aq_ua wrote:KnicksManiac wrote:suicidedeuce wrote:
I'm sure you're aware the KNicks don't have a first round pick in 2016.
Just for fun, here's the last 5 years worth of picks #2-5. How many of these players are you feeling great about being a franchise type players (again, keeping in mind the Knicks didn't pick on this year and won't be able to pick one in 2016.
Completely on point. People here seem to think that "rebuilding" and "creating cap space" and "tanking" are sure-fire ways to succeed in this league. Unfortunately, it seldom works out that way.
I'd rather go to bat in Free Agency 2015 WITH a legitimate #1 option in Carmelo Anthony as part of the pitch.
There is no high probability success rate strategy in the NBA. If there were one, everyone would be doing it and thus automatically make it less successful. There are only a few meaningful free agents in the NBA just as there are only a few impactful rookies in each draft. Nothing has proven otherwise, and it's silly to think that anyone has the right formula. The only question is how do you ensure that you can surround the superstar talent with a meaningful roster of role players when you're able to secure one, hopefully two. The inability to field a substantially talented group of role players was a large part of our downfall during the Ewing era and will likely be the same for the Melo era without meaningful cap space flexibility and rookie contracts. The path from signing Melo to a max and fielding a substantial enough roster of talent around him given our limited assets and Melo's age is murky at best and pretty much entirely depends on having major cap space next summer and an aforementioned rare meaningful free agent that wants to accept that cap space, while retaining adequate talent to surround the stars. There is no room for error under that plan, hence the possibility of being stuck under a massive deadweight unmovable Melo contracts in a few years is extremely unappealing.
All reasonably accurate.
There is no clear, easy path. Each path is fraught with obstacles and difficulties.
This is when I remind myself, when I'm trying to evaluate what is the more realistic, likely option, that the KNicks are ALSO a business and not just a 'championship or bust' contraption.
The KNicks are likely going to choose the path that will result is higher attendance, higher ratings, and more postseason how dates, since every alternative is flawed.