JDLAW wrote:BobbieL wrote:JDLAW wrote:
Ask yourself, "why is this coming out of the northwest and not locally?
Good question.
The declining salaries is a non factor to me. That is strictly the ability of the Suns to put more money on this years cap to make future years less so they can remain competitive. They did this with Tucker and Thomas. 4/48 is 48 whether its 4 x 12 or 10.5, 11.5, 12.5, 13.5 or declining like 13.5, 12.5 11.5, 10.5. Granted, in year , he might think he is underpaid but in year 1,he is overpaid. The contract set up is easily explainable with a real agent.
Bledsoe and Paul need to understand its not the Suns, its not the RFA - it is the market. And until otherwise, the Suns KNEW the most they would pay for Bledsoe is 4/63. To think that 5/84 was ever on the able is asinine and stupid. This wasn't Carmelo who could get offers from LA or the Bulls to make the Knicks go 5/122.
Bledsoe was NEVER going to get more than 4/63 and that should have been his starting point.
I think explore the trade market. Its obvious Bledsoe will go where he gets paid.
No you do not explore the trade market - it is not the Suns job. If Bledsoe's agent wants him elsewhere and can work out a S&T that would be acceptable to the Suns so be it. Agents do this all the time. My guess is that he has tried and like his negotiating tactics, has come up with zero.
This "irreparable relationship" reeks of desperation and affirms that his agent has no clue what he is doing. it sounds like he is two years old and is threatening to take his ball and bat home.



















