KLEON wrote:JJ13 wrote:Would you rather have Deng for 10-12/yr or Stephenson for 10-12/yr?
I'll take the crazy one I guess
Are you a comedian?
I don't get it
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
KLEON wrote:JJ13 wrote:Would you rather have Deng for 10-12/yr or Stephenson for 10-12/yr?
I'll take the crazy one I guess
Are you a comedian?
JMac1 wrote:Because he is better than Tucker? Because rookies hardly play? because Warren may spend time in the D League. Because Goran and Bledsoe are good and may want to try to get better. Because a healthy Deng can play defense?Fo-Real wrote:Dont see why we would still go after Deng after signing Tucker and drafting Warren.
Because we may make a trade.If we are interested, it is for a reason. I'm sure MC'D can see what we need and will do better than us.
JMac1 wrote:bwoolf2 wrote:JMac1 wrote:
They can get 10-15 minutes a game. Do you want them starting? Not unless you are trading Goran and Bledsoe, then why sign anyone.
Nevermind your right lets hope we get that 8th seed and tie up our cap space with Deng, its a solid move.
Yea, lets not sign a guy to a short term contract and TRY to compete. That is real competitive of you.....Maybe I should learn how to not try or quit, then maybe I can relate to your point of view.
JJ13 wrote:Would you rather have Deng for 10-12/yr or Stephenson for 10-12/yr?
I'll take the crazy one I guess




ruiner wrote:Still want us to make a trade for Love. As a straight male, I'll do sexual things to anyone for us to land him.

JMac1 wrote:If you unknowing ignorant hard headed experts watch the video form last December maybe you'd understand!!
JMac1 wrote:NaturalBuns wrote:No point in deng suns 3 deep at that position.
Upgrade at 4 or 5.
Three deep or have 3 players?!
oldscho0led wrote:Baseball is all about momentum. Pirates will carry their winning ways and beat Giants in the Wildcard.
A's over Royals. Lester and experience will prove that he's worth the trade.
Tigers winning it all. Tigers are, imo, peaking at the right time.
Kerrsed wrote:
bwoolf2 wrote:JMac1 wrote:If you unknowing ignorant hard headed experts watch the video form last December maybe you'd understand!!
Ahhhhh I see that you're a Cubs fan it all makes sense now, making the playoffs in any form would be a great achievement.
Sreister wrote:JMac1 wrote:bwoolf2 wrote:
Nevermind your right lets hope we get that 8th seed and tie up our cap space with Deng, its a solid move.
Yea, lets not sign a guy to a short term contract and TRY to compete. That is real competitive of you.....Maybe I should learn how to not try or quit, then maybe I can relate to your point of view.
Nevermind stifling our youth. We are too deep right now with talent to take on more. Look at our roster..
Bled/Ennis/Ish
Dragic\Green\Goodwin
Tuck\Marcus\Warren
Kieff
Plum\Len
We need bigs, not a 4th option at SF. You could argue Marcus could go 4 as well, but that still leaves us too deep. Yes, there is TOO deep, unless you plan on using our young guys as assets.
Besides ALL OF THAT. I would rather watch a young up-and-coming team than a team stuck in mediocrity.
SunsFanSSOL wrote:It's possible the Suns plan to play Deng at the 4. He's a better rebounder than Frye.
Kerrsed wrote:
bwoolf2 wrote:JMac1 wrote:If you unknowing ignorant hard headed experts watch the video form last December maybe you'd understand!!
Ahhhhh I see that you're a Cubs fan it all makes sense now, making the playoffs in any form would be a great achievement.


gaspar wrote:SunsFanSSOL wrote:It's possible the Suns plan to play Deng at the 4. He's a better rebounder than Frye.
+1
Paul Pierce was great last year at PF.