InsideOut wrote:Kidd = Head of basketball operations.
Hammond = GM.
Drew = coach.
![]()
![]()
Do you honestly believe this would occur? Seriously? I think the likelihood of this occurring is about slim to none.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
InsideOut wrote:Kidd = Head of basketball operations.
Hammond = GM.
Drew = coach.
![]()
![]()
buckboy wrote:davids22 wrote:
So, I'm unclassy if I don't want a 6'4" 200# man who beat his wife representing my favorite franchise?
Whatever you say buddy.
I don't think it's the determining factor (inexperience would be for me), but it sure as hell doesn't help.
I don't like woman beaters. Sue me.
Nycballa2k wrote:Sherman Douglas wrote:I think we should make Chris Brown VP of Marketing. Sure, he's a piece of **** and not qualified at all, but can you imagine the excitement among our youth? That will get the arena done. It's all about da ticket sales.
couldn't be as bad as this post

Sherman Douglas wrote:StikWitEM wrote:Bruce Bowen being an idiot and taking jabs at the city of Milwaukee on Sportscenter. We need to shed this disparaging ignorance about our city. Jeez
Hiring a scumbag to run our team will surely do the trick.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Max Green wrote:As long as we don't give up any 1st round picks I'm more then fine with hiring Kidd as POBO. I understand he doesn't have any experience in a FO besides being a Head Coach for 1 year, but he's been involved with the NBA for the last 20 years, I'm pretty sure he has an idea on what the responsibilities are for the POBO and how to execute them. Also in that span of 20 years I'm sure he has identified who the Good GM's and Coaches are and I"m willing to give him the benefit of doubt that he will surround himself with highly qualified people.
StikWitEM wrote:Bruce Bowen being an idiot and taking jabs at the city of Milwaukee on Sportscenter. We need to shed this disparaging ignorance about our city. Jeez
emunney wrote:I find it hilarious that the guy who claimed to want nothing to do with Exum because of his unknown qualities wants to give total control of the organization to somebody with zero front office experience.
wichmae wrote:They have Jon Nichols already
Max Green wrote:Max Green wrote:As long as we don't give up any 1st round picks I'm more then fine with hiring Kidd as POBO. I understand he doesn't have any experience in a FO besides being a Head Coach for 1 year, but he's been involved with the NBA for the last 20 years, I'm pretty sure he has an idea on what the responsibilities are for the POBO and how to execute them. Also in that span of 20 years I'm sure he has identified who the Good GM's and Coaches are and I"m willing to give him the benefit of doubt that he will surround himself with highly qualified people.
After sleeping on it I still feel the same way. I hope this happens. We are taking a risk no doubt, and this could potentially blow up in our face, but if Kidd is able to thrive in his role then we will have found our Riley, Ainge, West etc... that could have our franchise running in the right direction for the next couple of decades.
Sherman Douglas wrote:weezybaby856 wrote:Sherman Douglas wrote:If I had been working there for a week and had been hired despite having no college degree and a checkered history, it would be wrong.
I get ur point but Billy Kings entire NBA accomplishment list is a joke on it's own. Kidds credentials as a player almost outweighs anything King has done. So while I agree with ur argument, it certainly doesn't apply here at all. I'd rather give a fresh start to an unknown and see what he's got then continue to trust some hack that has done zippo during his tenure just because he has a piece of paper laminated and hung on the wall behind his desk.
It's not an either or situation. The two options are not keep Billy King or hire Jason Kidd. Even if Billy King is not qualified for the job, Jason Kidd is even less qualified, so he has no right to try and push him out the door.
It was a power play by someone who had no leverage, which is why he's now trying to come here and rebound with us. And I can't believe anyone is actually for it.
wichmae wrote:They have Jon Nichols already
VooDoo7 wrote:For those who are saying "well at least it'd be better than Hammond/Drew"....ugh, I won't even say what I wanna because I don't feel like getting banned.

DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
wichmae wrote:stillgotgame wrote:AussieBuck wrote:Explain it to me someone, these numbers mean nothing to us foreign types.
In 1982 when I took the test, 1600 was the max score. You got 400 for filling out your name correctly. There were 60 math and 60 English questions, each worth 10 points each. The questions started out very easy, and got progressively harder. They were multiple choice, with 5 selections.
A score of 670 would be 27/120 questions right.
Kidd scored higher than our Ivy League president (580). SAT scores mean very little to me.
Sherman Douglas wrote:I think we should make Chris Brown VP of Marketing. Sure, he's a piece of **** and not qualified at all, but can you imagine the excitement among our youth? That will get the arena done. It's all about da ticket sales.

Chuck Diesel wrote:Save Our Bucks needs to step up here with the thoughtful concern they've shown in the past.
