Ruzious wrote:stevemcqueen1 wrote:bondom34 wrote:There is no Aquaman......Lebron is Batman, Love is Robin, Kyrie is Alfred Pennyworth

Yeah. But Kyrie is going to need the ball in his hands.
Cleveland should trade Kyrie for a good center. That team would be so much better if you swapped Kyrie with Joakim Noah or Marc Gasol.
Sorry if I've said this before, but people said the same about Wade teaming with Lebron - they both need the ball. You could be right, but I think Irving will thrive with Lebron and Love, because they're all high BBIQ high skill players who pass very well. Either way, it should be fun to watch how it works out - and if they can dominate without playing particularly good defense.
Kyrie is the third best player, but I have a feeling he's going to get the second most touches and have the second highest usage rate. LeBron will get his. I think Kyrie will keep Love from getting his too since he's a ball dominant player and Love has the better off ball game and can make an impact with his rebounding and passing if he's not scoring. Kyrie isn't really giving you much if he's not scoring.
Dion Waiters doesn't really fit into this picture. He's strictly a microwave player and a secondary ball handler, but he needs the ball to do his thing. If Kyrie wasn't in the picture, I'd say Waiters is a nice sixth man who can get plenty of opportunities as Cleveland's secondary option to spell LeBron. Much like Wade ended up becoming the past two years. But with Kyrie too, you get too many chiefs and not enough indians on offense.
I think everything for Cleveland's roster would click into place if they could trade Kyrie for a quality 3&D player at PG and a good defensively oriented center. Someone who can protect the rim and shut down pick and rolls with LeBron. You don't need a ball handler at PG when you've got LeBron. Imagine that team with Victor Oladipo at PG, Larry Sanders or Nerlens Noel at C, and someone like Ray Allen at SG. Complete balance.