Image ImageImage Image

Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 7,710
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Love #5: Wiggins gone??? 

Post#1901 » by NecessaryEvil » Sat Aug 2, 2014 1:57 am

DRoseIsNotNice wrote:
red222 wrote:http://store.nba.com/Cleveland_Cavaliers_Gear/Andrew_Wiggins_Cleveland_Cavaliers_adidas_2014_NBA_Draft_Number_1_Pick_Replica_Jersey_-_Wine/partnerID/13558

........oh ****......


:-?

So, are we really ready to face a James-Love-Irving trio for the next 5 seasons?
User avatar
DRoseCantStop
RealGM
Posts: 13,014
And1: 3,371
Joined: Feb 17, 2013
     

Re: Love #5: Wiggins gone??? 

Post#1902 » by DRoseCantStop » Sat Aug 2, 2014 2:02 am

NecessaryEvil wrote:
DRoseIsNotNice wrote:
red222 wrote:http://store.nba.com/Cleveland_Cavaliers_Gear/Andrew_Wiggins_Cleveland_Cavaliers_adidas_2014_NBA_Draft_Number_1_Pick_Replica_Jersey_-_Wine/partnerID/13558

........oh ****......


:-?

So, are we really ready to face a James-Love-Irving trio for the next 5 seasons?

If that means 5 straight Bulls-Cavs ECFs then bring it on.

That will be an awesome series.
User avatar
Kaled
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 78
Joined: Jun 30, 2014
     

Re: Love #5: Wiggins gone??? 

Post#1903 » by Kaled » Sat Aug 2, 2014 3:08 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:
DRoseIsNotNice wrote:
red222 wrote:http://store.nba.com/Cleveland_Cavaliers_Gear/Andrew_Wiggins_Cleveland_Cavaliers_adidas_2014_NBA_Draft_Number_1_Pick_Replica_Jersey_-_Wine/partnerID/13558

........oh ****......


:-?

So, are we really ready to face a James-Love-Irving trio for the next 5 seasons?


We weren't ready to face a LBJ-Wade-Bosh trio last couple of seasons, but we were up to the challenge. I said bring it on Cavs!
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1904 » by Ralphb07 » Sat Aug 2, 2014 3:23 pm

Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1905 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 3:41 pm

Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh. Particularly in this game where a stretch 4 next to Bron is huge. Love is also better than Bosh was IMO. So what if Bosh got bounced in the first round a couple of times, thats not much playoff experience. I also think the supporting cast in Cleveland is better than it was in Miami at first.
G I N T
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,368
And1: 202
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1906 » by G I N T » Sat Aug 2, 2014 3:45 pm

Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

I don't know about that. 2011 Wade for sure, but he sucked these past few seasons and was clearly battling health issues and age-related decline. Same with Bosh, who basically turned into a jump shooter with Miami and was nowhere near the 3-pt shooter, post player and monster rebounder Love is. Kyrie/Love is younger than Wade/Bosh were too and is much better for floor spacing with their elite shooting. Defensively they're worse, but that team will absolutely be a force to be reckoned with.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1907 » by Shill » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:31 pm

TheStig wrote:Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh.



That's debatable.

The year before Bosh joined the Heat, he averaged 24 & 11 with a TS% of 59.2 and a PER of 25.0. He's also a significantly better defender than Love.

Love is the better three-point shooter, so it might be more of a natural fit, but Bosh sacrificed a lot of his game to join the Heat.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,375
And1: 9,334
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1908 » by Jcool0 » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:36 pm

G I N T wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

I don't know about that. 2011 Wade for sure, but he sucked these past few seasons and was clearly battling health issues and age-related decline. Same with Bosh, who basically turned into a jump shooter with Miami and was nowhere near the 3-pt shooter, post player and monster rebounder Love is. Kyrie/Love is younger than Wade/Bosh were too and is much better for floor spacing with their elite shooting. Defensively they're worse, but that team will absolutely be a force to be reckoned with.


Wade might not be able to finish the entire season anymore but he has yet to "suck". He averaged 19 ppg in the regular season on .545 shooting (22 PER) and in the playoffs averaged 17.8 ppg on .500 shooting (18.5 PER)
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1909 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:38 pm

Shill wrote:
TheStig wrote:Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh.



That's debatable.

The year before Bosh joined the Heat, he averaged 24 & 11 with a TS% of 59.2 and a PER of 25.0. He's also a significantly better defender than Love.

Love is the better three-point shooter, so it might be more of a natural fit, but Bosh sacrificed a lot of his game to join the Heat.

I'm sorry, Love is better than Bosh was.

Comparing their last years, Love scored 2.1 ppg more, 1.7 rpg more, 2.0 apg more, played 7 more games, made 182 more 3's, 1.9 higher per and shot virtually the same ts%. Love was better.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1910 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:41 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
G I N T wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

I don't know about that. 2011 Wade for sure, but he sucked these past few seasons and was clearly battling health issues and age-related decline. Same with Bosh, who basically turned into a jump shooter with Miami and was nowhere near the 3-pt shooter, post player and monster rebounder Love is. Kyrie/Love is younger than Wade/Bosh were too and is much better for floor spacing with their elite shooting. Defensively they're worse, but that team will absolutely be a force to be reckoned with.


Wade might not be able to finish the entire season anymore but he has yet to "suck". He averaged 19 ppg in the regular season on .545 shooting (22 PER) and in the playoffs averaged 17.8 ppg on .500 shooting (18.5 PER)

It will be interesting to see what Wade does. He is still very talented and its really his health that is the question mark. The thing people forget is that Wade is best with the ball in his hands. Bron took that away from him after the first year. I think Wade will look much better in the pnr with Bosh. Playing off the ball takes away all his strengths.
red222
RealGM
Posts: 11,513
And1: 2,293
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
       

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1911 » by red222 » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:42 pm

Why not try to attack Love in the pnr? We are allowed to try to attack them. I got no worries. :lol:
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,375
And1: 9,334
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1912 » by Jcool0 » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:45 pm

TheStig wrote:
Shill wrote:
TheStig wrote:Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh.



That's debatable.

The year before Bosh joined the Heat, he averaged 24 & 11 with a TS% of 59.2 and a PER of 25.0. He's also a significantly better defender than Love.

Love is the better three-point shooter, so it might be more of a natural fit, but Bosh sacrificed a lot of his game to join the Heat.

I'm sorry, Love is better than Bosh was.

Comparing their last years, Love scored 2.1 ppg more, 1.7 rpg more, 2.0 apg more, played 7 more games, made 182 more 3's, 1.9 higher per and shot virtually the same ts%. Love was better.


So when the numbers are in Loves favor you quote them but when Bosh is higher in something its "virtually the same ts%" i think someone has a bias.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1913 » by Shill » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:46 pm

TheStig wrote:
Shill wrote:
TheStig wrote:Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh.



That's debatable.

The year before Bosh joined the Heat, he averaged 24 & 11 with a TS% of 59.2 and a PER of 25.0. He's also a significantly better defender than Love.

Love is the better three-point shooter, so it might be more of a natural fit, but Bosh sacrificed a lot of his game to join the Heat.

I'm sorry, Love is better than Bosh was.

Comparing their last years, Love scored 2.1 ppg more, 1.7 rpg more, 2.0 apg more, played 7 more games, made 182 more 3's, 1.9 higher per and shot virtually the same ts%. Love was better.



We're talking about a 26.9 PER player versus at 25.0 PER player with comparable stats and better defense. That's not an overwhelming difference.

Cleveland is going to be a beast, but I don't know how much "scarier" they're going to be, if at all.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
User avatar
TruthSerum
Rookie
Posts: 1,226
And1: 274
Joined: Sep 18, 2013

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1914 » by TruthSerum » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:47 pm

I'd take Bosh over Love just on playoff experience alone. Then there's durability and D...
Image
51st pick vs. 11th pick
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1915 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 4:49 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Shill wrote:

That's debatable.

The year before Bosh joined the Heat, he averaged 24 & 11 with a TS% of 59.2 and a PER of 25.0. He's also a significantly better defender than Love.

Love is the better three-point shooter, so it might be more of a natural fit, but Bosh sacrificed a lot of his game to join the Heat.

I'm sorry, Love is better than Bosh was.

Comparing their last years, Love scored 2.1 ppg more, 1.7 rpg more, 2.0 apg more, played 7 more games, made 182 more 3's, 1.9 higher per and shot virtually the same ts%. Love was better.


So when the numbers are in Loves favor you quote them but when Bosh is higher in something its "virtually the same ts%" i think someone has a bias.

Considering the ts% is 59.2 vs 59.1 What would you call it? I consider 2.1 ppg, 1.7rpg, 2.0 apg, 1.9 per significant differences. .1% ts is not significant. What is that? 1 more basket out of a 1000?
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1916 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 5:00 pm

Shill wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Shill wrote:

That's debatable.

The year before Bosh joined the Heat, he averaged 24 & 11 with a TS% of 59.2 and a PER of 25.0. He's also a significantly better defender than Love.

Love is the better three-point shooter, so it might be more of a natural fit, but Bosh sacrificed a lot of his game to join the Heat.

I'm sorry, Love is better than Bosh was.

Comparing their last years, Love scored 2.1 ppg more, 1.7 rpg more, 2.0 apg more, played 7 more games, made 182 more 3's, 1.9 higher per and shot virtually the same ts%. Love was better.



We're talking about a 26.9 PER player versus at 25.0 PER player with comparable stats and better defense. That's not an overwhelming difference.

Cleveland is going to be a beast, but I don't know how much "scarier" they're going to be, if at all.

I don't think the stats are as comparable as you make them out to be in that blanket statement. I think Love was better. Its a comparison of relativity and clearly Love was better in most measures.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1917 » by Shill » Sat Aug 2, 2014 5:19 pm

TheStig wrote:
Shill wrote:
TheStig wrote:I'm sorry, Love is better than Bosh was.

Comparing their last years, Love scored 2.1 ppg more, 1.7 rpg more, 2.0 apg more, played 7 more games, made 182 more 3's, 1.9 higher per and shot virtually the same ts%. Love was better.



We're talking about a 26.9 PER player versus at 25.0 PER player with comparable stats and better defense. That's not an overwhelming difference.

Cleveland is going to be a beast, but I don't know how much "scarier" they're going to be, if at all.

I don't think the stats are as comparable as you make them out to be in that blanket statement. I think Love was better. Its a comparison of relativity and clearly Love was better in most measures.



And I don't think the stat disparity is as big as you make it out to be, especially when factoring in defense.

I think Cleveland is going to be a juggernaut, but I don't expect a "next level" impact when subbing Bosh for Love.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1918 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 5:35 pm

Shill wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Shill wrote:

We're talking about a 26.9 PER player versus at 25.0 PER player with comparable stats and better defense. That's not an overwhelming difference.

Cleveland is going to be a beast, but I don't know how much "scarier" they're going to be, if at all.

I don't think the stats are as comparable as you make them out to be in that blanket statement. I think Love was better. Its a comparison of relativity and clearly Love was better in most measures.



And I don't think the stat disparity is as big as you make it out to be, especially when factoring in defense.

I think Cleveland is going to be a juggernaut, but I don't expect a "next level" impact when subbing Bosh for Love.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

They are pretty significant when its almost every major category. They aren't next level differences. I never said they were. But they are significant. And my entire statement was that Love was better and the stats support that. Bosh's defense also suspect in Toronto. I think that Love being better goes a long way toward covering the differences between Irving and Wade. I think the fit between skill sets is better and the supporting cast is better.
MalikJoakim24
Banned User
Posts: 15,295
And1: 3,420
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Chicago
   

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1919 » by MalikJoakim24 » Sat Aug 2, 2014 5:43 pm

red222 wrote:Why not try to attack Love in the pnr? We are allowed to try to attack them. I got no worries. :lol:

if rose is healthy, i aint worried about nothin
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1920 » by Shill » Sat Aug 2, 2014 6:10 pm

TheStig wrote:They are pretty significant when its almost every major category. They aren't next level differences. I never said they were. But they are significant. And my entire statement was that Love was better and the stats support that. Bosh's defense also suspect in Toronto. I think that Love being better goes a long way toward covering the differences between Irving and Wade. I think the fit between skill sets is better and the supporting cast is better.



You said Love was "scarier", and I said it's debatable when factoring in defense and the, in my opinion, not-so-significant difference in the raw averages.

And the bump you get from Bosh to Love doesn't cover the gargantuan difference between Wade and Irving. Wade was a 30 PER player before teaming up with Bron and Bosh.

As I've said, Cleveland is going to be beastly. But I don't expect them to be a severe upgrade over the 2010-11 Heat.

I guess we'll find out after the trade goes through.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."

Return to Chicago Bulls