ImageImageImageImageImage

Officially welcome Carlos Boozer

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 22,014
And1: 8,817
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#61 » by Stratmaster » Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:24 pm

Penberthy wrote:
milesfides wrote:Boozer was a mistake. Mitch's comments almost seemed apologetic at times, like going home with the last girl left at closing time.

The team's future depends on Kelly's and davis' growth.

Boozer's potential is tapped out, and he just doesn't fit with our roster. Right now we have kelly for a good fit on offense and davis for defense. Boozer is really neither, despite his rebounding.

Why bother? I'd rather know for sure that kelly and Davis are busts than confirm the inevitability that boozer will be mediocre for us and ultimately hold us back.

If we needed some more depth I'd rather have earl clark stealing some minutes, a young four who can shoot and defend and was a good fit next to kobe too.


This team's future depends more on Clarkson and Randle's growth than kelly's and davis'. Especially davis, he is just a very poor man's Jordan Hill. Even so, there are still plenty of minutes to go around.

SF: Randle- 10min
PF: Boozer: 20min Randle- 13min Kelly: 15min
C: Hill- 28min Davis- 15min Kelly: 5min

Jordan Hill averaged a CAREER HIGH 20 minutes per game last year, and we saw how well his body took that. I think its a safe bet that they will keep his minutes under 30, OR we can expect him to miss some games. From what I've seen Davis is a tip in, hustle, rebound around the basket big, not really a step out and stretch the D out guy, so he seems much better suited for C. Randle definitely has the agility to step out and play 3, at least for a few minutes against the other teams back up. Kelly at the stretch 5 for 5 minutes can hold his own against any back up C in the league.

Total minutes for these guys would be:

Hill: 28
Randle: 23
Boozer: 20
Kelly: 20
Davis: 15

And that is before the inevitable injury that would increase the remaining 4 guys' minutes by 5-7 per game. Boozer is not here to win us the championship, he is here to mentor the other 4 on how to be professional bigs in this league, and to go up against in practice every day. Having him is not a detriment, its a big advantage. Did he limit millsap or taj's growth? No, he did the opposite.


Well put.
User avatar
milesfides
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,012
And1: 1,449
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#62 » by milesfides » Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:46 pm

Stratmaster wrote:
You should come over to the bulls board. You would fit right in. Except y'all are paying him 3 mil, not 16 mil. What is ironic is that the very things you mention... scoring, passing and putting the team first are exactly Boozer's strengths. And Boozer was the starting PF for two 62 win Bulls teams and has been in the postseason 4 straight years; so as far as winning games goes I'm not sure where you are going.

He had a bad season last season from an efficiency standpoint. Can't argue that. He was also the best overall rebounder on a team that included Noah and Gibson, although primarily on the defensive end. You got a steal.

If you are saying your team should have tanked the season because they have 3000 miles to go, you would know better than me.


Doesn't matter what we're paying him, the only thing that matters to the Lakers right now is opportunity cost. The Lakers can pay everybody double and still make a profit. Money doesn't matter, operating under the cap rules and building a championship team does.

Scoring isn't Boozer's strength. The guy was an inefficient scorer last year, in fact, make that the last two years in a row. Check his shot charts for the past season, he wasn't an efficient scorer ANYWHERE on the court.

And playmaker? Really? Boozer was 52nd among all power forwards in assists ratio. Pau was 15th, our own Ryan Kelly was tied for 8th. You sure you're a Bulls' fan?

One thing I would give credit to Boozer for, he's a decent rebounder. Not close to as good as Jordan Hill's rebounding rate, but around Chris Kaman's and Pau Gasol's. Oh - and Ed Davis'...who is also a terrific finisher and a good defender. So what's the point of Boozer? Nothing.

And it's ironic that you're crediting Boozer for the Bulls' playoff runs - are you serious? That's a joke. He's also been yanked down the stretch for his lack of defense and his jumpers and the subject of amnesty rule for how long?

Just enjoy Pau Gasol. He's a much, much better player than Boozer, and the description of scorer, rebounder, playmaker all fits him. But he pretty much drew the ire of 80% of Lakerdom, so I guess Laker fans and Bulls fans just have different standards.

Kelly was a fan favorite last year...and I'm guessing Ed Davis' dunks and blocks and hustle will win fans over. Randle will probably draw some excitement.

Boozer? I expect him to be booed within a month.
“OH! Caruso parachutes in! You cannot stop him - you can only hope to contain him!” -Kevin Harlan, LAL-GSW 4/4/19
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 22,014
And1: 8,817
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#63 » by Stratmaster » Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:09 pm

milesfides wrote:
Stratmaster wrote:
You should come over to the bulls board. You would fit right in. Except y'all are paying him 3 mil, not 16 mil. What is ironic is that the very things you mention... scoring, passing and putting the team first are exactly Boozer's strengths. And Boozer was the starting PF for two 62 win Bulls teams and has been in the postseason 4 straight years; so as far as winning games goes I'm not sure where you are going.

He had a bad season last season from an efficiency standpoint. Can't argue that. He was also the best overall rebounder on a team that included Noah and Gibson, although primarily on the defensive end. You got a steal.

If you are saying your team should have tanked the season because they have 3000 miles to go, you would know better than me.


Doesn't matter what we're paying him, the only thing that matters to the Lakers right now is opportunity cost. The Lakers can pay everybody double and still make a profit. Money doesn't matter, operating under the cap rules and building a championship team does.

Scoring isn't Boozer's strength. The guy was an inefficient scorer last year, in fact, make that the last two years in a row. Check his shot charts for the past season, he wasn't an efficient scorer ANYWHERE on the court.

And playmaker? Really? Boozer was 52nd among all power forwards in assists ratio. Pau was 15th, our own Ryan Kelly was tied for 8th. You sure you're a Bulls' fan?

One thing I would give credit to Boozer for, he's a decent rebounder. Not close to as good as Jordan Hill's rebounding rate, but around Chris Kaman's and Pau Gasol's. Oh - and Ed Davis'...who is also a terrific finisher and a good defender. So what's the point of Boozer? Nothing.

And it's ironic that you're crediting Boozer for the Bulls' playoff runs - are you serious? That's a joke. He's also been yanked down the stretch for his lack of defense and his jumpers and the subject of amnesty rule for how long?

Just enjoy Pau Gasol. He's a much, much better player than Boozer, and the description of scorer, rebounder, playmaker all fits him. But he pretty much drew the ire of 80% of Lakerdom, so I guess Laker fans and Bulls fans just have different standards.

Kelly was a fan favorite last year...and I'm guessing Ed Davis' dunks and blocks and hustle will win fans over. Randle will probably draw some excitement.

Boozer? I expect him to be booed within a month.


This is where watching 82 games a season really helps versus looking at stats. I wouldn't question your knowledge of Lakers players. Maybe give some benefit of the doubt to someone who watched almost every game Boozer played as a Bull.

Bulls fans would have loved Boozer on their team at 3.5 mil. You mentioned CAP space. I think that affects it.

Boozer was brought in to be the 3rd option on the Bulls. The last two seasons he had to be the first option. No one ever claimed or is claiming Boozer is a first option. But when you are not talented enough to be a first option, yet you are the only real go-to scorer left on the team, your efficiency is going to go down.

Thibs is a defensive genius, but really had no offensive ideas other than a PG oriented offense. When Rose went down, everyone on the teams efficiency suffered.

Boozer is known as one of the top passing bigs in the game. Who was he going to pass to on the Bulls the last two seasons?

Boozer was an elite rebounder, playing next to another elite rebounder in Noah, and when Noah wasn't on the court with him Taj Gibson was. There are only so many rebounds in any game.

You do realize the Bulls became a 62 win team, for two seasons, immediately after adding Boozer and Korver. I guarantee you that Korver helped a little, but Boozer was much more responsible for that. Certianly DRose gets the majority of the credit for that. What is interesting is that Noah missed 34 games one of those seasons. Who do you think was holding down the front court.

Boozer is weak on defense. Just like Pau.

Boozer was the subject of amnesty because of the size of his contract, which you aren't paying, also because of the presence of another quality PF, Taj Gibson, playing behind him, and because of a highly touted European PF Mirotic waiting in the wings.

What is truly ironic is that Bulls fans hated on Boozer (somebody other than Rose and his injuries had to take the ire) while Lakers fans hated on Pau (somebody other than Kobe...well, you get the idea) and it wasn't accurate in either case. So the teams swapped them.
User avatar
milesfides
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,012
And1: 1,449
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#64 » by milesfides » Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:13 pm

Penberthy wrote:
This team's future depends more on Clarkson and Randle's growth than kelly's and davis'. Especially davis, he is just a very poor man's Jordan Hill.


Nonsense. Clarkson has a built-in limit on his role with this team, that's Kobe and Lin. Clarkson is going to be brought slowly, and that's the proper play for him.

Randle? Hasn't a proven a thing yet, except that he can't rebound yet, not even in the D-league. What exactly will be his role? We don't know. He has already been thrown into a trade rumor though, lol. But I'd be more than happy to see him grow into an asset or a player, but the idea that he's somehow going to displace Kelly? Nonsense, until Randle proves that he can fit with the four other starters on our team, which is highly suspect until he can get that jumper going.

Ed Davis isn't a poor man's Jordan Hill at all. You obviously haven't watched much of either. Jordan Hill is much more of a conventional big man, back to the basket with solid post moves. He has an OK jumper too. Excellent rebounder, shot blocking is ok. Jordan Hill is a good all-around center, as good as you can ask for from a non-superstar big man, but for him it's just about getting those minutes and staying healthy.

Ed Davis? That guy is limited. He's not a conventional center. He a great athlete who gets most of his points by diving to the basket and dunking the ball. He doesn't have a legit back to the basket game, nor a serious jumper, and that makes him a limited player until he can prove otherwise. He'll eventually be an offensive liability down the stretch, especially with his atrocious free throw shooting.

They're just very different players.

Even so, there are still plenty of minutes to go around.

SF: Randle- 10min
PF: Boozer: 20min Randle- 13min Kelly: 15min
C: Hill- 28min Davis- 15min Kelly: 5min



In what world do you see Randle playing 10 minutes of small forward a game? With Wes Johnson, Nick Young, X, and even Kobe?

Boozer isn't going to play only 20 mpg - if he is, you'd better let him know so he can start demanding a trade right now. He thinks he's going to start, and if he's going to start, he's not going to play only 20.

Kelly won't play any center, not with Davis and Sacre on the team.

Jordan Hill averaged a CAREER HIGH 20 minutes per game last year, and we saw how well his body took that. I think its a safe bet that they will keep his minutes under 30, OR we can expect him to miss some games.


Almost all players miss games. He played in 72 games last season. And how many games did he miss to D'antoni just not playing him? And he averaged only 21 mpg over the year, because D'Antoni killed his role from Dec-Feb (although Kaman and Pau all bitched about minutes and role). It was feast or famine, and in Nov, Mar, and Apr, Hill played close to starter minutes and put up some sick numbers.

The only year that Hill was legitimately hurt was '12-'13.

So all the talk about Hill breaking down is nonsense, because the reality is that he played most of his career under a coach who hated playing conventional bigs, who had a deep big man rotation. So unless he has nagging injuries or major debilitating injuries, I would love to hear why Jordan Hill is such an injury risk. I expect him to play 30 mpg under a coach who knows how to use him, and I expect the steady minutes and role to make him a MIP candidate next year. There's a reason why the Lakers have offered him a 2-year 18m deal, and also a reason why that second year is a team option. He's gotta prove it, yes, but there's also reason why he's a good bet.

Boozer is not here to win us the championship, he is here to mentor the other 4 on how to be professional bigs in this league, and to go up against in practice every day. Having him is not a detriment, its a big advantage. Did he limit millsap or taj's growth? No, he did the opposite.


Mentor them in what? The school of Shareef Abdur Rahim, loser basketball of shoot jumpers, grabs some boards, collect a paycheck? Contract scandals? Bitching about minutes and role?

Millsap, good for him, didn't follow Boozer's footsteps. Millsap is a tireless worker who also isn't afraid to change his game, aka become a three point shooter and a stretch four to stay in this league.
“OH! Caruso parachutes in! You cannot stop him - you can only hope to contain him!” -Kevin Harlan, LAL-GSW 4/4/19
Penberthy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,704
And1: 243
Joined: Jul 06, 2010

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#65 » by Penberthy » Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:43 pm

milesfides wrote:Nonsense. Clarkson has a built-in limit on his role with this team, that's Kobe and Lin. Clarkson is going to be brought slowly, and that's the proper play for him.


Lin's contract is up this year, Kobe's next year. Not sure how that is a limit on Clarkson going forward. He is the back up pg his rookie year and could very likely split time 50-50 with an old vet his sophomore year.

milesfides wrote:Randle? Hasn't a proven a thing yet, except that he can't rebound yet, not even in the D-league. What exactly will be his role? We don't know. He has already been thrown into a trade rumor though, lol. But I'd be more than happy to see him grow into an asset or a player, but the idea that he's somehow going to displace Kelly? Nonsense, until Randle proves that he can fit with the four other starters on our team, which is highly suspect until he can get that jumper going.


Really hilarious that you are higher on Kelly than Randle. You may be the only person on Earth.

milesfides wrote:Ed Davis? That guy is limited. He's not a conventional center. He a great athlete who gets most of his points by diving to the basket and dunking the ball. He doesn't have a legit back to the basket game, nor a serious jumper, and that makes him a limited player until he can prove otherwise. He'll eventually be an offensive liability down the stretch, especially with his atrocious free throw shooting.


So we agree there is no need for him to get significant minutes, especially at pf.


milesfides wrote:In what world do you see Randle playing 10 minutes of small forward a game? With Wes Johnson, Nick Young, X, and even Kobe?


In a world where the Lakers most recent internal depth chart on the white board in their facility lists Randle as third string SF behind Swaggy P(space cadet) and Johnson(unreliable). And in a world where his summer league coach compared his body to lebron james' his rookie year. Kobe and X will be splitting all the minutes at 2, as was shown on the same white board.

milesfides wrote:Boozer isn't going to play only 20 mpg - if he is, you'd better let him know so he can start demanding a trade right now. He thinks he's going to start, and if he's going to start, he's not going to play only 20.


Do you have Saturday's lotto numbers as well. Keeping his minutes down can be sold to him as prolonging his career. In the end he has no say in the matter.
User avatar
aaron_gray
Analyst
Posts: 3,665
And1: 979
Joined: Nov 24, 2013

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#66 » by aaron_gray » Fri Aug 1, 2014 4:12 am

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owL2Foxh5CU[/youtube]
TyCobb wrote:Embiid at peak value after reaching a new maturity level.
1_OldSoul
Ballboy
Posts: 7
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 05, 2014
     

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#67 » by 1_OldSoul » Wed Aug 6, 2014 8:54 pm

I am not buying Boozer. He is short term solution until the real rebuilding starts. This is a one year deal of fix-a-flat. I rather see A.I. and Ron Artest with a one year deal.
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#68 » by LApwnd » Wed Aug 6, 2014 9:49 pm

1_OldSoul wrote:I am not buying Boozer. He is short term solution until the real rebuilding starts. This is a one year deal of fix-a-flat. I rather see A.I. and Ron Artest with a one year deal.


guess you want to lose then :lol:
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#69 » by Kilroy » Wed Aug 6, 2014 10:06 pm

Andre Igoudala isn't available
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
D Nice
Veteran
Posts: 2,840
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 05, 2009

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#70 » by D Nice » Wed Aug 6, 2014 10:31 pm

Still super super annoyed by this signing when we have Kelly/Randle/Hill/Davis and absolutely no championship aspirations. All this does is stunt the development of potentially useful young bigs. Most short-sighted move I can remember Mitch making in a long time (perhaps THE most short-sighted of his entire tenure). You don't draft arguably the mos nba-ready top 8 prospect then sign a non-defender non-leader at the same position to suck up his minutes.

"C'mon Mitch, you're better than that." [/Mark Jackson]

BOOOOOOOOOOOOO(zer).
1_OldSoul
Ballboy
Posts: 7
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 05, 2014
     

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#71 » by 1_OldSoul » Thu Aug 7, 2014 3:39 pm

LApwnd wrote:
1_OldSoul wrote:I am not buying Boozer. He is short term solution until the real rebuilding starts. This is a one year deal of fix-a-flat. I rather see A.I. and Ron Artest with a one year deal.


guess you want to lose then :lol:


we are still going to lose but at least it will be more entertaining.
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#72 » by LApwnd » Thu Aug 7, 2014 4:59 pm

1_OldSoul wrote:
LApwnd wrote:
1_OldSoul wrote:I am not buying Boozer. He is short term solution until the real rebuilding starts. This is a one year deal of fix-a-flat. I rather see A.I. and Ron Artest with a one year deal.


guess you want to lose then :lol:


we are still going to lose but at least it will be more entertaining.


I highly doubt the "entertaining" part, unless you like laughing at them :lol:
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#73 » by Kilroy » Thu Aug 7, 2014 6:06 pm

The best way Boozer could help the team is to move to outer Mongolia and never show himself again... We can't risk him even breathing on Ryan Kelly.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
User avatar
milesfides
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,012
And1: 1,449
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#74 » by milesfides » Thu Aug 7, 2014 8:31 pm

The best use of Boozer is to showcase him the first couple months then trade him for a draft pick or young talent.
“OH! Caruso parachutes in! You cannot stop him - you can only hope to contain him!” -Kevin Harlan, LAL-GSW 4/4/19
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#75 » by LApwnd » Thu Aug 7, 2014 8:33 pm

milesfides wrote:The best use of Boozer is to showcase him the first couple months then trade him for a draft pick or young talent.

can't be traded
User avatar
milesfides
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,012
And1: 1,449
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Officially welcome Carlos Boozer 

Post#76 » by milesfides » Thu Aug 7, 2014 8:34 pm

yeah he can
“OH! Caruso parachutes in! You cannot stop him - you can only hope to contain him!” -Kevin Harlan, LAL-GSW 4/4/19

Return to Los Angeles Lakers