kinghasnoequal wrote:This again with the Bulls? It's going to start this early eh.
They won 48 games last year, and added Gasol, Mirotic, McBuckets and DRose.
I dont see whats so crazy about it.
Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77
kinghasnoequal wrote:This again with the Bulls? It's going to start this early eh.
Troubadour wrote:EscapoTHB wrote:Pacers
heat
bulls
Nets
hawks
raptors
cavs
wizards
The Nets got worse this off-season...how are they now better than the Raptors who added two quality rotation players in Lou Williams and James Johnson?
Lost Livingston and Pierce. Garnett is a year older. Lopez and Williams coming off of major surgeries.
Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app
BJGOAT3 wrote:Yes but Bulls-Cavs-Pacers are all in the same division, all 3 can't be top 4, Raptors and the winner of the other division(Wiz?) would be above Pacers in this model, while Pacers would keep the HCA against Wizards.
KRSN wrote:There's three division's and only two are represented in the 1-4 seeds in his standings. The three division winner are placed in the top 4 seeds.
ThunderUp1234 wrote:kinghasnoequal wrote:This again with the Bulls? It's going to start this early eh.
They won 48 games last year, and added Gasol, Mirotic, McBuckets and DRose.
I dont see whats so crazy about it.
Darkstar77 wrote:ThunderUp1234 wrote:kinghasnoequal wrote:This again with the Bulls? It's going to start this early eh.
They won 48 games last year, and added Gasol, Mirotic, McBuckets and DRose.
I dont see whats so crazy about it.
Until Rose proves he can stay healthy for a majority of a season the Bulls shouldn't be rated so highly.
1)Deron isn't coming off a major surgery, in terms of recovery.Troubadour wrote:EscapoTHB wrote:Pacers
heat
bulls
Nets
hawks
raptors
cavs
wizards
The Nets got worse this off-season...how are they now better than the Raptors who added two quality rotation players in Lou Williams and James Johnson?
Lost Livingston and Pierce. Garnett is a year older. Lopez and Williams coming off of major surgeries.
Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app
kerry kittles wrote:Troubadour wrote:EscapoTHB wrote:Pacers
heat
bulls
Nets
hawks
raptors
cavs
wizards
The Nets got worse this off-season...how are they now better than the Raptors who added two quality rotation players in Lou Williams and James Johnson?
Lost Livingston and Pierce. Garnett is a year older. Lopez and Williams coming off of major surgeries.
Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app
Lopez and Jack could in theory replace Pierce and Livingston's production. The Nets were better than the Raptors after they went small 1/1/14 and on and were better when it mattered most, the playoffs.
There's two schools of thought with the Nets that make them so hard to pencil in:
DWill/Johnson/Wallace/Evans/Lopez and a terrible bench outside Blatche won 49 games
There's more talent around those 3 players this season, but bigger question marks, namely the health of DWill and Lopez. If Lopez plays 70+ games they'll be in the playoffs, if he doesn't they'll be fighting to get in.
Darkstar77 wrote:ThunderUp1234 wrote:kinghasnoequal wrote:This again with the Bulls? It's going to start this early eh.
They won 48 games last year, and added Gasol, Mirotic, McBuckets and DRose.
I dont see whats so crazy about it.
Until Rose proves he can stay healthy for a majority of a season the Bulls shouldn't be rated so highly.
Liver_Pooty wrote:Stopped reading after I saw the Bobcats mentioned 3 times. That isn't our name. Keep up with things.
catsfan wrote:dammit guys. we aren't the bobcats! we are the hornets!
Troubadour wrote:Also, the number of people who don't understand how the conference rankings work is shocking
Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app
DarkXaero wrote:1)Deron isn't coming off a major surgery, in terms of recovery.Troubadour wrote:EscapoTHB wrote:Pacers
heat
bulls
Nets
hawks
raptors
cavs
wizards
The Nets got worse this off-season...how are they now better than the Raptors who added two quality rotation players in Lou Williams and James Johnson?
Lost Livingston and Pierce. Garnett is a year older. Lopez and Williams coming off of major surgeries.
Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app
2)Nets were without Brook for almost the entire last season. If they have him back this season, it's already a huge improvement.
3)Livingston has been replaced by Jarrett Jack, who is a much different player, but still a decent enough replacement. While Livingston was very solid defensively, his lack of shooting and playmaking was a major negative. Jack is nowhere near defensively, but he does bring the things that Livingston didn't. It's a trade off.
The Pierce loss sucks, especially given that Nets had the option to match. There's no denying that. KG is a year older, but I really like him in a backup role to Brook. 28-30 MPG for Brook, with 20 MPG for KG. Plumlee with minutes at PF and C. Plumlee should improve his game, and the team as a whole has gotten younger. Also, Nets have a better head coach than Kidd this time. Bojan Bogdanovic is a solid Euro prospect who might make an immediate impact.
Troubadour wrote:kerry kittles wrote:Troubadour wrote:
The Nets got worse this off-season...how are they now better than the Raptors who added two quality rotation players in Lou Williams and James Johnson?
Lost Livingston and Pierce. Garnett is a year older. Lopez and Williams coming off of major surgeries.
Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app
Lopez and Jack could in theory replace Pierce and Livingston's production. The Nets were better than the Raptors after they went small 1/1/14 and on and were better when it mattered most, the playoffs.
There's two schools of thought with the Nets that make them so hard to pencil in:
DWill/Johnson/Wallace/Evans/Lopez and a terrible bench outside Blatche won 49 games
There's more talent around those 3 players this season, but bigger question marks, namely the health of DWill and Lopez. If Lopez plays 70+ games they'll be in the playoffs, if he doesn't they'll be fighting to get in.
So, their success was predicated on Pierce playing the 4 and Livingston playing the 2. The team also acknowledged how much better they were without Lopez.
The success will continue with Lopez back and the loss of two of their starters from last season. Jack is fine, but does not offer any of the defensive play Livingston offered.
The Nets lost two starters and as many as two rotation players. They're being replaced by Jarrett Jack, a rookie, and the 59th pick in the draft....
Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app