Avenger wrote:Lateral Quicks wrote:
Really? That's an interesting perspective. So a pitcher that goes 7 innings one night and 2 innings the next is just as consistent as a guy who goes 6 innings one game and 8 the next?
A Clayton Kershaw or Yu Darvish don't usually have games where they get chased in 2 innings giving up 6 runs, its not because they're consistent, its because they're good. J.A Happ has a game like yesterday and then the next start he gives up 7 runs in 4 innings, its not because he's inconsistent, its because he's mediocre.
Lateral Quicks wrote:Tell me which numbers are incorrect.
Pretty much all of them but why don't you go through them yourself, compare his NL numbers and his AL East numbers, there's no difference he might have actually gotten better.
http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?pl ... position=PAnd compare his numbers with other AL East pitchers, i already did the work for you which you conveniently ignored and pretended that they don't exist. There's 8 SP pitchers worse than JA Happ in the AL East, one on our own team and somehow he's a AAAA pitcher for you, what is anyone supposed to say to that ridiculous argument.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?p ... &sort=18,d
So because J.A. Happ is outperforming guys like Jake Peavy in less than half a season of pitching means he's a solid #5? That's a fascinating argument. I'm surprised we're even having this debate, given Happ has barely been able to hold down a starting job since becoming a Blue Jay. Let's go through your list one by one.
Chris Tillman - last year put up WAR of 4.4 (Happ's career WAR is < 6)
Erik Bedard - has had good career, only pitching now because TB is desperate (hell, they're so desperate they might even consider J.A. Happ!)
Jake Peavy - career WAR of 35; enough said
Miguel Gonzalez - agreed, he sucks
Bud Norris - OK, he sucks too
Ubaldo Jimenez - prized free agent, career WAR of over 20
Vidal Nuno - rookie, has plenty of rope
R.A Dickey - two years removed from Cy Young, has big conract
So out of a bunch of guys with either much better track records, higher contracts, or rookies/inexperienced, Happ is better than them based on a single metric over barely more than a handful of starts, meaning he's a legit #5 (or #4 even). OK then.
And no, Happ has not been better as a Blue Jay. The statistics I'm looking at have gotten worse, not better. Adjusted for quality of opposition? Perhaps.