ImageImageImage

The One And Only Offseason Thread 3

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,407
And1: 17,044
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1861 » by Saberestar » Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:53 pm

JJ13 wrote:
carey wrote:
NTB wrote:Can someone tell me how can we spend exactly? How much cap space do we have?


With Tolliver, Thomas, Tucker, and Bledsoe as a cap hold. $14,419,176.


We can spend that $14+M prior to signing Bledsoe, right...and then go over to sign Bledsoe? Or no?

Exactly.
User avatar
ShawnBronald
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,955
And1: 365
Joined: Feb 16, 2009

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1862 » by ShawnBronald » Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:57 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ValleyoftheSuns/status/491228880163065856[/tweet]

Press conference is for both Thomas -and- Tolliver.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1863 » by BobbieL » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:12 pm

Saberestar wrote:
JJ13 wrote:
carey wrote:
With Tolliver, Thomas, Tucker, and Bledsoe as a cap hold. $14,419,176.


We can spend that $14+M prior to signing Bledsoe, right...and then go over to sign Bledsoe? Or no?

Exactly.


Doesn't mean the team shoud spend it - be fiscaly pragmatic. But its good to have the space if the right player comes along before Bledso. But at this point, probably not going to happen. Not Traxxed reported as much
NTB
Suns Forum News Guru
Posts: 5,796
And1: 6,029
Joined: Dec 24, 2013
Contact:
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1864 » by NTB » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:30 pm

Guys i don't understand cap hold things. Simply, we have 14 MD to spend? Then how can we keep both Monroe and Bledsoe theoretically ?
carey wrote:It is 2-time, every time.
User avatar
ShawnBronald
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,955
And1: 365
Joined: Feb 16, 2009

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1865 » by ShawnBronald » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:36 pm

NTB wrote:Guys i don't understand cap hold things. Simply, we have 14 MD to spend? Then how can we keep both Monroe and Bledsoe theoretically ?


I'm not cap savvy either, but as I understand it, if we could sign Monroe first (without Detroit matching) and then resign Bledsoe, we could go over the cap, but then Sarver would have to pay the luxury tax. I know he was willing to do it if we could sign LeBron and another superstar, I'm not sure Monroe fits into that category, though.
PhxSunsFan1234
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 55
Joined: Jun 17, 2014
 

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1866 » by PhxSunsFan1234 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:37 pm

NTB wrote:Guys i don't understand cap hold things. Simply, we have 14 MD to spend? Then how can we keep both Monroe and Bledsoe theoretically ?


Bird Rights. Theoretically, if we signed Monroe to $14 mil/yr, we would have $100k in salary cap space. Because of Bledsoe's Bird Rights, if we signed him for $13 million/yr, we'd be able to go over the cap limit, but be forced into paying a luxury tax. BUT, we could only do this situation if we signed Monroe first, and then Bledsoe. If we sign Bledsoe first, we're out of cap space.
PhxSunsFan1234
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 55
Joined: Jun 17, 2014
 

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1867 » by PhxSunsFan1234 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:38 pm

What does salary cap situation look like next year if we sign Bledsoe to 4/52? Goran will want that, probably more. If we trade him what does our salary cap situation look like for FA? If we re-sign him, do we have any salary cap space for a big signing or just minimal amount?
NTB
Suns Forum News Guru
Posts: 5,796
And1: 6,029
Joined: Dec 24, 2013
Contact:
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1868 » by NTB » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:46 pm

Oh yeah, Bird Rights. I love you Larry Bird :lol: Thanks for responses. But with our cap space, we can give Monroe max i guess. Wasn't Monroe's max worth 16 MD?
carey wrote:It is 2-time, every time.
Frank Lee
RealGM
Posts: 14,268
And1: 10,086
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1869 » by Frank Lee » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:53 pm

carey wrote:
gaspar wrote: Baseless speculation and jumping to conclusions based on no evidence whatsoever.


I think there's plenty of evidence. The fact that they shut down negotiations last year. The fact that they haven't been in Phoenix this entire off-season. There is the "favorite" of the tweet suggesting the Lakers sign him. The reports coming out from a "source" suggesting that he wants the full 5-year max when anyone with half a brain knows he doesn't deserve that off half a season of starting. You can ignore these signs if you like, but the rest of us can connect the dots fairly easily.


Yup Carey .... SunsFan's observation summarized the scenario quite well. I'd say we have 80% chance on 'Bleeding out' .... The only scenario I see him staying is if he cannot find a way out. Look for a public announcement soon voicing his desires. It's the only playing card he has.

As disappointing and hard to accept for some here, who can really blame someone who exercises their personal right to work in/for the city/organization they want. These guys are essentially private contractors. The challenge is for Babby and McDo to maximize the return. Unfortunately, it may not be equitable as we deal from a lesser leveraged position.
What ? Me Worry ?
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,314
And1: 61,068
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1870 » by bwgood77 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:57 pm

ShawnBronald wrote:
NTB wrote:Guys i don't understand cap hold things. Simply, we have 14 MD to spend? Then how can we keep both Monroe and Bledsoe theoretically ?


I'm not cap savvy either, but as I understand it, if we could sign Monroe first (without Detroit matching) and then resign Bledsoe, we could go over the cap, but then Sarver would have to pay the luxury tax. I know he was willing to do it if we could sign LeBron and another superstar, I'm not sure Monroe fits into that category, though.


Sarver wouldn't necessarily have to pay the luxury tax. It would be close. The cap is about 63 and luxury tax level is a shade under 77. Going over the cap doesn't immediately put you into the luxury tax, which is what it seems like a couple of you were saying.

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q21 Scroll down to chart at bottom of this question

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q13
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,314
And1: 61,068
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1871 » by bwgood77 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:01 pm

NTB wrote:Oh yeah, Bird Rights. I love you Larry Bird :lol: Thanks for responses. But with our cap space, we can give Monroe max i guess. Wasn't Monroe's max worth 16 MD?


It's that same contract that Hayward got. Max we could offer is 14.7 + 4.5% raises (which comes out to about 63.6 I think, or close to an avg of 16 a year). You can see what the max starting salaries are for players by # of years in the league on bottom chart (0-6 year category for Monroe, Bledsoe)

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q16
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,314
And1: 61,068
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1872 » by bwgood77 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:04 pm

Frank Lee wrote:
carey wrote:
gaspar wrote: Baseless speculation and jumping to conclusions based on no evidence whatsoever.


I think there's plenty of evidence. The fact that they shut down negotiations last year. The fact that they haven't been in Phoenix this entire off-season. There is the "favorite" of the tweet suggesting the Lakers sign him. The reports coming out from a "source" suggesting that he wants the full 5-year max when anyone with half a brain knows he doesn't deserve that off half a season of starting. You can ignore these signs if you like, but the rest of us can connect the dots fairly easily.


Yup Carey .... SunsFan's observation summarized the scenario quite well. I'd say we have 80% chance on 'Bleeding out' .... The only scenario I see him staying is if he cannot find a way out. Look for a public announcement soon voicing his desires. It's the only playing card he has.

As disappointing and hard to accept for some here, who can really blame someone who exercises their personal right to work in/for the city/organization they want. These guys are essentially private contractors. The challenge is for Babby and McDo to maximize the return. Unfortunately, it may not be equitable as we deal from a lesser leveraged position.


I'd say it's unclear whether or not he wants to play here right now. I definitely wouldn't jump to conclusions that he wants out. Now the way Eric Gordon did it was another story. That was pretty clear. But even if someone wants out, it doesn't matter. That doesn't mean they are getting out unless it makes sense for the Suns to do it. Need to hang onto the asset unless we can find a trade that clearly makes sense for the Suns.
RunDogGun
No Sham, More Cam
Posts: 17,891
And1: 5,437
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Beyond the Sun

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1873 » by RunDogGun » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:34 pm

I think we should do Detroit a solid, and offer Monroe an $11 million contract, and have them do the same to Bledsoe. Both of us set a market price, and then we can offer the $12 million to ours and they can to theirs.
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,788
And1: 7,669
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1874 » by RaisingArizona » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:54 pm

RunDogGun wrote:I think we should do Detroit a solid, and offer Monroe an $11 million contract, and have them do the same to Bledsoe. Both of us set a market price, and then we can offer the $12 million to ours and they can to theirs.

Why would Bledsoe sign that? That's the same price we've offered.
Image
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1875 » by LukasBMW » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:56 pm

RunDogGun wrote:I think we should do Detroit a solid, and offer Monroe an $11 million contract, and have them do the same to Bledsoe. Both of us set a market price, and then we can offer the $12 million to ours and they can to theirs.


I do like this idea.

"Hey Bledsoe, since we haven't heard from you, we are going to offer $11 million a year for 4 years to a CENTER who averaged 15 and 10 last year and has only missed 1 games in his last 2 years. He has career averages of 14 and 9 compared to your 8 and 3. So do you want $11 million per season too???? Or are you going to continue to live in the land of ponies and rainbows and max contracts for injury prone point guards?"
Image
gaspar
Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
Posts: 6,761
And1: 5,479
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1876 » by gaspar » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:16 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Frank Lee wrote:
carey wrote:
I think there's plenty of evidence. The fact that they shut down negotiations last year. The fact that they haven't been in Phoenix this entire off-season. There is the "favorite" of the tweet suggesting the Lakers sign him. The reports coming out from a "source" suggesting that he wants the full 5-year max when anyone with half a brain knows he doesn't deserve that off half a season of starting. You can ignore these signs if you like, but the rest of us can connect the dots fairly easily.


Yup Carey .... SunsFan's observation summarized the scenario quite well. I'd say we have 80% chance on 'Bleeding out' .... The only scenario I see him staying is if he cannot find a way out. Look for a public announcement soon voicing his desires. It's the only playing card he has.

As disappointing and hard to accept for some here, who can really blame someone who exercises their personal right to work in/for the city/organization they want. These guys are essentially private contractors. The challenge is for Babby and McDo to maximize the return. Unfortunately, it may not be equitable as we deal from a lesser leveraged position.


I'd say it's unclear whether or not he wants to play here right now. I definitely wouldn't jump to conclusions that he wants out. Now the way Eric Gordon did it was another story. That was pretty clear. But even if someone wants out, it doesn't matter. That doesn't mean they are getting out unless it makes sense for the Suns to do it. Need to hang onto the asset unless we can find a trade that clearly makes sense for the Suns.


Yeah, it's inconclusive at best. With guys like Chandler Parsons or Eric Gordon it was pretty clear they wanted out.

There's also this:
"I don't think he wants to leave Phoenix," Coro said. "It's probably frustrating for everybody to hear him not just say a simple thing like ‘man I would really love to stay here, it was great here, I love my team, I could really see myself being here a long time.' It would have been great if somebody had coached him to say that or had him say that, but I think we maybe read a little too much into Eric Bledsoe not saying things like that."

"I know just from being around the team, and watching his interaction, he loves that team, and he loved (them) playing the way they did and I think he really showed a great appreciation too for the process he went through after the knee surgery and how the training staff handled that with him and how he wasn't pushed through that whole process, and came out feeling really healthy and with full confidence once he was able to play again," Coro said.


and this:
"From my aspects," [Ish] Smith said, "and talking to him on the plane -- he sits right beside me, he wants to be back. He likes it here and so obviously all of you guys will be excited to have him back and I know I will be."
User avatar
wordsenuff
Pro Prospect
Posts: 821
And1: 370
Joined: Mar 18, 2010
   

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1877 » by wordsenuff » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:20 pm

i'm getting tired of waiting for these guys to reach an agreement. every morning the first thing i do is check to see if the situation has changed. some one has to give!
User avatar
NapoleonII
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,613
And1: 4,964
Joined: Aug 31, 2007

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1878 » by NapoleonII » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:21 pm

Yep, we're all in the "inconclusive" boat for now. Bledsoe's personality is hard to read, he's quiet and introverted and probably doesn't like "announcing his desires."

Just hold on to what we've built last year and hope his primadonna of an agent does what is best for his client, which is ink him up for a contract that Steph Curry took, that Kyle Lowry took and is best for his long-term future.
JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1879 » by JDLAW » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:26 pm

Frank Lee wrote:
carey wrote:
gaspar wrote: Baseless speculation and jumping to conclusions based on no evidence whatsoever.


I think there's plenty of evidence. The fact that they shut down negotiations last year. The fact that they haven't been in Phoenix this entire off-season. There is the "favorite" of the tweet suggesting the Lakers sign him. The reports coming out from a "source" suggesting that he wants the full 5-year max when anyone with half a brain knows he doesn't deserve that off half a season of starting. You can ignore these signs if you like, but the rest of us can connect the dots fairly easily.


Yup Carey .... SunsFan's observation summarized the scenario quite well. I'd say we have 80% chance on 'Bleeding out' .... The only scenario I see him staying is if he cannot find a way out. Look for a public announcement soon voicing his desires. It's the only playing card he has.

As disappointing and hard to accept for some here, who can really blame someone who exercises their personal right to work in/for the city/organization they want. These guys are essentially private contractors. The challenge is for Babby and McDo to maximize the return. Unfortunately, it may not be equitable as we deal from a lesser leveraged position.



I think if he we're to make a pronouncement that he wants out, it would have the opposite effect on his perception among NBA teams and little to no effect on the market. There would be several teams calling to offer their "crap" sign and trades, which the Suns will reject. Most teams will view this as petulance and stay away from the situation.
JDLAW
Suns Forum CBA and Legal Expert
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,301
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: The One And Only Offseason Thread 3 

Post#1880 » by JDLAW » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:27 pm

wordsenuff wrote:i'm getting tired of waiting for these guys to reach an agreement. every morning the first thing i do is check to see if the situation has changed. some one has to give!



Patience-it will all sort out eventually.

Return to Phoenix Suns