fpliii wrote:Basketballefan wrote:Wade was a top 10 player from 05-2012. That's 8 quality seasons, yes he was inured in 07 08 but i think he was still good enough to be top 10. Arguably the league's best player in 06, 09, 2011(mind you i'm not saying he for sure was but there was no clear cut best players those years which is rare), clear top 2 player in 09 & 10. I'm not convinced Frazier was on Wade's level, the numbers indicate that Wade was handily a better player and i don't see the longevity to compensate. I think the Frazier over Wade is based on nostalgia more than anything else. Frazier doesn't have a season anywhere near 09 Wade, i hear how his defense makes him better but I'm skeptical of this, Wade was very good at defense and took over games with his defense and offense just like Frazier.
Like i said the revisionist history is already happening to Wade, he went 22nd in the last project, so since then he's made 3 all star games, won 2 championships and went to 3 finals and it somehow brings him down on the list? It doesn't make any sense at all. The disrespect for Wade needs to stop.
That's the thing though, the injuries are problematic. Can we reasonably credit him for those seasons? 05 probably, because the rib injury isn't a knock on his health. I think the shoulder injury in 07 derailed his season a bit, but it's still a quality year (though we can't project him as arguably the best player since he went down. He had the surgery on his left knee after the year, but I think that definitely prevents 08 from being considered IMO. So I'm willing to concede 7 quality seasons.
I didn't see Frazier live, so it's not nostalgia per se. I do think there is an issue since we don't know how well he'd play defensively today. Hand-checking has been curtailed three times (78-79, 94-95, 04-05) since his prime, so if that was a big part of how he played defense, he loses a good deal of value. Frazier gives you what appear to be 8 quality seasons (68-69 through 76-77, except for 75-76, derailed by a back injury), which is comparable. Wade was a very good defender, and the superior offensive anchor, so if we think Frazier wouldn't be the same offensive player today, I'd agree that Wade has a great case.
As for this being revisionist history, you have to consider a couple of things:
1) The voting pool isn't exactly the same. I for one didn't participate in 2011, and I'm not the only such poster. A bunch of participants from the last project aren't participating this time. Different voters value different things, so even if a guy has done nothing differently, it's entirely possible he might jump/fall compared to the last project.
2) I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't consider accolades when evaluating players, so the all-star games don't mean much to me. I do think 2012 was a quality season, probably the last one of his prime (he could've played at his 2011 level that year if LeBron wasn't on the team IMO), but the last couple of years he's had severe injury problems. Even with strategic resting, he hasn't been able to play at a high level by his standards by the time the Finals have rolled around.
So I will admit that if I consider Frazier I should be considering Wade here. But I don't think either guy is a lock here. It's wide open, but I do think Stockton has a case at this spot.
05 Wade is a little underrated. Yeah i hear you on the rib thing but he still avged 24 5 7 56 TS% in the regular season and 27 6 7 56 TS% in the playoffs, he raised his game in the playoffs 3 years in a row 04-06 as a very young player.