if he moved on from Gortat (and Ariza) and tried to build through free agency.

Trying to keep together a middling team with no hopes of a championship is more than likely what they do.


OK I get it that you didn't like the Gortat trade - but COMPLETE failure? The only way it was a complete failure is if you wanted to tank last year - not get to the second round of the playoffs. And this past year was a tough year to tank because so many other teams were tanking.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,500
And1: 2,148
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1710 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:40 pm

all im asking for is to let the market set the price--if we're the only ones looking to bring him in as a starter then why don't we start at 7 million a year in negotiations? why not actually negotiate?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,719
And1: 23,216
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1711 » by nate33 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:51 pm

Dark Faze wrote:
Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine 2m
Sources tell ESPN that Mavericks are in advanced talks on deal to complete trade that will bring Chandler and Raymond Felton to Dallas


watch us be literally the only team looking to get Gortat now and still end up "rewarding him" with a dumb contract

This is really good news though. Dallas was probably the biggest threat to pay Gortat big money. They're one of the few teams with cap room that are in "win now" mode who would be looking for older vets.
thinker07
Junior
Posts: 360
And1: 75
Joined: Jul 08, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1712 » by thinker07 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:59 pm

nate33 wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine 2m
Sources tell ESPN that Mavericks are in advanced talks on deal to complete trade that will bring Chandler and Raymond Felton to Dallas


watch us be literally the only team looking to get Gortat now and still end up "rewarding him" with a dumb contract

This is really good news though. Dallas was probably the biggest threat to pay Gortat big money. They're one of the few teams with cap room that are in "win now" mode who would be looking for older vets.


I think this helps make it possible to keep Gortat and Ariza for $20 million or less.
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,852
And1: 3,573
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1713 » by Rafael122 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:06 pm

nate33 wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine 2m
Sources tell ESPN that Mavericks are in advanced talks on deal to complete trade that will bring Chandler and Raymond Felton to Dallas


watch us be literally the only team looking to get Gortat now and still end up "rewarding him" with a dumb contract

This is really good news though. Dallas was probably the biggest threat to pay Gortat big money. They're one of the few teams with cap room that are in "win now" mode who would be looking for older vets.


Something I just thought about, will the focus on the Mavs move from Gortat to Ariza? They have $30 mil in cap space roughly, you would assume they will go ahead and re-sign Dirk to a Duncan-like contract, say 3 yrs/$30 million. That's enough money to go after Lowry/Bledsoe and Ariza.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,500
And1: 2,148
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1714 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:11 pm

lowry
ellis
ariza
dirk
chandler

not bad
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,509
And1: 11,704
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1715 » by Wizardspride » Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:29 pm

Dark Faze wrote:all im asking for is to let the market set the price--if we're the only ones looking to bring him in as a starter then why don't we start at 7 million a year in negotiations? why not actually negotiate?

So you would like Gortat to take a pay cut?

Last year he made 7.7

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,500
And1: 2,148
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1716 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:43 pm

Wizardspride wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:all im asking for is to let the market set the price--if we're the only ones looking to bring him in as a starter then why don't we start at 7 million a year in negotiations? why not actually negotiate?

So you would like Gortat to take a pay cut?

Last year he made 7.7


that's what negotiating is, you try to get him for the least you possibly can

you don't start your offer at 10 million to start when nobody else has even called his agent

so yea, if the highest offer is 7 then I want him to take a paycut because thats what the market dictates

if we're not going to have any superstars on this team then its imperative that Ernie makes us a winner through depth and thats only possible by strong negotiating and good signing
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,569
And1: 1,993
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1717 » by gambitx777 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:49 pm

I think we heavily explore sign and trade options for Ariza, I really think we should let him go, If he coasts us more than 7-8 mill a year. Gortat you can understand over paying for because he is arguably a top 15 center. But ariza, no you can easily replace a 3 and D guy like him with someone like Jordan Hamilton, who would be much cheaper!
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,066
And1: 10,579
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1718 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:57 pm

stevemcqueen1 wrote:Beal + Nene for DeMarcus Cousins + Ben McLemore. Thoughts?


No, Beal has a bright future and I just can't see letting him go after he had a decent playoffs.

Porter and Nene, yeah. In a heartbeat

Sent from my SGH-M919 using RealGM Forums mobile app
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1719 » by JWizmentality » Thu Jun 26, 2014 1:34 am

A headcase and Nick Young 2.0....great.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,412
And1: 6,819
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVII 

Post#1720 » by TGW » Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:05 am

thinker07 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
watch us be literally the only team looking to get Gortat now and still end up "rewarding him" with a dumb contract

This is really good news though. Dallas was probably the biggest threat to pay Gortat big money. They're one of the few teams with cap room that are in "win now" mode who would be looking for older vets.


I think this helps make it possible to keep Gortat and Ariza for $20 million or less.


:banghead:
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.

Return to Washington Wizards