RealGM Top 100 List #20
Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,591
- And1: 654
- Joined: Sep 20, 2012
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Can't pick Wade over Barkley myself. Barkley is far more proven as the 1st option on not just a good, but elite offensive team. He had the talent around him in Phoenix, but was consistently elite, and even in '89 and '90, he had his teams top 2-3 offensively, right there with powerhouse LA and Phoenix teams with far more talent.
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,264
- And1: 818
- Joined: Jul 09, 2012
- Location: Clutch City, Texas
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
I also have Mikan over guys who played in his era like Dolph Schayes or Cousy, I don't know where they would fall in this list though.
Since people are interested in integration and how it changed the game, as well as folks interested in basketball history I'll share something I found from my notes on the topic: Mikan's Lakers vs the Globetrotters and the initial upsets, it's a short part of the history of the Globetrotter biography in the beginning.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E23MxqyjWLo[/youtube]
More notes on the upset ( a great article):
http://www.mmbolding.com/basketball/Globetrotters.htm
Now Mikan did always dominate back then, even the Globetrotters (box scores):
http://www.apbr.org/trotters-lakers.html
Since people are interested in integration and how it changed the game, as well as folks interested in basketball history I'll share something I found from my notes on the topic: Mikan's Lakers vs the Globetrotters and the initial upsets, it's a short part of the history of the Globetrotter biography in the beginning.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E23MxqyjWLo[/youtube]
More notes on the upset ( a great article):
http://www.mmbolding.com/basketball/Globetrotters.htm
Now Mikan did always dominate back then, even the Globetrotters (box scores):
http://www.apbr.org/trotters-lakers.html
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,463
- And1: 9,978
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
As I suspected, this one is a clear win for Charles Barkley. Frankly, if I hadn't watched so much of him and just was reading the excellent arguments here, I'd vote for Barkley too. The arguments for Ewing have been excellent too and I have to consider him more strongly than I had been (may move ahead of Frazier).
Barkley -- ShaqAttack3234, tsherkin, ardee, FJS, DoctorMJ, shutupandjam, basketballefan, trex_8063, Clyde Frazier, Moonbeam, PCProductions, DQuinn1575, drza, SactoKingsFan
Pettit -- penbeast0, Jim Naismith, Warspite, Chuck Texas,
Wade -- HeartbreakKid, lukekarts,
Ewing -- ronnymac2, 90s AllDecade
Barkley -- ShaqAttack3234, tsherkin, ardee, FJS, DoctorMJ, shutupandjam, basketballefan, trex_8063, Clyde Frazier, Moonbeam, PCProductions, DQuinn1575, drza, SactoKingsFan
Pettit -- penbeast0, Jim Naismith, Warspite, Chuck Texas,
Wade -- HeartbreakKid, lukekarts,
Ewing -- ronnymac2, 90s AllDecade
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,226
- And1: 831
- Joined: Jul 11, 2013
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
penbeast0 wrote:As I suspected, this one is a clear win for Charles Barkley. Frankly, if I hadn't watched so much of him and just was reading the excellent arguments here, I'd vote for Barkley too. The arguments for Ewing have been excellent too and I have to consider him more strongly than I had been (may move ahead of Frazier).
Barkley -- ShaqAttack3234, tsherkin, ardee, FJS, DoctorMJ, shutupandjam, basketballefan, trex_8063, Clyde Frazier, Moonbeam, PCProductions, DQuinn1575, drza, SactoKingsFan
Pettit -- penbeast0, Jim Naismith, Warspite, Chuck Texas,
Wade -- HeartbreakKid, lukekarts,
Ewing -- ronnymac2, 90s AllDecade
Heh, I just did this too

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 92,334
- And1: 31,912
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Alrighty then.
Through the top 20 and some really interesting debates coming up!
Through the top 20 and some really interesting debates coming up!
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 53,639
- And1: 22,589
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
penbeast0 wrote:The issue with the typical "big" is that he must live by the basket because he can't handle the ball. Barkley is not one of those bigs. It's not hard to find highlights of a young Barkley going coast to coast doing a Magic impression with fancy dribbles and a behind the back pass, and he shot from range.
Frankly it's rather astonishing to consider the efficiency you mention on top of that: Barkley lacked that crippling aspect of being an offensive big, and yet he still destroyed all the other bigs when it came to efficiency. I voted Malone over Barkley because of the other issues involved, but it's rather amazing that despite the fact Malone had Stockton feeding him he couldn't touch Barkley's efficiency numbers.
Were we making a GOAT offesnive "big" list that included all 4s and 5s, it's hard for me to imagine picking anyone over Barkley.
How high do you rate Amare Stoudamire? Similar defensive rep, lesser rebounder, slightly higher scoring volume per 38 or per 100 possession for career, slightly lower efficiency but in the playoffs, Amare maintains his volume scoring edge and closes the efficiency to a virtual tie. Barkley passes better but turns it over a lot more as well. Barkley shoots more 3's but generally scores much closer to the basket. Offensively, I'd say their numbers were very close (Barkley owns him on the boards and seems to have a stronger team impact so higher overall).
Hmm. Well first I'll say it's a little weird getting asked about Amare given what I just said about Barkley. To be clear, these things I'm talking about with Barkley, I don't say the same thing about Amare. Barkley is a creator, both with his rebounds and playmaking, Amare's just a finisher. Amare's calling card of scoring + efficiency came to an end as soon as he stopped having Nash next to him.
Then there's the correlation issue. The Suns offense lived and died far more with Nash than with Amare. You might say "This isn't about Nash", and that's true, but for example, Amare's peak scaled PI offensive RAPM is +4.11. That ain't terrible - it's better for example than anything Pau Gasol ever did - but it doesn't put him anywhere near the top of the list of the best in the game. We have 3 such scores from Barkley in his final 3 years, all were huge compared to Amare.
So yeah, they just don't occupy similar places in my mind. I get that they are both offensive-oriented bigs, but I consider Barkley's offense to be far, far more impressive. And frankly defensively, if I have to use Amare as a 5, I consider that a considerably bigger liability than Barkley at the 4.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
- Moonbeam
- Forum Mod - Blazers
- Posts: 10,340
- And1: 5,102
- Joined: Feb 21, 2009
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
trex_8063 wrote:Lastly, I’ll cite the data I’d posted on the #18 thread, regarding the best 3-year/5-year/7-year/10-year/12-spans for best rs PER, WS/48, and ORtg-DRtg gap, positions of Barkley, Wade, Pettit, and Nash bolded:
Best 3-year stretch rs PERSpoiler:
Best 5-Year Stretch PER (rs)Spoiler:
Best 7-Year Stretch PER (rs)Spoiler:
Best 10-Year Stretch PER (rs)Spoiler:
Best 12-Year Stretch PER (rs)Spoiler:
Best 3-Year WS/48 (rs)Spoiler:
Best 5-Year WS/48 (rs)Spoiler:
Best 7-Year WS/48 (rs)Spoiler:
Best 10-Year WS/48 (rs)Spoiler:
Best 12-Year WS/48 (rs)Spoiler:
Best 3-Year ORtg/DRtg GapSpoiler:
Best 5-Year ORtg/DRtg GapSpoiler:
Best 7-Year Stretch (rs)Spoiler:
Best 10-Year ORtg/DRtg GapSpoiler:
Best 12-Year ORtg/DRtg GapSpoiler:
Very awesome job putting these together. I've noticed a few players missing from the WS/48 runs, and just thought I'd let you know:
Dolph Schayes
Adrian Dantley
Sidney Moncrief
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,646
- And1: 99,054
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Doctor MJ wrote: Amare's calling card of scoring + efficiency came to an end as soon as he stopped having Nash next to him.
Let me preface this by saying obviously Amare benefited from playing with Nash.
However, when we examine Amare we also have to take into account the injuries and how they have robbed him of much of what made him such a dangerous and effective scorer.
And in his first year in NYK he still put up 25 ppg on really good efficiency and when we do per 100 as is in vogue in this project his production is every bit as it was when playing with Nash. And the last couple years while his raw totals are down, we again see him being nearly as productive per 100 possessions and still on really strong efficiency.
This narrative that Amare is nearly exclusively a product of Nash doesn't really hold up when we give it even a cursory examination. Obviously he had his best years with Nash, but some of that is due to him having come into the league out of high school and the natural evolution that coincided with Nash's arrival and of course post-Nash is also post knee and serious eye injury.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 12,677
- And1: 8,321
- Joined: Feb 24, 2013
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Moonbeam wrote:
Very awesome job putting these together. I've noticed a few players missing from the WS/48 runs, and just thought I'd let you know:
Dolph Schayes
Adrian Dantley
Sidney Moncrief
Thanks for catching them; Sid's actually a big presence in the ORtg-DRtg gap category, too. Embarrassed to have missed him (and the others).
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 92,334
- And1: 31,912
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Chuck Texas wrote:Let me preface this by saying obviously Amare benefited from playing with Nash.
However, when we examine Amare we also have to take into account the injuries and how they have robbed him of much of what made him such a dangerous and effective scorer.
And in his first year in NYK he still put up 25 ppg on really good efficiency and when we do per 100 as is in vogue in this project his production is every bit as it was when playing with Nash. And the last couple years while his raw totals are down, we again see him being nearly as productive per 100 possessions and still on really strong efficiency.
His last couple of years are irrelevant due to low minutes and lower volume. Different role, smaller sample, different defensive attention, and generally still not getting the level of production and efficiency he saw with Nash.
It IS relevant to say that Amare wasn't ENTIRELY a product of Nash; as I'd noted earlier, he had his off-ball movement, his jumper (which improved DRAMATICALLY after 03-04, but was already showing improvement in his second season anyway) and earlier on, his relentless athleticism.
He would have been very good without Nash; he was legendary WITH Nash (at least on offense). That's kind of the difference there. His best usage is within the scope of the role he fulfilled while playing alongside Nash. Using him as a focal offensive player from an isolation standpoint took away from his strengths. 2011, as I'd mentioned, was actually a pretty strong statement about his ability to still be good without Nash... just clearly not AS good. And in context of a comparison with Barkley, he drops off of the map entirely.
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 12,677
- And1: 8,321
- Joined: Feb 24, 2013
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
trex_8063 wrote:Moonbeam wrote:
Very awesome job putting these together. I've noticed a few players missing from the WS/48 runs, and just thought I'd let you know:
Dolph Schayes
Adrian Dantley
Sidney Moncrief
Thanks for catching them; Sid's actually a big presence in the ORtg-DRtg gap category, too. Embarrassed to have missed him (and the others).
Viola. All necessary corrections have been made.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
- Clyde Frazier
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,238
- And1: 26,114
- Joined: Sep 07, 2010
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Doctor MJ wrote:penbeast0 wrote:The issue with the typical "big" is that he must live by the basket because he can't handle the ball. Barkley is not one of those bigs. It's not hard to find highlights of a young Barkley going coast to coast doing a Magic impression with fancy dribbles and a behind the back pass, and he shot from range.
Frankly it's rather astonishing to consider the efficiency you mention on top of that: Barkley lacked that crippling aspect of being an offensive big, and yet he still destroyed all the other bigs when it came to efficiency. I voted Malone over Barkley because of the other issues involved, but it's rather amazing that despite the fact Malone had Stockton feeding him he couldn't touch Barkley's efficiency numbers.
Were we making a GOAT offesnive "big" list that included all 4s and 5s, it's hard for me to imagine picking anyone over Barkley.
How high do you rate Amare Stoudamire? Similar defensive rep, lesser rebounder, slightly higher scoring volume per 38 or per 100 possession for career, slightly lower efficiency but in the playoffs, Amare maintains his volume scoring edge and closes the efficiency to a virtual tie. Barkley passes better but turns it over a lot more as well. Barkley shoots more 3's but generally scores much closer to the basket. Offensively, I'd say their numbers were very close (Barkley owns him on the boards and seems to have a stronger team impact so higher overall).
Hmm. Well first I'll say it's a little weird getting asked about Amare given what I just said about Barkley. To be clear, these things I'm talking about with Barkley, I don't say the same thing about Amare. Barkley is a creator, both with his rebounds and playmaking, Amare's just a finisher. Amare's calling card of scoring + efficiency came to an end as soon as he stopped having Nash next to him.
Then there's the correlation issue. The Suns offense lived and died far more with Nash than with Amare. You might say "This isn't about Nash", and that's true, but for example, Amare's peak scaled PI offensive RAPM is +4.11. That ain't terrible - it's better for example than anything Pau Gasol ever did - but it doesn't put him anywhere near the top of the list of the best in the game. We have 3 such scores from Barkley in his final 3 years, all were huge compared to Amare.
So yeah, they just don't occupy similar places in my mind. I get that they are both offensive-oriented bigs, but I consider Barkley's offense to be far, far more impressive. And frankly defensively, if I have to use Amare as a 5, I consider that a considerably bigger liability than Barkley at the 4.
I have to echo what Chuck Texas said about Amare's ability as a scorer not being directly related to Nash. They made one of the best P&R combos over the last decade because he was an incredible finisher as much as nash was a lethal threat in the mid range.
In amare's first season in NY, it didn't take him long to develop chemistry with a VERY average starting PG in felton in the P&R. And just to clarify, felton at his best was a serviceable PG, so i'm not trying to make him out to be the felton of last season or something. Amare still put up 25 PPG on a TS% of ~57%, made all NBA 2nd team, and finished 10th in MVP voting. Those are pretty substantial accomplishments 1 season removed from nash, so I don't think the bolded statement above is accurate. It was really injuries that derailed him over the last few seasons.
Outside of that, I would've had a similar response to penbeast as you did. In his prime, amare wasn't much of a shot creator or playmaker beyond having a quick first step against slower defenders, and becoming an adept mid range shooter. He thrived on finishing off the catch, and his game just didn't really resemble barkley's offensively. Barkley was a far more versatile player who didn't need a PG to help him score with high efficiency. They aren't on the same level offensively, and barkley being an elite rebounder further separates the 2.
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 92,334
- And1: 31,912
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
If you took away the passing element, Amare reminded me of a hyper athletic Karl Malone offensively, to be honest. EXCELLENT off-ball, great catch-and-shoot jumper, simplistic but effective face-post game. Not as strong, but a lot of the basic elements of Malone's game were the foundations of Amare's. He had far more athleticism to rely on than did Malone, but he was like Old Malone with a stupid-fast first step, great bounce and way weaker passing.
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
- ronnymac2
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,008
- And1: 5,077
- Joined: Apr 11, 2008
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
In 2010, PHX ran the best offense in the league, a +7.7 offense that hit the vaunted 115 points per possession territory. Then they put up a 117.8 ORTG through the WCFs. Historic stuff here.
In 2011, PHX dropped to a +2.2 offense at 109.5, good for 9th in the league.
In 2011, Amar'e Stoudemire's NYK team was a +3.6 offense, good for 7th in the league.
Total minute leaders for PHX in 2010:
Amar'e
Nash
J-Rich
Hill
Frye
Dudley
Dragic
Amundson
Lopez
Barbosa
Total minute leaders for PHX in 2011:
Frye
Nash
Hill
Dudley
Gortat
Warrick
Carter
Lopez
Childress
Dragic
J-Rich
Pietrus
Turkoglu
1. The Carter/Gortat trade in December is important to note, as Richardson and Nash had great chemistry, and Gortat was only getting his first chance at being a major minutes player.
2. Nash played 163 more minutes in 2010 than in 2011.
3. Amar'e's team was shook up midseason as well, as NY gutted the roster to acquire Carmelo Anthony and Chauncey Billups. Amar'e and Melo aren't a natural fit. Both Amar'e and Nash had to adjust mid-season in their first year apart for reasons other than being apart.
In 2011, PHX dropped to a +2.2 offense at 109.5, good for 9th in the league.
In 2011, Amar'e Stoudemire's NYK team was a +3.6 offense, good for 7th in the league.
Total minute leaders for PHX in 2010:
Amar'e
Nash
J-Rich
Hill
Frye
Dudley
Dragic
Amundson
Lopez
Barbosa
Total minute leaders for PHX in 2011:
Frye
Nash
Hill
Dudley
Gortat
Warrick
Carter
Lopez
Childress
Dragic
J-Rich
Pietrus
Turkoglu
1. The Carter/Gortat trade in December is important to note, as Richardson and Nash had great chemistry, and Gortat was only getting his first chance at being a major minutes player.
2. Nash played 163 more minutes in 2010 than in 2011.
3. Amar'e's team was shook up midseason as well, as NY gutted the roster to acquire Carmelo Anthony and Chauncey Billups. Amar'e and Melo aren't a natural fit. Both Amar'e and Nash had to adjust mid-season in their first year apart for reasons other than being apart.
Pay no mind to the battles you've won
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 53,639
- And1: 22,589
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Chuck Texas wrote:Doctor MJ wrote: Amare's calling card of scoring + efficiency came to an end as soon as he stopped having Nash next to him.
Let me preface this by saying obviously Amare benefited from playing with Nash.
However, when we examine Amare we also have to take into account the injuries and how they have robbed him of much of what made him such a dangerous and effective scorer.
And in his first year in NYK he still put up 25 ppg on really good efficiency and when we do per 100 as is in vogue in this project his production is every bit as it was when playing with Nash. And the last couple years while his raw totals are down, we again see him being nearly as productive per 100 possessions and still on really strong efficiency.
This narrative that Amare is nearly exclusively a product of Nash doesn't really hold up when we give it even a cursory examination. Obviously he had his best years with Nash, but some of that is due to him having come into the league out of high school and the natural evolution that coincided with Nash's arrival and of course post-Nash is also post knee and serious eye injury.
Really good efficiency? Peak Amare shot 65% TS. 2010 Suns Amare shot 61%. Knicks Amare shot 56%. The bulk of what made Amare so insanely impressive as a scorer left with that efficiency drop. Afterwards he was impressive sure, but being a volume scorer who can do it at slightly above league average efficiency isn't the same outlier kind of thing.
Look I'm not saying Amare was nothing. It really hurt the Sun offense when he went out because while Nash was good, he couldn't get any other teammate to be anywhere near as good as Amare. I think Amare being on All-NBA teams made tons of sense. But Amare's being brought up next to Barkley in part because they both had extreme efficiency, and the fact that one guys efficiency was dependent on an all-time point guard while the other created it for himself is the big reason why one deserves discussion here while the other doesn't in my book.
Also, regarding the injuries. Those are worth discussing when talking about Amare's longevity, but I don't know if they really affect what we know about his potential. He basically recovered from his 2005 injury/surgery, and he didn't start having the serious injuries in New York until after we'd seen him play a while.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 53,639
- And1: 22,589
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
tsherkin wrote:If you took away the passing element, Amare reminded me of a hyper athletic Karl Malone offensively, to be honest. EXCELLENT off-ball, great catch-and-shoot jumper, simplistic but effective face-post game. Not as strong, but a lot of the basic elements of Malone's game were the foundations of Amare's. He had far more athleticism to rely on than did Malone, but he was like Old Malone with a stupid-fast first step, great bounce and way weaker passing.
Are you seriously saying though you think Amare was a better independent scorer than Malone? I doubt you mean that.
Amare was an excellent scorer by any normal standards, but the fact remains that if we had a stat that measured "scoring profit" by multiplying a volume factor by an efficiency factor, Amare would have lost the bulk of his profit when he left Phoenix. That should be considered a big deal.
If one agrees with me there and simply things I'm giving Amare no credit, well, then I should be nicer to Amare. I don't think he's a nothing player, but truly I don't know if he'll make my Top 100 (and he didn't make the group Top 100 last time).
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 53,639
- And1: 22,589
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
ronnymac2 wrote:In 2010, PHX ran the best offense in the league, a +7.7 offense that hit the vaunted 115 points per possession territory. Then they put up a 117.8 ORTG through the WCFs. Historic stuff here.
In 2011, PHX dropped to a +2.2 offense at 109.5, good for 9th in the league.
In 2011, Amar'e Stoudemire's NYK team was a +3.6 offense, good for 7th in the league.
Total minute leaders for PHX in 2010:
Amar'e
Nash
J-Rich
Hill
Frye
Dudley
Dragic
Amundson
Lopez
Barbosa
Total minute leaders for PHX in 2011:
Frye
Nash
Hill
Dudley
Gortat
Warrick
Carter
Lopez
Childress
Dragic
J-Rich
Pietrus
Turkoglu
1. The Carter/Gortat trade in December is important to note, as Richardson and Nash had great chemistry, and Gortat was only getting his first chance at being a major minutes player.
2. Nash played 163 more minutes in 2010 than in 2011.
3. Amar'e's team was shook up midseason as well, as NY gutted the roster to acquire Carmelo Anthony and Chauncey Billups. Amar'e and Melo aren't a natural fit. Both Amar'e and Nash had to adjust mid-season in their first year apart for reasons other than being apart.
Great stuff to bring up for Amare no doubt. I think I'll leave it at that for now. I'm tempted to come in and defend Nash, but that wasn't really what we were talking about. We were talking about Amare, and yes Amare was a valuable part of a great offense that took a major hit without him.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,646
- And1: 99,054
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Doc,
Im not asking you to think higher of Amare as a player. I don't think of him in the same terms as Barkley either.
I just take issue with the idea that Amare(and Marion if he gets traction at the bottom of this list) are dependent on Nash. Nash's stats blew up playing with them too. Now part of that is Nash getting himself into good physical condition and cutting way back on the night life, and wanting to prove Cuban wrong. But part of it is the guys like Amare, Marion, and the various shooters were much more symbiotic with Nash than Dirk and Finley, etc were.
It needs to go both ways. Absolutely Amare and Co benefit from playing with one of the 3 best offensive PG's of all time. But he benefited from having elite finishers and being surrounded by shooters too. To think otherwise is to suggest that Nash radically became a different and superior player at age 30 which I don't believe to be the case.
Im not asking you to think higher of Amare as a player. I don't think of him in the same terms as Barkley either.
I just take issue with the idea that Amare(and Marion if he gets traction at the bottom of this list) are dependent on Nash. Nash's stats blew up playing with them too. Now part of that is Nash getting himself into good physical condition and cutting way back on the night life, and wanting to prove Cuban wrong. But part of it is the guys like Amare, Marion, and the various shooters were much more symbiotic with Nash than Dirk and Finley, etc were.
It needs to go both ways. Absolutely Amare and Co benefit from playing with one of the 3 best offensive PG's of all time. But he benefited from having elite finishers and being surrounded by shooters too. To think otherwise is to suggest that Nash radically became a different and superior player at age 30 which I don't believe to be the case.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 92,334
- And1: 31,912
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
Doctor MJ wrote:tsherkin wrote:If you took away the passing element, Amare reminded me of a hyper athletic Karl Malone offensively, to be honest. EXCELLENT off-ball, great catch-and-shoot jumper, simplistic but effective face-post game. Not as strong, but a lot of the basic elements of Malone's game were the foundations of Amare's. He had far more athleticism to rely on than did Malone, but he was like Old Malone with a stupid-fast first step, great bounce and way weaker passing.
Are you seriously saying though you think Amare was a better independent scorer than Malone? I doubt you mean that.
No, I was making a stylistic comparison.
Amare was an excellent scorer by any normal standards, but the fact remains that if we had a stat that measured "scoring profit" by multiplying a volume factor by an efficiency factor, Amare would have lost the bulk of his profit when he left Phoenix. That should be considered a big deal.
I debate that point; especially pre-trade, he was still performing at what we consider an elite level in New York before his knees fell apart. That's an issue of its own and while true that he wasn't AS good in ny as pho, it's inaccurate to suggest that there was not stron offensive profit from his offense as a knick. I think you're underselling his ability because we saw so little of healthyAmare post Phoenix and it's hard to recall, personally.
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
-
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 53,639
- And1: 22,589
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: RealGM Top 100 List #20
tsherkin wrote:Amare was an excellent scorer by any normal standards, but the fact remains that if we had a stat that measured "scoring profit" by multiplying a volume factor by an efficiency factor, Amare would have lost the bulk of his profit when he left Phoenix. That should be considered a big deal.
I debate that point; especially pre-trade, he was still performing at what we consider an elite level in New York before his knees fell apart. That's an issue of its own and while true that he wasn't AS good in ny as pho, it's inaccurate to suggest that there was not stron offensive profit from his offense as a knick. I think you're underselling his ability because we saw so little of healthyAmare post Phoenix and it's hard to recall, personally.
His efficient the prior year in Phoenix 61.5% T.
His efficiency for the season in NY was 56.5% TS.
His efficiency pre-all-star break in NY was 57.0% TS.
As you can see, the efficiency of Amare for the season was still basically in line with what it was pre-Melo. Both were much below his Sun norms, and hence my statement on profit stands.
People actually overrate how big of an immediate impact Melo's presence had on Amare. Primarily they do so because it just makes sense that the two would have problems together, and they clearly did even before Amare got hurt, I think it's also because of how bizarre the perception was early on in the season. Halfway through the year New York was basically a .500 ballclub yet he was considered the league MVP to that point by the press. I wrote a blog post at the time because of how insane it was.
There was a lot to went into that, including New York staring and its collective Gothamite navel, but the big thing was that Amare had a hot stretch early on which helped generate a narrative of "Woot! Amare's doing it! We finally have a superstar in NY!", and that narrative took a while to dissipate. This can lead to people not remembering that there was months between Amare's hot stretch and Melo's arrival during which the Knicks were sliding down the gutter which was what truly led the franchise to think "holy crap, we're nowhere close to a contender, we have to get Melo now" despite the fact Amare was still healthy.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!