ImageImageImageImageImage

MeloDrama Part VI

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

siar617
Analyst
Posts: 3,079
And1: 457
Joined: May 11, 2009

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2501 » by siar617 » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:05 pm

suicidedeuce wrote:
don't panac wrote:some posters are acting like it's a given that melo for the supermax is good for the knicks.


Its not a supermax, it's his max, and no, no one is.

No rebuild method will be a sure thing. Each path is fraught with obstacles and imperfections and uncertainties and good fortune and luck will be required.

This included rebuilding around a maxed Melo. Not a perfect option. Not a sure thing by any means.

Okay, there. Its on record.

So stop with the hyperbole and the strawmen.

Actually I'm one of those people.
So are you calling me a nobody?
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,636
And1: 9,348
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2502 » by Marty McFly » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:05 pm

VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:basically, i think riles needs to net a big fish to bring lebron back, he doesn't do that, i think lebron bolts for cleveland, i think it's possible that melo joins him there. if he really wants to win he'd want to play with lebron.



Lala in Cleveland?


planes exist. she doesn't need to live in hollywood or new york to get work in media. that's what agents are for. that said, probably not :lol:
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2503 » by K_ick_God » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:09 pm

The one thing about Melo waiting -- he doesn't have an agreement so he's risking $129M or whatever number he'd take with the Knicks. He's taking on risk as far as injury (especially if he's continuing to play which is likely).

My guess is that Melo is not torn -- he is waiting for something else to happen. He's not the torn type in my personal estimation.

Nothing wrong with the Knicks giving him a deadline by the way. We have a huge offer out there. He may want to wait until the Heat or XYZ, but that imposes a risk that the Knicks don't need to accept. They can tell Leon -- the full Max offer stays on the table till 5 PM today. By forcing it, you may force him to choose security.

No reason the Knicks have to let Leon and Melo use all the time they want, and wait for all the chips to fall, before making a decision. That's something they understandably want, but why would the Knicks let that happen? Their offer is big and could be attached to a "Take it or leave it" requirement. That's one of the advantages of having a very high bid -- you can attach strings to it.
User avatar
Futureisnow
Head Coach
Posts: 7,025
And1: 1,282
Joined: Oct 28, 2009
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2504 » by Futureisnow » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:10 pm

Are we really keeping this thread open because Carl said to?
suicidedeuce
And1: 0

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2505 » by suicidedeuce » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:11 pm

KnicksGod wrote:
suicidedeuce wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:I definitely disagree with the idea that we can't do a traditional rebuild because we lack a 2016 pick. 1 pick is not make or break to that strategy working. If you got the top pick in the draft in 2015 and there's a surefire stud available, you'd be well on your way.

The fact that picks are hard to turn into great players kind of weighs against suicide's argument. 1 pick is not a huge piece of the overall puzzle.


Waitaminute.

So picks are hard to turn into great players?

Doesn't that reasoning apply to 2015?

Isn't that an argument against trying rebuild through the draft?


It is *an* argument against building through the draft. But it's not an argument that means building through the draft, and with cap space, is doomed to fail.

And not having a pick in one year certainly does not foreclose that as a viable path. What you'd essentially be saying is that the Spurs drafting Cory Joseph or James Anderson, or the Thunder/Sonics drafting Saer Sene, should have meant that their ability to contend was derailed. But we know that to not be the case.


Why are you and others making things up to argue against??

Impediment does not mean impossible.

No one has said you can't get fortunate and rebuild that way. The point is, if you're relying on the draft to find your star player, having 2 picks gives you better odds of getting that players, because as YOU noted, picking a winner in the draft is hard and uncertain.

This is a matter of what's the better of two imperfect options. I acknowledge fully and gladly it gets HARDER with Melo at the max. I don't think impossible, but I certainly admit more difficult.

Some of you guys, however, are performing logic gymnastics to avoid simply acknowledging you'd have a better shot at finding a stud player through the draft if you had 2016 pick along with a 2015 one.

Add to that, NO ONE is advocating trading away the 2015 pick in the melo plan. The Knicks still get to pick a player there. Yes, it won't be as HIGH as it would be otherwise, but again, you can't make the argument but then at the same time dismiss not having a 2016 pick at all.

None of you are real advocates of a draft rebuild plan if you're unwilling an unable to acknowledge the problems with it, in the way I can acknowledge melo at the max makes it more difficult than melo at a discount.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,229
And1: 25,675
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2506 » by moocow007 » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:12 pm

Futureisnow wrote:Are we really keeping this thread open because Carl said to?


The biggest thread in RGM history I believe was 181 pages. So....record boys and girls? :D
User avatar
omerome
RealGM
Posts: 16,570
And1: 8,831
Joined: Aug 22, 2004
Location: Maryland (via Brooklyn)

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2507 » by omerome » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:13 pm

I thought we reached the 200+ post mark before.

Anyways, posting before lock. :)
User avatar
Rasho Brezec
RealGM
Posts: 61,958
And1: 18,587
Joined: Mar 12, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2508 » by Rasho Brezec » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:13 pm

sol537 wrote:who will be the realgm'er who posts the inevitable "*Breaking News*: Carmelo Chooses _______" thread?

that's what I'm waiting for. F5 away, folks!

I feel like whoever it is, he should get banned. And if there's 10 threads made, ban all 10 of them.

None of you ain't special, we post here, in this thread.
Image
suicidedeuce
And1: 0

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2509 » by suicidedeuce » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:13 pm

siar617 wrote:
suicidedeuce wrote:
don't panac wrote:some posters are acting like it's a given that melo for the supermax is good for the knicks.


Its not a supermax, it's his max, and no, no one is.

No rebuild method will be a sure thing. Each path is fraught with obstacles and imperfections and uncertainties and good fortune and luck will be required.

This included rebuilding around a maxed Melo. Not a perfect option. Not a sure thing by any means.

Okay, there. Its on record.

So stop with the hyperbole and the strawmen.

Actually I'm one of those people.
So are you calling me a nobody?


If you're saying it's a GIVEN that it'll be good for the knicks, then yes, I am.
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2510 » by K_ick_God » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:15 pm

suicidedeuce wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:
suicidedeuce wrote:
Waitaminute.

So picks are hard to turn into great players?

Doesn't that reasoning apply to 2015?

Isn't that an argument against trying rebuild through the draft?


It is *an* argument against building through the draft. But it's not an argument that means building through the draft, and with cap space, is doomed to fail.

And not having a pick in one year certainly does not foreclose that as a viable path. What you'd essentially be saying is that the Spurs drafting Cory Joseph or James Anderson, or the Thunder/Sonics drafting Saer Sene, should have meant that their ability to contend was derailed. But we know that to not be the case.


Why are you and others making things up to argue against??

Impediment does not mean impossible.

No one has said you can't get fortunate and rebuild that way. The point is, if you're relying on the draft to find your star player, having 2 picks gives you better odds of getting that players, because as YOU noted, picking a winner in the draft is hard and uncertain.

This is a matter of what's the better of two imperfect options. I acknowledge fully and gladly it gets HARDER with Melo at the max. I don't think impossible, but I certainly admit more difficult.

Some of you guys, however, are performing logic gymnastics to avoid simply acknowledging you'd have a better shot at finding a stud player through the draft if you had 2016 pick along with a 2015 one.

Add to that, NO ONE is advocating trading away the 2015 pick in the melo plan. The Knicks still get to pick a player there. Yes, it won't be as HIGH as it would be otherwise, but again, you can't make the argument but then at the same time dismiss not having a 2016 pick at all.

None of you are real advocates of a draft rebuild plan if you're unwilling an unable to acknowledge the problems with it, in the way I can acknowledge melo at the max makes it more difficult than melo at a discount.


Didn't you say building through the draft (and also through cap space by extension) was a bad idea because we don't have a 2016 pick?
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,229
And1: 25,675
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2511 » by moocow007 » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:18 pm

omerome wrote:I thought we reached the 200+ post mark before.

Anyways, posting before lock. :)


Did we? Damn. We're one potent group here. :lol:
User avatar
Brooklyn_Yards
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,788
And1: 4,322
Joined: May 15, 2012
Location: Waiting to see the receipts.
     

Re: MeloDrama Part VI 

Post#2512 » by Brooklyn_Yards » Tue Jul 8, 2014 5:25 pm

Rasho Brezec wrote:
sol537 wrote:who will be the realgm'er who posts the inevitable "*Breaking News*: Carmelo Chooses _______" thread?

that's what I'm waiting for. F5 away, folks!

I feel like whoever it is, he should get banned. And if there's 10 threads made, ban all 10 of them.

None of you ain't special, we post here, in this thread.

:lol:
BAT 14.0 Utah Jazz
PG: Toney Parker
SG: Jimmy Butler
SF:
PF:
C: Nikola Vucevic
7,54,67,114,127,174,187,234,247,294,307,354.

Return to New York Knicks