RealGM Top 100 List #4

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,679
And1: 3,174
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#221 » by Owly » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:10 pm

JordansBulls wrote:
colts18 wrote:I don't know how anyone can say that Wilt's teammates weren't that good. That's true until 1965 but from 66-onwards he consistently had the most loaded cast. In 68 his much more talented team lost to the Celtics. Same deal in 69. In 70 his team was more talented.

Exactly from 1966 to 1969 Wilt lost 3 times with a superior team and HCA that is what harmed him in any debate vs Russell.

Except his homecourt in '66 was misleading. Boston had injuries in the '66 RS which artificially deflated their win loss record (and to a lesser degree their SRS) and yet Boston still had the better SRS.

'67 they won. Handily.

'68 they were better. But if you don't know about the degree of injuries that they suffered in the '68 playoffs you haven't been reading these threads.

'69 is well known by those who care. I've discussed this, so have others. Wilt carries his share of the blame (not for the game 7 injury, but for the team level problems).

'70 was a miracle Wilt was playing. And his finals stats speak for themselves.
colts18 wrote:In 1963 Wilt Chamberlain posted a 31.8 PER. That is an NBA record. His team also had 2 all-stars (one of them led the league in assists per game). His team won just 31 games that season. That is his statistical peak and translated into no impact at all in win-loss column. What other superstar can you say that about? Even KG, T-Mac's, and Kobe's awful teams won more games than that. I'm still not sure if volume scorer Wilt had much of an impact with the exception of 1964.

For the last time. Maximum of 3 all-stars per team (so Boston and any other deep team can't have more than 3), there are 5 teams in the East and 12 all-star spots. That's 2.4 expected all stars (and with a cap of 3 so deep teams can't take the proportion they deserve) and Philly were the second best team the previous year. If you believe Tom Meschery and Guy Rodgers were great players explain why. But don't not name them and say 2 all-stars as though that's the same things as today.

And no impact? You really think that team posts an SRS (-1.86) which would expect to produce 35-45 record without Wilt? The '63 team. Really?

GC Pantalones wrote:
Spoiler:
Owly wrote:My quick responses to a reasonable argument
Doctor MJ wrote:
Yup. This is my issue when people say things like "well he lost to Russell and Russell is already in". Russell doesn't deserve to be in first because he won - even casual fans know this is a team sport - he deserves it because he clearly outplayed Wilt when you look at helping his team win.
Is it clear though. Sportwriter accolades went clearly to Wilt at the time. You've got George Kiseda saying 1 in 3 nights, Wilt won, one in three Russell won, and one in three Wilt dominated. Russell has great with/without numbers so long as you're willing to ignore '57 (the largest sample, and one in which the team hadn't built a style around Russell). And you've got the above which seems to suggest Wilt didn't have great impact, except as Colts notes they got significantly worse when he left, and as we will discuss later, Wilt was seriously ill at the time.

Doctor MJ wrote:And you know who else did? Look at that list.
See above.

Doctor MJ wrote:I realize that things have progressed since then but basketball had been around over half a century at the time and everyone instantly recognized the physical talent of Wilt. That he wasn't able to do more was a shock to them because as people here suggest, it seems like it should be simple. What Wilt instead proved to be was a bed sheet too small for the bed. You pull one corner to solve one problem and next thing you know it's something else.
Hard to argue with a metaphor. I suppose I'd say you need someone not incompetent at bedmaking in charge, not trying to put him on sidewise. I'd also note his obvious initial impact.

Doctor MJ wrote:I think in general people have far too much faith in their own superior ability to handle Wilt...and I actually think that makes them a lot like the more problematic people of that time.
I don't think I'd be a good coach for Wilt. I think a decent or better NBA coach (i.e. not a good ex-pro who the owner likes, or whatever, with little or no experience; or an unflexible combatative coach who rigidly abides by one system), would be a good coach for Wilt. And they were.

Doctor MJ wrote:I think if you aren't awestruck by Hannum's move you aren't seeing things how they were, and if you're not discouraged that even Hannum's struggled to maintain Wilt's focus for what today would be a fraction of the duration of a max deal I really don't know what else to say.
I think if you don't see Chamberlain's immediate impact on D or that teams were successful with Wilt as a low post scorer (see '62) in spite of poor floor spacing, or that Hannum had Wilt in plenty enough focused for the '68 Sixers to be clearly the NBA's best team who got crippled by injuries in the playoffs. Or if reffering to '65 I'd note serious injuries including the possible/suspected heart attack/pancreatitis and weight loss, the fact his team was 1-4 when he arrived. "At times the Warriors look like out-clinic patients at St. Mary's Hostpital" said the SF Chronicles Stu Herman (per The Rivalry p220). Then John Thompson broke his nose on December 4th (in his absence SF lost twice 81-105 to Boston and 93-113 to St Louis both at home). I think Wilt did slip back into scoring Wilt at this time, but partly out of necessity with other players injured and ineffective. And to be honest I do tend to care more what a guy does to a good team rather than to a lousy one. With trade rumours, the team not fully healthy and lousy without him (1-6, with 680 points scored, 748 conceded, a net loss of 68 points, or -9.714285714 per game) ill-health and a broken nose, I think Wilt didn't help as much as he might have. He's probably a poor guy (of these all-time elites) to have in this situation. I don't think anybody really helps make your team relevent here though.

Well how come when Wilt gets to great teams his impact looks minuscule. I can't get out of my head that he raised crappy teams to average levels but didn't really help great teams as much as others here and unlike Hakeem he didn't raise bad teams to championship levels because he didn't perform in the post season.

Not sure which teams you're referring to. But my thoughts are on record here. I guess you're talking the Lakers as the elite team. That has been explained somewhat in posts but '69 is clearly on the debit side of the ledger for Wilt. Over the period he stayed there he clearly improved them significantly. I don't know to which team you're reffering to in terms of making them average. Again my vote and other Wilt voters have offered a lot of thoughts on his impact. And Hakeem is IMO, a poor analogy because he was surrounded by excellent floor spacers and defenders (and because he didn't win any more titles, albeit he did so in a larger league, and because he didn't go through the era's dominant team, or indeed as noted here his team's worst matchup - Seattle). Wilt's playoff numbers and success has been largely explained in terms of a large number of games played against Russell. But if playoffs is heavily weighted in your criteria I could understand how Hakeem looks good and Wilt doesn't so much.
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,255
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#222 » by colts18 » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:12 pm

From 1998-2006 we have RAPM data that says Duncan was better than KG every single one of those years and had a higher defensive RAPM in all of those years.
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,255
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#223 » by colts18 » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:16 pm

colts18 wrote:From 1998-2006 we have RAPM data that says Duncan was better than KG every single one of those years and had a higher defensive RAPM in all of those years.

From xRAPM.

Rank Player Poss off/100 def/100 ovr/100
2 LeBron James 61621 6.58 1.06 7.65
3 Tim Duncan 81972 2.45 4.94 7.39
4 Shaquille O'Neal 87045 3.86 3.18 7.03
7 Kevin Garnett 92279 1.85 3.98 5.82

xRAPM has Duncan and Shaq ahead of KG.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,238
And1: 26,114
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#224 » by Clyde Frazier » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:18 pm

Vote for #4 - Magic

My reasoning from the last thread:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... sma02.html

12x all star
10x all NBA (9 1st, 1 2nd)
3x reg season MVP (6 other top 3 finishes)
3x Finals MVP
5 championships
Career leader in APG

Not many players started their career off with a bang the way magic did. He led the lakers to 60 wins and a famous finals clinching performance against the sixers with 42 pts, 15 rebounds, and 7 assists. This came against a sixers team who ranked 1st in DRTG that season. To have that kind of impact out the gate as a rookie is almost unfathomable (yes, i'm aware russell had a similar impact).

His marked consistency throughout his career from a statistical as well as team standpoint (lakers made the finals 9 times from 80-91) was remarkable. For a guy who never really developed a 3 pt shot and did play guard regardless of size, posting a TS% of 60+ for the majority of his career was more than impressive.

No doubt he had plenty of talent around him over the years, but he was the key to navigating that team to their success throughout the 80s (queue the "tragic johnson" stories...) He had a truly unique impact on the court due to decision making that was only rivaled by a select few in the history of the league.

Haven't been able to find any RAPM data from the 80s, but this chart from the 90s indicates that even late in his career, magic was at the top of the list:

http://stats-for-the-nba.appspot.com/ratings/90s.html

We need to consider the fact that magic was forced to retire at 31 due to illness, and not a basketball related injury. It makes me wonder how productive and successful he would've been up to say age 35. I know it's discussed, but not nearly as much as I would expect. In his last season he played in 79 games, averaging the following:

19 PPG, 7 RPG, 12.5 APG, 1 SPG

~47% FG, 38% 3PT, 86% FT, 62% TS

117/107 OFF/DEF rating, .18 WS/48

His playoff production taking the lakers to the finals that year didn't drop off much at all, scoring more PPG on only a slightly lower TS%. Considering he still put up respectable #s at 36 after being out of the league for 5 years, I could see his production only dipping slightly each season from 31 to 35.

I can't help but think about how Walton's short prime is valued so highly when the majority of his career was derailed by injuries. I'm not saying he isn't deserving, but a guy like ralph sampson (who yes, wasn't as good as walton) for example doesn't really get the same treatment.

*EDIT* - Long story short, it's just something to think about. My ranking magic #3 is still based on his NBA career as a whole only.


I'd like to clarify 1 other thing about wondering how magic's career would progress if he never got HIV: there's a significant and consistent sample size upon which we could extrapolate. That isn't the case for guys like sabonis who came into the league post prime or walton who in his very short prime only played in 60+ games in 1 season.

Again, not part of my ranking. Just think he's more of a unique case than others.

Some game footage of note:

85 Playoffs G5 vs. Blazers - 34 PTS, 9 REB, 19 AST (closeout game)

http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 70LAL.html

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWm93xi3x8U[/youtube]

88-99 vs. Sixers - 32 PTS, 11 REB, 20 AST

http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 80PHI.html

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LoELfNFZaQ[/youtube]

88 Playoffs G7 vs. Jazz - 23 PTS, 9 REB, 16 AST

http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 10LAL.html

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa6GJo2fCYQ[/youtube]

87 Finals G4 vs. Celtics - 29 PTS, 8 REB, 5 AST (famous game winning hook shot down the middle)

http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 90BOS.html

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n1-KIcoIzU[/youtube]

80 Finals G6 vs. Sixers - 42 PTS, 15 REB, 7 AST (closeout game without kareem)

http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 60PHI.html

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=au7WJbus5BM[/youtube]
MisterWestside
Starter
Posts: 2,449
And1: 596
Joined: May 25, 2012

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#225 » by MisterWestside » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:19 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:Oh and too the point about the lack of shooters in the 60s impacting the efficacy of a low post scorer that is something worth considering.

I'd be cautious going too far with it though. Something I've pointed out before is how Wilt's actual impact didn't correlate much at all with his stats. By that I mean not that he didn't have impact but that he maintained his stats while his impact seemed to fluctuate drastically.


Because the context (and the optimal conditions for his impact) isn't constant. From San Fran to Philly to L.A..

Case in point: as a center then and now, it's the defense that makes you the highest ceiling guy around. There's never been a way to get around the fact that you can keep a low post guy from getting the ball and this is why we're less and less likely to seeing volume scoring at all from a big. wilt had the clear cut way of doing what bigs do to make reliable huge impact right in front of him always.


On offense? Absolutely not. See the earlier posts in this thread. Even Russell had issues woth this, despite being a solid passer from the block and having a solid set of moves.
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,822
And1: 25,116
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#226 » by E-Balla » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:28 pm

Owly wrote:
GC Pantalones wrote:
Spoiler:
Owly wrote:My quick responses to a reasonable argumentIs it clear though. Sportwriter accolades went clearly to Wilt at the time. You've got George Kiseda saying 1 in 3 nights, Wilt won, one in three Russell won, and one in three Wilt dominated. Russell has great with/without numbers so long as you're willing to ignore '57 (the largest sample, and one in which the team hadn't built a style around Russell). And you've got the above which seems to suggest Wilt didn't have great impact, except as Colts notes they got significantly worse when he left, and as we will discuss later, Wilt was seriously ill at the time.

See above.

Hard to argue with a metaphor. I suppose I'd say you need someone not incompetent at bedmaking in charge, not trying to put him on sidewise. I'd also note his obvious initial impact.

I don't think I'd be a good coach for Wilt. I think a decent or better NBA coach (i.e. not a good ex-pro who the owner likes, or whatever, with little or no experience; or an unflexible combatative coach who rigidly abides by one system), would be a good coach for Wilt. And they were.

I think if you don't see Chamberlain's immediate impact on D or that teams were successful with Wilt as a low post scorer (see '62) in spite of poor floor spacing, or that Hannum had Wilt in plenty enough focused for the '68 Sixers to be clearly the NBA's best team who got crippled by injuries in the playoffs. Or if reffering to '65 I'd note serious injuries including the possible/suspected heart attack/pancreatitis and weight loss, the fact his team was 1-4 when he arrived. "At times the Warriors look like out-clinic patients at St. Mary's Hostpital" said the SF Chronicles Stu Herman (per The Rivalry p220). Then John Thompson broke his nose on December 4th (in his absence SF lost twice 81-105 to Boston and 93-113 to St Louis both at home). I think Wilt did slip back into scoring Wilt at this time, but partly out of necessity with other players injured and ineffective. And to be honest I do tend to care more what a guy does to a good team rather than to a lousy one. With trade rumours, the team not fully healthy and lousy without him (1-6, with 680 points scored, 748 conceded, a net loss of 68 points, or -9.714285714 per game) ill-health and a broken nose, I think Wilt didn't help as much as he might have. He's probably a poor guy (of these all-time elites) to have in this situation. I don't think anybody really helps make your team relevent here though.

Well how come when Wilt gets to great teams his impact looks minuscule. I can't get out of my head that he raised crappy teams to average levels but didn't really help great teams as much as others here and unlike Hakeem he didn't raise bad teams to championship levels because he didn't perform in the post season.

Not sure which teams you're referring to. But my thoughts are on record here. I guess you're talking the Lakers as the elite team. That has been explained somewhat in posts but '69 is clearly on the debit side of the ledger for Wilt. Over the period he stayed there he clearly improved them significantly. I don't know to which team you're reffering to in terms of making them average. Again my vote and other Wilt voters have offered a lot of thoughts on his impact. And Hakeem is IMO, a poor analogy because he was surrounded by excellent floor spacers and defenders (and because he didn't win any more titles, albeit he did so in a larger league, and because he didn't go through the era's dominant team, or indeed as noted here his team's worst matchup - Seattle). Wilt's playoff numbers and success has been largely explained in terms of a large number of games played against Russell. But if playoffs is heavily weighted in your criteria I could understand how Hakeem looks good and Wilt doesn't so much.

When I say he made teams average I'm speaking on the late San Fransisco years. 61 on. The average level of those teams weren't too good.

I guess if you don't value postseason that much I can see this high ranking for Wilt but personally I care about how many rings I can get with a guy and Wilt has a lacking shelf life in that regard.
MisterWestside
Starter
Posts: 2,449
And1: 596
Joined: May 25, 2012

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#227 » by MisterWestside » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:30 pm

ElGee wrote:All the different criteria is a bit disorienting. With the exception of a few posters who explicitly link back to their criteria, I have no idea who values what in a GOAT list. The amount of discussion in the last thread about judging players based on the modern era was really surprising and incredibly abstract for me.


And, thankfully, no such (set) criteria were ever stipulated. If this was "Rank the players based on the impact that they achieved in their own era", the rankings would be virtually set in stone for many players. It would also be a boring exercise. As another astute basketball statistician/historian I know once told me, "There's no such thing as a definitive set of rankings." There's lots to consider, and different viewpoints will emerge. Personally, I enjoy hearing them. If some posters feel that they're wasting their time however, then they should come back with the required omnipotence to end all disputes.

However, I do agree with the issue of consistency.
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,861
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#228 » by drza » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:36 pm

colts18 wrote:
drza wrote:Official Vote: Kevin Garnett

Why do you have KG ranked higher than Shaq? Shaq was consistently better in RAPM stats and was a much better playoff performer.


In order, no he wasn't, and that's worth discussion.

I've watched how you use RAPM over time. On the one hand I applaud it, because I remember your arguments when you first started posting here and they've gotten more sophisticated and supported, which is a great thing. On the other hand, I've also noticed that you tend to be very selective with using different types of RAPM to better fit your case without being clear on that. You've already done it in this thread, pulling out XRAPM data and calling it RAPM (when you KNOW it isn't the same thing). This can be dangerous, especially in this environment where any type of "advanced" statistical analysis is held in such suspicion. Selective/preferential application of stats as you do can start to smack of those that believe in the "lies, damn lies and statistics meme".

How that relates, here. The "state of the art" (as it were) of non-boxscore based RAPM, is the prior informed approach. As I'm sure you're aware, KG doesn't take a back seat to anyone in that approach, including Shaq.

If you like XRAPM, by all means cite it. But make sure you're clear that this is what you're using, how it's different from the RAPM that you know others have started to get more of a feel for and/or appreciate for it's orthogonality to the box score data, and make sure that you don't mix them up. And have the same clarity/transparency when you use non prior informed RAPM. And see...even us going back in forth in this way is going to generate negative sentiments from some of the others in the project because we're trying to outnerd each other on something that not everyone is even convinced is fully relevant. We should be making arguments that are basketball-based, and only use the stats to support that. Not challenging each other with dubious 1-liner posts built on incorrect (or at least deceptive) data analysis
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
ceiling raiser
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,531
And1: 3,754
Joined: Jan 27, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#229 » by ceiling raiser » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:37 pm

GC Pantalones wrote:When I say he made teams average I'm speaking on the late San Fransisco years. 61 on. The average level of those teams weren't too good.

I guess if you don't value postseason that much I can see this high ranking for Wilt but personally I care about how many rings I can get with a guy and Wilt has a lacking shelf life in that regard.

Regarding Wilt in the postseason:
Image
(btw O = playoff ORtg - DRtg of avg team faced, D = playoff DRtg - ORtg of avg team faced)
His teams were consistently good to terrific defensively in the postseason, with two exceptions.

Offensively, he only played two playoffs in a volume scoring role with great shooters (65 and 66), and in 66 they wet the bed (that being said, in 66 Wilt is not blame free because of some skipped practices before the final two games, though Dipper addressed that here: viewtopic.php?p=40413952#p40413952).

Now, my concern is...the two seasons he had shooters and was in a volume scoring role, were the same two seasons his teams were poor defensively (and the only two such seasons in his career). Is that a coincidence? In earlier seasons even with poor shooters, he was committed defensively, while still playing in that volume scoring role, so maybe. But I can't ignore that datapoint entirely.

When I have a chance, I'm going to try and estimate ORtg/DRtg splits for SFW and PHI during 65 with and without Wilt (I believe we already have SRS numbers).
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
Basketballefan
Banned User
Posts: 2,170
And1: 583
Joined: Oct 14, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#230 » by Basketballefan » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:38 pm

colts18 wrote:
drza wrote:Official Vote: Kevin Garnett

Why do you have KG ranked higher than Shaq? Shaq was consistently better in RAPM stats and was a much better playoff performer.

I think some people just like to go against the norm.
3Pac
Banned User
Posts: 92
And1: 213
Joined: Jan 27, 2013
         

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#231 » by 3Pac » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:42 pm

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugphPVQHaaw[/youtube]
D Nice
Veteran
Posts: 2,840
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 05, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#232 » by D Nice » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:42 pm

One thing I also haven't read yet is anybody bring up the point that if Magic were born 5 years later he never would have exited the game at the height of his powers. Obviously I don't credit him with value added for seasons he never played but it's a pretty powerful tiebreaker for me over Shaq or Chamberlin. I suppose I'll expound on this as well.
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,207
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#233 » by ElGee » Sun Jul 6, 2014 8:44 pm

ardee wrote:
colts18 wrote:I'm still questioning whether Wilt had a great impact.

In 1968 the Lakers had a 4.99 SRS without Wilt.

In 1969, the Lakers, a team in desperate need of Center help, acquired Wilt (winner of the 3 previous MVP) and had Jerry West play 10 more games than the previous season. Did the Lakers get better? No. In fact their SRS declined to 3.84 SRS. That's an indictment on Wilt. Could you imagine if the Thunder acquired Peak Shaq (2001) and had Westbrook play more games. Would they become a worse team? Absolutely not.


You don't understand the circumstances of the time, obviously.

Wilt was used perfectly in Philadelphia, alternately as a low-post scorer and facilitator. In any case, the ball went into him every time.

Van Brenda Kloff, idiot that he was, moved Wilt out to the high post to accomodate an aging Baylor. For whatever reason, he acquired the best player in the league and decided to take him out of his best spot. This caused a season long feud between Wilt and VBK that caused difficulties within the team, through no real fault of Wilt's.

Now tell me, a guy like Shaq, with no range at all: if you put him in the high post, would his impact be worsened? Hell yes it would.

Your post smacks of a guy who looks at BBRef without considering the circumstances at all.


What's your basis for that? I wouldn't call VBK an idiot -- it's a lot like calling Mike D'Antoni an idiot. VBK implemented Princeton-style offensive sets that were ridiculously successful in 1968. We're talking record-setting stuff. VBK clashing with Wilt and how Wilt was supposed to fit into that "system" does not mean he was an idiot, nor that he was trying to accommodate for Baylor.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
ceiling raiser
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,531
And1: 3,754
Joined: Jan 27, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#234 » by ceiling raiser » Sun Jul 6, 2014 9:01 pm

D Nice wrote:And I like how we're 4 threads in and nobody has addressed any position bias with D-RAPM for 4s and 5s. That's quintessential "being selective to aid arguments."

Or is everyone just completely oblivious to that reality? I guess I'll include some of that in my post.

I'm pretty sure I could design a piece of software to rank these guys for many of these posters.

One thing I also haven't read yet is anybody bring up the point that if Magic were born 5 years later he never would have exited the game at the height of his powers. Obviously I don't credit him with value added for seasons he never played but it's a pretty powerful tiebreaker for me over Shaq or Chamberlin. I suppose I'll expound on this as well.

1) There isn't really any inherent bias, ridge regression takes in lineup data and produces coefficients to solve a problem similar to OLS (though the input matrix isn't nxn, since there are so many more lineups than there are players). It just so happens that the coefficients that fit the regression (minimizing L2/Euclidean norm) consistently tell us that bigs are producing more defensively (same with smalls and offensively).

I've only been playing around with RAPM for a few months, but the method I've been using to calculate RAPM (which is similar to calculating APM, though it uses the glmnet package instead) has two phases (after the data is prepared):

1) Run one regression to produce coefficients (total RAPM values).
2) After modifying the data (changing all values of players to 1, whether they're home or away in a lineup...in calculating total RAPM, 1 indicates a player on the home team, -1 indicates a player on the away team, 0 means the player isn't on the floor; the dependent variable is changed from "margin" to "diffOD", which is =100*(HomePts/HomePoss) + 100*(AwayPts/AwayPoss) as well), run a second regression to calculate the difference between offense and defense. The coefficients here are used to calculate offense (ORAPM = (RAPM + result from second regression) / 2) and defense (DRAPM = (RAPM - result from second regression) / 2) for each player.

Neither phase takes into account position, so there is no bias in the calculations.

Now, if we're not concerned with off/def on an absolute scale, but want it relative to position, one could calculate the mean or median in a sample, and look at off/def splits relative to position.

I think, rather than that, it's a better idea to look at RAPM, as well as the splits, in the context of a role a player plays. Compare volume scoring wings to one another, two-way centers to one another, 3-and-D guys to one another, and so on.

2) Regarding Magic's longevity, that's true, and obviously it was outside of his control. Even though it's not the same thing, had Wilt been born 5 years later, how can he leave the Lakers and try and join the ABA as a player-coach (since it wasn't around in 1978)? He wasn't exactly on his last legs when playing under Sharman, and by all accounts could conceivably have produced several more great years in that same role. :wink:
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
90sAllDecade
Starter
Posts: 2,264
And1: 818
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
Location: Clutch City, Texas
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#235 » by 90sAllDecade » Sun Jul 6, 2014 9:01 pm

Owly wrote:
ardee wrote:
This post is intellectually dishonest.

To make Gola, Arizin and Rodgers out to be really valuable teammates based on their HOF status is dishonest. Gola and Arizin were near the end of their primes when they played with Wilt in the early 60s. Rodgers was an awful offensive player. Couldn't shoot or really score in anyway, never cracked 40% from the field.

And Thurmond was in his rookie and sophomore year as Wilt's backup when they played together.

The best teammate Wilt had in his prime was Hal Greer, who is probably about the same level as Sampson and definitely worse than Drexler.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app

Particularly so because it it compares accolades without the context of league size (and particularly All-Stars whereby there was a maximum of three all-stars per team which for much of the 60s meant you were depending on your conference guaranteed 3 players, or once the Chicago-Baltimore franchise arrived in the east merely likely to get 2 or 3) whilst ignoring the more representative all-NBA teams.

I wouldn't deny Hakeem didn't have the supporting casts to succeed in the late 80s, but to imply Wilt did based on HOF (Rodgers long, long after the fact, Gola based on HS/college, Arizin based primarily on his 50s, though still effective in the early 60s) is misguided.


Based on the evidence I've seen, and keep finding, these guys were good players.

I wanted to address these arguments. The more I read about these guys, relative to competition they were quality players with plenty of accomplishments, not just All Star or HOF, but All NBA selections, Top 50 player selections etc.

Gola played with Wilt from age 27-29, and was 2nd team all NBA the year before. He wasn't even in his thirties yet. He was also one of the greatest college players of all time.

La Salle

Gola was one of the most talented collegiate athletes in Philadelphia sports history. He came to national attention while playing for the hometown La Salle University Explorers men's basketball team.

Gola starred as a college freshman and led La Salle to the 1952 N.I.T. championship.[2] Gola paced the Explorers to the NCAA basketball championship in 1954 and was named Tournament MVP. That same season he was selected as National Player of the Year. As a senior, Gola helped La Salle finish as the runner-up in the 1955 NCAA Tournament. He averaged 20.9 points and 19.0 rebounds during 115 games and holds the NCAA record with 2,201 career rebounds. At 6'6" (198 cm), Gola was clearly a forward who could shoot/score, rebound and defend, but he also had the ballhandling (dribbling, passing) skills of a guard, and with his shooting range and All-Pro defensive skills, could play just as well in the backcourt. He was inducted into the La Salle Hall of Athletes in 1961 and the Big 5 Hall of Fame in 1986. In 1977, Tom Gola was inducted into the National Polish American Sports Hall of Fame.[3] Gola was listed on "ESPN's Countdown to the Greatest" College basketball players as #17.



NBA

After a phenomenal college career, Gola turned pro with the Philadelphia Warriors as a territorial draft pick. He teamed with All-Pros Paul Arizin and Neil Johnston to lead the Warriors to an NBA championship in 1956. He gained praise for concentrating on defense, passing and rebounding and allowing the other two to be the chief scorers during these years.

In 1959, Johnston temporarily retired due to a knee injury and the Warriors added seven-foot superstar Wilt Chamberlain. Again sacrificing himself for his team, Gola helped the Warriors back to the NBA Finals, but they could not beat the star-studded Boston Celtics during his seasons in the early 1960s even with Chamberlain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Gola


Paul Arizin was 31- 33 and All NBA 2nd team Wilt's first year (before that he was All NBA first team for three years).

Professional career
After being selected by the Warriors with their first pick in the 1950 NBA Draft, Arizin averaged 17.2 points per game in his rookie season and was named NBA Rookie of the Year — a designation not currently sanctioned by the NBA for the 1950-51 season. He became one of the greatest NBA players of the 1950s, leading the NBA in scoring during the 1951–52 and 1956–57 seasons and leading the league in field goal percentage in 1951-52. Arizin sat out the 1952–53 and 1953–54 NBA seasons due to military service in the Marines during the Korean War.[4]

Arizin became famous for his line-drive jump shots, and teamed with center Neil Johnston to form the best offensive one-two punch in the NBA at the time, leading the Warriors to the 1956 NBA title. He also played with scoring star Joe Fulks early in his career, and with Philadelphia legends Tom Gola and Wilt Chamberlain toward the end of his career in the early 1960s. Arizin chose to retire from the NBA rather than move with the Warriors to San Francisco. At the time of his retirement, no player had retired from the game with a higher scoring average (21.9 points per game) in his final season. This record would stand until Bob Pettit's retirement in 1965 following a season in which he averaged 22.5 PPG.

Arizin played in a total of 10 NBA All-Star Games (he was the 1952 NBA All-Star Game MVP) and was named to the All-NBA First-Team in 1952, 1956, and 1957.

After retiring from the NBA, Arizin played for three seasons with the Camden Bullets of the Eastern Professional Basketball League, who won the 1964 title. Averaging over 20 points per game each season, Arizin was named the EBL MVP in 1963, was named to the EBL All-Star First Team in 1963 and 1964, and was named to the EBL All-Star Second Team in 1965.[5]

Arizin was named to the NBA 25th Anniversary Team in 1971. He was inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame in 1978,[6] and was selected to the 50 Greatest Players in NBA History in 1996.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Arizin

He may have been in his thirties but he was still a good enough talent to make the 50 Greatest Players List and All NBA several times before. I didn't grow up in the era, but I have a hard time seeing him as a quota all star with those other accomplishments relative to his competition in that league.

Guy Rodgers was age 24 - 29 (prime imo) and an excellent play-maker for Wilt. His strength was passing not scoring:

Guy William Rodgers (September 1, 1935 – February 19, 2001) was an American professional basketball player born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He spent twelve years (1958–1970) in the NBA, and was one of the league's best playmakers in the early to mid-1960s. Rodgers led the NBA in assists twice, and placed second six times. [1]

Rodgers played alongside the great Wilt Chamberlain from 1959 through 1964, and during Chamberlain's famous 100-point game, he led the way with 20 assists.[2] In the 1962–63 season, Rodgers led the NBA in assists with an average of 10.4 per game, and played in his first NBA All-Star game. On March 14 of that same season, Rodgers tied Bob Cousy's record of 28 assists in a single game — a record that wasn't broken until nearly 15 years later.[3]

Rodgers was the point guard on the 1964 Warriors team that made the NBA finals but eventually lost the series to the Boston Celtics four games to one. In 1966 Rodgers was traded to the expansion team, the Chicago Bulls. Rodgers played the 1966–67 season in Chicago and was named NBA All-Star for the fourth and final time in his career. That same season, Rodgers handed out a then-NBA record 908 assists, which is still the Chicago Bulls single-season record.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Rodgers

Nate Thurmond average 16.5 points and 18.1 rebounds his sophomore year in 41.2 mpg in the "backup role"(the all star year I posted). How can that be downplayed?
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... mna01.html

Hal Greer was his best teammate and no mention of Jerry West (All NBA 1st team x4 2nd team x1 and Def. 1st team x 4, 2nd team x1 playing with Wilt) or Elgin Baylor (All NBA 1st team x2)?

Just an accusation without acknowledging the Hakeem vs Wilt playoff scoring advantage (even with Wilt's pace advantage)?

If there were all star quotas then please provide a link, I appreciate learning.

But even if that's true, so far I have to agree to disagree based on the evidence I've found (and still finding) Wilt had great team support relative to Hakeem. Those guys were quality players and did contribute imo.
NBA TV Clutch City Documentary Trailer:
https://vimeo.com/134215151
ceiling raiser
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,531
And1: 3,754
Joined: Jan 27, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#236 » by ceiling raiser » Sun Jul 6, 2014 9:04 pm

Basketballefan wrote:
colts18 wrote:
drza wrote:Official Vote: Kevin Garnett

Why do you have KG ranked higher than Shaq? Shaq was consistently better in RAPM stats and was a much better playoff performer.

I think some people just like to go against the norm.

Or, they feel he was the better/greater player, with all things that they value in evaluations are considered. :wink:

There are no right/wrong answers, so I don't think it's fair to throw someone's opinion out the window as intentionally going against the norm. Doc and drza voted for KG here, and I'm sure myself and many others will be considering him very soon as well.
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,601
And1: 22,567
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#237 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Jul 6, 2014 9:08 pm

colts18 wrote:From 1998-2006 we have RAPM data that says Duncan was better than KG every single one of those years and had a higher defensive RAPM in all of those years.


Colts please stop referring to this without some acknowledgement of the discrepancy between studies.

You're using non prior informed RAPM and both pure APM and prior informed RAPM give Garnett the edge over Duncan and make Garnett vs Shaq look quite close.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
ceiling raiser
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,531
And1: 3,754
Joined: Jan 27, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#238 » by ceiling raiser » Sun Jul 6, 2014 9:09 pm

90sAllDecade wrote:Just an accusation without acknowledging the Hakeem vs Wilt playoff scoring advantage (even with Wilt's pace advantage)?

If there were all star quotas then please provide a link, I appreciate learning.

But even if that's true, so far I have to agree to disagree based on the evidence I've found (and still finding) Wilt had great team support relative to Hakeem. Those guys were quality players and did contribute imo.

Wilt played in an isolation-heavy low post volume scoring role from when he came into the league until 65-66. For the first five years of career, while had some good teammates (Rodgers was a terrific ball-handler and passer, for instance, and Nate was possibly the GOAT man defender in the post and the GOAT non-Russell defender overall), he wasn't surrounded with shooters to space the floor, and prevent defenders from cheating/sagging off their assignments and crowding the paint. There have been some good posts on the matter in the thread. :wink:

I don't think anybody is suggesting Wilt's casts with the Sixers and Lakers were subpar (though some have mentioned that in 66 they underperformed and there were injuries in 68, I don't think anybody is saying his casts were poor those years). People are just stating that in 5 of the 7 years Wilt was asked to score, there was little outside game to speak of on his teams.
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,601
And1: 22,567
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#239 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Jul 6, 2014 9:17 pm

MisterWestside wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:Oh and too the point about the lack of shooters in the 60s impacting the efficacy of a low post scorer that is something worth considering.

I'd be cautious going too far with it though. Something I've pointed out before is how Wilt's actual impact didn't correlate much at all with his stats. By that I mean not that he didn't have impact but that he maintained his stats while his impact seemed to fluctuate drastically.


Because the context (and the optimal conditions for his impact) isn't constant. From San Fran to Philly to L.A..

Case in point: as a center then and now, it's the defense that makes you the highest ceiling guy around. There's never been a way to get around the fact that you can keep a low post guy from getting the ball and this is why we're less and less likely to seeing volume scoring at all from a big. wilt had the clear cut way of doing what bigs do to make reliable huge impact right in front of him always.


On offense? Absolutely not. See the earlier posts in this thread. Even Russell had issues woth this, despite being a solid passer from the block and having a solid set of moves.


I'm not talking about switching time zones I'm literally talking about Wilt changing his behavior from year to year, month to month, game to game.

Wilt entered the league capable of being the #2 MVP simply becauseof his defense, but he had a clear tendency to coast on that side of the ball which is why his teams saw such drastic ups and downs even more than the offense.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
ceiling raiser
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,531
And1: 3,754
Joined: Jan 27, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #4 

Post#240 » by ceiling raiser » Sun Jul 6, 2014 9:19 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
colts18 wrote:From 1998-2006 we have RAPM data that says Duncan was better than KG every single one of those years and had a higher defensive RAPM in all of those years.


Colts please stop referring to this without some acknowledgement of the discrepancy between studies.

You're using non prior informed RAPM and both pure APM and prior informed RAPM give Garnett the edge over Duncan and make Garnett vs Shaq look quite close.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Good point. I've seen your thread on the stats board with the normalized RAPM numbers. I tried doing something similar:

1) Isolated all players who had 5000 combined season + playoff minutes in seasons n and (n-1) combined (cutoff seems somewhat arbitrary, but J.E. noted that RAPM flattens after 5000 minutes here: http://apbr.org/metrics/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8594#p19801).
2) Divided total RAPM, ORAPM, DRAPM by the SD of total RAPM (prior informed).

Here are the results for each season (columns are season/name/off/def/total):

1998:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

1998   Alonzo Mourning   1.1   1.7   2.8
1998   Mookie Blaylock   1.7   0.9   2.6
1998   Michael Jordan   1.8   0.7   2.5
1998   Kevin Garnett   0.9   1.3   2.3
1998   Tim Hardaway   1.8   0.4   2.2
1998   John Stockton   1.3   0.8   2.1
1998   Karl Malone   2.1   0.1   2.1
1998   Vlade Divac   0.8   1.3   2.1
1998   Grant Hill   1.3   0.8   2.1
1998   Jeff Hornacek   1.7   0.3   2.0
1998   Reggie Miller   1.7   0.2   2.0
1998   Detlef Schrempf   1.7   0.2   1.9
1998   Rasheed Wallace   0.5   1.3   1.8
1998   Bo Outlaw   0.4   1.4   1.8
1998   Gary Payton   1.5   0.3   1.8
1998   Scottie Pippen   1.6   0.1   1.8
1998   Christian Laettner   1.1   0.6   1.7
1998   Ron Harper   0.5   1.2   1.7
1998   Chris Mills   0.4   1.3   1.7
1998   Dikembe Mutombo   -0.7   2.3   1.6
1998   Mark Jackson   1.1   0.5   1.6
1998   Mitch Richmond   1.1   0.2   1.4
1998   Chris Webber   0.5   0.8   1.3
1998   Clyde Drexler   0.7   0.6   1.3
1998   Hakeem Olajuwon   -0.1   1.3   1.2
1998   Hersey Hawkins   0.8   0.4   1.2
1998   Shawn Kemp   0.6   0.6   1.2
1998   Eddie Jones   0.8   0.4   1.1
1998   Jason Kidd   1.0   0.1   1.0
1998   Tyrone Corbin   0.3   0.6   1.0
1998   Wesley Person   0.5   0.4   0.9
1998   Kendall Gill   0.8   0.1   0.9
1998   Horace Grant   -0.2   1.1   0.9
1998   Bryon Russell   0.7   0.2   0.8
1998   Rod Strickland   1.1   -0.3   0.8
1998   P.J. Brown   -0.2   1.0   0.8
1998   Glen Rice   1.4   -0.7   0.7
1998   Kerry Kittles   1.0   -0.3   0.7
1998   Dennis Rodman   0.5   0.2   0.7
1998   Larry Johnson   0.7   -0.1   0.6
1998   Clifford Robinson   0.7   -0.1   0.6
1998   Voshon Lenard   0.6   -0.1   0.5
1998   Kenny Anderson   0.2   0.3   0.4
1998   Ray Allen   0.8   -0.4   0.4
1998   Anthony Mason   0.2   0.2   0.4
1998   Joe Dumars   0.7   -0.3   0.4
1998   Glenn Robinson   0.3   -0.0   0.3
1998   Doug Christie   0.6   -0.3   0.3
1998   Nick Van Exel   1.1   -0.9   0.3
1998   Mario Elie   0.7   -0.5   0.2
1998   Avery Johnson   -0.1   0.4   0.2
1998   Calbert Cheaney   0.4   -0.2   0.2
1998   Jerry Stackhouse   0.7   -0.5   0.2
1998   David Wesley   -0.1   0.2   0.1
1998   Rick Fox   0.3   -0.2   0.1
1998   Vin Baker   0.7   -0.6   0.1
1998   Isaiah Rider   0.6   -0.5   0.1
1998   Allen Iverson   1.3   -1.3   0.0
1998   Chris Mullin   -0.0   0.0   0.0
1998   Allan Houston   -0.2   0.2   -0.1
1998   Antonio McDyess   -0.8   0.7   -0.1
1998   Bryant Reeves   0.1   -0.3   -0.2
1998   Lindsey Hunter   0.4   -0.6   -0.2
1998   Clarence Weatherspoon   -0.7   0.5   -0.2
1998   Charles Oakley   -0.8   0.5   -0.3
1998   Matt Maloney   0.3   -0.6   -0.3
1998   Juwan Howard   -0.2   -0.1   -0.3
1998   Michael Finley   -0.1   -0.2   -0.3
1998   Steve Smith   0.7   -1.1   -0.4
1998   Dale Ellis   0.6   -1.0   -0.4
1998   Damon Stoudamire   0.4   -0.9   -0.5
1998   Joe Smith   -0.4   -0.2   -0.6
1998   Otis Thorpe   -0.5   -0.1   -0.6
1998   Stephon Marbury   0.9   -1.5   -0.6
1998   Rodney Rogers   0.8   -1.4   -0.7
1998   Shareef Abdur-Rahim   0.7   -1.4   -0.7
1998   A.C. Green   -0.7   -0.1   -0.7
1998   Antoine Walker   0.3   -1.3   -1.0
1998   Jim Jackson   -0.1   -1.0   -1.1


1999:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

1999   Kevin Garnett   1.1   1.8   3.0
1999   Grant Hill   2.1   0.7   2.8
1999   Tim Duncan   1.3   1.1   2.5
1999   Dikembe Mutombo   -0.8   3.1   2.3
1999   Karl Malone   2.4   -0.2   2.2
1999   Eddie Jones   1.4   0.7   2.1
1999   Tim Hardaway   2.0   0.1   2.1
1999   Jason Kidd   1.7   0.2   1.9
1999   Reggie Miller   2.3   -0.4   1.9
1999   Gary Payton   1.8   -0.1   1.7
1999   Larry Johnson   0.7   0.6   1.4
1999   Ray Allen   1.4   -0.1   1.3
1999   Allen Iverson   1.8   -1.0   0.8
1999   Avery Johnson   0.2   0.3   0.6
1999   Bryon Russell   0.1   0.4   0.5
1999   Stephon Marbury   1.6   -1.2   0.4
1999   Michael Finley   0.6   -0.3   0.3
1999   Allan Houston   -0.4   0.6   0.2
1999   Damon Stoudamire   0.4   -1.3   -0.9


2000:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2000   Shaquille O'Neal   2.1   0.8   2.8
2000   Kevin Garnett   1.2   1.2   2.4
2000   Dikembe Mutombo   0.0   2.2   2.2
2000   Gary Payton   1.8   0.3   2.1
2000   Rasheed Wallace   0.6   1.5   2.1
2000   Alonzo Mourning   0.6   1.3   1.9
2000   Tim Duncan   0.8   0.9   1.7
2000   Vince Carter   1.6   0.1   1.7
2000   Reggie Miller   1.7   -0.2   1.4
2000   Karl Malone   1.8   -0.5   1.4
2000   Jason Kidd   1.1   0.2   1.2
2000   Bryon Russell   0.6   0.3   0.9
2000   Scottie Pippen   0.8   0.1   0.8
2000   Ray Allen   1.3   -0.5   0.8
2000   Clifford Robinson   0.3   0.0   0.4
2000   Larry Johnson   0.1   0.2   0.3
2000   Michael Finley   0.7   -0.5   0.2
2000   Allen Iverson   1.5   -1.3   0.2
2000   Kobe Bryant   0.6   -0.6   0.0
2000   Allan Houston   -0.1   0.1   0.0
2000   Latrell Sprewell   0.5   -0.6   -0.0
2000   Shareef Abdur-Rahim   0.9   -1.1   -0.2
2000   Avery Johnson   -0.2   -0.2   -0.4
2000   Jalen Rose   -0.0   -0.4   -0.4
2000   Eric Snow   -0.7   0.2   -0.4


2003:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2003   Kevin Garnett   1.6   1.2   2.9
2003   Doug Christie   0.7   1.8   2.5
2003   Shaquille O'Neal   2.1   0.4   2.4
2003   Tim Duncan   0.5   1.8   2.4
2003   Jason Kidd   1.3   0.8   2.1
2003   Vlade Divac   0.1   1.8   1.9
2003   Rasheed Wallace   0.7   1.1   1.8
2003   Kenyon Martin   1.1   0.7   1.8
2003   Dirk Nowitzki   1.2   0.5   1.8
2003   John Stockton   1.0   0.6   1.6
2003   Chris Webber   0.9   0.5   1.5
2003   Kobe Bryant   1.2   0.1   1.3
2003   Michael Finley   0.3   0.9   1.2
2003   Baron Davis   0.4   0.8   1.2
2003   Steve Francis   0.4   0.8   1.2
2003   Tony Parker   0.8   0.5   1.2
2003   Shawn Marion   0.2   1.0   1.2
2003   Matt Harpring   0.7   0.5   1.1
2003   Jermaine O'Neal   0.2   0.9   1.1
2003   Eric Snow   0.3   0.8   1.1
2003   Mike Bibby   1.1   -0.1   1.0
2003   Ben Wallace   -0.7   1.6   0.9
2003   Wally Szczerbiak   0.9   -0.1   0.8
2003   Richard Jefferson   -0.2   1.0   0.8
2003   Paul Pierce   0.0   0.8   0.8
2003   Desmond Mason   0.9   -0.1   0.8
2003   Elton Brand   0.9   -0.1   0.8
2003   Bruce Bowen   0.2   0.5   0.7
2003   Gary Payton   0.5   0.1   0.6
2003   Tracy McGrady   0.6   0.0   0.6
2003   Chauncey Billups   0.6   -0.1   0.5
2003   Karl Malone   0.7   -0.1   0.5
2003   Antoine Walker   -0.5   1.0   0.5
2003   Jerry Stackhouse   0.0   0.5   0.5
2003   P.J. Brown   0.9   -0.4   0.5
2003   Steve Nash   0.8   -0.3   0.5
2003   Keith Van Horn   -0.2   0.6   0.4
2003   Shane Battier   0.2   0.3   0.4
2003   Derek Fisher   0.3   0.1   0.4
2003   Michael Jordan   0.6   -0.3   0.3
2003   Robert Horry   -0.1   0.4   0.3
2003   Allen Iverson   0.7   -0.4   0.3
2003   Ray Allen   0.6   -0.4   0.2
2003   Clifford Robinson   -0.4   0.4   0.1
2003   Bonzi Wells   0.4   -0.4   0.1
2003   Antonio Davis   -0.1   0.1   0.1
2003   Stephon Marbury   0.2   -0.1   0.1
2003   Kerry Kittles   -0.7   0.7   0.0
2003   Brent Barry   -0.1   0.1   -0.1
2003   Alvin Williams   -0.1   0.0   -0.1
2003   Rashard Lewis   0.1   -0.1   -0.1
2003   Peja Stojakovic   0.4   -0.4   -0.1
2003   Andre Miller   0.7   -0.8   -0.1
2003   Jamal Mashburn   0.2   -0.3   -0.2
2003   Morris Peterson   0.2   -0.4   -0.2
2003   Rick Fox   0.2   -0.4   -0.2
2003   Antawn Jamison   1.3   -1.5   -0.2
2003   Cuttino Mobley   0.2   -0.4   -0.2
2003   Jalen Rose   0.3   -0.5   -0.2
2003   Jason Terry   0.3   -0.6   -0.3
2003   Sam Cassell   0.4   -0.8   -0.3
2003   Kurt Thomas   -0.5   0.1   -0.4
2003   Reggie Miller   -0.3   -0.2   -0.5
2003   Pau Gasol   0.4   -0.9   -0.5
2003   David Wesley   -0.2   -0.4   -0.5
2003   Darrell Armstrong   -0.1   -0.5   -0.5
2003   Nick Van Exel   0.9   -1.4   -0.5
2003   Jason Richardson   0.9   -1.5   -0.6
2003   Ricky Davis   -0.4   -0.4   -0.9
2003   Pat Garrity   -0.1   -0.9   -1.0
2003   Richard Hamilton   -0.3   -0.7   -1.0
2003   Latrell Sprewell   0.1   -1.1   -1.1
2003   Shareef Abdur-Rahim   -0.5   -0.7   -1.1
2003   Juwan Howard   -0.3   -0.9   -1.2
2003   Allan Houston   -0.3   -1.0   -1.3
2003   Anthony Mason   -0.4   -1.3   -1.7


2004:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2004   Kevin Garnett   2.2   2.1   4.3
2004   Shaquille O'Neal   2.1   0.8   2.8
2004   Tim Duncan   0.5   2.2   2.6
2004   Rasheed Wallace   0.6   1.7   2.3
2004   Jason Kidd   1.2   1.1   2.3
2004   Dirk Nowitzki   1.8   0.4   2.2
2004   Ben Wallace   -0.4   2.3   2.0
2004   Brad Miller   0.8   1.1   1.9
2004   Jermaine O'Neal   0.4   1.5   1.9
2004   Metta World Peace   1.0   0.8   1.7
2004   Sam Cassell   1.4   0.2   1.6
2004   Kenyon Martin   0.4   1.1   1.5
2004   Doug Christie   0.9   0.6   1.5
2004   Andrei Kirilenko   1.3   0.2   1.5
2004   Desmond Mason   1.3   0.1   1.4
2004   Steve Francis   0.3   1.1   1.4
2004   Theo Ratliff   -0.3   1.6   1.3
2004   Baron Davis   0.3   1.0   1.3
2004   Andre Miller   1.7   -0.4   1.3
2004   Yao Ming   0.5   0.7   1.2
2004   Chauncey Billups   0.7   0.4   1.1
2004   Vlade Divac   -0.1   1.0   1.0
2004   Eric Snow   0.2   0.8   1.0
2004   Michael Finley   0.3   0.6   0.9
2004   Kobe Bryant   1.1   -0.3   0.8
2004   Tony Parker   0.6   0.3   0.8
2004   Shawn Marion   0.4   0.5   0.8
2004   James Posey   -0.3   1.1   0.8
2004   Gary Payton   0.6   0.2   0.8
2004   Bruce Bowen   -0.4   1.1   0.7
2004   P.J. Brown   0.6   0.2   0.7
2004   Ray Allen   1.1   -0.4   0.7
2004   Eddie Jones   -0.3   1.0   0.7
2004   Paul Pierce   -0.2   0.8   0.7
2004   Keith Van Horn   0.1   0.6   0.6
2004   Elton Brand   1.2   -0.6   0.6
2004   Karl Malone   0.3   0.2   0.5
2004   Allen Iverson   0.6   -0.2   0.5
2004   Richard Jefferson   -0.1   0.5   0.5
2004   Antawn Jamison   1.8   -1.5   0.4
2004   Tracy McGrady   0.9   -0.6   0.4
2004   Rasho Nesterovic   -0.5   0.8   0.3
2004   Kurt Thomas   0.1   0.2   0.3
2004   Mike Bibby   1.0   -0.8   0.2
2004   Richard Hamilton   0.4   -0.3   0.2
2004   Derek Fisher   -0.2   0.3   0.1
2004   Latrell Sprewell   0.2   -0.1   0.1
2004   Jason Richardson   0.6   -0.6   0.0
2004   Kenny Thomas   0.4   -0.5   -0.1
2004   Stephon Marbury   0.6   -0.7   -0.1
2004   Steve Nash   0.7   -0.8   -0.1
2004   Pau Gasol   1.0   -1.1   -0.1
2004   Jalen Rose   0.2   -0.4   -0.2
2004   Al Harrington   -0.3   0.1   -0.2
2004   Brian Grant   -0.5   0.4   -0.2
2004   Lamar Odom   0.2   -0.3   -0.2
2004   Joe Johnson   0.1   -0.3   -0.2
2004   Caron Butler   -0.3   0.1   -0.2
2004   Kerry Kittles   -0.7   0.5   -0.2
2004   Rashard Lewis   0.2   -0.4   -0.2
2004   Stephen Jackson   0.2   -0.4   -0.2
2004   Morris Peterson   -0.2   -0.1   -0.3
2004   Clifford Robinson   -0.7   0.4   -0.3
2004   Reggie Miller   -0.5   0.2   -0.3
2004   Cuttino Mobley   -0.3   -0.1   -0.4
2004   Donyell Marshall   -0.7   0.2   -0.5
2004   Peja Stojakovic   0.4   -1.0   -0.6
2004   Antoine Walker   -0.8   0.1   -0.7
2004   Jason Terry   0.1   -0.9   -0.8
2004   Jamaal Magloire   -0.4   -0.4   -0.8
2004   Ricky Davis   0.0   -0.9   -0.9
2004   David Wesley   -0.8   -0.2   -1.0
2004   Shareef Abdur-Rahim   -0.8   -0.2   -1.0
2004   Juwan Howard   -0.1   -1.1   -1.1
2004   Michael Redd   0.7   -2.1   -1.4


2005:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2005   Manu Ginobili   1.8   1.2   2.9
2005   Tim Duncan   1.0   1.8   2.8
2005   Shaquille O'Neal   1.5   1.0   2.5
2005   Jason Collins   -0.6   2.9   2.3
2005   Brad Miller   0.9   1.3   2.2
2005   Jason Kidd   1.4   0.8   2.2
2005   Dirk Nowitzki   1.6   0.6   2.2
2005   Kevin Garnett   1.4   0.6   2.1
2005   Paul Pierce   1.0   0.9   1.9
2005   Richard Hamilton   1.1   0.6   1.6
2005   Zydrunas Ilgauskas   0.5   1.0   1.5
2005   Elton Brand   1.4   0.1   1.5
2005   Ben Wallace   0.2   1.3   1.5
2005   Steve Nash   1.9   -0.4   1.5
2005   Shawn Marion   1.2   0.3   1.5
2005   Steve Francis   1.2   0.2   1.4
2005   Andre Miller   1.4   -0.1   1.3
2005   LeBron James   0.9   0.2   1.2
2005   Rasheed Wallace   -0.1   1.2   1.1
2005   Rashard Lewis   0.7   0.4   1.1
2005   Eddie Jones   -0.2   1.3   1.1
2005   Ray Allen   1.5   -0.5   1.0
2005   Tracy McGrady   0.9   0.0   0.9
2005   Udonis Haslem   0.7   0.3   0.9
2005   Dwyane Wade   1.1   -0.2   0.9
2005   Jermaine O'Neal   -0.1   0.9   0.8
2005   Tayshaun Prince   0.5   0.3   0.8
2005   Amare Stoudemire   1.2   -0.4   0.7
2005   Stephon Marbury   1.4   -0.7   0.7
2005   Tony Parker   0.7   -0.1   0.6
2005   Antawn Jamison   1.4   -0.9   0.5
2005   Michael Finley   0.5   0.0   0.5
2005   Yao Ming   -0.4   0.9   0.5
2005   Desmond Mason   1.2   -0.8   0.4
2005   Allen Iverson   0.4   0.0   0.4
2005   Jason Terry   0.8   -0.4   0.4
2005   Vince Carter   -0.2   0.5   0.3
2005   P.J. Brown   0.2   0.1   0.3
2005   Kobe Bryant   0.8   -0.5   0.3
2005   Kenyon Martin   -0.2   0.5   0.3
2005   Lamar Odom   -0.1   0.4   0.3
2005   Gary Payton   0.7   -0.4   0.3
2005   Mike Bibby   0.8   -0.5   0.3
2005   Kurt Thomas   0.2   0.0   0.2
2005   Joe Johnson   0.4   -0.2   0.2
2005   Stephen Jackson   -0.0   0.3   0.2
2005   Jason Richardson   0.6   -0.4   0.2
2005   Gilbert Arenas   1.0   -0.9   0.1
2005   Caron Butler   0.4   -0.3   0.1
2005   Kenny Thomas   0.4   -0.3   0.1
2005   Quentin Richardson   -0.1   0.2   0.1
2005   Rafer Alston   -0.2   0.3   0.1
2005   Carmelo Anthony   0.3   -0.3   0.0
2005   Chris Bosh   -0.2   0.2   0.0
2005   Bruce Bowen   -0.6   0.6   -0.0
2005   Al Harrington   -0.5   0.4   -0.1
2005   Corey Maggette   0.4   -0.6   -0.1
2005   Chauncey Billups   -0.2   0.1   -0.1
2005   Reggie Miller   0.0   -0.2   -0.1
2005   Damon Jones   0.7   -0.8   -0.1
2005   David Wesley   -0.4   0.2   -0.2
2005   Richard Jefferson   -0.4   0.1   -0.3
2005   Jeff McInnis   0.6   -1.0   -0.4
2005   Latrell Sprewell   -0.6   0.0   -0.5
2005   Kirk Hinrich   -0.8   0.3   -0.5
2005   Jim Jackson   -0.6   0.0   -0.6
2005   Damon Stoudamire   0.4   -0.9   -0.6
2005   Peja Stojakovic   0.3   -1.0   -0.7
2005   Cuttino Mobley   -0.2   -0.6   -0.8
2005   Jalen Rose   0.2   -1.1   -0.8
2005   Ricky Davis   -0.1   -0.8   -0.9
2005   Michael Redd   0.7   -1.7   -1.0
2005   Jamal Crawford   -0.6   -0.4   -1.0
2005   Antoine Walker   -0.7   -0.6   -1.4


2006:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2006   Dwyane Wade   2.1   0.7   2.8
2006   Tim Duncan   1.1   1.6   2.7
2006   Manu Ginobili   1.8   0.9   2.7
2006   Dirk Nowitzki   2.0   0.4   2.4
2006   Kobe Bryant   2.7   -0.5   2.1
2006   LeBron James   1.8   0.4   2.1
2006   Shane Battier   0.2   1.9   2.1
2006   Steve Nash   2.0   0.0   2.0
2006   Kevin Garnett   1.1   0.9   2.0
2006   Shaquille O'Neal   1.8   0.1   1.9
2006   Rasheed Wallace   0.9   0.9   1.8
2006   Brad Miller   1.3   0.5   1.8
2006   Elton Brand   1.4   0.3   1.7
2006   Jason Kidd   1.5   0.1   1.6
2006   Ben Wallace   0.0   1.5   1.5
2006   Ray Allen   2.4   -1.0   1.4
2006   Vince Carter   0.3   1.1   1.4
2006   Tony Parker   0.9   0.4   1.4
2006   Tracy McGrady   1.2   0.1   1.3
2006   Zydrunas Ilgauskas   0.3   0.9   1.3
2006   Eddie Jones   0.6   0.7   1.3
2006   Josh Howard   1.0   0.2   1.2
2006   Andre Miller   1.4   -0.2   1.2
2006   Bobby Simmons   0.1   1.0   1.1
2006   Antawn Jamison   1.8   -0.7   1.1
2006   Tayshaun Prince   0.7   0.4   1.1
2006   Jason Richardson   1.4   -0.4   1.1
2006   Lamar Odom   0.0   1.0   1.0
2006   Dwight Howard   0.9   0.1   1.0
2006   Shawn Marion   0.6   0.4   0.9
2006   Allen Iverson   1.4   -0.5   0.9
2006   Paul Pierce   1.2   -0.4   0.9
2006   Chris Bosh   0.9   0.0   0.9
2006   Andre Iguodala   0.2   0.6   0.8
2006   Jason Terry   1.3   -0.6   0.7
2006   Michael Redd   1.5   -0.8   0.7
2006   Pau Gasol   0.8   -0.2   0.6
2006   Richard Hamilton   0.6   -0.2   0.5
2006   Gilbert Arenas   1.4   -1.0   0.4
2006   Udonis Haslem   0.2   0.1   0.4
2006   Wally Szczerbiak   1.0   -0.7   0.3
2006   P.J. Brown   -0.0   0.3   0.2
2006   Stephon Marbury   0.9   -0.7   0.2
2006   Chauncey Billups   0.4   -0.2   0.2
2006   Damon Jones   0.5   -0.4   0.1
2006   Rashard Lewis   1.2   -1.1   0.1
2006   Rafer Alston   -0.1   0.1   -0.0
2006   Caron Butler   0.1   -0.2   -0.0
2006   Mehmet Okur   0.8   -0.8   -0.0
2006   Michael Finley   -0.6   0.4   -0.2
2006   Mike Bibby   0.4   -0.5   -0.2
2006   Ricky Davis   0.2   -0.4   -0.2
2006   Kyle Korver   -0.1   -0.1   -0.2
2006   Peja Stojakovic   0.8   -1.1   -0.3
2006   Mike Dunleavy   -0.2   -0.0   -0.3
2006   Steve Francis   -0.1   -0.1   -0.3
2006   Carmelo Anthony   0.1   -0.5   -0.4
2006   Stephen Jackson   -0.5   0.1   -0.4
2006   David Wesley   -0.6   0.2   -0.4
2006   Cuttino Mobley   -0.5   0.1   -0.4
2006   Gary Payton   -0.9   0.5   -0.5
2006   Joe Johnson   -0.1   -0.4   -0.5
2006   Raja Bell   -0.3   -0.2   -0.5
2006   Bruce Bowen   -0.5   -0.1   -0.6
2006   Kirk Hinrich   -0.5   -0.2   -0.6
2006   Al Harrington   0.0   -0.7   -0.6
2006   Antoine Walker   -0.8   0.0   -0.8
2006   Morris Peterson   0.4   -1.2   -0.8
2006   Chris Webber   0.3   -1.1   -0.8
2006   Jamal Crawford   -0.1   -0.9   -1.1
2006   Luke Ridnour   0.2   -1.8   -1.6


2007:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2007   Tim Duncan   2.5   1.0   3.5
2007   LeBron James   2.8   0.1   2.9
2007   Kevin Garnett   1.1   1.7   2.8
2007   Steve Nash   3.1   -0.6   2.5
2007   Dirk Nowitzki   2.4   0.1   2.5
2007   Kobe Bryant   2.4   -0.2   2.2
2007   Dwyane Wade   2.4   -0.5   1.9
2007   Gilbert Arenas   1.2   0.6   1.9
2007   Shawn Marion   1.6   0.2   1.8
2007   Luol Deng   0.9   0.9   1.7
2007   Chauncey Billups   2.4   -0.7   1.7
2007   Metta World Peace   0.8   0.9   1.7
2007   Jason Kidd   1.6   -0.1   1.5
2007   Chris Bosh   1.4   0.0   1.4
2007   Elton Brand   0.8   0.6   1.4
2007   Rasheed Wallace   1.5   -0.2   1.3
2007   Zydrunas Ilgauskas   1.5   -0.2   1.2
2007   Tayshaun Prince   1.2   0.0   1.2
2007   Ben Gordon   1.3   -0.1   1.2
2007   Rafer Alston   0.6   0.6   1.2
2007   Josh Howard   1.4   -0.2   1.2
2007   Shane Battier   -0.3   1.5   1.1
2007   Michael Redd   1.3   -0.2   1.1
2007   Jason Terry   1.6   -0.5   1.1
2007   Hedo Turkoglu   1.1   0.0   1.1
2007   Antawn Jamison   2.3   -1.3   1.1
2007   Dwight Howard   0.6   0.5   1.0
2007   Vince Carter   1.0   -0.0   1.0
2007   Andrei Kirilenko   1.1   -0.2   0.9
2007   Rashard Lewis   0.8   0.0   0.8
2007   Andre Miller   1.0   -0.2   0.8
2007   Richard Hamilton   1.2   -0.4   0.8
2007   Ray Allen   1.4   -0.6   0.8
2007   Lamar Odom   0.5   0.3   0.8
2007   Allen Iverson   0.7   0.0   0.7
2007   Stephen Jackson   1.7   -1.0   0.7
2007   Derek Fisher   -0.2   0.9   0.6
2007   Chris Paul   0.6   0.1   0.6
2007   Tony Parker   1.5   -0.9   0.6
2007   Bruce Bowen   0.1   0.5   0.6
2007   Udonis Haslem   -0.0   0.5   0.4
2007   Raymond Felton   0.3   0.1   0.4
2007   Mike Bibby   0.1   0.2   0.4
2007   Raja Bell   0.5   -0.2   0.3
2007   Kirk Hinrich   0.3   -0.1   0.2
2007   Leandro Barbosa   1.0   -0.8   0.2
2007   Joe Johnson   -0.2   0.3   0.2
2007   Deron Williams   0.8   -0.8   0.1
2007   Carmelo Anthony   1.2   -1.1   0.1
2007   Mike Dunleavy   -0.6   0.6   0.0
2007   Andre Iguodala   -0.5   0.6   0.0
2007   Caron Butler   -0.3   0.3   0.0
2007   Ben Wallace   -0.3   0.3   0.0
2007   Pau Gasol   0.8   -0.8   0.0
2007   Cuttino Mobley   -0.6   0.4   -0.2
2007   Josh Smith   -0.2   0.0   -0.2
2007   Mike Miller   -0.2   -0.0   -0.3
2007   Ricky Davis   -0.6   0.2   -0.4
2007   T.J. Ford   -0.7   0.3   -0.4
2007   Al Harrington   0.0   -0.5   -0.5
2007   Chris Webber   1.0   -1.4   -0.5
2007   Mehmet Okur   1.1   -1.6   -0.5
2007   Richard Jefferson   1.0   -1.5   -0.6
2007   Boris Diaw   -0.3   -0.4   -0.7
2007   Smush Parker   -0.7   -0.2   -0.9
2007   Chris Kaman   -0.8   -0.2   -1.1
2007   Drew Gooden   -0.1   -1.3   -1.5
2007   DeShawn Stevenson   -0.2   -1.5   -1.7


2008:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2008   Kevin Garnett   1.2   1.8   3.0
2008   Steve Nash   3.1   -0.3   2.9
2008   Manu Ginobili   1.5   1.2   2.7
2008   Dirk Nowitzki   2.3   -0.0   2.3
2008   LeBron James   1.7   0.6   2.3
2008   Chris Bosh   1.9   0.3   2.3
2008   Kobe Bryant   2.3   -0.2   2.1
2008   Tim Duncan   1.2   1.0   2.1
2008   Paul Pierce   1.8   0.2   2.0
2008   Tayshaun Prince   1.0   0.9   1.9
2008   Andrei Kirilenko   1.1   0.7   1.8
2008   Tyson Chandler   1.1   0.7   1.8
2008   Chauncey Billups   1.6   0.2   1.8
2008   Baron Davis   1.6   0.0   1.7
2008   Pau Gasol   1.5   0.2   1.6
2008   Rasheed Wallace   0.9   0.7   1.6
2008   Antawn Jamison   2.0   -0.4   1.6
2008   Shane Battier   0.3   1.3   1.6
2008   Tracy McGrady   1.2   0.2   1.4
2008   Shawn Marion   0.7   0.5   1.3
2008   Dwight Howard   1.1   0.2   1.3
2008   Ray Allen   1.6   -0.4   1.2
2008   Josh Howard   0.8   0.4   1.2
2008   Chris Paul   1.3   -0.2   1.2
2008   Vince Carter   0.8   0.4   1.2
2008   Allen Iverson   1.2   -0.1   1.1
2008   Lamar Odom   0.3   0.8   1.0
2008   Hedo Turkoglu   1.2   -0.2   1.0
2008   Tony Parker   0.5   0.5   1.0
2008   Carlos Boozer   1.6   -0.6   1.0
2008   Deron Williams   1.2   -0.3   0.9
2008   Rafer Alston   0.3   0.6   0.9
2008   Derek Fisher   0.2   0.6   0.9
2008   Luol Deng   0.6   0.3   0.9
2008   Jason Terry   1.3   -0.5   0.8
2008   Jason Kidd   0.8   -0.1   0.7
2008   Caron Butler   0.9   -0.2   0.7
2008   Jason Richardson   0.9   -0.2   0.7
2008   Mike Dunleavy   0.7   0.0   0.7
2008   Marcus Camby   0.1   0.6   0.6
2008   Stephen Jackson   0.4   0.2   0.6
2008   David West   0.8   -0.2   0.6
2008   Mehmet Okur   1.1   -0.4   0.6
2008   Andre Iguodala   0.0   0.5   0.6
2008   Rashard Lewis   1.1   -0.5   0.6
2008   Raja Bell   0.4   0.2   0.6
2008   Richard Hamilton   0.5   0.0   0.5
2008   Andre Miller   1.0   -0.4   0.5
2008   Josh Smith   -0.1   0.6   0.4
2008   Bruce Bowen   -0.7   1.1   0.4
2008   Zydrunas Ilgauskas   -0.3   0.7   0.4
2008   Joe Johnson   0.4   -0.1   0.3
2008   Amare Stoudemire   1.0   -0.7   0.3
2008   Carmelo Anthony   0.9   -0.7   0.2
2008   Ben Wallace   -0.8   0.9   0.1
2008   Samuel Dalembert   0.0   0.1   0.1
2008   Monta Ellis   0.4   -0.3   0.1
2008   Gerald Wallace   0.0   0.1   0.1
2008   Anthony Parker   0.5   -0.4   0.1
2008   Kirk Hinrich   -0.0   0.1   0.0
2008   Raymond Felton   0.4   -0.4   0.0
2008   Mike Miller   0.8   -0.8   -0.0
2008   Ben Gordon   0.6   -0.6   -0.0
2008   Al Harrington   0.4   -0.7   -0.3
2008   Leandro Barbosa   1.0   -1.3   -0.3
2008   Jamal Crawford   0.4   -0.7   -0.4
2008   Emeka Okafor   -0.6   0.2   -0.4
2008   Marvin Williams   0.1   -0.6   -0.5
2008   Kevin Martin   0.7   -1.3   -0.5
2008   Richard Jefferson   0.1   -0.7   -0.6
2008   Cuttino Mobley   -0.4   -0.3   -0.7
2008   Larry Hughes   0.2   -0.9   -0.7
2008   Danny Granger   -0.2   -0.6   -0.7
2008   Ricky Davis   -0.5   -0.3   -0.9
2008   DeShawn Stevenson   0.1   -1.1   -0.9
2008   Al Jefferson   -0.1   -0.9   -1.0
2008   Rudy Gay   -0.1   -1.0   -1.1


2009:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2009   LeBron James   2.3   0.8   3.2
2009   Kevin Garnett   0.8   2.0   2.8
2009   Lamar Odom   1.1   1.3   2.4
2009   Dwyane Wade   2.1   0.2   2.4
2009   Steve Nash   2.7   -0.5   2.2
2009   Kobe Bryant   2.2   -0.2   2.0
2009   Metta World Peace   0.9   1.1   2.0
2009   Ray Allen   1.7   -0.1   1.6
2009   Chris Paul   1.4   0.2   1.6
2009   Dirk Nowitzki   1.8   -0.2   1.6
2009   Rashard Lewis   1.3   0.3   1.6
2009   Chris Bosh   1.5   0.1   1.6
2009   Hedo Turkoglu   0.9   0.5   1.5
2009   Chauncey Billups   1.8   -0.3   1.5
2009   Tim Duncan   0.9   0.6   1.5
2009   Paul Pierce   1.2   0.1   1.3
2009   Dwight Howard   0.7   0.6   1.3
2009   Shane Battier   0.3   1.0   1.3
2009   Tony Parker   0.9   0.2   1.1
2009   Vince Carter   1.3   -0.3   1.1
2009   Pau Gasol   1.2   -0.1   1.0
2009   LaMarcus Aldridge   1.0   0.1   1.0
2009   Brandon Roy   1.3   -0.2   1.0
2009   Jason Kidd   0.7   0.3   1.0
2009   Andre Iguodala   0.3   0.7   1.0
2009   Rasheed Wallace   0.6   0.4   1.0
2009   Carmelo Anthony   1.3   -0.4   0.9
2009   Peja Stojakovic   1.2   -0.4   0.8
2009   Deron Williams   1.2   -0.4   0.8
2009   Baron Davis   0.9   -0.1   0.7
2009   Joe Johnson   0.7   0.1   0.7
2009   Josh Smith   0.1   0.6   0.7
2009   Tayshaun Prince   0.5   0.1   0.6
2009   Ben Gordon   1.0   -0.5   0.5
2009   Antawn Jamison   1.2   -0.7   0.5
2009   Derek Fisher   0.1   0.4   0.5
2009   Danny Granger   0.9   -0.5   0.4
2009   Mehmet Okur   0.9   -0.5   0.4
2009   David West   0.7   -0.3   0.4
2009   Gerald Wallace   -0.1   0.5   0.4
2009   Boris Diaw   0.1   0.2   0.3
2009   Andre Miller   0.7   -0.4   0.3
2009   Jason Terry   0.9   -0.7   0.2
2009   David Lee   0.9   -0.8   0.1
2009   Stephen Jackson   0.5   -0.3   0.1
2009   Raja Bell   0.1   0.0   0.1
2009   Rafer Alston   -0.3   0.3   0.0
2009   Samuel Dalembert   -0.3   0.3   0.0
2009   Raymond Felton   0.1   -0.1   0.0
2009   Allen Iverson   -0.0   0.1   0.0
2009   Emeka Okafor   -0.5   0.5   0.0
2009   Anthony Parker   0.1   -0.1   -0.0
2009   Caron Butler   0.8   -0.8   -0.0
2009   Richard Hamilton   0.1   -0.1   -0.1
2009   Rajon Rondo   -0.2   0.1   -0.1
2009   Mo Williams   0.6   -0.8   -0.2
2009   Kendrick Perkins   -0.8   0.6   -0.2
2009   Jason Richardson   0.6   -0.8   -0.2
2009   Richard Jefferson   -0.1   -0.2   -0.3
2009   Rudy Gay   0.2   -0.8   -0.5
2009   Marvin Williams   -0.1   -0.5   -0.6
2009   Ryan Gomes   0.1   -0.7   -0.6
2009   Jamal Crawford   0.6   -1.3   -0.7
2009   Michael Finley   0.3   -1.1   -0.7
2009   Ronnie Brewer   -0.4   -0.4   -0.8
2009   Luis Scola   -0.4   -0.7   -1.1
2009   Jeff Green   -0.4   -0.8   -1.2
2009   Al Horford   -0.8   -0.6   -1.3
2009   John Salmons   -0.1   -1.4   -1.6
2009   Kevin Durant   -0.8   -1.3   -2.1


2010:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2010   LeBron James   2.6   0.9   3.5
2010   Dwyane Wade   2.8   0.3   3.1
2010   Steve Nash   2.8   -0.6   2.2
2010   Dwight Howard   0.8   0.8   1.6
2010   Chris Bosh   1.5   0.1   1.6
2010   Kobe Bryant   1.8   -0.2   1.6
2010   Lamar Odom   0.4   1.2   1.6
2010   Anderson Varejao   0.6   0.9   1.5
2010   Tim Duncan   0.6   0.9   1.5
2010   Deron Williams   1.5   -0.1   1.4
2010   Ray Allen   1.6   -0.1   1.4
2010   Dirk Nowitzki   1.3   0.0   1.3
2010   Vince Carter   1.0   0.3   1.3
2010   Metta World Peace   0.3   0.9   1.2
2010   Rashard Lewis   0.6   0.5   1.1
2010   Josh Smith   0.3   0.6   0.9
2010   LaMarcus Aldridge   0.7   0.3   0.9
2010   Joe Johnson   1.1   -0.2   0.9
2010   Andre Miller   0.9   -0.1   0.8
2010   Nene Hilario   0.4   0.3   0.8
2010   Chauncey Billups   1.4   -0.6   0.8
2010   Shawn Marion   0.3   0.5   0.7
2010   Carmelo Anthony   1.2   -0.5   0.7
2010   Jason Kidd   0.2   0.4   0.7
2010   Russell Westbrook   0.7   -0.1   0.6
2010   Brandon Roy   1.1   -0.5   0.6
2010   Paul Pierce   0.8   -0.2   0.6
2010   Hedo Turkoglu   0.8   -0.2   0.6
2010   Paul Millsap   0.3   0.1   0.4
2010   Pau Gasol   0.8   -0.4   0.4
2010   Andre Iguodala   0.2   0.1   0.3
2010   Kevin Durant   0.6   -0.2   0.3
2010   Gerald Wallace   -0.3   0.6   0.3
2010   Antawn Jamison   1.0   -0.8   0.3
2010   Anthony Parker   0.0   0.2   0.2
2010   Trevor Ariza   -0.1   0.2   0.1
2010   Stephen Jackson   0.5   -0.3   0.1
2010   Rudy Gay   0.6   -0.5   0.1
2010   Boris Diaw   -0.1   0.2   0.1
2010   Richard Jefferson   -0.0   0.1   0.1
2010   Jason Richardson   1.0   -0.9   0.1
2010   David Lee   0.9   -1.0   -0.0
2010   Ben Gordon   0.7   -0.8   -0.1
2010   Derek Fisher   0.0   -0.1   -0.1
2010   Mike Bibby   0.6   -0.7   -0.1
2010   Grant Hill   -0.3   0.2   -0.1
2010   David West   0.7   -0.8   -0.1
2010   Kendrick Perkins   -0.6   0.5   -0.1
2010   Jason Terry   0.5   -0.6   -0.2
2010   Raymond Felton   -0.1   -0.1   -0.2
2010   Al Horford   -0.1   -0.2   -0.3
2010   Amare Stoudemire   0.2   -0.5   -0.3
2010   Mike Conley   0.1   -0.5   -0.3
2010   Marvin Williams   -0.3   -0.1   -0.4
2010   John Salmons   -0.2   -0.2   -0.4
2010   Emeka Okafor   -0.6   0.2   -0.4
2010   Jamal Crawford   1.0   -1.4   -0.5
2010   Mo Williams   0.1   -0.7   -0.5
2010   Udonis Haslem   -0.4   -0.2   -0.6
2010   Caron Butler   0.1   -0.6   -0.6
2010   Rajon Rondo   -0.7   -0.1   -0.7
2010   Aaron Brooks   0.3   -1.0   -0.8
2010   Rodney Stuckey   -0.6   -0.2   -0.8
2010   O.J. Mayo   -0.0   -0.8   -0.9
2010   Jeff Green   -0.0   -1.0   -1.0
2010   Derrick Rose   -0.3   -0.7   -1.0
2010   Rasual Butler   -0.6   -0.5   -1.1
2010   Wilson Chandler   -0.7   -0.6   -1.2
2010   Luis Scola   -0.4   -0.8   -1.2
2010   Brook Lopez   -0.7   -0.9   -1.6
2010   Andrea Bargnani   0.1   -1.7   -1.7


2011:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2011   Dirk Nowitzki   2.1   0.7   2.8
2011   Kevin Garnett   0.5   2.0   2.5
2011   LeBron James   1.8   0.7   2.5
2011   Manu Ginobili   1.8   0.5   2.3
2011   Steve Nash   2.8   -0.5   2.3
2011   Dwyane Wade   2.2   -0.0   2.2
2011   Luol Deng   0.7   1.2   1.9
2011   Dwight Howard   0.6   1.0   1.7
2011   Tim Duncan   0.4   1.0   1.4
2011   Nene Hilario   0.6   0.8   1.4
2011   LaMarcus Aldridge   0.7   0.5   1.2
2011   Lamar Odom   0.4   0.7   1.1
2011   Ray Allen   1.3   -0.2   1.1
2011   Metta World Peace   0.3   0.9   1.1
2011   Chris Bosh   0.6   0.4   1.1
2011   Paul Pierce   0.9   0.1   1.1
2011   Josh Smith   -0.1   1.1   1.0
2011   Kobe Bryant   1.6   -0.7   0.9
2011   Gerald Wallace   0.3   0.5   0.9
2011   Andre Iguodala   0.1   0.7   0.8
2011   Zach Randolph   1.0   -0.2   0.8
2011   Andre Miller   1.0   -0.2   0.8
2011   Danny Granger   0.9   -0.2   0.7
2011   Joe Johnson   1.0   -0.3   0.7
2011   Kevin Durant   1.1   -0.4   0.7
2011   Elton Brand   0.3   0.4   0.7
2011   Deron Williams   1.4   -0.7   0.6
2011   Paul Millsap   0.5   0.2   0.6
2011   Mike Conley   0.8   -0.2   0.6
2011   Pau Gasol   0.8   -0.2   0.6
2011   Hedo Turkoglu   0.7   -0.1   0.6
2011   Carmelo Anthony   1.1   -0.7   0.5
2011   Russell Westbrook   0.8   -0.4   0.4
2011   Rudy Gay   0.3   0.0   0.3
2011   Jason Kidd   0.1   0.2   0.3
2011   Chauncey Billups   1.2   -0.9   0.3
2011   Raymond Felton   0.4   -0.2   0.2
2011   Marc Gasol   -0.1   0.2   0.1
2011   Jason Terry   1.0   -0.8   0.1
2011   David West   0.6   -0.5   0.1
2011   David Lee   1.1   -1.1   -0.0
2011   Beno Udrih   0.2   -0.3   -0.1
2011   Carlos Boozer   0.8   -0.9   -0.1
2011   Amare Stoudemire   0.9   -1.0   -0.1
2011   Stephen Curry   0.5   -0.6   -0.1
2011   Derek Fisher   0.0   -0.2   -0.1
2011   Jason Richardson   0.8   -0.9   -0.2
2011   Derrick Rose   0.4   -0.6   -0.2
2011   Richard Jefferson   -0.1   -0.1   -0.2
2011   Boris Diaw   -0.1   -0.1   -0.2
2011   Channing Frye   0.2   -0.4   -0.2
2011   Shawn Marion   -0.3   0.0   -0.2
2011   Jamal Crawford   1.2   -1.5   -0.3
2011   John Salmons   -0.5   0.2   -0.3
2011   Trevor Ariza   -0.5   0.1   -0.4
2011   Stephen Jackson   0.3   -0.7   -0.4
2011   O.J. Mayo   0.5   -1.0   -0.4
2011   Al Horford   -0.2   -0.3   -0.5
2011   Rajon Rondo   -0.4   -0.1   -0.5
2011   Grant Hill   -0.5   0.0   -0.5
2011   Brandon Jennings   -0.3   -0.3   -0.6
2011   Kirk Hinrich   -0.6   -0.1   -0.7
2011   Luis Scola   0.0   -0.7   -0.7
2011   Mike Bibby   0.2   -1.0   -0.8
2011   Al Jefferson   0.1   -1.2   -1.1
2011   Wesley Matthews   -0.4   -0.7   -1.1
2011   Monta Ellis   -0.2   -1.0   -1.2
2011   Jeff Green   -0.2   -1.2   -1.4
2011   Brook Lopez   -0.4   -1.0   -1.4
2011   Andrea Bargnani   0.3   -1.9   -1.5


2012:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2012   Kevin Garnett   0.8   1.9   2.8
2012   LeBron James   2.0   0.6   2.7
2012   Dirk Nowitzki   2.1   0.5   2.6
2012   Dwyane Wade   2.1   0.0   2.1
2012   Chris Paul   1.8   0.1   2.0
2012   Luol Deng   0.5   1.3   1.8
2012   Danny Granger   1.2   0.3   1.5
2012   Josh Smith   0.4   1.0   1.4
2012   Dwight Howard   0.2   1.2   1.4
2012   LaMarcus Aldridge   0.8   0.4   1.2
2012   Andre Iguodala   -0.0   1.1   1.1
2012   Tony Parker   0.6   0.4   1.0
2012   Mike Conley   1.0   -0.2   0.8
2012   Russell Westbrook   1.2   -0.4   0.8
2012   James Harden   1.6   -0.8   0.8
2012   Joe Johnson   1.2   -0.4   0.7
2012   Chris Bosh   0.4   0.3   0.7
2012   Marc Gasol   -0.0   0.7   0.7
2012   Elton Brand   -0.0   0.7   0.7
2012   Blake Griffin   0.7   -0.1   0.6
2012   Kevin Durant   1.2   -0.5   0.6
2012   Kobe Bryant   1.2   -0.6   0.6
2012   Paul Pierce   0.5   -0.0   0.5
2012   Derrick Rose   0.8   -0.3   0.5
2012   Pau Gasol   0.5   -0.1   0.4
2012   Ray Allen   0.8   -0.7   0.1
2012   Jrue Holiday   0.1   -0.3   -0.2
2012   Serge Ibaka   -0.2   -0.2   -0.4
2012   Rajon Rondo   -0.2   -0.2   -0.4
2012   Al Jefferson   0.5   -1.0   -0.4
2012   Jason Terry   0.4   -1.1   -0.7
2012   Wesley Matthews   -0.1   -0.7   -0.8
2012   DeMar DeRozan   -0.3   -0.6   -0.9
2012   Monta Ellis   -0.0   -0.9   -0.9
2012   Shawn Marion   -0.8   -0.2   -1.0


2013:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2013   LeBron James   2.4   0.4   2.8
2013   Chris Paul   2.1   -0.1   2.1
2013   Andre Iguodala   0.2   1.3   1.5
2013   Dwyane Wade   1.6   -0.2   1.5
2013   Mike Conley   1.0   0.4   1.3
2013   Kevin Durant   1.5   -0.4   1.1
2013   Russell Westbrook   1.4   -0.3   1.1
2013   Joe Johnson   1.5   -0.4   1.1
2013   Luol Deng   0.1   0.9   1.1
2013   Tony Parker   0.7   0.4   1.0
2013   James Harden   2.0   -1.0   1.0
2013   Marc Gasol   -0.2   1.2   1.0
2013   David West   0.8   0.1   0.9
2013   Josh Smith   0.0   0.8   0.8
2013   Roy Hibbert   0.1   0.6   0.7
2013   Paul Pierce   0.6   0.1   0.7
2013   Blake Griffin   0.8   -0.2   0.6
2013   Paul George   -0.2   0.5   0.3
2013   Deron Williams   1.5   -1.3   0.2
2013   Kobe Bryant   1.2   -1.0   0.2
2013   David Lee   0.8   -0.8   0.1
2013   Chris Bosh   0.1   -0.1   -0.0
2013   Ty Lawson   1.0   -1.0   -0.1
2013   Tayshaun Prince   0.6   -0.6   -0.1
2013   Carmelo Anthony   1.0   -1.1   -0.1
2013   Rudy Gay   0.0   -0.3   -0.3
2013   Serge Ibaka   -0.2   -0.2   -0.4
2013   Jrue Holiday   -0.2   -0.1   -0.4
2013   Klay Thompson   -0.2   -0.4   -0.6
2013   Monta Ellis   0.1   -0.8   -0.7
2013   Mario Chalmers   -0.8   -0.2   -0.9
2013   Carlos Boozer   -0.1   -1.0   -1.2
2013   DeMar DeRozan   -0.6   -0.7   -1.3
2013   Jeff Teague   -0.3   -1.0   -1.3
2013   Evan Turner   -0.7   -0.7   -1.4
2013   Brandon Jennings   -0.2   -1.5   -1.7


2014:
Spoiler:

Code: Select all

2014   Chris Paul   2.5   0.8   3.3
2014   LeBron James   3.1   0.1   3.2
2014   LaMarcus Aldridge   1.5   1.1   2.6
2014   Andre Iguodala   0.8   1.6   2.4
2014   Kevin Durant   2.4   -0.3   2.1
2014   Russell Westbrook   2.1   -0.1   2.0
2014   James Harden   2.8   -0.8   2.0
2014   Stephen Curry   2.0   -0.2   1.7
2014   Blake Griffin   1.1   0.5   1.7
2014   Tim Duncan   0.4   1.2   1.6
2014   Mike Conley   1.3   0.3   1.6
2014   Paul Millsap   0.7   0.8   1.5
2014   David West   1.0   0.5   1.5
2014   Kyle Lowry   1.1   0.3   1.4
2014   Dwight Howard   0.1   1.3   1.4
2014   Luol Deng   0.2   1.1   1.3
2014   Deron Williams   2.0   -0.8   1.2
2014   Goran Dragic   1.8   -0.7   1.2
2014   Kawhi Leonard   0.5   0.5   1.0
2014   Paul George   -0.1   1.1   1.0
2014   Serge Ibaka   0.6   0.4   1.0
2014   Danny Green   0.2   0.8   1.0
2014   Joe Johnson   1.4   -0.4   1.0
2014   Damian Lillard   1.2   -0.3   0.9
2014   Dwyane Wade   1.2   -0.3   0.9
2014   George Hill   0.5   0.3   0.8
2014   Tony Parker   0.7   0.1   0.8
2014   Roy Hibbert   -0.2   0.9   0.8
2014   Josh Smith   0.1   0.7   0.8
2014   Chris Bosh   0.5   0.3   0.7
2014   Jimmy Butler   0.1   0.6   0.7
2014   Zach Randolph   0.8   -0.1   0.7
2014   Kyle Korver   0.7   -0.1   0.7
2014   David Lee   1.0   -0.3   0.6
2014   Kemba Walker   0.0   0.6   0.6
2014   Marc Gasol   -0.6   1.2   0.6
2014   J.R. Smith   1.0   -0.4   0.6
2014   Joakim Noah   -0.1   0.6   0.5
2014   Klay Thompson   0.6   -0.1   0.5
2014   Carmelo Anthony   1.3   -0.8   0.5
2014   Paul Pierce   0.0   0.4   0.4
2014   John Wall   0.7   -0.4   0.4
2014   Wesley Matthews   0.9   -0.6   0.3
2014   Thaddeus Young   0.5   -0.2   0.3
2014   Chandler Parsons   0.5   -0.3   0.3
2014   DeAndre Jordan   0.5   -0.3   0.2
2014   Rudy Gay   0.3   -0.2   0.1
2014   Nicolas Batum   1.0   -0.9   0.1
2014   Al Jefferson   0.7   -0.7   -0.0
2014   Lance Stephenson   0.1   -0.3   -0.2
2014   Robin Lopez   -0.2   -0.0   -0.2
2014   Greg Monroe   0.2   -0.5   -0.2
2014   Monta Ellis   0.6   -0.9   -0.3
2014   Tayshaun Prince   -0.0   -0.3   -0.3
2014   DeMar DeRozan   0.1   -0.4   -0.4
2014   Ray Allen   1.0   -1.6   -0.6
2014   Jeff Teague   -0.3   -0.4   -0.6
2014   Tristan Thompson   0.1   -1.1   -0.9
2014   Jeff Green   -0.7   -0.2   -1.0
2014   Brandon Jennings   0.4   -1.5   -1.1
2014   Evan Turner   -0.7   -0.5   -1.2
2014   Jarrett Jack   -0.6   -0.7   -1.3
2014   Carlos Boozer   -0.7   -0.8   -1.5


Source for 98-00 is acrossthecourt, source for 03-07 is J.E. (from colts' site), source for 08-14 is gotbuckets.com. I haven't looked at 01 or 02 yet, because there is no published prior-informed 01 RAPM out there yet, and from my understanding the 02 dataset is missing a bunch of games.
Now that's the difference between first and last place.

Return to Player Comparisons