SelbyCobra wrote:IrishBeatdown wrote:Lets be honest, NYK would S&T him for a first rounder if it came down to it, if it doesn't involve taking on Boozer, Phil isn't going to turn down assets out of pride.
But as you say later in posts, they have to clear the space to sign him outright at the money he wants. The only reason teams were "forced" to accept S&T for stars in the past was to get the extra year for the player, and that's not possible anymore. You either have the money to sign the player outright, or you have to bend to the team that's trading him in order to get the player on your roster at the money he wants.
There is no longer any "recouping whatever possible" aspect to S&Ts under the new CBA because the trading team can't pass the 5th year or annual increases on to the accepting team.
The entirety of you and everyone else who is discussing a S&T using terms such as "if it came down to it" and "something rather than nothing" have a fundamentally incorrect understanding of the new CBA rules.
There are quite literally only two scenarios involving Melo to the Bulls:
1) The Bulls clear enough space to give him his desired salary outright.
2) The Bulls do not have enough money to give Melo his desired salary outright, but he wants to play there.
In scenario one the Knicks have no leverage and just get boned over. Lose Melo, no assets returned.
In scenario two the Bulls are completely at the Knicks' mercy. They have to satisfy the Knicks or PJax just sits there with his hands folded smiling.
But again, these trade scenarios where the Knicks have no leverage and are being forced into accepting assets are misinformed fan ramblings based on the previous CBA, not the current one.
Solid post and generally correct except for a couple of addendums.
In the second scenario, Melo could create leverage to increase pressure on the Knicks to get a S&T deal done with Chicago by using a 3rd team that has enough cap space to sign him directly, and that he is willing to go to, but not as much as he wants to go to Chicago.
I wonder if that's why his side might be leaking that he wants LA, just to use the spectre of signing with LA to force the Knicks to work out a S&T to Chicago or lose him to LA for nothing. Though if that's the case, you may have to question his sincerity about signing with LA, and divine whether it's a negotiating ploy to force a Chicago S&T and call his bluff or if he really means to choose LA over NY and the extra money.
Also, there's a 3rd scenario, where a team which was over the cap has managed to create sufficient cap space to give him the max but would still prefer a S&T. This is because when a team trades away player to go from over the cap to under the cap, that cap space is not created immediately. What is created is a traded player exception. In order to realize that cap space for a free agent signing, the team must renounce the traded player exception (along with possibly the BAE and non-taxpayer MLE) to free up that cap space. If the team is instead able to work out a S&T using that traded player exception, instead of renouncing it for cap space, then the team might be able keep its BAE and non-taxpayer MLE (instead of having it devolve into the Room MLE). But that's not the case here, if Chicago is not able to create that cap space to give him the max in the first place.