ImageImageImageImageImage

MeloDrama Part V

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,009
And1: 45,778
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#861 » by GONYK » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:17 pm

J0rdan4life42o wrote:Who knows, maybe PJ wanting tbe Knicks job was all a ploy to:

1. Help facilitate Melo to LA, which sways James to join the Lakers soon after
2. Help get 2 of his disciples head coaching gigs
3. Take $10 M of Dolans money for a years worth of keeping his feet up at a desk, only to step down that offseason citing differences between ownership and himself
4. Signs a lucrative deal with the Lakers, taking the dual role of President/head coach

If anyone's capable of masterminding this type of genius (without getting caught of course), it would be Phil Jackson.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using RealGM Forums mobile app


That is the least Zen thing I've ever heard
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#862 » by K_ick_God » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:18 pm

P Gasol shouldn't be a selling point to Melo in LA or NY.
knicksrbake
Junior
Posts: 302
And1: 111
Joined: Jul 21, 2012

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#863 » by knicksrbake » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:19 pm

SlikRik7 wrote:FYI, there is a sign and trade option with the Bulls that does not involve Boozer.

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1332779


1) Trade the three unguaranteeds, Snell, Smith, a first and a signed-and-traded Hinrich (three year deal starting at $5,184,140) to New York, as well as Dunleavy to wherever the hell someone wants him, in exchange for Melo starting at an even $20 mil.

:lol:

Snell, Smith, and a 1st for Melo? Is everyone from the Bulls board a raging alcoholic?
User avatar
CoolKids
RealGM
Posts: 14,447
And1: 2,650
Joined: Feb 17, 2009
Location: The Bronx
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#864 » by CoolKids » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:19 pm

SlikRik7 wrote:FYI, there is a sign and trade option with the Bulls that does not involve Boozer.

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1332779

Thats even worse
User avatar
DowNY
RealGM
Posts: 13,879
And1: 10,366
Joined: Dec 19, 2010
Location: Your mom's crib, NYC
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#865 » by DowNY » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:19 pm

NYMNYKFN10 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ramonashelburne/status/485856426519449601[/tweet]

Whenever she reports something, it's usually not gonna happen. I remember her putting false hope in "LakersNation" regarding Phil Jackson curving the Knicks & actually going to LA.
IrishBeatdown
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,742
And1: 1,052
Joined: Apr 13, 2011

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#866 » by IrishBeatdown » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:22 pm

SelbyCobra wrote:
IrishBeatdown wrote:
SelbyCobra wrote:But as you say later in posts, they have to clear the space to sign him outright at the money he wants. The only reason teams were "forced" to accept S&T for stars in the past was to get the extra year for the player, and that's not possible anymore. You either have the money to sign the player outright, or you have to bend to the team that's trading him in order to get the player on your roster at the money he wants.

There is no longer any "recouping whatever possible" aspect to S&Ts under the new CBA because the trading team can't pass the 5th year or annual increases on to the accepting team.

The entirety of you and everyone else who is discussing a S&T using terms such as "if it came down to it" and "something rather than nothing" have a fundamentally incorrect understanding of the new CBA rules.

There are quite literally only two scenarios involving Melo to the Bulls:

1) The Bulls clear enough space to give him his desired salary outright.

2) The Bulls do not have enough money to give Melo his desired salary outright, but he wants to play there.

In scenario one the Knicks have no leverage and just get boned over. Lose Melo, no assets returned.

In scenario two the Bulls are completely at the Knicks' mercy. They have to satisfy the Knicks or PJax just sits there with his hands folded smiling.

But again, these trade scenarios where the Knicks have no leverage and are being forced into accepting assets are misinformed fan ramblings based on the previous CBA, not the current one.

Agree, I actually addressed that specifically in my post:
IrishBeatdown wrote:I agree with the fact that Chicago isn't going to force-feed a trade to NY. Isn't going to happen. If NY doesn't want Boozer for the price of two 1sts, than they don't do the deal, simple as that.

The motivation on NY's part is the LA nuclear option. Melo leaves for nothing, point black, NY is left with nothing. In that situation NY is in full rebuild mode and will be looking to clear cap and hoard picks, even if that means taking on cap short term.

LAL offering the max is one of the only bargaining chips CHI even has. If NY is convinced Melo will leave for nothing, suddenly the alternative of Boozer for 2 firsts and Mirotic becomes more attractive. You only take on his salary for one year, get the best prospect in europe, get one pick in the 10-14 range, and one in the late first round. Boozer helps with the tank, NY is free to really suck once Melo is gone and can tank its way into the top 5.

If you know Melo is leaving, why not do this? But then again, not everyone wants to blow it up.


Because it's not the Knicks choice of where to send Melo, it's his own. A scenario where Melo says, "I'm not re-signing and am going to either the Lakers or Bulls, get a S&T with Chicago if you can," isn't nuclear, it's just illogical and a hypothetical that has no place in the practical world.

Yeah, my whole argument is predicated on the idea that faced with a decision of whether to get a deal in a situation where you may end up with nothing, the knicks agree to take on short term salary for picks & prospects.

If I was losing Melo, I would rather have 2-3 first rounders and Mirotic than absolutely nothing to kick off my rebuild, but that is just me. In a vacuum, that makes sense, right? Or still illogical?
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#867 » by K_ick_God » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:23 pm

Yikes I don't see how Marvin Williams keeps LeBron in Miami. Riley just has a bad hand to play here.
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#868 » by Thugger HBC » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:24 pm

SlikRik7 wrote:FYI, there is a sign and trade option with the Bulls that does not involve Boozer.

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1332779


It really isnt just Boozer, the proposals just arent anything remote to good.

"Trade the three unguaranteeds, Snell, Smith, a first and a signed-and-traded Hinrich (three year deal starting at $5,184,140) to New York, as well as Dunleavy to wherever the hell someone wants him, in exchange for Melo starting at an even $20 mil."

Even if this is accurate, dont have a reason to care, the deal is what the rest were...garbage.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
bigfnjoe96
General Manager
Posts: 7,912
And1: 3,948
Joined: Jul 02, 2009
       

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#869 » by bigfnjoe96 » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:26 pm

Bulls Fans are still stuck in 2010 with these S&T offers. They keep using the LBJ S&T to Miami as a base for their scenarios.

Just a heads up Bulls Fans we're in 2014

Sent from my G2 via Tapatalk
Image
Workforce250
Banned User
Posts: 3,643
And1: 900
Joined: Oct 03, 2012

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#870 » by Workforce250 » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:26 pm

Thugger HBC wrote:
Moose wrote:
Workforce250 wrote:

So Dogg, as a NY fan, wouldn't you prefer to get Detriot or Minny involved and with up with Love or much stronger "assets"? Dude NOBODY wants Boozer, not EVEN the Bulls or it's fanbase.
hell no, tired of taking in players in big contracts nobody wants!!!!!! A bunch f unknowns for Camelo Anthony? Ludicrous


If Melo wants to leave, then yes, I would take that package.

And we would have cap space and assets to send to the twolves for Love. Draft picks, MCD, Mirotic, Shump, THJ, etc.

We can sign Gasol in the off-season too.

You have to have something to attract these upper level guys, unless they're just in it for the cheese.

Love in NY without Melo? He wont sign the extension for that.[/quote
]

Bro but dudes are acting as tho Taj is not part of deal. We gutted our team for Melo, guess what? We're Denver now.
User avatar
LJ4pointplay
Knicks Forum GM King
Posts: 8,283
And1: 1,324
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#871 » by LJ4pointplay » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:27 pm

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/los-angele ... 20herring/

This situation is very odd. Herring is the best of the beat writers in my opinion.
User avatar
Futureisnow
Head Coach
Posts: 7,025
And1: 1,282
Joined: Oct 28, 2009
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#872 » by Futureisnow » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:28 pm

knicksrbake wrote:
SlikRik7 wrote:FYI, there is a sign and trade option with the Bulls that does not involve Boozer.

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1332779


1) Trade the three unguaranteeds, Snell, Smith, a first and a signed-and-traded Hinrich (three year deal starting at $5,184,140) to New York, as well as Dunleavy to wherever the hell someone wants him, in exchange for Melo starting at an even $20 mil.

:lol:

Snell, Smith, and a 1st for Melo? Is everyone from the Bulls board a raging alcoholic?


They keep trying to use the jedi mind trick on us. It's funny.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,009
And1: 45,778
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#873 » by GONYK » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:28 pm

LJ4pointplay wrote:http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/los-angeles-lakers-emerge-as-contenders-for-carmelo-anthony-1404674407?mobile=y&KEYWORDS=chris%20herring/


If you read Herring's twitter, even he doesn't really believe the LAL hype.
User avatar
Futureisnow
Head Coach
Posts: 7,025
And1: 1,282
Joined: Oct 28, 2009
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#874 » by Futureisnow » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:30 pm

LAL doesn't offer a chance to "win" and it's less money than we could offer. Chiraq has a better chance of getting Melo than LA, and Chiraq has no chance. I'd put LA's chances at less than zero
KnicksFan_11
Ballboy
Posts: 36
And1: 15
Joined: Jun 23, 2014

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#875 » by KnicksFan_11 » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:32 pm

Anyone follow this or know who it is?

DYST Now @DYST_Now
Follow
SOURCE: Carmelo Anthony expected to reach a verbal agreement with the Knicks as early as tomorrow. The deal will be for the max.
2:49 PM - 6 Jul 2014

The only way the verbal agreement won't happen is if LeBron and him decide to team up somewhere. However that's unlikely to happen.
User avatar
NYMNYKFN10
Analyst
Posts: 3,318
And1: 1,605
Joined: Jun 29, 2010
   

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#876 » by NYMNYKFN10 » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:32 pm

Looks like Phil is urging Melo to not take the max.

Looks like Melo wants the max. Guy is not about winning, just wants his money.

According to a person familiar with the situation, Anthony felt as if he got mixed signals from the New York Knicks during his meeting with the team on Thursday. While Anthony and his camp were told that he could have a maximum contract if he wanted it, a source said, team president Phil Jackson continued to preach the virtues of taking less than the maximum—a message that left Anthony questioning whether the max offer was sincere.
duetta
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,437
And1: 12,886
Joined: Aug 28, 2002
Location: Patrolling the middle....

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#877 » by duetta » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:34 pm

NYMNYKFN10 wrote:Looks like Phil is urging Melo to not take the max.

Looks like Melo wants the max. Guy is not about winning, just wants his money.


Absolutely. Which is why I continue to say, promise him anything, but just don't give him a no-trade.
Workforce250
Banned User
Posts: 3,643
And1: 900
Joined: Oct 03, 2012

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#878 » by Workforce250 » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:36 pm

NYMNYKFN10 wrote:Looks like Phil is urging Melo to not take the max.

Looks like Melo wants the max. Guy is not about winning, just wants his money.

According to a person familiar with the situation, Anthony felt as if he got mixed signals from the New York Knicks during his meeting with the team on Thursday. While Anthony and his camp were told that he could have a maximum contract if he wanted it, a source said, team president Phil Jackson continued to preach the virtues of taking less than the maximum—a message that left Anthony questioning whether the max offer was sincere.



Boy you"re REALLY quick to jump yhr gun and base judgement by people you don't even know.
User avatar
FemaleDogPlease
Veteran
Posts: 2,858
And1: 1,473
Joined: Jun 30, 2010

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#879 » by FemaleDogPlease » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:36 pm

NYMNYKFN10 wrote:Looks like Phil is urging Melo to not take the max.

Looks like Melo wants the max. Guy is not about winning, just wants his money.

According to a person familiar with the situation, Anthony felt as if he got mixed signals from the New York Knicks during his meeting with the team on Thursday. While Anthony and his camp were told that he could have a maximum contract if he wanted it, a source said, team president Phil Jackson continued to preach the virtues of taking less than the maximum—a message that left Anthony questioning whether the max offer was sincere.



These writers are desperate. No news so they make it up.
liknicks7
Rookie
Posts: 1,174
And1: 431
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: MeloDrama Part V 

Post#880 » by liknicks7 » Sun Jul 6, 2014 7:36 pm

KnicksFan_11 wrote:Anyone follow this or know who it is?

DYST Now @DYST_Now
Follow
SOURCE: Carmelo Anthony expected to reach a verbal agreement with the Knicks as early as tomorrow. The deal will be for the max.
2:49 PM - 6 Jul 2014

The only way the verbal agreement won't happen is if LeBron and him decide to team up somewhere. However that's unlikely to happen.

Syracuse based. Def not full proof but shouldn't be dismissed.

Return to New York Knicks