coldfish wrote:StephenAA wrote:
I think the majority of the talk lately is how we can be the "third" team needed to possibly facilitate the trade, and what we would be giving out and getting back (which would not be KL).
AA
OK, I'll address that. Its basically Taj for Martin.
Let's be honest, Taj is an insurance policy against Mirotic being able to play and Noah + Gasol's health. If all three of those work out well for the Bulls, Taj is really unnecessary.
However, Martin would be an insurance policy on McDermott. If McDermott can play, then Butler / McDermott is fine and Snell / Dunleavey / Hinrich / Rose backing up the 2/3 is also fine.
I think its a "meh" discussion. Swapping insurance policies. Probably doesn't do much for the Bulls.
I have seen Waiters mentioned and I think he sucks.
I agree that it's likely to be something like Taj for Martin, and I'm against that.
BTW, I wrongly posted last night about how much Martin has declined-- I was posting from my phone, which made it hard to look up the stats, and I had read an article earlier which (it turns out) erroneously cited Martin's FG% as 40.3% (rather than 43.0%, as it really was). Martin was worse on offense last year than he was with OKC, and IMO it'd be a mistake to expect him to return to the efficiency that he posted alongside Durant and Westbrook, but he might still have a couple of pretty good years in him. I still wouldn't trade Taj for him, though. At least, not right now.
I would trade Dunleavy + Snell, even though I'd feel conflicted about that. But Martin replaces Dunleavy's shooting and Snell, while he's looked good in SL, shouldn't be the guy to hold up our chances of improving our offense significantly.
bad_knees proposed a best-case situation in which we could sign several vets to unguaranteed contracts and trade them, mid-season, to Minny for Martin if he's still on their team and if they still want to dump him. I'd be just fine with taking on the extra salary that way, if it didn't mean harming our defense and leadership. We could probably sign Chris Douglas-Roberts for the vet minimum if we want one more wing who can play decent defense.
The risk, of course, is that Cleveland will acquire both Martin and Love, and that IMO will make them even stronger-- much stronger than if they simply had Waiters at SG, given that I don't think Waiters will deal well being pushed so far to the background on an Irving-Lebron-Love-led team. But whatcha gonna do. I don't want to get panicked into trading Taj just to keep Cleveland from getting an upgrade. Too many variables to plan that kind of chess game reliably.