Thugger HBC wrote:greenhughes wrote:
That's the thing, I don't think its a bad contract. Then again I believe in Melo and you don't...much like the majority of the board.
a bad deal is offering from the jump by a large margin over everyone else in any business. deal no matter who it is. And yeah for the record I dont believe melo is worth 129 mil on the court, and durability has always been my reason why. too much money for a player whose been injured every year they've been here, and way too inefficient to command such dollar when the lights are brightest.
He's a #1 if the goal isnt to win at the highest level.....#2 if it is.
greenhughes wrote:Say what you want but LA offered that max. Period.
You said "market'. 129 isnt his market, the lakers offer isnt his market either, neither is the bulls.
Notice how three different teams offered three different things. Not market, CBA dictates what they can.
greenhughes wrote:Chicago simply can't as they have money tied up. You have no idea what's going on behind the scenes to say who's trying to move what so your point there is mute.
Sure they could, they wont because they dont want a gutted team just to get Melo. but they certainly could if they wanted to.
greenhughes wrote:Fact: LA offered the Max.
Fact: Other teams want him but don't have the necessary cap space to offer the max.
Thats all LA could do, but it isnt "market" as you want it to be believed.
If a team truly wanted a legit shot for Melo, they'd make the room....plain and simple. The well known destination (Bulls) isnt even doing it, and there's no indication they would even if he picked them.