Image ImageImage Image

Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1921 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 6:44 pm

Shill wrote:
TheStig wrote:They are pretty significant when its almost every major category. They aren't next level differences. I never said they were. But they are significant. And my entire statement was that Love was better and the stats support that. Bosh's defense also suspect in Toronto. I think that Love being better goes a long way toward covering the differences between Irving and Wade. I think the fit between skill sets is better and the supporting cast is better.



You said Love was "scarier", and I said it's debatable when factoring in defense and the, in my opinion, not-so-significant difference in the raw averages.

And the bump you get from Bosh to Love doesn't cover the gargantuan difference between Wade and Irving. Wade was a 30 PER player before teaming up with Bron and Bosh.

As I've said, Cleveland is going to be beastly. But I don't expect them to be a severe upgrade over the 2010-11 Heat.

I guess we'll find out after the trade goes through.

I think the fact that Love is a better player, the pieces fit and the fact that they actually have a front court is scarier for us. Indy and Us used to bully Miami down low to stay competitive and D up the perimeter. The fact is that you can't bully a front court of Love, Varejo and Thompson like you could Bosh, Haslem and whatever scrub they had. Varejo is also a better help defender and primary front court defender than anyone the heat had. Thompson is about equivalent to Bosh on D and a better rebounder. Love is bad but I think having less offensive responsibilities and a good help defender behind him will help. Wade also was minimized playing next to Bron. He had no outside game and Irving can work much better off the ball. The sum of the parts looks scarier to me because we won't be able to maximize our advantges and they are a much more complete team than that Heat team was.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1922 » by Shill » Sat Aug 2, 2014 7:07 pm

TheStig wrote:I think the fact that Love is a better player, the pieces fit and the fact that they actually have a front court is scarier for us. Indy and Us used to bully Miami down low to stay competitive and D up the perimeter. The fact is that you can't bully a front court of Love, Varejo and Thompson like you could Bosh, Haslem and whatever scrub they had. Varejo is also a better help defender and primary front court defender than anyone the heat had. Thompson is about equivalent to Bosh on D and a better rebounder. Love is bad but I think having less offensive responsibilities and a good help defender behind him will help. Wade also was minimized playing next to Bron. He had no outside game and Irving can work much better off the ball. The sum of the parts looks scarier to me because we won't be able to maximize our advantges and they are a much more complete team than that Heat team was.



Joel Anthony sucked at everything but defense. He was a pretty decent rim protector. And I'm not sure about Thompson being a better rebounder. Maybe now, but not when Bosh wasn't playing as far away from the basket.

That Miami team was 5th defensively. I'm not sure Cleveland projects to be that good.

We'll see. I think they'll be the favorites, but I think we have a chance.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1923 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 7:13 pm

Shill wrote:
TheStig wrote:I think the fact that Love is a better player, the pieces fit and the fact that they actually have a front court is scarier for us. Indy and Us used to bully Miami down low to stay competitive and D up the perimeter. The fact is that you can't bully a front court of Love, Varejo and Thompson like you could Bosh, Haslem and whatever scrub they had. Varejo is also a better help defender and primary front court defender than anyone the heat had. Thompson is about equivalent to Bosh on D and a better rebounder. Love is bad but I think having less offensive responsibilities and a good help defender behind him will help. Wade also was minimized playing next to Bron. He had no outside game and Irving can work much better off the ball. The sum of the parts looks scarier to me because we won't be able to maximize our advantges and they are a much more complete team than that Heat team was.



Joel Anthony sucked at everything but defense. He was a pretty decent rim protector. And I'm not sure about Thompson being a better rebounder. Maybe now, but not when Bosh wasn't playing as far away from the basket.

That Miami team was 5th defensively. I'm not sure Cleveland projects to be that good.

We'll see. I think they'll be the favorites, but I think we have a chance.

We always had a chance against Miami. It was just small. I just know we punished that team on the boards. And we won't be able to punish this Cavs team.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,938
And1: 6,662
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1924 » by Indomitable » Sat Aug 2, 2014 10:19 pm

TheStig wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh. Particularly in this game where a stretch 4 next to Bron is huge. Love is also better than Bosh was IMO. So what if Bosh got bounced in the first round a couple of times, thats not much playoff experience. I also think the supporting cast in Cleveland is better than it was in Miami at first.

Bosh was just as good and a far better defender.
Bosh in last season in Toronto 25 per and a .592 TS 1 block
Love last season in Minnie 26.9 and .591 TS .05 blocks

Bosh was a dynamic player.
:banghead:
User avatar
johnnyvann840
RealGM
Posts: 34,207
And1: 18,703
Joined: Sep 04, 2010

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1925 » by johnnyvann840 » Sat Aug 2, 2014 10:22 pm

I'm just glad this will be the last Kevin Love thread. Unless, the Cleveland deal gets stymied, then we could have another thousand pages around the deadline.
I am more than just a serious basketball fan. I am a life-long addict. I was addicted from birth. - Hunter S. Thompson
User avatar
AKfanatic
RealGM
Posts: 12,210
And1: 10,068
Joined: May 20, 2001
     

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1926 » by AKfanatic » Sat Aug 2, 2014 10:22 pm

Indomitable wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh. Particularly in this game where a stretch 4 next to Bron is huge. Love is also better than Bosh was IMO. So what if Bosh got bounced in the first round a couple of times, thats not much playoff experience. I also think the supporting cast in Cleveland is better than it was in Miami at first.

Bosh was just as good and a far better defender.


Love may be the better 3pt shooting big, but Bosh absolutely destroyed us with the mid-range shot. It wasn't just the shot, but his athleticism and ability to put the ball on floor kept Noah completely off balance and as you stated, he's a far better defender.

Not saying it'd be easy, but I don't think Cleveland would be some unbeatable force.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,938
And1: 6,662
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1927 » by Indomitable » Sat Aug 2, 2014 10:28 pm

AKfanatic wrote:
Indomitable wrote:
TheStig wrote:Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh. Particularly in this game where a stretch 4 next to Bron is huge. Love is also better than Bosh was IMO. So what if Bosh got bounced in the first round a couple of times, thats not much playoff experience. I also think the supporting cast in Cleveland is better than it was in Miami at first.

Bosh was just as good and a far better defender.


Love may be the better 3pt shooting big, but Bosh absolutely destroyed us with the mid-range shot. It wasn't just the shot, but his athleticism and ability to put the ball on floor kept Noah completely off balance and as you stated, he's a far better defender.

Not saying it'd be easy, but I don't think Cleveland would be some unbeatable force.

I am comfortable Taj guarding Love. Bosh is a long 7'0 athlete with better ball skills. Love is nonathletic and not a rim protector. Which means Varajo. This reduces the number of shooters.
:banghead:
User avatar
johnnyvann840
RealGM
Posts: 34,207
And1: 18,703
Joined: Sep 04, 2010

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1928 » by johnnyvann840 » Sat Aug 2, 2014 10:33 pm

Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.


Spot on Ralph.

Wade and Lebron were Miami's two best offensive players but they also their two best defensive players. The last super pairing you could say that about was MJ and Scottie. They were also 2 of the top 5 players in the NBA when they joined forces. Your best players have to be two way players or you're not winning it all, ever.

The problem with Irving and Love as 2/3rds of a big three, is they are both so pathetically bad on defense it makes it tough to have the kind of balance on the floor it takes to win playoff series.
I am more than just a serious basketball fan. I am a life-long addict. I was addicted from birth. - Hunter S. Thompson
bearadonisdna
RealGM
Posts: 19,757
And1: 5,394
Joined: Jul 07, 2012

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1929 » by bearadonisdna » Sat Aug 2, 2014 10:57 pm

johnnyvann840 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.


Spot on Ralph.

Wade and Lebron were Miami's two best offensive players but they also their two best defensive players. The last super pairing you could say that about was MJ and Scottie. They were also 2 of the top 5 players in the NBA when they joined forces. Your best players have to be two way players or you're not winning it all, ever.

The problem with Irving and Love as 2/3rds of a big three, is they are both so pathetically bad on defense it makes it tough to have the kind of balance on the floor it takes to win playoff series.


i like ur point about the love and irvings defense. Bosh was also a good defender as their third option. This lbj , love superteam , lbj is the only real defender and his defense has been dwindling getting lit up en route to a FMVP.

As far as playoff experience, i think we saw that means not that much as the wiz showed us. Also drose in his first playoff matchup. Love has a gold medal so has some experience in a high level tourney.
Miami had more upper tier talent than the spurs but the spurs had a more balanced roster and i will stay way from experience and say continuity.

As far as the bulls chances vs a love cavs team, talent wise its pretty simple:
lbj>rose
Love>Noah
Irving>gasol

So the bulls would have to bank on things like a balanced roster, continuity, coaching etc. Can things like that trump the talent gap, the spurs showed us yes. But we dont have all the tendencies the spurs coach has (ie. adaptability).
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1930 » by TheStig » Sat Aug 2, 2014 11:16 pm

Indomitable wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh. Particularly in this game where a stretch 4 next to Bron is huge. Love is also better than Bosh was IMO. So what if Bosh got bounced in the first round a couple of times, thats not much playoff experience. I also think the supporting cast in Cleveland is better than it was in Miami at first.

Bosh was just as good and a far better defender.
Bosh in last season in Toronto 25 per and a .592 TS 1 block
Love last season in Minnie 26.9 and .591 TS .05 blocks

Bosh was a dynamic player.

That looks pretty simple since you ignored the fact that Love scored more, stretched the floor more,assisted more and rebounded more. Basically he did everything better on the offensive end. And while he was a worse defender, I will remind you the possession doesn't end till you get the rebound. And Love was is an elite rebounder. And its not like Bosh was some tremendous defender. He was average at best.

The thing that will be the biggest change for the Cavs vs Heat is that the Cavs will be an elite rebounding team. They won't get killed on the boards like the Heat did by us. Pounding the glass was our biggest advantage. You guys write them off too quickly, if they get Love, they are pretty big favorites over everyone else.

Bosh was a similar player but not as good.
Mbrahv0528
Veteran
Posts: 2,987
And1: 1,399
Joined: May 19, 2010
       

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1931 » by Mbrahv0528 » Sat Aug 2, 2014 11:25 pm

Not sure if this has been posted yet, but Wiggins' jersey has been removed from nba.com for purchasing. Could be nothing, but could be an indication that it's all but done.

Sent from my LG-LS980 using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
kurtatx
Starter
Posts: 2,312
And1: 921
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
Location: Austin, TX
         

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1932 » by kurtatx » Sat Aug 2, 2014 11:27 pm

Mbrahv0528 wrote:Not sure if this has been posted yet, but Wiggins' jersey has been removed from nba.com for purchasing. Could be nothing, but could be an indication that it's all but done.

Sent from my LG-LS980 using RealGM Forums mobile app

I'm thinking it's probably nothing, but I can't figure a motive for why they would do this.
Image
User avatar
SteelerSpartan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,529
And1: 849
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
   

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1933 » by SteelerSpartan » Sat Aug 2, 2014 11:28 pm

No, that cavs team(with love) is nowhere close to that heat team defensively vs us.....and we hopefully have more offensive ammo this time
FecesOfDeath
Head Coach
Posts: 6,139
And1: 1,698
Joined: Mar 21, 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
       

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1934 » by FecesOfDeath » Sat Aug 2, 2014 11:47 pm

Who's forgetting that the Heat had Chris Andersen and Shane Battier -- two premier frontcourt defenders? It wasn't just Bosh, Haslem, and whatever.
G I N T
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,368
And1: 202
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1935 » by G I N T » Sat Aug 2, 2014 11:48 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
G I N T wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

I don't know about that. 2011 Wade for sure, but he sucked these past few seasons and was clearly battling health issues and age-related decline. Same with Bosh, who basically turned into a jump shooter with Miami and was nowhere near the 3-pt shooter, post player and monster rebounder Love is. Kyrie/Love is younger than Wade/Bosh were too and is much better for floor spacing with their elite shooting. Defensively they're worse, but that team will absolutely be a force to be reckoned with.


Wade might not be able to finish the entire season anymore but he has yet to "suck". He averaged 19 ppg in the regular season on .545 shooting (22 PER) and in the playoffs averaged 17.8 ppg on .500 shooting (18.5 PER)

He was horrid in the Finals this year and all of the 2013 playoffs too. Even in 2012 when he was better than he was in either of the past two years, he was very inconsistent throughout the playoffs and battling his knee injury. Bosh was also very unimpressive in the 2012 playoffs, missing most of the first two rounds and being mediocre when he actually played. At 22, Kyrie going forward should absolutely be a more reliable second or third option than Wade was. It's alarming how badly people are overrating Wade and his impact during the Heat big 3 era. Outside of the first year, he was incredibly underwhelming. Same with Bosh. Kyrie/LeBron/Love would be absolutely devastating for the league. LeBron has never had anywhere near that kind of offensive help around him and still has 2 rings and 5 Finals appearances to show for it.
FecesOfDeath
Head Coach
Posts: 6,139
And1: 1,698
Joined: Mar 21, 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
       

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1936 » by FecesOfDeath » Sun Aug 3, 2014 12:04 am

G I N T wrote:He was horrid in the Finals this year and all of the 2013 playoffs too. Even in 2012 when he was better than he was in either of the past two years, he was very inconsistent throughout the playoffs and battling his knee injury. Bosh was also very unimpressive in the 2012 playoffs, missing most of the first two rounds and being mediocre when he actually played. At 22, Kyrie going forward should absolutely be a more reliable second or third option than Wade was. It's alarming how badly people are overrating Wade and his impact during the Heat big 3 era. Outside of the first year, he was incredibly underwhelming. Same with Bosh. Kyrie/LeBron/Love would be absolutely devastating for the league. LeBron has never had anywhere near that kind of offensive help around him and still has 2 rings and 5 Finals appearances to show for it.


I think Kyrie's fit with LeBron is going to take a while. Kyrie was an absolutely ball-dominant PG, and he doesn't have the first step, penetration ability, or explosiveness of Dwyane Wade even during the Big 3 Era. He's a bigger Allen Iverson without the toughness that inspires his teammates. It'll be quite an adjustment for both Kyrie and LeBron, with or without Love.
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1937 » by Ralphb07 » Sun Aug 3, 2014 12:21 am

G I N T wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Wade and Bosh were way scarier in 2010 than Irving and Love. Those players combined have ZERO playoff experience. I don't see that trio being better than the Wade, Bosh and James one. Wade and Bosh were both better than Love and Kyrie.

I don't know about that. 2011 Wade for sure, but he sucked these past few seasons and was clearly battling health issues and age-related decline. Same with Bosh, who basically turned into a jump shooter with Miami and was nowhere near the 3-pt shooter, post player and monster rebounder Love is. Kyrie/Love is younger than Wade/Bosh were too and is much better for floor spacing with their elite shooting. Defensively they're worse, but that team will absolutely be a force to be reckoned with.


You do know I said 2010 right when the trio was assembled?
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,938
And1: 6,662
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1938 » by Indomitable » Sun Aug 3, 2014 12:47 am

TheStig wrote:
Indomitable wrote:
TheStig wrote:Wade was scarier that Irving but Love is scarier than Bosh. Particularly in this game where a stretch 4 next to Bron is huge. Love is also better than Bosh was IMO. So what if Bosh got bounced in the first round a couple of times, thats not much playoff experience. I also think the supporting cast in Cleveland is better than it was in Miami at first.

Bosh was just as good and a far better defender.
Bosh in last season in Toronto 25 per and a .592 TS 1 block
Love last season in Minnie 26.9 and .591 TS .05 blocks

Bosh was a dynamic player.

That looks pretty simple since you ignored the fact that Love scored more, stretched the floor more,assisted more and rebounded more. Basically he did everything better on the offensive end. And while he was a worse defender, I will remind you the possession doesn't end till you get the rebound. And Love was is an elite rebounder. And its not like Bosh was some tremendous defender. He was average at best.

The thing that will be the biggest change for the Cavs vs Heat is that the Cavs will be an elite rebounding team. They won't get killed on the boards like the Heat did by us. Pounding the glass was our biggest advantage. You guys write them off too quickly, if they get Love, they are pretty big favorites over everyone else.

Bosh was a similar player but not as good.

Bosh last year in Toronto

Bosh 25 pt
Love 26.1
Bosh 10.8
Love 12.8 reb
If the Cavs do not get killed on the boards. It will because Varejo was there playing center. He is about equal to the offensive player Nosh was coming in. Love will be a third option. His overall numbers will drop.

I think less of Kyrie and Love. Bosh and Wade were better all around ball players. Both actually could help protect the rim.

Bosh and Wade were better then Love and Kyrie are right now.
:banghead:
User avatar
Sinistar6
Starter
Posts: 2,356
And1: 133
Joined: Nov 18, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1939 » by Sinistar6 » Sun Aug 3, 2014 12:47 am

My preference would be to act like 2010 is over and look at the very real young dynasty forming in Ohio. Bosh may have sacrificed a lot but he was still a no-show at times in the playoffs. Bron will have two young hungry stars itching to bring home a title to ohio. Kyrie and love will never disappear like wade and bosh did. I also expect bron to grow as a distributor. I expect the caves to be EC favorites for the next 5 years.
Next time the cult's spaceship lands we'll all be wearing black Starburys.

-mcwelk
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,377
And1: 9,335
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Love #5: P. 88, Bulls 'moving on' from Love 

Post#1940 » by Jcool0 » Sun Aug 3, 2014 12:56 am

G I N T wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
G I N T wrote:I don't know about that. 2011 Wade for sure, but he sucked these past few seasons and was clearly battling health issues and age-related decline. Same with Bosh, who basically turned into a jump shooter with Miami and was nowhere near the 3-pt shooter, post player and monster rebounder Love is. Kyrie/Love is younger than Wade/Bosh were too and is much better for floor spacing with their elite shooting. Defensively they're worse, but that team will absolutely be a force to be reckoned with.


Wade might not be able to finish the entire season anymore but he has yet to "suck". He averaged 19 ppg in the regular season on .545 shooting (22 PER) and in the playoffs averaged 17.8 ppg on .500 shooting (18.5 PER)

He was horrid in the Finals this year and all of the 2013 playoffs too. Even in 2012 when he was better than he was in either of the past two years, he was very inconsistent throughout the playoffs and battling his knee injury. Bosh was also very unimpressive in the 2012 playoffs, missing most of the first two rounds and being mediocre when he actually played. At 22, Kyrie going forward should absolutely be a more reliable second or third option than Wade was. It's alarming how badly people are overrating Wade and his impact during the Heat big 3 era. Outside of the first year, he was incredibly underwhelming. Same with Bosh. Kyrie/LeBron/Love would be absolutely devastating for the league. LeBron has never had anywhere near that kind of offensive help around him and still has 2 rings and 5 Finals appearances to show for it.


Again Wade has not "sucked" nor was he "horrid". Up until he physically fell apart in the last two games of the NBA finals he was averaging 18.6 ppg on .522 shooting, 1.4 steals, 4 rebounds and 4 assists. Kyrie is no lock to be a reliable second option either. He has had to deal with a lot of injuries already and a ton of the issues with Cleveland last year had to do with him (Mr reliable Luol Deng fell apart playing on that team). I'm sure LeBron will help change that but this is a 6'3" ball dominate PG who doesn't play defense.

Return to Chicago Bulls