mpharris36 wrote:Rasho Brezec wrote:This is the same scenario as with the Bargnani trade, trying to diminish the importance of everything to rationalize a bad move and it always turns out to be false.
"Those draft picks are meaningless, they had to be included to get rid of Novak"
"The no-trade clause is not important, players hate us because of this"
It is a completely distorted line of thinking and it always comes back to haunt us. There is a reason why only 4 players had a no-trade clause last season, Kobe, Duncan, Garnett and Nowitzki. They've proven themselves loyal to their teams, they've all won MVP's with them, they've all made them perennial playoff teams and they've all gotten at least to the conference finals with them. Carmelo doesn't meet a single criteria.
just playing devil's advocate here. Wouldn't passing up on current better winning situations like Houston and Chicago being showing loyalty to the knicks?
Both of those teams need help to acquire him.