Offseason Trade Thread
Moderator: THE J0KER
Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 818
- And1: 40
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Offseason Trade Thread
I was wondering what would it take to get Jan Vessely? We could offer Wright + Mekel + James for Vessely + Foye/Filler
or
We could do Crowder + James + Mekel for Jan V.
or
We could do Mekel + James + Cash or our Exemption for Jan V.
or
We could do Crowder + James + Mekel for Jan V.
or
We could do Mekel + James + Cash or our Exemption for Jan V.
Really LOLRightToCensor wrote:Rubio is just too damn inefficient to be a team's primary option for offense. He needs to play in a system offense for you to get the best out of him. Trade him to New York, Dallas, or any other team that could use a poor-man's Rajon Rondo.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 14,089
- And1: 5,448
- Joined: Jun 02, 2014
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
Vesely isn't U/C, just sign him....
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose
Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 818
- And1: 40
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
skywalker33 wrote:Vesely isn't U/C, just sign him....
Why does it show him as on your team with trade machine?
Really LOLRightToCensor wrote:Rubio is just too damn inefficient to be a team's primary option for offense. He needs to play in a system offense for you to get the best out of him. Trade him to New York, Dallas, or any other team that could use a poor-man's Rajon Rondo.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 387
- And1: 80
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
Not sure why you want him but he signed with a team in Turkey so his NBA career is most likely over.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 818
- And1: 40
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
We want him because he is a 7 footer that's > James. We want to improve our back C position
Really LOLRightToCensor wrote:Rubio is just too damn inefficient to be a team's primary option for offense. He needs to play in a system offense for you to get the best out of him. Trade him to New York, Dallas, or any other team that could use a poor-man's Rajon Rondo.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,606
- And1: 1,146
- Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
Nash/Cash/Hou 1st/future 2nd for Chandler?
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 387
- And1: 80
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
I would do it if Nash wasn't so injury prone. He's a guy we could use in a half court situation but his back will limit him to only play half the season.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
- DowNY
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,879
- And1: 10,366
- Joined: Dec 19, 2010
- Location: Your mom's crib, NYC
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
Is Thad Young & Shane Larkin fair value for Danilo Gallinari?
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 14,089
- And1: 5,448
- Joined: Jun 02, 2014
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
DowNY wrote:Is Thad Young & Shane Larkin fair value for Danilo Gallinari?
NO !! Add in PHI's unprotected 2015 #1 and we'll talk....
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose
Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
- DowNY
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,879
- And1: 10,366
- Joined: Dec 19, 2010
- Location: Your mom's crib, NYC
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
skywalker33 wrote:DowNY wrote:Is Thad Young & Shane Larkin fair value for Danilo Gallinari?
NO !! Add in PHI's unprotected 2015 #1 and we'll talk....
Are those guys fair value for Wilson Chandler then?
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,900
- And1: 2,334
- Joined: Dec 24, 2006
- Location: Denver, CO
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
Value wise, I don't think it's far off but it doesn't work for our current roster. We don't need more depth. We need to consolidate talent.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 818
- And1: 40
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
What is Mosgovs situation? Is he expendable or is JJ?
Really LOLRightToCensor wrote:Rubio is just too damn inefficient to be a team's primary option for offense. He needs to play in a system offense for you to get the best out of him. Trade him to New York, Dallas, or any other team that could use a poor-man's Rajon Rondo.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,377
- And1: 1,118
- Joined: May 30, 2010
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
kbrow20 wrote:What is Mosgovs situation? Is he expendable or is JJ?
Mozgov probably not.
JJ, I would accept anything but a worse contract for him at this point.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 818
- And1: 40
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
eathb_au wrote:kbrow20 wrote:What is Mosgovs situation? Is he expendable or is JJ?
Mozgov probably not.
JJ, I would accept anything but a worse contract for him at this point.
Is JJ not have good defense? He doesn't have that many blocks per game. Does he do quite well for being 6'9 at center?
Really LOLRightToCensor wrote:Rubio is just too damn inefficient to be a team's primary option for offense. He needs to play in a system offense for you to get the best out of him. Trade him to New York, Dallas, or any other team that could use a poor-man's Rajon Rondo.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 400
- And1: 226
- Joined: Apr 02, 2013
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
Hi guys.
Mozgov - would an offer of non-guaranteed contracts (i.e. cap space) and a reverse protected Memphis pick (1-5 and 15-30 protected the next two years) or top-10 protected MIA pick be enough to reunite him with David Blatt?
I assume that with McGee returning and the drafting of Nurkic he is somewhat surplus to requirements - is this an appropriate value?
Mozgov - would an offer of non-guaranteed contracts (i.e. cap space) and a reverse protected Memphis pick (1-5 and 15-30 protected the next two years) or top-10 protected MIA pick be enough to reunite him with David Blatt?
I assume that with McGee returning and the drafting of Nurkic he is somewhat surplus to requirements - is this an appropriate value?
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,186
- And1: 11,359
- Joined: Mar 05, 2005
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
AustinCarr61 wrote:Hi guys.
Mozgov - would an offer of non-guaranteed contracts (i.e. cap space) and a reverse protected Memphis pick (1-5 and 15-30 protected the next two years) or top-10 protected MIA pick be enough to reunite him with David Blatt?
I assume that with McGee returning and the drafting of Nurkic he is somewhat surplus to requirements - is this an appropriate value?
You are assuming wrong, Mozgov is the starting center until McGee or Nurkic can unseat him, and Nurkic right now is seen as a project a year or two away from being a good NBA player. No I am not going to trade him for mid 1st, especially 1 likely to be a couple of years away at the soonest.
kbrow20 wrote:eathb_au wrote:kbrow20 wrote:What is Mosgovs situation? Is he expendable or is JJ?
Mozgov probably not.
JJ, I would accept anything but a worse contract for him at this point.
Is JJ not have good defense? He doesn't have that many blocks per game. Does he do quite well for being 6'9 at center?
Hickson is above average at man to man post defense, but terrible at help defense and defense on the perimeter.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 400
- And1: 226
- Joined: Apr 02, 2013
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
The Rebel wrote:AustinCarr61 wrote:Hi guys.
Mozgov - would an offer of non-guaranteed contracts (i.e. cap space) and a reverse protected Memphis pick (1-5 and 15-30 protected the next two years) or top-10 protected MIA pick be enough to reunite him with David Blatt?
I assume that with McGee returning and the drafting of Nurkic he is somewhat surplus to requirements - is this an appropriate value?
You are assuming wrong, Mozgov is the starting center until McGee or Nurkic can unseat him, and Nurkic right now is seen as a project a year or two away from being a good NBA player. No I am not going to trade him for mid 1st, especially 1 likely to be a couple of years away at the soonest.
Ok - thanks for the clarification.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,606
- And1: 1,146
- Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
tstrick33 wrote:I would do it if Nash wasn't so injury prone. He's a guy we could use in a half court situation but his back will limit him to only play half the season.
Nash wouldn't be seen as contributing asset, best case you guys use him same way we did, use him to match salary and either take back longer contracts with assets or trade him for similar contract of a disgruntled "star" player who wants to go elsewhere. OR worse case, he settles for a decent buyout and you guys can use the money on some one else.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 818
- And1: 40
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
Would you guys consider JJ + Foye for Wright + Mekel + pick
Really LOLRightToCensor wrote:Rubio is just too damn inefficient to be a team's primary option for offense. He needs to play in a system offense for you to get the best out of him. Trade him to New York, Dallas, or any other team that could use a poor-man's Rajon Rondo.
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,377
- And1: 1,118
- Joined: May 30, 2010
Re: Offseason Trade Thread
Yes I would do that